Abstract
THE correspondence which has recently appeared in NATURE on this subject has great interest for those engaged in teaching Physics. I confess I regretted to learn that “gravity” had been diverted from its long recognised meaning in science—that pointed out by Mr. Stoney—at Glasgow, to be employed for one of the meanings of the word “weight.” The symbol “g” is “gravity” represented by its initial letter, so that if the meaning of the word be changed, consistency would require that the symbol should be altered. I find, practically, no difficulty in restricting the word “weight” to the sense of force, insisting on the use of the phrases “mass of so many pounds, ounces, or grammes,” and “force equal to the weight of a mass of so many pounds, grammes,” &c.; for which, after sometime, I allow the use of the phrase, “the weight of so many pounds.”
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
WALKER, J. “Weight” and “Mass”. Nature 13, 405–406 (1876). https://doi.org/10.1038/013405b0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/013405b0
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.