Abstract
THERE are two or three points in Dr. Pettigrew's new book as to which, perhaps, many of your readers in common with myself would be glad of a little light First, in speaking of the gannet, he says: “Each wing, when carefully measured and squared, gave an area of 191/2 square inches.” But how is such an area obtained from the dimensions given? They are: “girth of trunk, 18 inches,” i.e., about 5 inches for its width; “expanse of wing from tip to tip across the body, 5 feet,” so that each wing would stretch about 331/2 inches from root to tip; “across secondaries, 7 inches,” and this we may take as about the average width of the wing. Multiplying length of wing by width (331/2 × 7), we get therefore an area of 2341/2 square inches. Similarly Dr. Pettigrew assigns the heron's wing an area of 26 square inches, although the dimensions he gives yield an area of about 311 square inches. A friend of mine has the temerity to suggest That for some reason or unreason Dr. Pettigrew has divided the true area by 12, for so 2341/2 (if we neglect the half inch) gives just 191/2 and 312 instead of 311 gives 26.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
WARD, J. Animal Locomotion. Nature 9, 280–281 (1874). https://doi.org/10.1038/009280d0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/009280d0
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.