Abstract
As I now learn for the first time what are the grounds on which Prof G. C. Foster based his inculpation of me, I may ask for a very few last words. I fully admit that in giving a sketch of the history of the Radiometer, I intended to attribute to Mr. Crookes that he had in the first instance put a wrong interpretation upon his own results; because I believed that this was a simple fact, well known to everybody who had followed the history of the inquiry. And Prof. Carey Foster has not called in question the correctness of my statement of the general impression which prevailed among scientific men, alike when Mr. Crookes first exhibited his radiometer at the soirée of the Royal Society, and when its phenomena were discussed at the subsequent meeting. Having followed that discussion with the greatest interest, I cannot now recall one word that was not in harmony with the “direct impact” doctrine, or that suggested the idea of “heat reaction” through residual gas. If the question had been then asked, whether the rotation would continue to take place in an open vacuum (were such possible), or in a perfect vacuum,—so as to eliminate all “reaction”, through residual gas, between the vanes and the containing flask,—I believe that the general, if not the unanimous, verdict would have been in the affirmative. Certainly I heard nothing from Mr. Crookes on the other side, he having previously spoken of the dependence of the “Repulsion resulting from Radiation on the presence of residual gas as ‘impossible to conceive.’”
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
CARPENTER, W. The Radiometer and its Lessons. Nature 17, 26–27 (1877). https://doi.org/10.1038/017026b0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/017026b0
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.