Abstract
IF the Editor of the “English Cyclopædia,” in his letter contained in your issue of July 7, had restricted himself to defending his own handiwork, and had abstained from denying the correctness of my statements, I should not have ventured to ask for space in your columns to reply to him.
Article PDF
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
NEMO The “English Cyclopædia”. Nature 2, 297 (1870). https://doi.org/10.1038/002297b0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/002297b0
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.