Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

The Rigidity of the Earth

Abstract

I HAVE been urged from several quarters to defend my argument for the rigidity of the earth against attacks which are supposed to have been made upon it. It has, in fact, never been attacked to my knowledge, and I feel under no obligation to defend it. There is, I believe, a general impression that grave objections to it have been raised by M Delaunay, and it seems that even in this country some geological writers and teachers, in their reluctance to abandon the hypothesis of a thin solid crust, enclosing a wholly liquid mass hastily concluded that all dynamical arguments against it had been utterly overthrown by Delaunay.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

THOMSON, W. The Rigidity of the Earth. Nature 5, 223–224 (1872). https://doi.org/10.1038/005223a0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/005223a0

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing