Letter | Published:

“Mental Evolution in Animals”

Nature volume 29, page 428 | Download Citation

Subjects

Abstract

I AM as unwilling as Mr. Romanes to continue this discussion needlessly, but inaccuracy calls for correction. Mr. Romanes says that “the glass wall of a tank is not an object upon the solidity of which a skate would be likely to calculate.” If he will read my original account of the incident again, he will find that the skate made himself absolutely sure of the solidity of the glass wall of the tank; he tried hard to seize the food, and failed because he could not get his head through the glass, and there fore his mouth could not touch the food. As for his being unable to see the food when the current lifted it, that is precisely my case. But he saw it clearly enough, and had tangible experience of the conditions, before he adopted the successful device. If the matter is worth noticing, it may as well be described correctly.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Manchester, February 29

    • F. J. FARADAY

Authors

  1. Search for F. J. FARADAY in:

About this article

Publication history

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/029428c0

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.