Abstract
JEALOUS of any and every restriction to that full liberty of scientific thought which cannot be over-advocated, we have recently gone so far as to deny the necessary and universal validity of the old axioms or “self-evident principles,” not only in geometry, but in logic. Now I would submit that, if without some elementary or initial certainties all scientific thought is impossible, we must either retract these denials altogether, or so far limit them as to leave the logical certainties intact. But can we do the latter while geometrical axioms are in dispute? Towards answering this question, I propose to consider the hypothesis advanced by Prof. Helmholtz, to be found in NATURE, No. 103, October 19, and ably commented on by Prof. Jevons.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
TJPPER, J. Prof. Helmholtz and Prof. Jevons. Nature 5, 202–203 (1872). https://doi.org/10.1038/005202b0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/005202b0
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.