Genomic analysis of male puberty timing highlights shared genetic basis with hair colour and lifespan


The timing of puberty is highly variable and is associated with long-term health outcomes. To date, understanding of the genetic control of puberty timing is based largely on studies in women. Here, we report a multi-trait genome-wide association study for male puberty timing with an effective sample size of 205,354 men. We find moderately strong genomic correlation in puberty timing between sexes (rg = 0.68) and identify 76 independent signals for male puberty timing. Implicated mechanisms include an unexpected link between puberty timing and natural hair colour, possibly reflecting common effects of pituitary hormones on puberty and pigmentation. Earlier male puberty timing is genetically correlated with several adverse health outcomes and Mendelian randomization analyses show a genetic association between male puberty timing and shorter lifespan. These findings highlight the relationships between puberty timing and health outcomes, and demonstrate the value of genetic studies of puberty timing in both sexes.


The timing of puberty varies widely in populations and is determined by a broad range of environmental and genetic factors1. Understanding the biological mechanisms underlying such variation is an important step towards understanding why earlier puberty timing is consistently associated with higher risks for a range of later life diseases, including several cancers, cardiovascular disease and Type 2 diabetes2,3,4.

Most of our understanding of the genetic determinants of puberty timing is based on studies in women, as the age of first menstrual bleeding (age at menarche, AAM) is a well-recalled and widely measured marker of female sexual development. A recent large-scale genome-wide association study (GWAS) for AAM, in 370,000 women, identified 389 independent signals, accounting for approximately one quarter of the estimated heritability for the trait5. In contrast, genetic studies of puberty timing in men are much fewer and smaller in scale, due to lack of data in many studies on male pubertal milestones. We previously reported a GWAS for recalled age at voice breaking in men (N = 55,871) from a single study, 23andMe, which identified 14 genetic independent genetic association signals, and many signals with similar effect sizes on voice breaking as for AAM in women6. This overlapping genetic architecture between puberty timing in males (in 23andMe) and females was also reported by others7, and supports the use of recalled age at voice breaking in men as an informative measure of puberty timing for further genetic studies.

Although the overall shared genetic architecture for pubertal timing between sexes is high (rg = 0.74) and many genetic variants show similar effects sizes in both sexes, there are a number of genetic signals that differ between sexes. Most notably, at the SIM1/MCHR2 locus, the allele that promotes earlier puberty in one sex delays it in the other6. Sex-specific expression patterns for several of such highlighted genes was reported in the hypothalamus and pituitary of pre-pubertal mice8. Further work to identify the pubertal mechanisms that are divergent between sexes may shed light on differences in later life disease risk associations between sexes.

Here, we greatly extend our previously reported GWAS for age at voice breaking in 23andMe6 by combining additional data from the UK Biobank study9. In this four-fold larger sample, we increase the number of genomic loci that have male-specific effects on puberty timing from 5 to 29, and identify biological pathways that warrant further investigation.


Onset of facial hair as a marker of male puberty timing

Data on relative age of voice breaking and relative age of first facial hair were available in up to 207,126 male participants in the UK Biobank (UKBB) study. For each of these measures, participants were asked if the event occurred relative to their peers: younger than average, about average or older than average. We previously reported that signals for AAM in women show concordant associations with dichotomised voice breaking traits in these UKBB men5, but to our knowledge no genetic study has previously evaluated timing of facial hair appearance as a marker of pubertal development.

We defined two dichotomous facial hair variables in UKBB men: (1) relatively early onset (N = 13,226) vs. average onset (N = 161,175); and (2) relatively late onset (N = 26,066) vs. average onset. These facial hair traits were in concordance with similarly dichotomised voice breaking traits defined in the same individuals, although more men reported early or late facial hair onset (39,292; 19.6%) than early or late voice breaking (19,579; 10.2%) (Supplementary Table 1). To test the ability of these facial hair traits to detect puberty timing loci, we assessed their associations with previously reported AAM loci. Of the 328 reported autosomal AAM signals for which genotype data were available in UKBB, 266 (81.1%, binomial-P = 1.2 × 10−31) and 276 (84.1%, binomial-P = 2.1 × 10−38) showed directionally concordant individual associations with relatively early and relatively late facial hair, respectively. Furthermore, substantially more AAM signals showed at least nominally significant associations (GWAS P < 0.05) with relatively early (102, 31.1%) or relatively late facial hair (152, 46.3%) compared to ~16 expected by chance for each outcome (Supplementary Data 1).

A multi-trait GWAS for puberty timing in men

We analysed four GWAS models in UKBB men (imputation v2, ~7.4M SNPs): two models (early and late) for each of relative timing of voice breaking and facial hair. The shared genetic architecture between these four traits was high (genetic correlations (rg) aligned to later timing of voice breaking ranged 0.57–0.91; Supplementary Table 2), and all four showed high genetic correlation with the continuously measured age at voice breaking in 23andMe (rg 0.61–0.81). These high correlations supported the rationale to combine the GWAS data across all five strata using MTAG10. This approach enables genetic data from correlated traits and overlapping samples to be combined in a single analysis, provided three key assumptions are met: (1) homogeneity of variance-covariance matrix for effect sizes for all SNPs across all traits; (2) sampling variation can be ignored and (3) sample overlap is adequately captured. Simulations involving large numbers of traits with extreme sample overlap have demonstrated that assumptions (2) and (3) may safely be made for most applications of MTAG. Violation of the assumption of homogeneity of effect sizes may be plausible in this setting if some SNPs have an effect on voice breaking and not facial hair (and vice-versa). We therefore calculated the upper bound for the false discovery rate (FDR) in our meta-analysis using the ‘maxFDR’ calculation developed by the MTAG authors. As the value for maxFDR was 7.9 × 10−4, this indicates that test statistics are unlikely to be biased due to any violation of the homogeneity assumption.

We therefore aimed to enhance power to identify GWAS signals for continuous age at voice breaking (as recorded in 23andMe) by using MTAG to combine data from the four dichotomous UKBB puberty timing traits all aligned to later timing of voice breaking; this approach yielded an effective GWAS meta-analysis sample size of 205,354 men for continuous pubertal timing. In this combined MTAG dataset, we identified 7,897 variants associated with male puberty timing at the genome-wide statistical significance threshold (GWAS-P < 5 × 10−8), comprising 76 independent signals (Fig. 1; Supplementary Data 2). The most significantly associated variant (rs11156429, GWAS-P = 3.5 × 10−52) was located in/near LIN28B, consistent with previously reported studies in men and women. Of these 76 signals, 29 were not in linkage disequilibrium (LD, conservatively defined as r2 > 0.05) with a previously reported signal for puberty timing (either AAM in women or voice breaking in men) (Table 1).

Fig. 1: Miami plot of meta-analysis for age at voice breaking.

Miami plot comparing –log10(P values) for SNP associations with age at voice breaking from 23andMe GWAS (bottom half, blue shades) with –log10(P values) from meta-analysis for age at voice breaking combining 23andMe data with UK Biobank study (top half, red shades). Red line indicates genome-wide significance level (P < 5 × 10−8).

Table 1 Twenty nine previously unreported signals for puberty timing.

We sought collective confirmation of the 76 independent signals for male puberty timing in up to 2394 boys with longitudinally assessed pubertal sexual characteristics in The Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC)11. In ALSPAC boys, a polygenic risk score for later puberty timing based on 73 of the male puberty timing signals was associated with older ages at voice breaking, peak height velocity and appearance of armpit hair (Linear regression: P = 4.5 × 10−3 to P = 1.6 × 10−14), and was associated with lower likelihood of attaining various milestones of pubertal maturation at specific time-points (Pmin (pubic hair development at age 14.7 years old): = 4.6 × 10−10, univariate model r2 ~ 1.5%)(Supplementary Data 3).

Genetic heterogeneity between sexes

Consistent with our previous study6, we observed a moderately strong genome-wide genetic correlation in pubertal timing between males and females (rg = 0.68, P = 2.6 × 10−213; based on continuous data on voice breaking and AAM in 23andMe), with similar effect estimates in both sexes for many individual variants (Fig. 2). However, there were exceptions to this overall trend: 5/76 male puberty timing signals (Fig. 2b) and 15/387 reported AAM signals (Fig. 2a) showed significant (by Bonferroni-corrected P values) heterogeneity between sexes in their effects on puberty timing (two of these heterogeneous signals were found in both analyses) (Supplementary Data 4 and 5; Fig. 2). Only one signal showed significant directionally opposite effects (i.e. the allele that conferred earlier puberty timing in one sex delayed puberty in the other sex); rs6931884 at SIM1/PRDM13/MCHR2, as previously reported (males: βvoice-breaking = −0.064 years/allele; females: βmenarche = 0.059 years/allele; Pheterogeneity = 2.6 × 10−14). Two variants located near to genes that are disrupted in rare disorders of puberty12,13 showed no effect or weaker effect in males than in females: rs184950120, 5′UTR to MKRN3voice-breaking = 0.085 years/allele; βmenarche = 0.396 years/allele, Pheterogeneity = 3.6 × 10−3), and rs62342064, one of 3 AAM variants in/near TACR3voice-breaking = −0.017 years/allele; βmenarche = 0.057 years/allele, Pheterogeneity = 4.2 × 10−5).

Fig. 2: Scatterplots comparing variants for effect size on age at menarche and age at voice breaking.

a Scatterplot for independent signals identified in voice breaking meta-analysis (23andMe and UK Biobank) in MTAG. X-axis depicts SNP effect on age at voice breaking in years from 23andMeGWAS; y-axis shows effect on AAM. b Scatterplot for known AAM loci depicting effect size for menarche (x-axis) and age at voice breaking (y-axis). Signals are colour-coded based on heterogeneity P values.

Implicated genes, tissues and biological pathways

Two of the 76 lead variants associated with male pubertal timing were non-synonymous: a previously reported AAM signal in KDM4C (rs913588), encoding a lysine-specific demethylase, and a male-specific signal in ALX4 (rs3824915), encoding a homeobox gene involved in fibroblast growth factor (FGF) signalling that is mutated in rare disorders of cranium/central neural system (CNS) development with male-specific hypogonadism14. A further 10 lead variants were in strong LD (r2 > 0.8) with one or more non-synonymous variants, of which three have not previously been associated with puberty timing: FGF11, which encodes a FGF expressed in the developing CNS and promotes peripheral androgen receptor expression15, TFAP4, which encodes a transcription factor of the basic helix-loop-helix-zipper family16, and GCKR, which encodes a regulatory protein that inhibits glucokinase in liver and pancreatic islets and is associated with a range of cardiometabolic traits17 (Supplementary Table 3). A further seven are reported signals for AAM, but were not previously reported for voice-breaking. These missense variants are in the following genes: SRD5A2, encoding for Steroid 5-alpha-reductase, which converts testosterone into the more potent androgen dihydrotestosterone; LEPR, encoding the receptor for appetite and reproduction hormone leptin; SMARCAD1, encoding a mediator of histone H3/H4 deacetylation; BDNF, FNDC9, FAM118A and ZNF446.

Consistent with genetic analyses of AAM in females, tissues in the CNS were the most strongly enriched for genes co-located near to male puberty timing associated variants (Supplementary Figs. 1 and 2; Supplementary Data 6 and Supplementary Table 4). To identify mechanisms that regulate pubertal timing in males, we tested all SNPs genome-wide for enrichment of voice breaking associations with pre-defined biological pathway genes. Four pathways showed evidence of enrichment: histone methyltransferase complex (FDR = 0.01); regulation of transcription (FDR = 0.02)); ATP binding (FDR = 0.03); and cAMP biosynthetic process (FDR = 0.03) (Supplementary Data 7).

Links between hair colour and puberty timing

Noting that three loci for puberty timing were located proximal to genes previously associated with pigmentation (HERC2, IRF4, C16orf55), we assessed the broader relationship between these traits. It is known that men have darker natural hair colour than women in European ancestry populations18 and this sex difference appears following the progressive darkening of hair and skin colour during adolescence19,20. However, a link between inter-individual variation in natural hair colour and puberty timing has not previously been described. We assessed this phenotypic relationship in up to 179,594 white males of European ancestry in UKBB in a model including 40 genetic principal components (to adjust for even minor subpopulation ethnic variations). Men with red, dark brown and black natural hair colours showed progressively higher odds of early puberty timing, relative to men with blond hair. Similarly, women with darker natural hair colours had earlier puberty timing relative to women with blond hair (Table 2).

Table 2 Phenotypic associations between natural hair colour and puberty timing in UK Biobank men and women.

To test the shared biological basis between these two phenotypes, we systematically assessed the effects of genetic variants associated with natural hair colour on puberty timing. Using a two-sample Mendelian randomisation (MR) approach, we modelled 119 recently reported GWAS hair colour signals as a single instrumental variable18 on age at voice breaking (in 23andMe men). Such an approach can provide more robust and explicit evidence that there is shared biology between these two traits. The findings infer that susceptibility to darker natural hair colour also confers earlier puberty timing in men (βIVW = −0.044 years per ordered category, PIVW = 7.10 × 10−3) with no evidence of heterogeneity across signals (Cochrane Q: P = 0.99) or directional pleiotropy (MR-Egger Intercept: P = 0.99) (Supplementary Fig. 3). Using a similar approach in published AAM data in females5, we inferred a directionally consistent but weaker association between darker natural hair colour on earlier AAM (βIVW = −0.017, PIVW = 3.64 × 10−3), and with modest heterogeneity across signals (Cochrane Q: P = 0.038) (Supplementary Table 5).

Due to the partial overlapping samples between the SNP instrument discovery and outcome in the above approach, we performed a second, more conservative analysis, using a more limited 5-SNP score aligned to darker hair colour in non-overlapping data on white UK Biobank individuals, adjusting for 40 genetic principal components and geographical location of testing centres. This found highly consistent results in men: the 5-SNP score was associated with higher risk for early voice breaking (PIVW = 1.72 × 10−19) and lower risk for late voice breaking (PIVW = 5.90 × 10−6); but we found no association with AAM in women (PIVW = 0.23) (Supplementary Table 5).

Male puberty timing and other complex traits and diseases

To assess the extent of shared heritability between male puberty timing and other complex traits, we calculated genome-wide genetic correlations across 751 complex traits/datasets using LD score regression21 (Supplementary Data 8). Apart from other puberty and growth-related traits, the strongest positive genetic correlation was observed with ‘overall health rating’, followed by several social traits, including educational attainment, fluid intelligence score and ages at first/last birth. Conversely, male puberty timing showed negative genetic correlations with cardiometabolic diseases, including Type 2 diabetes and hypertension, as well as health risk behaviours, including alcohol intake frequency and smoking (Supplementary Fig. 4). In general, early genetically predicted puberty timing in men was correlated with adverse health outcomes. We then performed MR analyses to test the genetic association with two exemplar traits which have previously been associated with puberty timing: lifespan22 and prostate cancer5.

We previously reported genetic associations between earlier AAM and higher risks for hormone sensitive cancers, when adjusting for the protective effects of higher BMI5,23. Here, using a similar two-sample multi-variate MR approach, we did not find a significant association with prostate cancer (OR per year = 0.89, 95%CI = 0.79–1.01; PIVW = 0.06) or advanced prostate cancer (OR per year = 0.82, 95%CI = 0.67–1.00; PIVW = 0.05) (Supplementary Table 6; Supplementary Fig. 6). We used a similar MR approach to test the relevance of male puberty timing genetics to lifespan (see Methods). The findings support a genetic association between later puberty timing in males and longer lifespan, corresponding to 9 months longer life per year later puberty (IVW P = 6.7 × 10−4) (Fig. 3). The result was consistent after removal of one outlier SNP (MR-PRESSO P = 8.3 × 10−4), and with methods robust to the effects of heterogeneous SNPs (weighted median P = 0.02) (Supplementary Table 7).

Fig. 3: Effect of male puberty SNPs on longevity.

Scatterplot of 73 male puberty loci (pruned for heterogeneity) comparing effect sizes for puberty timing (from MTAG) and longevity. Lines show results of different Mendelian randomisation models: IVW (blue), weighted median (yellow). Error bars indicate 95% confidence intervals for individual SNP associations.


Here, we report the a genetic study of male puberty timing by performing a meta-analysis across closely related phenotypic traits in two large studies. The effective sample size of 205,354 men is substantially higher than the previous GWAS in men (n = 55,871), although still smaller than similar studies in women (n 370,000). While there was overall moderately strong overlap between sexes in the genetic architecture of puberty timing (rg = 0.68), several findings point to mechanisms with particular relevance to men. The genes implicated in puberty timing include, ALX4 and SRD5A2, the disruption of which leads to male pseudohermaphroditism whereas higher 5-alpha-reductase activity has been reported in women with polycystic ovary syndrome24, and INHBB encoding the beta-B subunit of the hormone Inhibin B, which is secreted by testicular Sertoli cells in males. By contrast, the known female puberty timing locus at INHBA, which encodes the beta-A subunit of the hormone Inhibin A, showed little association with puberty timing in males.

Non-genetic observational studies have consistently reported darkening of hair and skin pigmentation in children of European ancestry during the peri-pubertal years19,20. Furthermore, the established sexual dimorphism in pigmentation18 reportedly appears from puberty onwards19 and the relatively darker skin and hair of men compared to women is postulated to reflect the stronger stimulation of melanogenesis by androgens compared to estrogens25. Our findings suggest a more widespread overlap between pigmentation and reproduction, possibly reflecting common regulators of pituitary production of melanocortins and gonadotrophins, or even an impact of melanocyte signalling on puberty timing. The pituitary pro-peptide, pro-opiomelanocortin (POMC), is cleaved into several peptides with significant melanogenic activity (ACTH, α-MSH, and β-MSH) by the pro-hormone convertase enzymes, PC-1 and PC-2, both of which are implicated by previously reported loci for AAM in females5. The relationship in women is more complicated suggesting that while there is a relationship between pigmentation and puberty timing in both sexes, it may act in a sex-specific manner.

Finally, our findings substantiate links between puberty timing in men and later life health outcomes, including Type 2 diabetes and hypertension. Our observed genetic association between earlier puberty timing in males and reduced lifespan was consistent across three different MR analytical approaches, which reduces the likelihood of horizontal pleiotropy (where variants influence lifespan though mechanisms separate to puberty timing). Plausible interpretations are a causal effect of earlier male puberty timing on earlier mortality or widespread horizontal pleiotropy (affecting >50% of variants for puberty timing) whereby puberty variants affect biologic pathways, which on the one hand determine puberty timing and on the other hand influence the risk of mortality. We note that horizontal pleiotropy may have been underestimated in this analysis as the same UK Biobank population were included in both exposure and outcome samples26. In conclusion, our findings demonstrate the utility of multi-trait GWAS to combine data across studies with related measures to provide insights into the regulation and consequences of puberty timing.


23andMe study

Genome-wide SNP data were available in up to 55,871 men aged 18 or older of European ancestry from the 23andMe study. Age at voice breaking was determined by response to the question ‘How old were you when your voice began to crack/deepen?’ in an online questionnaire. Participants chose from one of seven pre-defined age bins (under 9, 9–10 years old, 11–12 years old, 13–14 years old, 15–16 years old, 17–18 years old, 19 years old or older). These were then re-scaled to one year age bins post-analysis by a previously validated method27. SNPs were excluded prior to imputation based on the following criteria: Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium P < 10−20; call rate < 95%; or a large frequency discrepancy when compared with European 1000 Genomes reference data6. Imputation of genotypes was performed using the March 2012 ‘v3’ release of 1000 Genomes reference haplotype panel. Genetic associations with puberty timing were obtained by linear regression models using age and five genetically determined principal components to account for population structure as covariates, with additive allelic effects assumed. P values for SNP associations were computed using likelihood ratio tests. Participants provided informed consent to take part in this research under a protocol approved by Ethical and Independent Review Services, an institutional review board accredited by the Association for the Accreditation of Human Research Protection Programs.

UK Biobank

Genotyping for UK Biobank participants has been described in detail previously9. For this analysis, we limited our sample to individuals of white European ancestry. Age at voice breaking for male participants from the UK Biobank cohort study was obtained by responses to the touchscreen question ‘When did your voice break?’ Participants were required to choose from one of five possible options (younger than average, about average, older than average, do not know, prefer not to answer). For age at first facial hair, respondents were asked to choose from one of the same five options in response to the touchscreen question ‘When did you start to grow facial hair?’ In total, data were available in up to 191,270 individuals for voice breaking and 198,731 individuals for facial hair. UK Biobank received ethical approval from the NHS National Research Ethics Service North West (11/NW/0382).

Respondents who answered either ‘older than average’ or ‘younger than average’ were compared separately using the ‘about average’ group as a reference in a case-control design for both phenotypes. For both voice breaking and facial hair, relatively early and relatively late effect estimates were obtained using linear mixed models which were applied using BOLT-LMM software, which accounts for cryptic population structure and relatedness. Covariates included age, genotyping chip and 10 principle components.

Meta-analysis of voice breaking results

GWAS summary results for each of the five strata (23andMe age at voice breaking; UK Biobank relatively early and late voice breaking; and UK Biobank relatively early and late facial hair) all aligned to later timing of voice breaking were meta-analysed using MTAG10. MTAG uses GWAS summary statistics from multiple correlated traits to effectively increase sample size and statistical power to detect genetic associations. Full details on the methodology have been described previously10. In brief, MTAG estimates a variance-covariance matrix to correlate the effect sizes of each trait using a moments-based method, with each trait and genotype standardised to have a mean of zero and variance of one. In addition, MTAG calculates a variance-covariance matrix for the GWAS estimation error using LD score regressions. The effect estimate for the association of each SNP on the trait of interest is then derived using a moments-based function, in a generalisation of standard inverse-variance weighted meta-analysis.

Prior to meta-analysis, we removed extremely rare variants (MAF < 0.01). In addition, for the four UK Biobank strata we calculated the effective sample size using

$$N_{{\rm{eff}}} = \frac{2}{{\frac{1}{{N_{{\rm{cases}}}}} + \frac{1}{{N_{{\rm{controls}}}}}}}.$$

Effective sample sizes for early and late voice breaking were 15,711 and 21,217, respectively, and 17,391 and 23,011 for early and late facial hair, respectively. We used the genome-significant P-value threshold of P < 5 × 10−8 to determine significant SNP associations. Independent signals were identified using distance-based clumping, with the SNP with the lowest P-value within a 1 MB window being considered the association signal at that locus.

Gene annotation and identification of loci

For each independent signal identified in the voice breaking meta-analysis, we identified all previously reported age at menarche (AAM) and voice breaking (VB) loci within 1MB of that SNP. We assessed if each locus had previously been associated with puberty timing (AAM or VB) within 1MB, and if any such loci within 1MB were in LD (r2 < 0.05). Heterogeneity between AAM and VB for each SNP was determined by the I2 statistic and P-value generated by the METAL software.

Gene annotation was performed using a combination of methods. Information on the nearest annotated gene was obtained from HaploReg v4.1. In addition, other genes in the region were identified using plots produced from LocusZoom. The most likely causal variant was determined by combining this information with identification of any non-synonymous variants within the region as well as application of existing knowledge.

Replication in ALSPAC

The Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC) recruited pregnant women resident in the Avon area of the UK with an expected delivery date between 1 April 1991 and 31 December 1992. Since then, mothers, partners, and offspring have been followed up regularly through questionnaires and clinical assessments11. The offspring cohort consists of 14,775 live-born children (75.7% of the eligible live births). Full details of recruitment, follow-up and data collection have been reported previously11. Ethical approval for the study was obtained from the ALSPAC Ethics and Law committee and the Local Research Ethics Committees. A series of nine postal questionnaires regarding pubertal development was administered approximately annually from the time the participant was aged 8 until he was aged 17. The questionnaires, which were responded by either the parents or the participant, had schematic drawings and verbal descriptions of secondary sexual characteristics (genitalia and pubic hair development) based on the Tanner staging system, as well as information on armpit hair growth and voice change. Age at voice change was considered the age at which the adolescent reported his voice to be occasionally a lot lower or to have changed completely. Weight and height were measured annually up to age 13 years, then at ages 15 and 17 years by a trained research team. Age at peak height velocity (PHV) was estimated using Superimposition by Translation And Rotation (SITAR) mixed effects growth curve analysis28. The sample size available varied according to the phenotype, from 1126 (for genital development) to 2403 (for age at which armpit hair started to grow).

The genetic risk score (GRS) was calculated based on 73 SNPs (genotypes at 3 SNPs were unavailable) weighted by the effect size reported for that SNP in the ReproGen Consortium. The GRS was standardised, and results are presented as increase in the phenotype per standard-deviation increase in the GRS. Linear (continuous phenotype) and logistic (binary phenotype) regression analyses were performed unadjusted and adjusted for age (except for age at PHV, age at voice change and age at which armpit hair started to grow) and controlled for population stratification using the first 10 principal components.

Gene expression and pathway analysis

We used MAGENTA to investigate whether genetic associations in the meta-analysed dataset showed enrichment in any known biological pathways. MAGENTA has previously been described in detail29. In brief, genes are mapped to an index SNP based on a 150 kb window, with a regression model applied to correct the P-value (gene score) for gene size, SNP density and LD-related properties. Gene scores are ranked, and the numbers of gene scores observed in a given pathway in the 75th and 95th percentiles are calculated. A P-value for gene-set enrichment analysis (GSEA) is calculated by comparing these values to one million randomly generated gene sets. Testing was completed on 3216 pathways from four databases (PANTHER, KEGG, Gene Ontology and Ingenuity). Significance was determined based on an FDR < 0.05 for genes in the 75th or 95th percentile.

To determine tissue-specific expression of genes, we used information from the GTEx project. GTEx characterises transcription levels of RNA in a variety of tissue and cell types, using sample from over 1000 deceased individuals of European, African-American and Asian descent. We investigated transcription levels of significant genes identified in our meta-analysis of voice breaking in 53 different tissue types. We used a conservative Bonferroni-corrected P-value of 9.4 × 10−4 (=0.05/53) to determine significance.

Association between hair colour and puberty timing

Information on natural hair colour for UK Biobank participants was collected via touchscreen questionnaire, in response to the question ‘What best describes your natural hair colour? (If your hair colour is grey, the colour before you went grey)’. Participants chose from one of 6 possible colours: blond, red, light brown, dark brown, black or other. For our analyses, we restricted this to include only non-related individuals of white European ancestry, totalling 190,845 men and 238,179 women. Hair colours were assigned numerical values from lightest (blond) to darkest (black) in order to perform ordered logistic regression of hair colour for both relative age at voice breaking in men and AAM in women. In both cases, blond hair was used as the reference group and models were adjusted for the top 10 principle components to account for population structure. In men this produces an effect estimate as an odds ratio for early puberty (relative to blond-haired individuals), while in women the effect estimate is on a continuous scale for AAM (in years) relative to the mean AAM for those with blond hair.

Genetic correlations

Genetic correlations (rg) were calculated between age of puberty in males and 751 health-related traits which were publically available from the LD Hub database using LD Score Regression21,30.

Mendelian randomisation analyses

GWAS summary statistics for longevity were obtained from Timmers et al.31. Briefly, Timmers et al. performed a GWAS of parent survivorship under the Cox proportional hazard model in 1,012,050 parent lifespans of unrelated subjects using methods of Joshi et al.32, but extending UK Biobank data to that of second release. Data were meta-analysed using inverse-variance meta-analysis results from UK Biobank genomically British, Lifegen, UK Biobank self-reported British (but not identified as genomically British), UK Biobank Irish, and UK Biobank other white European descent. The resultant hazard ratios and their standard errors were then taken forward for two-sample MR using the 74 male puberty loci which were available in both datasets. We then performed a sensitivity analysis after removing outlier SNPs on the basis of heterogeneity using MR-PRESSO33.

Summary statistics for the association between the genetic variants and risk of prostate cancer were obtained from the PRACTICAL/ELLIPSE consortium, based on GWAS analyses of 65,044 prostate cancer cases and 48,344 controls (all of European ancestry) genotyped using the iCOGS or OncoArray chips34. The analyses were repeated using summary statistics from a comparison of the subset of 9,640 cases with advanced disease versus 45,704 controls, where advanced cases were defined as those with at least one of: Gleason score 8+, prostate cancer death, metastatic disease or PSA > 100. Two-sample MR analyses were conducted using weighted linear regressions of the SNP-prostate cancer log odds ratios (logOR) on the SNP-puberty beta coefficients, using the variance of the logORs as weights. This is equivalent to an inverse-variance weighted meta-analysis of the variant-specific causal estimates. Because of evidence of over-dispersion (i.e. heterogeneity in the variant-specific causal estimates), the residual standard error was estimated, making this equivalent to a random-effects meta-analysis. Unbalanced horizontal pleiotropy was tested based on the significance of the intercept term in MR-Egger regression. The total effect of puberty timing on prostate cancer risk was separated into a direct effect (independent of BMI, a potential mediator) and an indirect effect (operating via BMI), as described in Burgess et al.19.

Genetic associations between hair colour and puberty timing were assessed in two ways. First, we performed a two-sample MR analysis based on summary statistics (as described in Burgess et al.19) using the most recently reported GWAS for hair colour18 and 23andMe data for SNP effect estimates on age at voice breaking in men, and published ReproGen consortium data on AAM in women. However, there is partial overlap (between samples used for the discovery phase GWAS of hair colour variants (n = 290,891 from 23andMe plus UK Biobank) and the samples used for puberty timing (n = 55,871 men from 23andMe; maximum potential overlap = 55,871/290,891 = 19%). Therefore, we also performed a sensitivity analysis in non-overlapping samples; we used a more limited 5-SNP instrument for darker hair colour (identified in an earlier hair colour GWAS that did not include UK Biobank35), and assessed its effects on puberty timing in UK Biobank men and women in an individual-level MR analysis, controlling for geographical (assessment centre) and genetic ancestry factors (40 principal components).

Reporting summary

Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.

Data availability

Puberty associations: The results for the top 10000 SNPs detailed in this manuscript can be found at this UK Biobank: Data are available to all bona fide researchers for all types of health-related research that is in the public interest, without preferential or exclusive access for any person. All researchers, whether in universities, charities, government agencies or commercial companies, and whether based in the UK or abroad, will be subject to the same application process and approval criteria. 23andMe: Full summary statistics for 23andMe datasets will be made available to qualified researchers under an agreement that protects participant privacy. Researchers should visit for more details and instructions for applying for access to the data. ALSPAC: Please note that the study website contains details of all the data that is available through a fully searchable data dictionary and variable search tool at


  1. 1.

    Day, F. R., Perry, J. R. B. & Ong, K. K. Genetic regulation of puberty timing in humans. Neuroendocrinology 102, 247–255 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Day, F. R., Elks, C. E., Murray, A., Ong, K. K. & Perry, J. R. Puberty timing associated with diabetes, cardiovascular disease and also diverse health outcomes in men and women: the UK Biobank study. Sci. Rep. 5, 11208 (2015).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Elks, C. E. et al. Age at menarche and type 2 diabetes risk: The EPIC-InterAct study. Diabetes Care 36, 3526–3534 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Lakshman, R. et al. Early age at menarche associated with cardiovascular disease and mortality. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 94, 4953–4960 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Day, F. R. et al. Genomic analyses identify hundreds of variants associated with age at menarche and support a role for puberty timing in cancer risk. Nat. Genet. 49, 834–841 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Day, F. R. et al. Shared genetic aetiology of puberty timing between sexes and with health-related outcomes. Nat. Commun. 6, 8842 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Pickrell, J. K. et al. Detection and interpretation of shared genetic influences on 42 human traits. Nat. Genet. 48, 709–717 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Hou, H. et al. Gene expression profiling of puberty-associated genes reveals abundant tissue and sex-specific changes across postnatal development. Hum. Mol. Genet. 26, 3585–3599 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Sudlow, C. et al. UK Biobank: an open access resource for identifying the causes of a wide range of complex diseases of middle and old age. PLoS Med. 12, 1–10 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Turley, P. et al. Multi-trait analysis of genome-wide association summary statistics using MTAG. Nat. Genet. 1–9, (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Boyd, A. et al. Cohort profile: The ‘Children of the 90s’-The index offspring of the avon longitudinal study of parents and children. Int. J. Epidemiol. 42, 111–127 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Topaloglu, A. K., Reimann, F., Guclu, M., Yalin, A. S. & Kotan, L. D. TAC3 and TACR3 mutations in familial hypogonadotropic hypogonadism reveal a key role for Neurokinin B in the central control of reproduction. Nat. Genet. 41, 354–358 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Abreu, A. P. et al. Central precocious puberty caused by mutations in the imprinted gene. N. Engl. J. Med. 368, 2467–2475 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Kayserili, H. et al. ALX4 dysfunction disrupts craniofacial and epidermal development. Hum. Mol. Genet. 18, 4357–4366 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Hu, Lei et al. T cells promote prostate cancer metastasis via modulation of FGF11→ miRNA-541→ androgen receptor (AR)→ MMP9 signaling. Mol. Oncol. 9, 44–57 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Jackstadt, R. et al. AP4 is a mediator of epithelial–mesenchymal transition and metastasis in colorectal cancer. J. Exp. Med. 210, 1331–1350 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Simons, N. et al. A common gene variant in glucokinase regulatory protein interacts with glucose metabolism on diabetic dyslipidemia: The combined CODAM and Hoorn studies. Diabetes Care 39, 1811–1817 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Hysi, P. G. et al. Genome-wide association meta-analysis of individuals of European ancestry identifies new loci explaining a substantial fraction of hair color variation and heritability. Nat. Genet. 50, 652–656 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Sitek, A., Zadzińska, E., Rosset, I. & Antoszewski, B. Is increased constitutive skin and hair pigmentation an early sign of puberty? HOMO- J. Comp. Hum. Biol. 64, 205–214 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Kukla-Bartoszek, M. et al. Investigating the impact of age-depended hair colour darkening during childhood on DNA-based hair colour prediction with the HIrisPlex system. Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 36, 26–33 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Zheng, J. et al. LD Hub: a centralized database and web interface to perform LD score regression that maximizes the potential of summary level GWAS data for SNP heritability and genetic correlation analysis. Bioinformatics 33, 272–279 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Mostafavi, H. et al. Identifying genetic variants that affect viability in large cohorts. PLoS Biol. 15, 1–29 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Burgess, S. et al. Dissecting causal pathways using mendelian randomization with summarized genetic data: application to age at menarche and risk of breast cancer. Genetics (2017).

  24. 24.

    Wu, C., Wei, K. & Jiang, Z. 5 α -reductase activity in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. 15, 1–9 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Slominski, A., Tobin, D. J., Shibahara, S. & Wortsman, J. Melanin pigmentation in mammalian skin and its hormonal regulation. Physiol. Rev. 84, 1155–1228 (2004).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Verbanck, M., Chen, C.-Y., Neale, B. & Do, R. Detection of widespread horizontal pleiotropy in causal relationships inferred from Mendelian randomization between complex traits and diseases. Nat. Genet. 50, 5 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Lunetta, K. L. et al. Rare coding variants and X-linked loci associated with age at menarche. Nat. Commun. 6, 1–8 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Frysz, M., Howe, L. D., Tobias, J. H. & Paternoster, L. Using SITAR (SuperImposition by Translation and Rotation) to estimate age at peak height velocity in Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children. Wellcome Open Res. 3, 90 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Serge, A. V. et al. Common inherited variation in mitochondrial genes is not enriched for associations with type 2 diabetes or related glycemic traits. PLoS Genet. 6, e1001058 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Bulik-Sullivan, B. et al. An atlas of genetic correlations across human diseases and traits. Nat. Genet. 47, 1236–1241 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Timmers, P. R. H. J. et al. Genomics of 1 million parent lifespans implicates novel pathways and common diseases and distinguishes survival chances. Elife 8, 1–40 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Joshi, P. K. et al. Genome-wide meta-analysis associates HLA- DQA1/DRB1 and LPA and lifestyle factors with human longevity. Nat. Commun. 8, 1–13 (2017).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Verbanck, M., Chen, C., Neale, B. & Do, R. Detection of widespread horizontal pleiotropy randomization between complex traits and diseases. Nat. Genet. 50, 693–698 (2018).

  34. 34.

    Schumacher, F. R. et al. Association analyses of more than 140,000 men identify 63 new prostate cancer susceptibility loci. Nat. Genet. 1, (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Eriksson, N. et al. Web-based, participant-driven studies yield novel genetic associations for common traits. PLoS Genet. 6, 1–20 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


This work was funded by the UK Medical Research Council (MRC; Unit programme MC_UU_12015/2) and used UK Biobank data under application 9905. The MRC, Wellcome Trust (Grant ref: 102215/2/13/2) and the University of Bristol provide core support for ALSPAC. This publication is the work of the authors and <John Perry and Ken Ong> will serve as guarantors for the contents of this paper. GWAS data for ALSPAC was generated by Sample Logistics and Genotyping Facilities at Wellcome Sanger Institute and LabCorp (Laboratory Corporation of America) using support from 23andMe. We are extremely grateful to all the families who took part in the ALSPAC study, the midwives for their help in recruiting them, and the whole ALSPAC team, which includes interviewers, computer and laboratory technicians, clerical workers, research assistants, volunteers, managers, receptionists and nurses. We thank the research participants and employees of 23andMe for making this work possible. Genotyping of the OncoArray was funded by the US National Institutes of Health (NIH) [U19 CA154 148537 for ELucidating Loci Involved in Prostate cancer SuscEptibility (ELLIPSE) project and X01HG007492 to the Center for Inherited Disease Research (CIDR) under contract number 156 HHSN268201200008I]. Additional analytic support was provided by NIH NCI U01 CA188392 157 (PI: Schumacher). The PRACTICAL consortium was supported by Cancer Research UK Grants C5047/A7357, C1287/A10118, C1287/A16563, C5047/A3354, C5047/A10692, C16913/A6135, European 160 Commission’s Seventh Framework Programme grant agreement no° 223175 (HEALTH-F2-2009-223175), and The National Institute of Health (NIH) Cancer Post-Cancer GWAS initiative grant: No. 1 U19 CA 148537-01 (the GAME-ON initiative). We would also like to thank the following for funding support: The Institute of Cancer Research and The Everyman Campaign, The Prostate Cancer Research Foundation, Prostate Research Campaign UK (now Prostate Action), The Orchid Cancer Appeal, The National Cancer Research Network UK, The National Cancer Research Institute (NCRI) UK. We are grateful for support of NIHR funding to the NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust. In memoriam: Brian E. Henderson.

Author information





B.H., F.R.D., K.K.O. and J.R.B.P. designed this study. D.F.E., The PRACTICAL Consortium, the 23andMe Research Team, N.J.T., K.K.O., and J.R.B.P. acquired the data. B.H., F.R.D., A.S.B., D.J.T., A.L.G.S., P.R.H.J.T., A.K., P.K.J, the 23andMe Research Team and J.R.B.P. analysed the data. B.H., F.R.D., A.S.B., K.K.O. and J.R.B.P. interpreted the data and B.H., K.K.O. and J.R.B.P. wrote the first draft of the manuscript. All authors participated in the preparation of the manuscript by reading and commenting on drafts prior to submission.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Ken K. Ong or John R. B. Perry.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The 23andMe Research Team are employees of and own stock or stock options in 23andMe, Inc. The remaining authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Peer review information Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hollis, B., Day, F.R., Busch, A.S. et al. Genomic analysis of male puberty timing highlights shared genetic basis with hair colour and lifespan. Nat Commun 11, 1536 (2020).

Download citation

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing