Introduction

HLA class II alleles have been repeatedly found to play an important role in the development of insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM). Alleles at the DR locus and at the DQ locus have been shown to contribute to susceptibility or protection against IDDM [1]. In particular, the DR4 and DR3 alleles associate positively, while DR2 alleles provide protection [2]. Previously we were able to assign the highest susceptibility to the DRB3*0200 encoded DR52b serologic specificity [3] and to DRB1*0401-DQB1*0302 encoding the DR4-DQ8 serologic specificity. For DQA1 the alleles encoding an arginine at position 52 (DQαArg52+) and for DQB1 the alleles encoding an aspartic acid at position 57 (DQβAsp57+) were found to show strong positive and negative association with IDDM susceptibility, respectively [1, 310]. Our previous study [3] also identified the high susceptibility conferred by the genotypes coding for DQαArg52+/DQβAsp57− heterodimers.

More recently, Thorsby and Rønningen [11] reviewed the role of DQ haplotypes in eis or trans, in IDDM and in a study of haplotypes in IDDM families. Kockum et al. [12] concluded that in a high-risk population, HLADQ alleles provided protection, while DR alleles conferred susceptibility for IDDM. To study the role of haplotypes over the different HLA class II loci, we reexamined the typing results for 210 unrelated Caucasian IDDM patients and 205 controls for the DQ and DR alleles of our previous studies [3]. Recently the three-dimensional structure of the HLA-DR1αβ heterodimer has been determined by X-ray crystallography [13]. Based on the three-dimensional structure of the DR1αβ heterodimer, some residues have been shown to be located at the side of the antigen-binding groove of the DRβ chain [13]. We therefore examined specifically the role of DQαArg52, DQβAsp57 and of polymorphic amino acids localized in the antigen-binding and CD4-binding domain of DRβ1 alone and in combination with each other in individuals with IDDM and controls. The results show that individuals homozygous for Lys71+ in the DRβ1 chain, combined with the absence of an aspartic acid at position 57 in the DQβ1 chain, show a significantly increased risk for developing IDDM (relative risk, RR = 20.41).

Materials and Methods

Patients

As previously described a population of 210 unrelated Caucasians with IDDM were studied [3]. Patients were diagnosed at the Paediatric and Adult Endocrinology Units of the University Hospital of Leuven according to the WHO criteria using clinical data, C peptide status and/or anti-islet autoantibodies. All patients were from Belgian origin. The mean age at onset of disease was 16.5 years (1–53 years). The control group of unrelated Caucasians from Belgian origin consisted of 205 blood donors. The control group did not have any personal or family history of IDDM, and the mean age at blood sampling was 40 years (28–52 years).

HLA Class II Typing with Sequence-Specific Oligonucleotides

HLA-DRB1, DRB3, DRB4, DRB5, DQA1 and DQB1 typing with sequence-specific oligonucleotides was performed on amplified DNA as described by Buyse et al. [14]. Briefly, the polymorphic second exons of the DRB and DQ genes were amplified from genomic DNA by the polymerase chain reaction, using specific genomic primers. The biotin-incorporated polymerase chain reaction products were hybridized at the appropriate temperatures for each locus to membrane-bound sequence-specific oligonucleotides. Positive signals were detected by chemiluminescence.

Analysis of the Role of DRβ1 Amino Acid Polymorphisms in Susceptibility or Protection against IDDM

Based on the three-dimensional structure model of Brown et al. [13], the amino acids of the antigen-binding side, which showed polymorphisms, as determined by the nucleotide composition of their codons, were examined. These included e.g. amino acid position 71, which can encode Lys, Arg, Ala and Glu, and position 9, including Trp, Glu, Lys and a few others. As a control, amino acids in nonfunctional positions were examined in the same fashion. The different alleles containing the particular amino acid were determined from the genomic sequence as published by Steven et al. [15].

Statistical A nalysis

The significance of the differences in allele or genotype frequencies found was calculated by means of Fisher’s exact test [16]. p values were corrected for multiple testing by the use of Bonferroni’s method [17, 18]. RR (odds ratio) was calculated using the formula: [number of patients with the specific allele (A)/number of patients without this allele (B)]/[number of controls with the specific allele (C)/number of controls without this allele (D)] [19]. When one element of the equation was zero, the RR was calculated by the method of Haldane: [(2A + 1) (2D + 1)]/[(2B + 1)(2C + 1)]. Only p values and RR were calculated for those alleles or genotypes which were observed more than 10 times in the total (patient and control) population.

Results

Combinations of DQαArg52/DQαArg52 with DQβAsp57/DQβAsp57 Genotypes in IDDM

As previously shown [3], analysis of HLADQ genotypes revealed (table 1) that the combination of DQαArg52+/DQαArg52+ (DQαSS; S = Arg52+) with DQβAsp57−/DQβAsp57− (DQβSS; S = Asp57−) genotypes, in which all of the DQαβ heterodimers presented on the cell surface are DQαS-DQβS, confer a very significant risk to develop IDDM (p < 10−7, RR = 19.1 with 95% confidence limit of 9.1–36.1). In addition, we show here that combination of DQαPP (P = Arg52−) or SP with DQβPP (P = Asp57+) genotypes on the other hand was extremely protective (RR = 0.02 and 0.01, respectively); indeed no IDDM patient was found with this combination.

Table 1 Combination of DQαArg52/DQαArg52 genotypes (S = Arg52+, P = Arg52−) with the DQβAsp57/DQβAsp57 genotypes (S = Asp57−, P = Asp57+) in IDDM patients

Association of Amino Acid Polymorphisms on the DRβ1 Chain with IDDM

Analysis of the polymorphic amino acids in the functional domains of the DRβ1 chain showed (table 2) that those alleles encoding DRβ1Glu9+, DRβ1Gln70+, DRβ1Lys71+ and DRβ1Thr140+ increased significantly the risk to develop IDDM (in all cases p < 10−8), while those alleles encoding DRβ1Arg71+ and DRβ1Trp9+ had a significant negative association with IDDM (for both p < 10−8). According to the three-dimensional structure of DRβ1, residues 9,70 and 71 are located in the antigen-binding groove of the DRβ1 chain, and residue 140 is located in the CD4-binding domain of the DRβ1 chain [13]. HLA-DRα chains are not polymorphic in structure except for minor variations in the cytoplasmic portion of the molecule [20]. It would therefore appear that the DRβ1Glu9+, DRβ1Gln70+, DRβ1Lys71+ and DRβ1Thr140+ residues contribute to the susceptibility and that DRβ1Arg71+ and DRβ1Trp9+ are associated with a protective effect in the DRαβ heterodimers for developing IDDM. As a control, the polymorphic positions for residues DRβ1Asp10+ and DRβ1Phe31+ located in a nonfunctional domain of the DRβ1 chain were tested and did not show any significant association with IDDM (table 2).

Table 2 Effect of amino acid polymorphisms in the DRβ1 molecule on IDDM risk

Combination of DQαArg52 and DQβAsp57 Alleles and Genotypes with DRβ1 Amino Acid Polymorphisms in IDDM Provides Higher Susceptibility or Protection

Analysis of the combined genotypes for HLA-DR and -DQ revealed that the RR for the combined genotypes DRβ1Lys71+/+-DQαArg52+/+-DQβAsp57−/− wag higher (RR = 20.41) than for other amino acids alone (table 3). To determine whether the polymorphisms in the DQα, DQβ and DRβ1 chain were required together for this high risk, the different combinations were tested separately. This revealed that only the DRβ1Lys71+/+-DQβAsp57−/− and DQαArg52+/+-DQβAsp57−/− combinations provided a similar high risk (table 3). DQαAsp52+ is however in linkage disequilibrium with DRβ1Lys71+ (table 4). Since DRβ1Lys71+/+ by itself provides a risk of 15.46, it would appear that the DQαArg52+ allele contributes only to the risk by being in linkage disequilibrium with DRβ1Lys71+. The combination of DRβ1Lys71+/+ with DQβAsp57−/− therefore identified the highest-risk genotype.

Table 3 Effect of DQα1Arg52+, DQβ1Asp57− and DRβ1Lys71+ on the RR for IDDM
Table 4 Frequency of the combined DQαArg52, DQβAsp57, DRβ1Trp9 and DRβ1Lys71 genotypes in 415 individuals

The alleles containing DRβ1Trp9+, DRβ1Lys71− DQαAsp52− and DQβAsp57+ provided significant protection on their own against IDDM (table 5). When the respective genotypes for each of these alleles were examined, an even higher protection for the different loci was observed (RR = 0.04–0.15). To determine whether the combination of these alleles would increase the protection against IDDM, the different haplotypes including DRβ1Trp9+, DRβ1Lys71−, DQαArg52− and DQβAsp57+ in cis or in trans in the protein chains were examined. The highest protection (RR = 0.08) was obtained for the DQαArg52−-DQβAsp57+ combination with or without the addition of DRβ1Lys71−. From table 4 it would appear that DRβ1Trp9+ and DRβ1Lys71− are in linkage disequilibrium with DQαArg52− and that DRβ1Trp9− is also in linkage disequilibrium with DQβAsp57−. Also DQαArg52− in the heterozygotes or the homozygotes gives better protection than DRβ1Lys71− or DRβ1Trp9+ in either combination. It would therefore appear that the haplotype DQαArg52−-DQβAsp57+ with a relative risk of 0.08, without considering the DRβ1 allele, is the best measure of the role of class II alleles in protection against type I diabetes.

Table 5 Effect of DQα1Arg52−, DQβ1Asp57+, DRβ1Lys71− and DRβ1Trp9+ on the relative protection against IDDM

Discussion

IDDM is the direct consequence of the destruction of insulin-secreting β cells. In the immune system, combination of HLA class II α and β chains forms the shape of the antigenbinding groove of the αβ heterodimer. In this fashion, HLA-αβ heterodimers could play a critical role in the predisposition for IDDM. The DQαSS/DQβSS genotype with an RR of 19.1 was carried by 47% of the IDDM patients, while only 4% of the normal population had this combined genotype. These results confirm the hypothesis that IDDM susceptibility associates quantitatively with the nature of the cell-surface-expressed DQαβ heterodimers.

The DRβ1Lys71+/+ is a major contributor to IDDM susceptibility. Lys71+ is in linkage disequilibrium with DQα1Arg52+ and is found in the DRB1*0401 and the 0300 group, and is also linked in the DRB 3 and DRB4 subtypes, respectively, to the DRB4*0101 and DRB3*0200, *0101 alleles. Some of these high-susceptibility haplotypes were identified previously [3]. This means that the susceptibility provided by the DQα1Arg52+/+ genotype and DR3 and DR4 subtypes can be explained by the presence of a Lys at position 71 of the antigen-binding domain.

Also, the susceptibility found with DQαArg52+ and DQβAsp57− appears to be due mainly to the Lys71+ in the DRβ1 locus. The susceptibility or RR is not altered when the DQα alleles carrying the Arg52+ are not taken into account. However, the Asp57− allele of DQβ1 increases the RR found with the DRβ1Lys71+/+ genotype alone to 20.41, suggesting an additive and as previously shown [3] independent role of these DQβ1Asp− alleles. The most susceptible genotype therefore can be defined by DRβ1Lys71+/+ combined with DQβ1Asp57−/−. This contrasts with the findings of Kockum et al. [12] who did not however consider the role of the amino acids in DRβ1.

The combined DQα-DQβ genotypes show that the presence of one protective allele (Arg52−, Asp57+) at both loci provides significant protection against IDDM (table 1). This protection increases as the number of protective alleles increases further to a maximum of 4. In DRβ1, tryptophan at position 9 and non-lysine amino acids at position 71 also provide protection in heterozygotes and homozygotes (table 5), but Trp9+ and Lys71− in DRβ1 are in strong linkage disequilibrium with DQαArg52− and are not as protective as the DQαArg52− alleles.

It has been previously shown that the presence of Asp57+ in the DQβ chain induces salt bridge formation with arginine in the DQα chain at position 79, thereby altering the shape of the antigen-binding cleft of the DQαβ heterodimer [21]. Presumably a similar mechanism may be achieved in the DRβ1 antigen-binding region as a consequence of the amino acids which compose it. How the configuration of the antigen-binding domains affects the susceptibility or protection for IDDM remains to be determined. Our results nevertheless provide a new and more specific approach to test for IDDM susceptibility. Indeed the typing for the presence of DRβ1Lys71, DQβ1Asp57 and of DQα1Arg52 is a rapid and simple assay to determine the increased or decreased susceptibility of a random person for IDDM.