By mass, iron is the most common element on earth and the most widely utilized metal in industry. Over 30 years of research have shown that iron is a poor choice for practical applications in solar energy conversion. Hematite and other ferric oxide polymorphs are competent for water oxidation in photoelectrochemical cells, but just barely. Photovoltaics based on iron oxide or sulfide materials are inefficient and the inclusion of even trace iron in silicon significantly lowers the efficiency of today’s commercial photovoltaics. In dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs), inclusion of an iron center in a dye molecule results in devices with poor efficiencies that are of no practical value.1 Iron-based materials and compounds function for light-driven electron transfer and catalysis, but just well enough to give some hope to highly optimistic scientists in academic labs. In the final analysis, iron consistently continues to disappoint and one can safely conclude that it is best to keep iron out of solar cells. Until now Harlang et al.2 found that the iron compound shown in Figure 1 harvests sunlight through most of the visible region with subsequent excited state electron transfer to a TiO2 semiconductor with efficiencies >90%. Such a breakthrough in efficiency is remarkable, particularly when one considers the decades of prior research that failed to accomplish anything even close. This breakthrough raises the question, are we on a path to solar cells that utilize iron? Before addressing this question, it is worthwhile to consider the impact an iron center has on a dye molecule.
- Tyler C Motley
- Gerald J Meyer
