Abstract
THIS question is becoming one de gustibus, and its further discussion will probably be profitless. I retain my opinion, and am content with the few who side with me. In the two finest treatises on astronomy published during the present century, Herschel's “Outlines of Astronomy,” and Grant's “History of Physical Astronomy,” the word position is used as I use it. Not systematically, I admit; for Herschel sometimes wrote “situation” wrhere I should write “position.” Grant in one place deals somewhat definitively with the word, for at p. 258 he writes, “The position of Saturn's ring is usually determined by the inclination of its plane to the ecliptic and the longitude of its ascending node,” the longitude of this node being defined, as all astronomers know, by the direction of the line of nodes, not by its actual place.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
PROCIOR, R. A Plane's Position. Nature 5, 25–26 (1871). https://doi.org/10.1038/005025e0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/005025e0
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.