Abstract
The identification of genes involved in salinity tolerance has primarily focused on model plants and crops. However, plants naturally adapted to highly saline environments offer valuable insights into tolerance to extreme salinity. Salicornia plants grow in coastal salt marshes, stimulated by NaCl. To understand this tolerance, we generated genome sequences of two Salicornia species and analyzed the transcriptomic and proteomic responses of Salicornia bigelovii to NaCl. Subcellular membrane proteomes reveal that SbiSOS1, a homolog of the well-known SALT-OVERLY-SENSITIVE 1 (SOS1) protein, appears to localize to the tonoplast, consistent with subcellular localization assays in tobacco. This neo-localized protein can pump Na+ into the vacuole, preventing toxicity in the cytosol. We further identify 11 proteins of interest, of which SbiSALTY, substantially improves yeast growth on saline media. Structural characterization using NMR identified it as an intrinsically disordered protein, localizing to the endoplasmic reticulum in planta, where it can interact with ribosomes and RNA, stabilizing or protecting them during salt stress.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Salinity is one of the major factors limiting crop productivity, with most crops being relatively salt sensitive and significantly affected when exposed to NaCl in the range of 50–200 mM1. Currently, at least 20% of irrigated lands are affected by salinity2, resulting in reduced crop production. Furthermore, soil salinization is increasing yearly3,4. With the world’s population projected to grow from 7.7 to 9.7 billion people by 20505, the demand for increased agricultural production will likely require expanding crop production on marginal land, including saline soils. Studies in salinity tolerance have primarily focused on plants that grow at low concentrations of salt6, which includes all major crops. However, plants that thrive in highly saline environments have the potential to be valuable in the development of salt tolerant crops, as they already possess adaptations that allow them to thrive in saline environments.
The genus Salicornia belongs to the subfamily Salicornioideae in the Amaranthaceae family and plants of this genus grow in coastal salt marshes and inland salt lakes throughout the world7. They are amongst the most salt tolerant of all plant species and can thrive in environments with salinities even higher than seawater8,9. Notably, Salicornia plants can accumulate high concentrations of Na+ in their photosynthetically active succulent shoots while avoiding ion toxicity8,10,11, suggesting highly efficient ion compartmentalization processes in cells through the action of specialized transporters12,13,14,15. Moreover, Salicornia growth is promoted by the addition of NaCl11,16,17,18, making it a particularly interesting genus for the study of salinity tolerance.
In this study, we generated draft genome sequences for two Salicornioideae species: Salicornia bigelovii, endemic to Mexico and the United States; and Salicornia europaea, endemic to Europe, Northern Africa, the Middle East, and Central Asia. We then focused on S. bigelovii and investigated its phenotypic, transcriptomic, and proteomic responses to different concentrations of NaCl, generating organellar membrane proteomes to enable allocation of membrane proteins to particular organelles. The protein SALT-OVERLY-SENSITIVE 1 (SOS1) unexpectedly appears to be localized to the vacuolar membrane, suggesting its neo-localization in S. bigelovii. Based on the transcriptomic and proteomic responses, we selected 45 candidate genes likely to contribute to salinity tolerance in S. bigelovii and found 11 altering salinity tolerance in a yeast expression system. We also further investigated a protein we named SALTY, which greatly improved salinity tolerance when expressed in yeast. Using nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), SALTY was found to be an intrinsically disordered protein. This protein was localized to the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) where it is likely to interact with ribosomes and RNA.
Results
NaCl stimulates growth of S. bigelovii
We analyzed the phenotypic responses of S. bigelovii to NaCl by treating 5-week-old plants with 0, 50, 200, and 600 mM NaCl. After 1 week, plants treated with NaCl were taller than plants treated with 0 mM NaCl, and plants treated with 200 and 600 mM NaCl developed lateral branches (Fig. 1a, b). The beneficial effects of NaCl became increasingly apparent with time, and 6 weeks after treatment, all plants supplemented with NaCl were significantly taller and displayed a lighter green hue (Fig. 1c, d). Plants treated with 600 mM NaCl were shorter than those treated with 50 or 200 mM NaCl, but had thicker shoots (Fig. 1e, f), suggesting that a concentration of NaCl somewhere between 200 mM–600 mM NaCl is optimal for the growth of S. bigelovii, this is in agreement with previous studies11,16,17,18,19.
S. bigelovii accumulates large amounts of Na+ and Cl- in its shoots
High concentrations of NaCl are usually detrimental to plants, as ion accumulation in shoots may lead to cell toxicity and premature senescence1,20,21. In plant cells, K+ is usually at least 10 times more abundant than Na+, with cells experiencing Na+ toxicity when the Na+/K+ is altered in favor of Na+ 22, as Na+ and K+ are thought to compete for functionally important binding sites inside the cell23,24,25.
Na+ and Cl- concentrations increased in shoots and roots with increasing NaCl treatment (Fig. 1g, h). We found Na+ and Cl- concentrations in excess of 750 mM in the shoots and 400 mM in the roots of S. bigelovii treated with 600 mM NaCl, which accounted for 60% of shoot and 10% of root dry mass (Supplementary Fig. 1). K+ concentrations decreased with increasing NaCl treatment (Fig. 1i) and Na+/K+ was greater than 1 in shoots in all treatments, being over 20 times greater in plants treated with 600 mM NaCl (Supplementary Fig. 1). In roots, Na+ concentrations were less than two-fold higher than K+ at 600 mM NaCl. Shoot sap osmolality increased with NaCl treatment (Supplementary Fig. 1). Water content was higher in shoots compared with roots and increased with NaCl treatment (Fig. 1j). It was positively correlated with both Na+ and Cl- and negatively correlated with K+ (Supplementary Fig. 2), suggesting that Na+ and Cl- could be used as osmolytes to facilitate water retention in the shoots26.
Genome sequencing and assembly
To gain insight into the molecular mechanisms driving the outstanding salt tolerance of Salicornia, we first generated genome assemblies for two Salicornia species: S. bigelovii, an autotetraploid (2n = 4x = 36)7, and S. europaea, a diploid (2n = 2x = 18)7,27. Here we used PacBio HiFi sequencing to generate near chromosome-scale genome assemblies, resulting in haploid genome assemblies of 2,026 and 517 Mb for S. bigelovii and S. europaea, respectively (Supplementary Table 1). These assemblies encompassed > 99% of the genome in 33 contigs for S. bigelovii and 20 for S. europaea. The genome assemblies were in line with flow cytometry-based genome size estimates and showed high assembly completeness28,29 (Supplementary Figs. 3 and 4). S. europaea flow cytometry values were similar to what has been reported for diploid Salicornia in the Gulf of Trieste30, yet interestingly, S. bigelovii shows a larger genome of almost double the size of previously reported tetraploid Salicornia. One of the potential causes for this could be the increased percentage of repetitive elements in the genome of S. bigelovii (Supplementary Table 1), but further investigation is required. The genomes were predicted to contain 63,843 and 28,794 genes for S. bigelovii and S. europaea, respectively. The predicted proteins were annotated against Swiss-Prot, TrEMBL31, NCBI NR32, MapMan33,34, and KEGG35 databases (Supplementary Data 1 and 2). The completeness of the gene prediction was assessed with BUSCO36, resulting in completeness scores of 96.3% and 95.3% for S. bigelovii and S. europaea, respectively (Supplementary Table 1).
Gene orthology analysis
To explore possible genetic adaptations of Salicornia to salinity we identified groups of orthologous proteins across representative genomes of five plant families (Brassicaceae, Amaranthaceae, Fabaceae, Solanaceae, and Poaceae) with OrthoMCL37, aiming to identify groups of proteins specific to different plant clades. A total of 38,356 orthogroups were identified, composed of 355,771 proteins (Supplementary Data 3). Phylogenetic reconstruction based on 1377 orthologs, resulted in a resolved phylogeny by family with the genus Salicornia forming a subclade within the family Amaranthaceae (Supplementary Fig. 5). A total of 9,470 orthogroups were shared across all families (Fig. 2a), and gene ontology (GO)38,39 enrichment analyses of unique orthogroups revealed enrichments specific to each family (Supplementary Data 3). Orthogroups unique and present in all Amaranthaceae, were enriched in GO terms such as ‘response to reactive oxygen species’, ‘positive regulation of sodium ion transport’, ‘clustering of voltage-gated sodium channels’, and ‘positive regulation of protein targeting to membrane’ (Supplementary Data 3), which could in part explain the high salt tolerance of plants in this family.
When looking at orthogroups within the Amaranthaceae, the majority of the orthogroups were found in all species, sharing 11,350 orthogroups (Fig. 2b). GO enrichment analysis of unique orthogroups in Salicornia species identified enrichment of terms related to light, in the form of ‘response to UV-A’, ‘response to far red light’, and ‘response to high light intensity’; to ‘ion binding’, in the form of zinc and manganese; to toxin production, in the form of ‘toxin catabolic and metabolic processes’; and to ‘mechanically gated ion channel’, particularly in the form of calcium channels. These calcium channels could be involved in calcium wave signaling during NaCl stress40,41,42. Nevertheless, no orthogroup was enriched for Na+ transport.
We then looked at possible expansions of sodium/proton exchanger (NHX) proteins of the cation/proton antiporter (CPA) family, which are commonly associated with salt tolerance1,20,43. Phylogenetic reconstruction of NHX proteins resulted in clustering by type and family (Fig. 2c and Supplementary Data 4). We identified 6 NHX proteins in S. bigelovii and S. europaea, of which 4 resembled the Arabidopsis thaliana vacuolar NHX1-444,45,46, one resembled the endosomal NHX647, and one the plasma membrane NHX7, also known as SALT-OVERLY-SENSITIVE 1 (SOS1)48 (Fig. 2c). Both contained only one endosomal NHX protein and no homolog for the Li+/H+ antiporter NHX849 was identified in either Salicornia genome, similarly to what has been observed in sugar beet50, another Amaranthaceae. Furthermore, proteins resembling NHX8 from families other than Brassicaceae, are small in size, appear to be truncated, and are usually localized next to an ORF coding for a complementary protein, that when combined, resemble SOS1. Further inspection would be required to identify if this is the result of the degeneration of a previous duplication event, or if it is an artifact of gene prediction. These results show no NHX gene expansion in Salicornia, indicating that its outstanding salt tolerance does not come from an increased repertoire of NHX proteins. We then looked at gene expansions in Salicornia, defined as having at least twice the number of proteins in S. bigelovii and S. europaea when compared to any other species within the orthogroup. GO enrichment analysis of these proteins revealed enrichments in terms related to transposable elements and iron transport, but no term was related to sodium transport (Supplementary Data 3). All together, these results suggest that Salicornia could have a different repertoire of currently unknown genes involved in salinity tolerance or that it has fine-tuned the same genes found in other species to cope with extremely saline environments.
NaCl induces expression of genes associated with growth
To gain insights into the responses of S. bigelovii to NaCl, we studied the transcriptomic responses in shoots of plants exposed to 0, 50, 200, and 600 mM NaCl for 1 and 6 weeks. We identified 11,799 differentially expressed genes between at least two treatments (Fig. 3a, Supplementary Table 2, Supplementary Data 4). Plants that were not treated with NaCl clustered together regardless of their age, while plants treated with NaCl clustered according to their age and treatment (Fig. 3a). This could be caused by the limited growth that plants displayed without the addition of NaCl and by the developmental responses that occurred upon NaCl treatment (Fig. 1). Plants treated with 600 mM NaCl for 1 week clustered separately from any time point or treatment and had the highest number of differentially expressed genes. This suggests a shock response to the high concentration of NaCl, as 6 weeks after treatment, their gene expression became similar to those treated with 50 and 200 mM NaCl, indicating that plants had adapted to the high concentration of NaCl (Fig. 3a).
GO enrichment analysis of genes upregulated in plants treated with NaCl revealed enrichment in terms related to growth, such as ‘carbohydrate biosynthetic and metabolic processes’, ‘cell wall biogenesis and modification’, ‘regulation of cell size’, and ‘water transport’ (Fig. 3b and Supplementary Data 5). This is in agreement with the increased growth, cell size, and water content observed in S. bigelovii plants upon the addition of salt (Fig. 1). Conversely, plants grown in the absence of NaCl had enriched terms such as ‘response to starvation’, ‘response to stress’, ‘response to nutrient levels’, ‘iron and nitrate transport’, ‘starch metabolic process’, and ‘lipid, terpenoid and oxylipin biosynthetic processes’, indicating that plants grown without salt were under stress and suffered nutritional imbalance (Fig. 3c and Supplementary Data 5). MapMan33,34 pathway analysis revealed similar results (Supplementary Tables 3 and 4), but also showed an enrichment in the downregulation of genes coding for receptor proteins with domain of unknown function 26 (DUF26). This downregulation was greatly overrepresented in plants treated with 600 mM NaCl for 1 week. Downregulation of the DUF26 protein, OsRMC, in rice increased survival of rice plants when exposed to severe NaCl treatments51. The increased downregulation of DUF26 proteins in S. bigelovii when exposed to high concentrations of NaCl could have a similar effect as in rice, increasing survival in high salinity.
We then looked at the expression of genes encoding transporter proteins commonly associated with salinity tolerance and found contrasting gene expression profiles (Fig. 3d–f). SOS1 was upregulated in plants treated with NaCl, the high-affinity potassium transporter (HKT1)52,53 expression was downregulated upon NaCl treatment, and NHXs gene expression remained constant throughout treatments (Supplementary Data 4). Previous studies in Salicornia dolichostachya, based on quantitative Reverse Transcription (qRT)-PCR, suggested HKT1 to be absent from Salicornia54. However, we found HKT1 to be present in both Salicornia species.
S. bigelovii organellar membrane proteome
We hypothesized that specific ion transporters must play key roles in preventing ion toxicity in S. bigelovii cells, extruding Na+ from the cytosol and compartmentalizing it in the vacuole. Proteomic analyses of specific membrane systems are possible as membranes from different organelles have different densities, allowing for their separation through ultracentrifugation55,56 (Supplementary Fig. 6). The separation does not result in pure isolates, but in fractions enriched with membranes from specific organelles57,58. We isolated membrane-enriched fractions from shoots of S. bigelovii plants treated with 0, 50, 200, and 600 mM NaCl for 6 weeks, resulting in 12 different density fractions from a continuous sucrose gradient covering a specific gravity range, from 1.08 to 1.19 relative to water, and a maximum variation of 0.8% sucrose or 0.003 specific gravity within fractions (Supplementary Figs. 6 and 7).
Membrane proteins were digested using the gel-free filter-aided sample preparation protocol (FASP)59, resulting in the identification of more than 1,500 protein clusters per treatment (Table 1) and a total of 2118 unique protein clusters. Markers from 5 different organelles were identified based on previous proteomic studies in Arabidopsis57,60,61,62,63,64.
Organellar membrane profiles were generated by assessing the relative abundance of marker proteins at the different density fractions with pRoloc65,66,67,68,69,70. To validate the in silico organellar profiles generated with pRoloc, western blots were carried out across the 12 different density fractions against marker proteins for the thylakoid (PsbA-D1), plasma membrane (H+-ATPase) and tonoplast (V-ATPase) (Fig. 4a, Supplementary Fig. 8). In silico organellar protein profiles coincided with the results obtained from western blots (Fig. 4a, b), indicating a good organelle profile accuracy of our in silico profiles. To allocate a subcellular localization to the unclassified proteins, their relative abundances were compared against organellar profiles across the 12 different density fractions (Fig. 4c and Supplementary Data 6). Due to similarities in their densities, separation between the plasma membrane and endoplasmic reticulum (ER), and between the chloroplast and mitochondrion, were difficult. The tonoplast fractions were distinctly different from other fractions (Fig. 4c) and had a greater relative density compared to that found in Arabidopsis56 and other glycophyte species, where the tonoplast is the least dense membrane. This apparently higher density of the tonoplast in S. bigelovii is supported not only by the western blot analysis (Fig. 4a), but also by the abundance profiles of tonoplast marker proteins such as vacuolar ATPase subunits and the vacuolar pyrophosphatase (Fig. 4c, Supplementary Figs. 9–11, and Supplementary Data 6). This higher density may be due to higher levels of membrane proteins in the tonoplast, perhaps related to the very high concentration of ions accumulating in the vacuoles of Salicornia shoots.
Possible neo-localization of SOS1 to the tonoplast in S. bigelovii
Exploration of the organellar membrane proteome revealed the localization of SOS1, also known as NHX7, to the tonoplast (Fig. 4c–g). SOS1 was first identified in Arabidopsis48,71 and has been described as a Na+/H+ antiporter localized to the plasma membrane, extruding Na+ from the cytosol into the apoplast48,72,73,74. SbiSOS1 is predicted to be 1159 amino acids in length, the same as the predicted SOS1 sequence in S. europaea and the reported SOS1 sequence for S. brachiata75. SbiSOS1 clustered with SOS1-like proteins (Fig. 2c) and shows a 63% sequence identity to Arabidopsis SOS1 and only a 27% identity to other NHX proteins. Similar sequence identities can be observed between the SOS1 protein of Arabidopsis and those of Quinoa, Rice, and Tomato (61-63%). Protein abundance profiles show that SbiSOS1 localizes to the tonoplast. This was consistent across all treatments, and in all instances, it had a high allocation score to the tonoplast (Fig. 4d–g, Supplementary Figs. 9–11, Supplementary Data 6). Furthermore, it was closely distributed with tonoplast marker proteins such as: vacuolar ATPase subunits a, b, c, d; tonoplast intrinsic protein TIP1-3; and the vacuolar pyrophosphatase (Fig. 4c, Supplementary Figs. 9–11). SbiSOS1 was more abundant in fractions 4-6 (Fig. 4d–g), following the abundance pattern of tonoplast marker proteins and different to plasma membrane markers (Fig. 4a,b). SbiSOS1 was amongst the most abundant membrane proteins in shoots of S. bigelovii, together with the plasma membrane H+-ATPase, the vacuolar V-ATPases, PIPs, and TIPs (Supplementary Data 6), and its abundance did not change with treatment.
To assess the possible neo-localization of SbiSOS1 to the tonoplast, we expressed SbiSOS1 and Arabidopsis SOS1 (AtSOS1) fused with the reporter protein eGFP and assessed their colocalization with the plasma membrane AtPIP1;4 and the tonoplast marker VAMP71176 in tobacco leaves (Fig. 5). SbiSOS1 colocalizes with the tonoplast marker (Fig. 5a–c, Supplementary Figs. 12–14), supporting the neo-localization hypothesis. This tonoplast localization was observed in both N and C-terminal eGFP fusions (Supplementary Figs. 13 and 14). However, SbiSOS1 was also observed to colocalize with AtPIP1;4 to the plasma membrane in tobacco cells (Fig. 5d–f). This dual localization of SbiSOS1 to both the tonoplast and the plasma membrane in tobacco cells, may suggest for a mechanism in Salicornia to reduce cytosolic salt accumulation by transporting Na+ into the vacuole and by transporting it outside of the cell. Nevertheless, the observed plasma membrane localization could also be the result of excess protein being targeted to the plasma membrane due to overexpression with the 35 S promoter, as the secretory pathway is the default pathway for membrane protein localization77. AtSOS1 colocalized with AtPIP1;4 in the plasma membrane (Fig. 5g–l and Supplementary Fig. 12). The expression and colocalization of eGFP and VAMP711 can be seen in Fig. 5m–o and Supplementary Fig. 12.
These results suggest the localization of SOS1 to the tonoplast in S. bigelovii and a high and constitutive abundance of SbiSOS1 in shoot cells. SbiSOS1 may have a role for rapid Na+ sequestration into the vacuole, enabling the cells to accumulate high Na+ concentrations. Further inspection of SOS1 sequences revealed high conservation across plant species, with increased differences at the N and C termini and some variable regions at the middle of the protein (Supplementary Fig. 15). Similar results were obtained when analyzing the nonsynonymous (Ka) and synonymous (Ks) substitution rates78 in S. bigelovii vs Arabidopsis SOS1. Ka/Ks greater than one were observed at the N-terminus and were particularly high at a region close to the C-terminus of the protein (Supplementary Fig. 16). It is possible that the difference in some of these residues contribute to the neo-localization of SbiSOS1 to the vacuole in S. bigelovii, yet further investigation is required.
NaCl increases the abundance of membrane proteins related to ATP synthesis
We then looked at the protein responses upon salt treatment. Of the 2118 unique protein clusters, 687 were found to be differentially abundant in at least one of the treatments (Supplementary Fig. 17 and Supplementary Data 6). Hierarchical clustering of the differentially abundant proteins showed a clear two-group clustering between replicates from each treatment and between plants treated with 0 and 50 mM NaCl and those treated with 200 and 600 mM NaCl (Supplementary Fig. 17). GO enrichment analysis of proteins significantly more abundant in plants treated with 200 and 600 mM NaCl revealed enrichment in the terms ‘cellular respiration’, ‘ATP synthesis’, ‘generation of precursor metabolites and energy’, and ‘cellular nitrogen compound biosynthetic process’, among others (Supplementary Data 5). Plants grown in 0 mM and 50 mM were enriched in the terms ‘programmed cell death’, ‘organelle fusion’, ‘response to stimulus’, and ‘calcium ion homeostasis’ (Supplementary Data 5). While a direct comparison of the enrichment analyses between gene expression and protein abundances is difficult, as one comprises all gene responses and the other focuses on membrane protein abundances, similar responses were observed between both analyses (Fig. 3 and Supplementary Data 5). Plants grown in higher concentrations of NaCl were both enriched in terms related to energy production and growth, while plants grown without or at lower concentrations of NaCl were enriched in terms related to stress. Both results are in agreement with the beneficial effect of NaCl in Salicornia growth and development. Other terms such as ‘response to stress’, ‘response to nitrogen transport’, and ‘response to water deprivation’ were uniquely found in the gene expression analysis in plants grown in the absence of NaCl. Closer inspection revealed that these terms were also firstly identified in the proteomics enrichments prior to multiple testing correction but were no longer significant after p-value adjustment (Supplementary Data 5). This could be the consequence of working with a reduced subset of proteins, reducing the statistical power, but could also be a reflection of the differences in responses between soluble and membrane proteins, or the difference between mRNA turnover rates and protein abundances. MapMan pathway enrichment analysis produced similar results, suggesting increased signaling and vesicle trafficking in plants grown in 0 mM and 50 mM NaCl and an increase in ribosome biogenesis and ATP synthesis in plants treated with 200 and 600 mM NaCl (Supplementary Tables 5 and 6).
Identification of salt tolerance related genes in yeast
To identify genes of S. bigelovii involved in salt tolerance, genes were selected for salt tolerance assays in the salt sensitive yeast strain AXT3 (Δena1-4::HIS3 Δnha1::LEU2 Δnhx1::TRP1)79 based on the following criteria: (1) Genes which were differentially expressed in response to NaCl; (2) Genes previously associated with salinity tolerance; (3) Genes with a domain or description associated with Na, K, Cl, or Ca; and (4) Preference was given to transmembrane proteins predicted to have at least six transmembrane helices, as this would advocate for transporters and channels. Based on these criteria, 45 genes were cloned and 11 showed a phenotype in response to NaCl (Fig. 6a, b, Supplementary Fig. 18, Supplementary Table 7, Supplementary Data 7). SbiSOS1 was toxic to E. coli and we were not able to retrieve a functional transformant for its further analysis in yeast.
Increased salinity tolerance was observed for four genes: SbiKAT2, SbiNHX4, SbiOPT4, and SbiSALTY (Fig. 6a and Supplementary Fig. 18). SbiKAT2 is similar to Arabidopsis potassium channel KAT2. It was downregulated upon NaCl treatment, it greatly increased yeast salt tolerance, and its activity as a K+ channel was confirmed when grown in high concentrations of K+, leading to K+ toxicity and cell death (Supplementary Fig. 19). NHX genes showed different phenotypes in yeast but were not differentially expressed in S. bigelovii upon NaCl treatment. SbiNHX4 greatly increased yeast salt tolerance and is similar to Arabidopsis NHX4, belonging to the Class I exchangers (NHX1-NHX4) that are localized to the tonoplast44,45,46 and are considered to be primarily responsible for the compartmentalization of K+ in the vacuole43,80,81,82. SbiOPT4 is similar to the oligopeptide transporter OPT4 in Arabidopsis, which has been described as a proton/oligopeptide transporter83. SbiOPT4 expression increased upon NaCl treatment and conferred a moderate increase in salinity tolerance in yeast, particularly when grown in AP medium (Supplementary Fig. 18). The most pronounced phenotype was observed with an RGG protein, which we called SALTY. Its gene expression and protein abundance increased upon NaCl treatment, and it localized to the cytosol in yeast (Supplementary Figs. 11 and 20). RGG proteins are not well studied in plants, but they are the second largest RNA binding protein family in humans84. Sequence analysis of SbiSALTY suggested it to be an intrinsically disordered protein (IDP), a protein that does not have a defined three-dimensional structure. The overexpression of Arabidopsis homologs AtRGGA (AT4G16830) and the RGG protein (AT4G17520) also increased salt tolerance in yeast, albeit to a lesser extent (Fig. 6a, c).
Reduced salt tolerance in yeast was observed for seven genes: SbiHKT1, SbiNHX1, SbiNHX2, SbiENT1, SbiSLC5-6, SbiPQ, and SbiIDP1 (Fig. 6b and Supplementary Fig. 18). Expression of SbiHKT1 decreased with NaCl treatment (Fig. 3e) and its induction in yeast led to cell death. HKT1;1 has been reported to be involved in root Na+ accumulation and Na+ retrieval from the xylem, preventing Na+ accumulation in leaves of Arabidopsis52,53. Two NHX genes (SbiNHX1 and SbiNHX2) decreased salt tolerance in yeast, contrarily to what was observed for SbiNHX4. This may be due to differences in their subcellular localization in yeast, with SbiNHX1 and SbiNHX2 primarily localizing to lysosomes and SbiNHX4 to the vacuole and ER (Supplementary Fig. 21). SbiENT1 is similar to Arabidopsis equilibrative nucleoside transporter 1 (ENT1). It was predicted to be localized to the tonoplast and was upregulated upon NaCl treatment. Equilibrative nucleoside transporters mediate the transport of purine and pyrimidine nucleosides85. In Arabidopsis, ENT1 is localized to the tonoplast and its overexpression leads to stunted growth86. SbiSLC5-6 expression did not change upon NaCl treatment and was predicted to localize to the tonoplast. It resembles a sodium-coupled amino acid transporter and has an SLC5-6-like_sbd superfamily domain. SLC5 proteins cotransport Na+ and a substrate, usually glucose87, whereas SLC6 proteins utilize Na+ and Cl- to cotransport substrates88. SbiPQ expression did not change upon NaCl treatment and it is similar to the PQ-loop repeat family of proteins. PQ-loop proteins are not well studied in plants, but have recently been shown to function as H+/monovalent cation transporters in plants89 and as H+/amino acid transporters in yeast90 and human91,92. SbiIDP1 was upregulated upon NaCl treatment and greatly induced yeast cell death, particularly upon NaCl treatment. It had no significant similarity to any Arabidopsis protein, and similarly to SbiSALTY, it is predicted to be an intrinsically disordered protein, to form coiled coils, and was localized to the cytosol in yeast (Supplementary Fig. 22).
The RGG protein SALTY is an intrinsically disordered protein and is localized to the ER
We further characterized SbiSALTY, as it greatly increased salt tolerance in yeast. Sequence analyses suggests it to be an intrinsically disordered protein (Fig. 7a, Supplementary Figs. 23 and 24) and be able to form coiled-coils (Fig. 7b), which could allow for oligomerization. To confirm its structure, SbiSALTY was expressed and purified in E. coli for circular dichroism (CD) and NMR analysis. The CD spectrum showed that SbiSALTY is predominantly disordered, having a minimum around 200 nm and very low ellipticity above 210 nm93,94, missing both well-pronounced classical secondary structures and distinct tertiary structural motifs (Fig. 7c). Temperature-based CD analyses at three different wavelengths, 201, 208, and 222 nm, showed no significant alterations at temperatures ranging from 20 to 92 °C (Fig. 7d), supporting the notion that SbiSALTY is an IDP. To explore the detailed structure of SbiSALTY, we expressed and purified the uniformly 15N-labeled protein for NMR analysis. The acquired high-resolution 2D 1H-15N TROSY-HSQC spectrum indicates that SbiSALTY is an IDP as the signal dispersion is minimal, particularly in the 1H dimension (Fig. 7e). This minimal dispersion is typical of IDPs95,96. The overall number of identified 1H/15N backbone amide correlations found in the spectrum fits the expected amount based on the SbiSALTY primary structure, confirming the one dominant conformation of the disordered state of the intact protein in solution. We did not observe any 1H/15N chemical shift changes with concentrations ranging from 50 µM to 1 mM. These data suggest that SbiSALTY is water-soluble and intrinsically disordered.
Since SbiSALTY is a water-soluble protein, its abundance in our membrane proteomes was highly diminished and its allocation to a subcellular compartment should be taken with caution. Nevertheless, SbiSALTY was detected and was most abundant at higher NaCl treatments and in proximity to ribosomal proteins (Supplementary Fig. 11). Expression of SbiSALTY in rice protoplasts suggests its localization to the ER, as it co-localized with an ER marker (Fig. 7f–l). The homolog of this gene in Arabidopsis (RGGA, AT4G16830) was observed to localize to the cytosol and interact with non poly-A RNA97, suggesting it might interact with ribosomes. Ribosomes bound to the ER (rough ER) cause an increase in the membrane’s density when compared to the ribosomes-devoid smooth ER, leading to an increased specific gravity between 1.15–1.1898,99, where SbiSALTY was most abundant. Most ribosomal proteins were also identified across these fractions. Sequence analysis of SbiSALTY with Phyre2100 predicted it to be a highly disordered protein, but showed a short conserved not disordered region to be most similar to the 40 S ribosomal protein S7 (Supplementary Fig. 24). This small, conserved region falls within the region predicted to form coiled-coils and could help SbiSALTY interact with ribosomes in the ER of plants.
Discussion
Here we studied the responses of the highly salt tolerant S. bigelovii to NaCl and generated the first genomic resources for the genus Salicornia. These plants are able to accumulate very high concentrations of NaCl in their shoot whilst avoiding visible symptoms of ion toxicity. Nevertheless, S. bigelovii plants displayed enhanced growth upon the addition of NaCl and accumulated very high concentrations of Na+ and Cl- in its shoots and roots (Fig. 1).
The positive effect of NaCl on growth was also observed at a transcriptional and protein level, where genes and proteins related to growth, photosynthesis, cell wall modification, water transport, and ATP synthesis were found to be upregulated upon NaCl treatment. The high concentration of both Na+ and Cl- in shoots and its positive correlation with water content suggest a possible role for both ions as osmolytes. Na+ was found to be more effective than Cl- or K+ for supporting S. europaea growth101. Nevertheless, a set of adaptations and possibly a tight regulation of specialized ion transporters would be required to avoid ion toxicity, moving ions out of the cytosol, and in particular into the large volume of the vacuole. We did not observe many differences at a transcriptional or protein level between plants treated with 200 mM and 600 mM NaCl for 6 weeks. It is possible that plants had already acclimated to the increased salinity after 6 weeks, or that post-translational modifications such as phosphorylation play an important role in the modulation of these responses through the regulation of transporters. It would be interesting to assess the prevalence and impact of these modifications.
Gene ontology enrichment analysis of unique orthogroups in Salicornia revealed enrichment in terms related to responses to high light intensity, toxin metabolism and ion channel activity, in the form of calcium channels. These calcium channels could help in calcium signaling upon NaCl stress, allowing for a fast response. However, neither an enrichment specific to Na+ transport nor an expansion in known Na+ transporters were observed. Suggesting that Salicornia might use the same set of genes found in other plants, albeit adapted for highly saline environments, or possess genes involved in salinity tolerance that have not yet been discovered.
Analysis of the organellar membrane proteomes revealed a possible neo-localization of SOS1 to the tonoplast (Fig. 4). SbiSOS1 was highly abundant in all treatments and was always allocated with high confidence to the tonoplast in our organellar membrane proteomes. Transient expression of SbiSOS1 in tobacco cells confirmed its presence in the tonoplast (Fig. 5). SbiSOS1 also localized to the plasma membrane, raising the question if this dual localization of SbiSOS1 also occurs in Salicornia or if Salicornia possesses a mechanism preventing SbiSOS1 accumulation in the plasma membrane. However, this could also be the result of excess protein being targeted to the plasma membrane due to overexpression with the 35 S promoter, as the secretory pathway is the default pathway for membrane protein localization77. In silico analysis of SbiSOS1 revealed regions of increased divergence when compared to Arabidopsis SOS1, particularly at the N and C termini of the protein, which could be involved in its localization to the tonoplast. Deletion of the C-terminal of Arabidopsis SOS1 results in its loss of autoinhibition102, further investigation is required to see if the observed differences in this region lead to changes in regulation or activity. SbiSOS1 has been described as a Na+/H+ antiporter localized to the plasma membrane in Arabidopsis, where it transports Na+ outside of the cell48,71,72,73,74. The novel localization of SOS1 to the tonoplast in S. bigelovii could allow for high concentrations of Na+ to be compartmentalized into the vacuole, preventing Na+ from causing toxicity in the cytoplasm, and allowing its use as an osmolyte for water retention. Compartmentalization of Na+ in the vacuole would be advantageous in highly saline environments, as the otherwise continuous Na+ extrusion from the cytoplasm to the extracellular space would be highly energetically demanding. V-ATPases, vacuolar pyrophosphatases, and TIPs were amongst the most abundant proteins in our membrane proteomes. The V-ATPase and vacuolar pyrophosphatases would generate H+ ions to be used by the Na+/H+ antiporter activity of SOS1103, while the TIPs would allow water flow into the vacuole, helping the increase in volume of Salicornia vacuoles that occurs in response to elevated salinity.
We identified 11 proteins that showed a phenotype in yeast – four increased salt tolerance and seven decreased it. Two NHX proteins decreased salt tolerance (SbiNHX1 and SbiNHX2), while one greatly increased it (SbiNHX4), which could be related to their different subcellular localization in yeast. Alternatively, their predicted C-terminus localization with respect to the membrane was opposite in SbiNHX4 when compared to SbiNHX1 and SbiNHX2 and could play a role in their regulation, as the binding of proteins to the C-terminus can influence their activities104,105. We also identified an SbiHKT1 whose expression was reduced in planta upon NaCl treatment, and which led to cell death in yeast. In planta, HKT1 seems likely to reduce root-to-shoot translocation of Na+ by removing Na+ from the transpiration stream into xylem parenchyma cells106. The detrimental effect that some genes had in yeast might not only be attributed to a negative effect of the expression of these genes upon salinity in plants but could also be a consequence of subcellular mis-localization in yeast cells, as expression in yeast may not accurately reflect organellar localization in planta. Furthermore, it could also be a consequence of the differences between the unicellular nature of yeast as opposed to the multicellularity of plants, as different plant tissues might behave differently in the presence and compartmentalization of NaCl.
Two predicted intrinsically disordered proteins, SbiIDP1 and SbiSALTY, showed contrasting phenotypes in yeast. SbiSALTY is an Arginine-Glycine-Glycine (RGG) motif protein and greatly increased salt tolerance in yeast. RGG proteins are not well studied in plants, but in humans are the second largest RNA binding protein family, and have been associated with transcription, pre-mRNA splicing, RNA transport, translation, ribonucleotide biogenesis, and other mechanisms such as DNA repair and modulation of chromatin structure84,107,108,109. In Arabidopsis, the overexpression of AtRGGA, encoding an RGG protein, increased salt and drought tolerance compared to wild type plants97. The protein localized to the cytosol, and bound non poly-A RNA97. Expression of Arabidopsis homologs RGGA and AT4G17520 in yeast also increased salt tolerance, albeit to a lesser extent than SbiSALTY (Fig. 6). NMR and CD analyses confirmed SbiSALTY to be an intrinsically disordered protein. Some of the most commonly known IDPs are the Late Embryogenesis Abundant (LEA) proteins, which are involved in dehydration tolerance110,111,112. IDPs are considered to be primary constituents of membrane-less compartments within the cell113,114,115. Membrane-less compartments display liquid-like properties116 and form structures such as stress granules and p-bodies, which have been observed to contain ribosomal subunits and translation initiation factors117,118,119. The RGG domain is intrinsically disordered, and RGG proteins have been associated with the formation of membrane-less compartments such as RNA-granules in Drosophila, C. elegans, and humans, regulating RNA stability and translation84,120,121. In our membrane proteomes, SbiSALTY was found to be most abundant at densities where ribosomal proteins are found and the expected density of the rough ER. However, a precise localization of SbiSALTY in our proteomes is difficult, as soluble protein abundances were reduced during membrane enrichment and no Mg2+ was added to our density fractions to preserve the ribosomes binding to the ER98,99. Nevertheless, in planta, SbiSALTY was found to be localized to the ER. It was recently found that three Arabidopsis RGG proteins, AtRGGA (AT4G16830), AtRGGB (AT4G17520), and AtRGGC (AT5G47210), interact with structural components of the 40 S and 60 S ribosomal subunits122. SbiSALTY has a high degree of similarity with these three proteins, 62%, 55%, and 58%, respectively and is likely to also interact with ribosomal proteins. The intrinsically disordered nature of SbiSALTY, together with its predicted ability to form coiled-coils at a region highly similar to the 40 S ribosomal proteins S7, could provide it with the required flexibility to form part of membrane-less compartments, where it could bind to RNA-containing structures such as ribosomes, possibly stabilizing or protecting them during salt stress. The increased gene expression and protein abundance of SbiSALTY upon salt stress suggests a beneficial effect of this protein upon highly saline conditions, posing the question of why this protein is not always expressed at the same levels. It could be that SbiSALTY has a “penalty”, perhaps its binding to ribosomes limits translation under non-saline conditions yet provides a protecting effect at higher salinities, allowing for sustained translation.
The analyses presented in this study provide new insights into the responses of S. bigelovii to salinity and the possible adaptations and mechanisms that allow it to thrive in highly saline environments. The resources generated open the possibility for further research in Salicornia, which will increase our knowledge of salinity tolerance and will help in the development of salt tolerant crops.
Methods
Plant material and growth conditions
Salicornia bigelovii seeds were kindly provided by Dr. E. Glenn of the Environmental Research Laboratory, University of Arizona, Tucson, USA. Salicornia europaea seeds were collected in the Dead Sea area and were kindly provided by Dr. Moshe Sagi of the Blaustein Institute for Desert Research (BIDR), Israel. For phenotypic, transcriptomic, and proteomic experiments in S. bigelovii, seeds derived from inbred populations were sown in Metro-Mix® 360 soil (SunGro Horticulture, USA) contained in plastic trays and watered daily to 70% soil water holding capacity. S. bigelovii plants of one inbred line were grown during the months of May–July 2015 in a glasshouse in KAUST under natural irradiance and kept at a constant temperature of 28/24 °C day/night with 65% relative humidity. Five weeks after sowing, S. bigelovii plants were treated with saline water to reach a final concentration of 0, 5, 50, 200, or 600 mM NaCl in the soil. Three trays per treatment, for a total of 12 trays, were grown for the experiments with all replicates showing consistent phenotypes.
Plant phenotype and ion content
Shoot diameter imaging and measurements were obtained by finely slicing S. bigelovii shoots with a surgical blade and examining them under a light microscope (AZ100 Multizoom, Nikon, Japan). Shoot area cross sections were measured with NIS-Elements BR software (Nikon). For ion content, shoots and roots of S. bigelovii were harvested 1 and 6 weeks after salt treatment. Samples were rinsed with MilliQ water and had the surface water removed with paper towels prior to fresh mass measurements. Samples were then dried in an oven at 70 °C for 3 days and had their dry mass measured. 10 mg of dried tissue were mixed with 1.5 mL of 500 mM nitric acid, heated at 80 °C for 3 h, and used for Na and K content analyses by flame photometry (Flame photometer model 420, Sherwood Scientific Ltd, United Kingdom) and Cl- content (Chloride analyser model 926, Sherwood Scientific Ltd, United Kingdom). Flame photometry measures the total element in a sample, not distinguishing between ionic and non-ionic forms; nevertheless, these measurements will be referred to as “Na+” and “K+” and not as “Na” and “K” as most of these elements are found as ions in the cell. In contrast, the choride analyzer uses titration with silver nitrate to measure chloride in its ionic form, “Cl-“. Water content was calculated as (fresh mass – dry mass) / dry mass. Shoot sap osmolality was obtained by crushing S. bigelovii shoots and centrifuging at 10,000 x g for 2 min. 10 µL of the supernatant was measured with a VAPRO® (ELITechGroup). For mean comparison across treatments, statistical analyses of three samples per treatment were done with the R package stats v.3.6.3123.
DNA extraction, library preparation, and sequencing
High molecular weight (HMW) DNA was isolated from the young secondary stems of a single plant after dark-treatment for 48 h. DNA was isolated using a modified CTAB method. Briefly, 5 grams of tissue were combined with 10 mL of CTAB Buffer (2% (w/v) CTAB, 1.4 M NaCl, 100 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8), 20 mM EDTA (pH 8), 2% (w/v) PVP (MW 10,000), 1% (v/v) Triton X-100, 0.1% (v/v) βME, 1.9 mg/mL RNase-A, and 10 mg/mL proteinase K). Extracts were incubated and mixed for 45 min at 65 °C before isolation of the aqueous phase with chloroform:isoamyl alcohol (24:1), done thrice. The DNA was precipitated in 0.6 volumes of pure isopropyl alcohol. The HMW DNA was pelleted and washed with 70% (v/v) ethanol and resuspended in TE buffer (pH 8.0). HMW DNA was further purified using AMPure PB beads (Beckman Coulter, USA) and resuspended in TE buffer (pH 8.0). High molecular weight DNA was used for HiFi sequencing of 4 PacBio HiFi SMRT cells, accounting for 57,386,832,994 bp or ~28 x coverage for S. bigelovii and 2 PacBio HiFi SMRT cells, accounting for 17,950,298,972 bp or ~34 x coverage for S. europaea and were sequenced in a PacBio Sequel II system at The Arizona Genomics Institute of The University of Arizona (USA). For genome size estimation using k-mer analysis, Illumina per species were sequenced in a NovaSeq 6000 system at The Arizona Genomics Institute of The University of Arizona (USA), resulting in 112,237,052,136 bp or ~ 55x coverage for S. bigelovii and 29,229,294,386 bp or ~56x coverage for S. europaea.
RNA extraction and library preparation
To generate reference transcriptomes for gene annotation, RNA samples from shoots and roots from S. bigelovii and S. europaea were extracted with an RNeasy Plant Mini Kit (Qiagen). RNA quality was determined with a Bioanalyzer 2100 using an RNA 600 Nano kit (Agilent, USA). High quality of RNA was used to prepare RNA-Seq libraries with NEBNext® Ultra™ Directional RNA Library Prep Kit for Illumina® (New England BioLabs, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. RNA-Seq libraries were sequenced in a NovaSeq 6000 system (Illumina, USA) under paired-end mode and 151 bp read length at the Bioscience Core Labs (KAUST), resulting in 552 million ( ~ 83 Gb) and 488 million ( ~ 73 Gb) reads for S. bigelovii and S. europaea, respectively.
For gene differential expression analysis of shoots for S. bigelovii plants treated with 0, 50, 200, or 600 mM NaCl for 1 and 6 weeks, RNA was extracted with TRIzol™ and an RNA MiniPrep kit (Zymo Research, USA), following the manufacturer’s protocol. RNA quality was determined with a Bioanalyzer 2100 using an RNA 600 Nano kit (Agilent, USA) using only RNA with RIN values greater to 8. Libraries for RNA-Seq were prepared with NEBNext® Ultra™ Directional RNA Library Prep Kit for Illumina® (New England BioLabs, USA) for three replicates per treatment resulting in 24 libraries with a mean insert size of 300 bp. DNA quality was determined with a high sensitivity DNA kit (Agilent, USA) using a Bioanalyzer 2100. Libraries were barcoded and sequenced in two lanes of Illumina HiSeq 2000 generating ~540 million paired end reads of 2 × 101 bp or ~22.5 million reads per library (Supplementary Data 4) at the Bioscience Core Labs (KAUST, Saudi Arabia).
Chromosome counting and genome size estimation
To count the number of chromosomes of S. bigelovii and S. europaea, chromosome spreads were prepared from actively growing roots as previously described124 with minor modifications. Roots were collected into 50 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) containing 0.2% (v/v) β-mercaptoethanol. The roots were transferred to 0.05% (w/v) 8-hydroxyquinoline and incubated for 3 h at room temperature, fixed in 3:1 ethanol:acetic acid fixative and stored in 70% (v/v) ethanol at −20 °C for further use. At least twenty roots were washed three times with distilled water within 10 min and once in 1xKCl buffer (pH 4.0) for 5 min. Meristematic zones of the roots were excised and digested in 200 µl of the enzyme solution containing 4% (w/v) cellulase and 1% (v/v) pectolyase for 48 min at 37 °C, then 200 µL of TE buffer (pH 7.6) was added to stop the reaction. Root partitions were washed three times in 96% (v/v) ethanol and 25 μL of 9:1 ice-cold acetic acid: methanol mixture was added. The root tips were broken with a rounded dissecting needle and the tube was kept on ice for 5 min before dropping. The suspension (5 µL) was dropped onto microscopic slide placed in a humid polystyrene box. The preparations were air-dried and counterstained with DAPI mounted in VECTASHIELD Antifade Mounting Medium (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA). The slides were examined with an Axio Imager Z.2 Zeiss microscope (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany). Pictures were captured by the ISIS software 5.4.7 (Metasystems) and chromosomes were counted manually. A minimum of five mitotic metaphase plates per slide were captured. Genome sizes were estimated through flow cytometry and k-mer frequencies. Nuclear DNA content was estimated by flow cytometry from three different individual inbred plants per species, as previously described125, using Zea mays L. ‘CE-777 (2 C = 5.43 pg DNA) and Solanum lycopersicum L. ‘Stupické polní rané’ (2 C = 1.96 pg DNA) as internal reference standards for S. bigelovii and S. europaea, respectively. Samples were analyzed using a CyFlow Space flow cytometer (Sysmex Partec GmbH, Görlitz, Germany) equipped with a 532 nm laser. The gain of the instrument was adjusted so that the peak representing G1 nuclei of the standard was positioned approximately on channel 100 (Zea mays) or 170 (Solanum lycopersicum) on a histogram of relative fluorescence intensity when using a 512-channel scale. Three individual plants were sampled and analyzed three times. At least 5000 nuclei per sample were analyzed and 2 C nuclear DNA contents were calculated from means of G1 peak positions by applying the formula: 2 C nuclear DNA content = (sample G1 peak mean) × (standard 2 C DNA content) / (standard G1 peak mean). The mean nuclear DNA content in pg was converted to genome size in bp using the conversion factor 1 pg DNA = 0.978 Gbp125. Genome size estimation through k-mer frequencies was done with FindGSE28 by counting k-mer frequencies of Illumina or HiFi reads with Jellyfish126. For genome size estimation with Illumina reads, reads were first trimmed with Trimmomatic127 and quality checked with FastQC128 prior to k-mer analysis.
Genome assembly and annotation
The genomes of S. bigelovii and S. europaea were assembled using the PacBio HiFi reads with HiFiasm129. HiFiasm was run with the --n-hap 4 and -s 0.35 commands for S. bigelovii and with the -s 0.35 command for S. europaea. The genome assembly completeness was measured with Merqury29, resulting in 97.13% and 99.29% read k-mer presence in the genome assemblies for S. bigelovii and S. europaea, respectively. The genomes of the Salicornia species were masked for repetitive elements by generating a de novo repeat library with RepeatModeler for each species and used to mask the genome with RepeatMasker130,131,132. Hints for genome annotation were generated by mapping RNA-Seq data from each species into their corresponding genome with HISAT2133. Protein predictions on the masked genomes were carried out with BRAKER2134,135,136,137,138,139,140,141, using the mapped RNA-Seq reads and the Viridiplantae dataset from OrthoDB142 as hints. Predicted proteins were then annotated with matches against Swiss-Prot, TrEMBL31, NCBI NR32 with BLASTp143,144, and the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG)35 with KofamKOALA145, while protein domains were identified with InterProScan146. Gene ontology terms38,39 were retrieved from the Swiss-Prot annotation and InterProScan results. MapMan33,34 terms were retrieved with Mercator34,147. The completeness of the annotations was assessed with BUSCO using the Eudicotyledons v.10 dataset. Genome annotations can be found in Supplementary Data 1 and 2.
Orthology and phylogenetic analyses
Groups of orthologous proteins were identified with OrthoMCL37 for representative genomes of Brassicaceae: Arabidopsis thaliana (Araport11)148,149 and Brassica rapa (FPSc v1.3)150; Amaranthaceae: Beta vulgaris (v1.2)151, Chenopodium quinoa (v1)152, Salicornia bigelovii (this study), Salicornia europaea (this study), and Spinacia oleracea (v1)153; Fabaceae: Glycine max (Wm82.a2.v1)154 and Phaseolus vulgaris (v2.1)155; Solanaceae: Solanum lycopersicum (ITAG4.0)156 and Solanum melongena (v3)157; and Poaceae Sorghum bicolor (v3.1.1)158. One isoform per gene was used for the analysis. All genome protein predictions were re-annotated by performing BLASTp143,144 against the Swiss-Prot database31. Gene Ontology (GO) terms38,39 were extracted from each best hit for each protein. Orthogroups shared across lists were identified with the Venn diagram creator of the University of Gent (http://bioinformatics.psb.ugent.be/webtools/Venn/). GO enrichment analyses on the orthogroup lists were analyzed with BINGO159,160 using a Benjamini and Hochberg false discovery rate correction161 of 0.05.
Family phylogenetic reconstruction was done by selecting BUSCO orthologs from the Eudicotyledons v10 dataset present in every species, resulting in a set of 1,377 proteins. Protein sequences were aligned with MUSCLE162,163, informative sites were identified and retained with Gblocks164, the alignments were concatenated and an appropriate protein evolutionary model was identified with ModelTest-NG165. Phylogenetic analysis was done with maximum likelihood inference with RAxML-NG166 under a JTT + I + G4 model and 1000 bootstrap replicates under the Transfer Bootstrap Expectation (TBE) method167. For the phylogenetic reconstruction of NHX proteins, Arabidopsis NHX protein sequences were searched in the genomes of all other species by BLAST, with a cutoff e-value of e-10. Only proteins longer than 200 aa were used for the analysis (Supplementary Data 4). Protein sequences were aligned with MUSCLE and an appropriate protein evolutionary model was identified with ModelTest-NG. Phylogenetic analysis was done with maximum likelihood inference with RAxML-NG under a JTT + G4 model and 1000 bootstrap replicates under the Transfer Bootstrap Expectation (TBE) method. Trees were visualized with iTOL168. For SOS1 sequence analyses, SOS1 proteins were aligned with MUSCLE and visualized with Jalview169. Nonsynonymous and synonymous substitution rates between S. biglovii and Arabidopsis SOS1 were identified with KaKs calculator 3.078, dividing the coding sequence in 6 bp sliding windows of 57 bp in length.
Gene differential expression analysis
For gene differential expression analysis of S. bigelovii shoots, RNA-Seq reads were adapter trimmed with Trimmomatic v0.39127 and quality checked with FastQC128. Transcript abundances were estimated with Salmon170 and differentially expressed genes were identified with DESeq2171 with a minimum of 10 counts and an adjusted p-value < 0.05. DE genes were clustered by hierarchical clustering of log2 transformed expression and displayed using MeV v.4.9172. GO enrichment analyses were done with BINGO159,160 using a Benjamini and Hochberg false discovery rate correction161 of 0.05.
Overrepresentation of MapMan33,34 bins were tested with Wilcoxon Rank Sum test and corrected for multiple testing with the Benjamini Hochberg correction with a p-value < 0.05.
Plant membrane extraction, fractionation, and protein quantitation
Membrane preparations were obtained for S. bigelovii shoots treated with 0, 50, 200, or 600 mM NaCl for 6 weeks with three biological replicates per treatment and processed similarly as described in Dunkley, et al.57 with all steps done at 4 °C. 100–120 g of shoot tissue were blended in homogenization buffer (5% glycerol, 100 mM KCl, 0.5% PVP, 10 mM EDTA, 2 mM PMSF, 10% sucrose, 50 mM HEPES, pH 7.8) and osmotically adjusted with sucrose to shoot sap osmolality measured with a VAPRO® vapor pressure osmometer (ELITechGroup Biomedical Systems). The homogenate was filtered through three layers of cheesecloth and spun at 10,000 x g for 30 min to sediment debris and intact organelles. The supernatant containing the microsomal fraction was transferred to a new tube and spun at 100,000 x g for 1 h. The pellet was resuspended in 2 mL resuspension buffer (5% glycerol, 50 mM KCl, 10% sucrose, 25 mM HEPES, pH 7.8) and layered on top of a 24 mL continuous sucrose density gradient (20 – 45%). Gradients were spun at 100,000 x g for 14 h. Fractions were recovered each 2 mL with an Auto Densi-Flow II (Buchler Instruments) resulting in 12 different density fractions. Fraction density was measured with a digital refractometer (Brix/RI-Chek, Reichert). To release cytosolic proteins trapped inside microsomes, fractions were diluted 3 times in 160 mM Na2CO3, left on ice for 30 min, and spun at 100,000 x g for 1 h. The pellet was washed with 160 mM Na2CO3 and spun again at 100,000 x g for 1 h. The pellet was washed with water and spun at 100,000 x g for 1 h. The resultant pellet was resuspended in 1 mL of storage buffer (7 M urea, 2 M thiourea, 5 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.1) and stored at −80 °C. Protein concentrations were measured by the Bradford assay173.
Protein digestion and LC-MS analyses
Proteins for each fraction were trypsin digested based on filter aided sample preparation59. 30 µg of protein were incubated with 100 mM DTT for 1 h at 37 °C. Samples were loaded into a Vivacon 500 hydrosart 30 kDa filter (Sartorius) and spun at 14,000 x g for 15 min. 100 µL of 50 mM iodoacetamide were added to the column, incubated for 20 min, and spun at 14,000 x g for 10 min. 100 µL of 8 M urea, 100 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.8 were added and the sample was spun at 14,000 x g for 15 min. This step was repeated twice. 40 µL of trypsin 1:100 (Sequencing grade modified trypsin, Promega) in 50 mM ammonium bicarbonate were added to the sample and incubated in a wet chamber at 37 °C overnight. Samples were spun at 14,000 x g for 10 min. 100 µL of 50 mM ammonium bicarbonate were added to the column and spun at 14,000 x g for 15 min. 50 µL of 0.5 M NaCl were added to the column and spun at 14,000 x g for 15 min followed by the addition of 50 µL ammonium bicarbonate and another centrifugation step at 14,000 x g for 15 min. Filtered peptides were acidified by the addition of 2% trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) and desalted with Sep-Pak C18 cartridges (Waters Scientific). Samples were lyophilized, resuspended in 15 µL 3% acetonitrile 0.1% TFA, and quantified with Nanodrop measurement at 280 nm wavelength. 1 µg of peptides for label-free LC/MS analyses were loaded to an Ultimate 3000 UHPLC/Q-Exactive system (Thermo Scientific) with an Acclaim PepMap RSLC 75 μm × 15 cm nanoViper column and run for 1 h.
MS spectra analyses and protein abundance quantitation
Mass spectra peak files were compared against a combined set of S. bigelovii and S. europaea proteins derived from their genome annotation with Mascot v. 2.8.0.1174. Database searching parameters included trypsin as digestion enzyme, peptide tolerance of ± 10 ppm, fragment tolerance of ± 0.5 Da, carbamidomethyl of cysteine as fixed modification, oxidation of methionine as variable modification, two maximum missed cleavage sites, and reverse sequences as decoy. Mascot files were loaded into Scaffold v.4.8.8175 for protein quantitation and differential abundance analyses. For differential abundance analyses, Mascot files were loaded as Multidimensional Protein Identification Technology (MudPIT) with three biological replicates per treatment. Protein identification required a minimum of two assigned peptides per protein, a greater than 95% peptide probability by the Scaffold Local FDR algorithm, and a greater than 99% probability of protein identification (Source Data file). Protein abundances were normalized by total spectrum counts. Differential protein abundances were tested at a significance of p ≤ 0.05 and corrected for multiple testing with the Hochberg-Benjamini correction161. Differentially abundant proteins were analyzed for pathway and overrepresentation with MapMan33,34,176 and GO enrichment analysis was performed with BINGO159.
Subcellular localization prediction
Protein subcellular localization was predicted with the pRoloc65,66,67,68,69,70 R package. To create a Salicornia organelle marker set, protein sequences of S. bigelovii and S. europaea genomes were combined. The Salicornia protein dataset was blasted against 279 Arabidopsis organelle markers retrieved from pRolocdata57,60,61,62,63,64. Positive hits with Arabidopsis markers were in silico predicted for subcellular compartmentalization with mGOASVM Plant V2177. Proteins whose predicted subcellular localization by mGOASVM Plant V2 was congruent with their Arabidopsis organelle marker blast hit, were assigned as Salicornia organelle markers. To predict for protein subcellular localization based on protein abundance profiles in the 12 density fractions, protein abundances per fraction of samples coming from shoots of S. bigelovii plants treated with 0, 50, 200, and 600 mM NaCl were analyzed with pRoloc. pRoloc was run under a supervised maximum likelihood (ML) analysis with a support vector machines analysis with 1000 iterations and using the generated Salicornia organelle marker set as reference.
Validation of subcellular compartmentalization prediction of pRoloc by Western blot
The predicted subcellular localization by pRoloc was validated with western blots against organelle markers. 5 µg of protein per density fraction were separated in a 4–20% SDS-PAGE gel and used for western blot analyses using antibodies for different organelles (polyclonal antibodies generated in rabbit, Agrisera): Chloroplast PsbA (catalog number AS05 084) 1:10000 working dilution; Plasma membrane H+ ATPase (catalog number AS07 260) 1:1000 working dilution; and Tonoplast V-ATPase (catalog number AS07 213) 1:2000 working dilution. Signal was detected by chemiluminescence using WesternBreeze® Chemiluminescent Kit anti-rabbit (Invitrogen) and according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Western blot profiles for different subcellular localization marker proteins were compared against protein profiles generated with pRoloc.
Subcellular localization assays in tobacco leaves
To assess the subcellular localization of SbiSOS1, reporter fusions were generated and transiently expressed in tobacco leaves. To generate the constructs, the CDS of SbiSOS1 and AtSOS1 (At2g01980) were synthesized by GenScript and cloned into the pGGC000178 entry vector and the modules were cloned into the pGGZ001 destination vector (pGGC000 and PGGZ001 were a gift from Jan Lohmann, Addgene plasmid #48858; http://n2t.net/addgene:48858; RRID:Addgene_48858 and Addgene plasmid #48868; http://n2t.net/addgene:48868; RRID:Addgene_48868). The Arabidopsis plasma membrane intrinsic protein 1;4 (AtPIP1;4) and the vesicle associated membrane protein (AtVAMP711)76 were used as plasma membrane and tonoplast markers, respectively. The overexpression constructs 35 S::SbiSOS1-eGFP, 35 S::eGFP-SbiSOS1, 35 S::AtSOS1-eGFP, 35 S::mCherry-AtPIP1;4, 35 S::mCherry-AtVAMP711, and 35 S::eGFP (as a negative control) were assembled by GreenGate cloning178. All constructs were transformed into the Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain GV3101179 carrying the pSOUP plasmid180 by electroporation181. Leaves from 4-week old Nicotiana benthamiana plants were inoculated with A. tumefaciens culture mixtures as follows: protein of interest (SbiSOS1 or eGFP), marker protein (AtPIP1;4 or AtVAMP711), and p19 (viral gene silencing suppressor to enhance transient expression efficiency)182. After 96 h of agroinfiltration, the subcellular localization of SbiSOS1 and AtSOS1 were determined by their co-localization with the two markers in leaf epidermal cells treated with 0.3 M D-mannitol for 3 h by confocal microscopy. Images were captured using a ZEISS LMS 710 microscope and analyzed by ZEN 2.3 SP1 and Fiji183. The excitation/emission wavelengths used in the confocal microscopy were 594/580-630 nm for mCherry and 488/500-530 nm for eGFP.
RNA extraction and cloning of candidate genes into E. coli
RNA was extracted from shoots of S. bigelovii plants grown in 200 mM NaCl using TRIzol™ with an RNA MiniPrep kit (Zymo Research, USA), following the manufacturer’s protocol. cDNA was prepared from the extracted, good quality RNA with SuperScript™ II (Invitrogen, USA), following the manufacturer’s protocol. Genes were amplified by PCR using the high fidelity KOD DNA polymerase (Toyobo, Japan), cloned into pCR™8/GW/TOPO® (Invitrogen, USA), and transformed into E. coli. Since S. bigelovii is an autotetraploid undomesticated species, several isoforms per gene might be cloned. Entry clones were sequenced and compared with the reference transcriptome. Genes that did not match the sequence were re-amplified and cloned again. If the same polymorphisms were observed in subsequent amplifications, they were considered natural allelic variants and proceeded to further analysis. In the case two or more alleles were observed, alleles sharing equal sequences with S. brachiata or S. europaea were selected as it was assumed that conserved alleles across species would be more likely to be functional. Entry clones with and without stop codons per gene were recombined with Gateway™ LR Clonase™ II (Invitrogen, USA) into pAG426GAL-ccdB-EGFP. pAG426GAL-ccdB-EGFP was a gift from Susan Lindquist (Addgene plasmid # 14203).
Yeast transformation, spot assays, and subcellular localization
Plasmids were transformed into the salt sensitive AXT3 (Δena1-4::HIS3 Δnha1::LEU2 Δnhx1::TRP1) yeast strain by the lithium acetate method184. Yeast spot assays were carried out in synthetic defined (SD) medium: 1.7 g/L BD™ Difco™ yeast nitrogen base without amino acids and ammonium sulfate, 5 g/L ammonium sulfate, 0.77 g/L complete supplement mix (CSM) Drop-out – uracil (Formedium), adjusted to pH 5.6 with KOH, and supplemented with either 2% glucose or galactose; or in arginine phosphate (AP) medium185: 10 mM L-arginine, 8 mM phosphoric acid, 2 mM MgSO4, 0.2 mM CaCl2, 20 µg/L biotin, 2 mg/L calcium pantothenate, 2 µg/L folic acid, 400 µg/L niacin, 200 µg/L riboflavin, 10 mg/L inositol, 200 µg/L p-aminobenzoic acid, 400 µg/L ZnSO4, 400 µg/L pyridoxine hydrochloride, 400 µg/L thiamine hydrochloride, 40 µg/L CuSO4, 500 µg/L H3BO3, 100 µg/L KI, 200 µg/L FeCl3, 200 µg/L Na2MoO4, 1 mM KCl, 0.77 g/L complete supplement mix (CSM) Drop-out – uracil (Formedium), adjusted to pH 6.5 with L-arginine, and supplemented with either 2% glucose or galactose.
Yeast spot assays were done with three different colonies per construct. In short, to normalize growth, yeast transformed with pAG426GAL-gene-EGFP were grown in SD or AP medium with 2% glucose for 2 days at 30 °C. 200 µL of the pre-grown yeast were transferred into 1.8 mL of medium with 2% glucose and grown for 16 h at 30 °C. The OD600 was measured and each sample was adjusted to an OD600 of 0.6 by diluting with medium without any carbon source. For each sample, four 10-fold dilutions were prepared. 10 µL per sample were spotted in each SD or AP plate. SD plates consisted in SD medium with 2% agar and supplemented with either 0, 100 mM, 150 mM, 175 mM, and 200 mM NaCl or 800 mM KCl. SD plates were supplemented with 2% galactose for all treatments and with 2% glucose for plates with 0 mM NaCl as control. AP plates consisted of AP medium with 2% agar and supplemented with either 0, 20 mM, 30 mM, 40 mM, and 60 mM NaCl. AP plates were supplemented with 2% galactose for all treatments and with 2% glucose for plates with 0 mM NaCl as control. Plates were grown at 30 °C for 2–5 days. Subcellular localization of proteins was analyzed by EGFP fusions in the C’ terminus of each protein and observed with a confocal laser scanning microscope (LSM 710, Zeiss, Germany). Images were acquired with Zen 2009 image software (Zess, Germany) and analyzed with Fiji image analysis software183.
To assess the subcellular localization of SbiSALTY in planta, SbiSALTY was cloned into the pBWA(V)HS-GLosgfp vector and transfected into rice protoplasts as described in Zhang, et al.186. The ER-mCherry marker ER-rk (TAIR: CD3-959)187, which consists of the AtWAK2 signal peptide at the N-terminus fused to the reporter protein mCherry with the ER retention signal His-Asp-Glu-Leu at its C-terminus, and empty pBWA(V)HS-GLosgfp vector were used to confirm the subcellular localization of SbiSALTY.
Protein expression and purification
cDNA encoding SALTY was codon optimized (Integrated DNA Technologies, Inc.), subcloned into the Expresso® SUMO Cloning system, a modified PET32a vector with an N-terminal His6-SUMO expression tag and SUMO protease cleavage site (Lucigen Corporation). SALTY fusion was expressed in Codon + BL21 (DE3) E. coli cells from Merck (Cat# CMC0014). Cells were grown in Luria broth or labeled M9 medium with kanamycin (His6-SUMO-SALTY). The pre-culture and unlabeled cell growth were accomplished using the auto-induction method188. The cell culture media were grown and suspended until OD = 0.6, then induced with 0.5 mM IPTG and incubated at 25 °C for 24 h. Cells were collected and resuspended in 50 mL lysis buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 250 mM NaCl, 30 mM Imidazole, 1 mM TCEP for His6-tag recombinant proteins) per liter of culture. 0.5 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF) and 1 mM β-mercaptoethanol (β-ME) were added to the lysis buffer. Cells were lysed using a cell disruptor (Constant Systems) and DNase I and RNase A (Invitrogen, Cat# 12091039 and AM2224) were added to digest the DNA/RNA. After centrifugation, the clarified lysate was applied to a HisTrap HP (GE Healthcare) and eluted with elution buffer (Lysis Buffer + 0.5 M Imidazole). To remove the His6-SUMO tag, the protein was cleaved with SUMO protease (Invitrogen, Cat# 12588018), and purified using an AKTA with a HisTrap HP column. The uniform 15N-labeling of recombinant protein was done according to well-established protocols189.
Sequence analysis and circular dichroism spectroscopy
In silico prediction for intrinsically disorder domains of SbiSALTY protein was done with DisEMBL v.1.5190. Coiled-coils region prediction was done with COILS191. The circular dichroism (CD) spectra of SALTY (10 μM in 50 mM MES, 50 mM NaCl, pH 6.5) were acquired using a Jasco 1500 spectropolarimeter flushed with N2 and a cuvette with 0.1 cm path length. The spectra to investigate its secondary and tertiary structure were measured from 190 – 260 nm and 250 – 350 nm with 0.2 nm intervals. The temperature stability was assessed with temperatures ranging from 25 – 90 °C at three wavelengths, 201, 208 and 222 nm. The spectrum of the buffer was subtracted. The internal software and CAPITO (CD Analysis and Plotting Tool) were used to assess the secondary structure elements of fused SALTY based on its CD spectrum192.
Protein NMR experiments
The NMR samples of 15N-SALTY1-357 contained 50–1000 μM protein in NMR buffer (50 mM MES, 50 mM NaCl, pH 6.5, 1 mM TCEP and 5%/95% D2O/H2O v/v). All NMR spectra were acquired at 5°C on an 800 MHz Bruker Advance NEO spectrometer equipped with TCI 1H&19F/13C/15N cryogenic probe head, running Topspin version 4.0.7.
Reporting summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Portfolio Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Data availability
All sequencing data are available in the NCBI Short Read Archive (SRA), Bioprojects PRJNA733891, and PRJNA733892. Genome assemblies and annotation data can be found at www.salicorniadb.org. Protein data are available at ProteomeXchange identifier PXD051103. Source data are provided with this paper.
References
Munns, R. & Tester, M. Mechanisms of salinity tolerance. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 59, 651–681 (2008).
FAO & ITPS. Status of the world’s soil resources (SWR) - Main Report, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and Intergovernmental Technical Panel on Soils. https://openknowledge.fao.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/6ec24d75-19bd-4f1f-b1c5-5becf50d0871/content Ch. 6, 124–125 (2015).
Ivushkin, K. et al. Global mapping of soil salinity change. Remote Sens. Environ. 231, 111260 (2019).
FAO. Global Soil Partnership. http://www.fao.org/global-soil-partnership/areas-of-work/soil-salinity/en/ (2021).
UN. World Population Prospects 2019: Highlights. https://population.un.org/wpp/Publications/Files/WPP2019_Highlights.pdf (2019).
Melino, V. & Tester, M. Salt-tolerant crops: time to deliver. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 74, 671–696 (2023).
Kadereit, G. et al. A taxonomic nightmare comes true: phylogeny and biogeography of glassworts (Salicornia L., Chenopodiaceae). Taxon 56, 1143–1170 (2007).
Lv, S. et al. Multiple compartmentalization of sodium conferred salt tolerance in Salicornia europaea. Plant Physiol. Biochem 51, 47–52 (2012).
Ventura, Y. & Sagi, M. Halophyte crop cultivation: the case for Salicornia and Sarcocornia. Environ. Exp. Bot. 92, 144–153 (2013).
Reddy, M. P., Sanish, S. & Iyengar, E. R. R. Compartmentation of ions and organic compounds in Salicornia brachiata Roxb. Biol. Plant. 35, 547 (1993).
Ayala, F. & Oleary, J. W. Growth and physiology of Salicornia bigelovii torr at suboptimal salinity. Int. J. Plant Sci. 156, 197–205 (1995).
Ayala, F., OLeary, J. W. & Schumaker, K. S. Increased vacuolar and plasma membrane H+-ATPase activities in Salicornia bigelovii Torr in response to NaCl. J. Exp. Bot. 47, 25–32 (1996).
Parks, G. E., Dietrich, M. A. & Schumaker, K. S. Increased vacuolar Na+/H+ exchange activity in Salicornia bigelovii Torr. in response to NaCl. J. Exp. Bot. 53, 1055–1065 (2002).
Flowers, T. J. & Yeo, A. R. Ion relations of plants under drought and salinity. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 13, 75–91 (1986).
Glenn, E. P., Brown, J. J. & Blumwald, E. Salt tolerance and crop potential of halophytes. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 18, 829 (1999).
Webb, K. L. NaCl effects on growth and transpiration in Salicornia bigelovii a salt-marsh halophyte. Plant Soil 24, 261–268 (1966).
Brown, J. J., Glenn, E. P., Fitzsimmons, K. M. & Smith, S. E. Halophytes for the treatment of saline aquaculture effluent. Aquaculture 175, 255–268 (1999).
Ohori, T. & Fujiyama, H. Water deficit and abscisic acid production of Salicornia bigelovii under salinity stress. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 57, 566–572 (2011).
Kong, Y. & Zheng, Y. B. Potential of producing Salicornia bigelovii hydroponically as a vegetable at moderate NaCl salinity. Hortscience 49, 1154–1157 (2014).
Roy, S. J., Negrão, S. & Tester, M. Salt resistant crop plants. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 26, 115–124 (2014).
Isayenkov, S. V. & Maathuis, F. J. M. Plant salinity stress: many unanswered questions remain. Front. Plant Sci. 10, 80 (2019).
Maathuis, F. J. M. & Amtmann, A. K. + nutrition and Na+ toxicity: the basis of cellular K+ /Na+ ratios. Ann. Bot. 84, 123–133 (1999).
Davenport, R. J. & Tester, M. A weakly voltage-dependent, nonselective cation channel mediates toxic sodium influx in wheat. Plant Physiol. 122, 823–834 (2000).
Demidchik, V. & Tester, M. Sodium fluxes through nonselective cation channels in the plasma membrane of protoplasts from arabidopsis roots. Plant Physiol. 128, 379–387 (2002).
Benito, B., Haro, R., Amtmann, A., Cuin, T. A. & Dreyer, I. The twins K+ and Na+ in plants. J. Plant Physiol. 171, 723–731 (2014).
Flowers, T. J., Galal, H. K. & Bromham, L. Evolution of halophytes: multiple origins of salt tolerance in land plants. Funct. Plant Biol. 37, 604–612 (2010).
Jefferies, R. L., Davy, A. J. & Rudmik, T. Population biology of the salt marsh annual Salicornia Europaea agg. J. Ecol. 69, 17–31 (1981).
Sun, H. Q., Ding, J., Piednoel, M. & Schneeberger, K. findGSE: estimating genome size variation within human and Arabidopsis using k-mer frequencies. Bioinformatics 34, 550–557 (2018).
Rhie, A., Walenz, B. P., Koren, S. & Phillippy, A. M. Merqury: reference-free quality, completeness, and phasing assessment for genome assemblies. Genome Biol. 21, 245 (2020).
Kaligarič, M., Bohanec, B., Simonovik, B. & Šajna, N. Genetic and morphologic variability of annual glassworts (Salicornia L.) from the Gulf of Trieste (Northern Adriatic). Aquat. Bot. 89, 275–282 (2008).
Bateman, A. et al. UniProt: a worldwide hub of protein knowledge. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, D506–D515 (2019).
Coordinators, N. R. Database resources of the national center for biotechnology information. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, D7–D19 (2016).
Thimm, O. et al. MAPMAN: a user-driven tool to display genomics data sets onto diagrams of metabolic pathways and other biological processes. Plant J. 37, 914–939 (2004).
Schwacke, R. et al. MapMan4: A refined protein classification and annotation framework applicable to multi-omics data analysis. Mol. Plant 12, 879–892 (2019).
Kanehisa, M. & Goto, S. KEGG: Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 28, 27–30 (2000).
Simao, F. A., Waterhouse, R. M., Ioannidis, P., Kriventseva, E. V. & Zdobnov, E. M. BUSCO: assessing genome assembly and annotation completeness with single-copy orthologs. Bioinformatics 31, 3210–3212 (2015).
Li, L., Stoeckert, C. J. & Roos, D. S. OrthoMCL: Identification of ortholog groups for eukaryotic genomes. Genome Res. 13, 2178–2189 (2003).
Carbon, S. et al. The gene ontology resource: 20 years and still going strong. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, D330–D338 (2019).
Ashburner, M. et al. Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. Nat. Genet. 25, 25–29 (2000).
Choi, W.-G., Toyota, M., Kim, S.-H., Hilleary, R. & Gilroy, S. Salt stress-induced Ca2+ waves are associated with rapid, long-distance root-to-shoot signaling in plants. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 6497–6502 (2014).
Schmöckel, S. M. et al. Different NaCl-induced calcium signatures in the Arabidopsis thaliana ecotypes Col-0 and C24. PLoS One 10, e0117564 (2015).
Manishankar, P., Wang, N., Koster, P., Alatar, A. A. & Kudla, J. Calcium signaling during salt stress and in the regulation of ion homeostasis. J. Exp. Bot. 69, 4215–4226 (2018).
Bassil, E., Zhang, S. Q., Gong, H. J., Tajima, H. & Blumwald, E. Cation specificity of vacuolar NHX-type cation/H+ antiporters. Plant Physiol. 179, 616–629 (2019).
Apse, M. P., Aharon, G. S., Snedden, W. A. & Blumwald, E. Salt tolerance conferred by overexpression of a vacuolar Na+/H+ antiport in Arabidopsis. Science 285, 1256–1258 (1999).
Yokoi, S. et al. Differential expression and function of Arabidopsis thaliana NHX Na+/H+ antiporters in the salt stress response. Plant J. 30, 529–539 (2002).
Pardo, J. M., Cubero, B., Leidi, E. O. & Quintero, F. J. Alkali cation exchangers: roles in cellular homeostasis and stress tolerance. J. Exp. Bot. 57, 1181–1199 (2006).
Bassil, E. et al. The Arabidopsis intracellular Na+/H+ antiporters NHX5 and NHX6 are endosome associated and necessary for plant growth and development. Plant Cell Online 23, 224–239 (2011).
Shi, H., Ishitani, M., Kim, C. & Zhu, J.-K. The Arabidopsis thaliana salt tolerance gene SOS1 encodes a putative Na+/H+ antiporter. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 97, 6896–6901 (2000).
An, R. et al. AtNHX8, a member of the monovalent cation:proton antiporter-1 family in Arabidopsis thaliana, encodes a putative Li+/H+ antiporter. Plant J. 49, 718–728 (2007).
Wu, G. Q., Wang, J. L. & Li, S. J. Genome-wide identification of Na+/H+ antiporter (NHX) genes in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) and their regulated expression under salt stress. Genes 10, 401 (2019).
Zhang, L. et al. Identification of an apoplastic protein involved in the initial phase of salt stress response in rice root by two-dimensional electrophoresis. Plant Physiol. 149, 916–928 (2009).
Sunarpi et al. Enhanced salt tolerance mediated by AtHKT1 transporter-induced Na+ unloading from xylem vessels to xylem parenchyma cells. Plant J. 44, 928–938 (2005).
Davenport, R. J. et al. The Na+ transporter AtHKT1;1 controls retrieval of Na+ from the xylem in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Environ. 30, 497–507 (2007).
Katschnig, D., Bliek, T., Rozema, J. & Schat, H. Constitutive high-level SOS1 expression and absence of HKT1;1 expression in the salt-accumulating halophyte Salicornia dolichostachya. Plant Sci. 234, 144–154 (2015).
Hodges, T. K., Leonard, R. T., Keenan, T. W. & Bracker, C. E. Purification of an ion-stimulated adenosine-triphosphatase from plant roots - association with plasma-membranes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 69, 3307 (1972).
Yang, H. & Murphy, A. Membrane preparation, sucrose density gradients and two-phase separation fractionation from five-day-old Arabidopsis seedlings. Bio-protocol 3, e1014 (2013).
Dunkley, T. P. J. et al. Mapping the Arabidopsis organelle proteome. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 6518–6523 (2006).
Sadowski, P. G. et al. Quantitative proteomic approach to study subcellular localization of membrane proteins. Nat. Protoc. 1, 1778–1789 (2006).
Wisniewski, J. R., Zougman, A., Nagaraj, N. & Mann, M. Universal sample preparation method for proteome analysis. Nat. Methods 6, 359–U60 (2009).
Ferro, M. et al. AT_CHLORO, a comprehensive chloroplast proteome database with subplastidial localization and curated information on envelope proteins. Mol. Cell. Proteom. 9, 1063–1084 (2010).
Trotter, M. W. B., Sadowski, P. G., Dunkley, T. P. J., Groen, A. J. & Lilley, K. S. Improved sub-cellular resolution via simultaneous analysis of organelle proteomics data across varied experimental conditions. Proteomics 10, 4213–4219 (2010).
Nikolovski, N. et al. Putative glycosyltransferases and other plant Golgi apparatus proteins are revealed by LOPIT proteomics. Plant Physiol. 160, 1037–1051 (2012).
Groen, A. J. et al. Identification of trans-Golgi network proteins in Arabidopsis thaliana root tissue. J. Proteome Res. 13, 763–776 (2014).
Nikolovski, N., Shliaha, P. V., Gatto, L., Dupree, P. & Lilley, K. S. Label-free protein quantification for plant golgi protein localization and abundance. Plant Physiol. 166, 1033–1043 (2014).
Gatto, L., Breckels, L. M., Wieczorek, S., Burger, T. & Lilley, K. S. Mass-spectrometry-based spatial proteomics data analysis using pRoloc and pRolocdata. Bioinformatics 30, 1322–1324 (2014).
Breckels, L. M. et al. The effect of organelle discovery upon sub-cellular protein localisation. J. Proteom. 88, 129–140 (2013).
Gatto, L. et al. A foundation for reliable spatial proteomics data analysis. Mol. Cell. Proteom. 13, 1937–1952 (2014).
Breckels, L. M. et al. Learning from heterogeneous data sources: an application in spatial proteomics. PLoS Comput. Biol. 12, e1004920 (2016).
Breckels, L. M., Mulvey, C. M., Lilley, K. S. & Gatto, L. A Bioconductor workflow for processing and analysing spatial proteomics data. F1000Res. 5, 2926 (2016).
Crook, O. M., Breckels, L. M., Lilley, K. S., Kirk, P. D. W. & Gatto, L. A Bioconductor workflow for the Bayesian analysis of spatial proteomics. F1000Res. 8, 446 (2019).
Wu, S. J., Ding, L. & Zhu, J. K. SOS1, a genetic locus essential for salt tolerance and potassium acquisition. Plant Cell 8, 617–627 (1996).
Qiu, Q. S., Guo, Y., Dietrich, M. A., Schumaker, K. S. & Zhu, J. K. Regulation of SOS1, a plasma membrane Na+/H+ exchanger in Arabidopsis thaliana, by SOS2 and SOS3. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 8436–8441 (2002).
Qiu, Q. S., Barkla, B. J., Vera-Estrella, R., Zhu, J. K. & Schumaker, K. S. Na+/H+ exchange activity in the plasma membrane of Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 132, 1041–1052 (2003).
Shi, H., Quintero, F. J., Pardo, J. M. & Zhu, J.-K. The putative plasma membrane Na+/H+ antiporter SOS1 controls long-distance Na+ transport in plants. Plant Cell Online 14, 465–477 (2002).
Yadav, N. S., Shukla, P. S., Jha, A., Agarwal, P. K. & Jha, B. The SbSOS1 gene from the extreme halophyte Salicornia brachiata enhances Na(+) loading in xylem and confers salt tolerance in transgenic tobacco. BMC Plant Biol. 12, 188 (2012).
Geldner, N. et al. Rapid, combinatorial analysis of membrane compartments in intact plants with a multicolor marker set. Plant J. 59, 169–178 (2009).
Wojcik, S. & Kriechbaumer, V. Go your own way: membrane-targeting sequences. Plant Physiol. 185, 608–618 (2021).
Zhang, Z. KaKs_Calculator 3.0: calculating selective pressure on coding and non-coding sequences. Genomics Proteom. Bioinforma. 20, 536–540 (2022).
Quintero, F. J., Blatt, M. R. & Pardo, J. M. Functional conservation between yeast and plant endosomal Na+/H+ antiporters. FEBS Lett. 471, 224–228 (2000).
Barragan, V. et al. Ion exchangers NHX1 and NHX2 mediate active potassium uptake into vacuoles to regulate cell turgor and stomatal function in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 24, 1127–1142 (2012).
Leidi, E. O. et al. The AtNHX1 exchanger mediates potassium compartmentation in vacuoles of transgenic tomato. Plant J. 61, 495–506 (2010).
Bassil, E. et al. The arabidopsis Na+/H+ antiporters NHX1 and NHX2 control vacuolar pH and K+ homeostasis to regulate growth, flower development, and reproduction. Plant Cell 23, 3482–3497 (2011).
Osawa, H., Stacey, G. & Gassmann, W. ScOPT1 and AtOPT4 function as proton-coupled oligopeptide transporters with broad but distinct substrate specificities. Biochem. J. 393, 267 (2005).
Chowdhury, M. N. & Jin, H. The RGG motif proteins: Interactions, functions, and regulations. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. RNA 14, e1748 (2023).
Wormit, A., Traub, M., FlöRchinger, M., Neuhaus, H. E. & MöHlmann, T. Characterization of three novel members of the arabidopsis thaliana equilibrative nucleoside transporter (ENT) family. Biochem. J. 383, 19–26 (2004).
Bernard, C. et al. Equilibrative nucleoside transporter 1 (ENT1) is critical for pollen germination and vegetative growth in Arabidopsis. J. Exp. Bot. 62, 4627–4637 (2011).
Wright, E. M. Glucose transport families SLC5 and SLC50. Mol. Asp. Med. 34, 183–196 (2013).
Bala, P. A., Foster, J., Carvelli, L. & Henry, L. K. SLC6 transporters: structure, function, regulation, disease association and therapeutics. Mol. Asp. Med. 34, 197–219 (2013).
Alqahtani, M. et al. The role of PQL genes in response to salinity tolerance in arabidopsis and barley. Plant Direct. 5, e00301 (2021).
Kawano-Kawada, M. et al. A PQ-loop protein Ypq2 is involved in the exchange of arginine and histidine across the vacuolar membrane of saccharomyces cerevisiae. Sci. Rep. 9, 15018 (2019).
Kalatzis, V., Cherqui, S., Antignac, C. & Gasnier, B. Cystinosin, the protein defective in cystinosis, is a H+‐driven lysosomal cystine transporter. EMBO J. 20, 5940 (2001).
Jézégou, A. et al. Heptahelical protein PQLC2 is a lysosomal cationic amino acid exporter underlying the action of cysteamine in cystinosis therapy. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, E3434–E3443 (2012).
Greenfield, N. J. Using circular dichroism spectra to estimate protein secondary structure. Nat. Protoc. 1, 2876–2890 (2006).
Chemes, L. B., Alonso, L. G., Noval, M. G. & de Prat-Gay, G. Circular dichroism techniques for the analysis of intrinsically disordered proteins and domains. Methods Mol. Biol. 895, 387–404 (2012).
Konrat, R. NMR contributions to structural dynamics studies of intrinsically disordered proteins. J. Magn. Reson. 241, 74–85 (2014).
Solyom, Z. et al. BEST-TROSY experiments for time-efficient sequential resonance assignment of large disordered proteins. J. Biomol. NMR 55, 311–321 (2013).
Ambrosone, A. et al. The arabidopsis RNA-binding protein AtRGGA regulates tolerance to salt and drought stress. Plant Physiol. 168, 292 (2015).
Jones, R. L. The isolation of endoplasmic-reticulum from barley aleurone layers. Planta 150, 58–69 (1980).
Schaller, G. E. Isolation of endoplasmic reticulum and its membrane. Methods Mol. Biol. 1511, 119–129 (2017).
Kelley, L. A., Mezulis, S., Yates, C. M., Wass, M. N. & Sternberg, M. J. E. The Phyre2 web portal for protein modeling, prediction and analysis. Nat. Protoc. 10, 845–858 (2015).
Lv, S. et al. Sodium plays a more important role than potassium and chloride in growth of Salicornia europaea. Acta Physiol. Plant. 34, 503–513 (2012).
Quintero, F. J. et al. Activation of the plasma membrane Na/H antiporter Salt-Overly-Sensitive 1 (SOS1) by phosphorylation of an auto-inhibitory C-terminal domain. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 2611–2616 (2011).
Sze, H. H. +-translocating ATPases of the plasma membrane and tonoplast of plant cells. Physiol. Plant. 61, 683–691 (1984).
Yamaguchi, T., Apse, M. P., Shi, H. & Blumwald, E. Topological analysis of a plant vacuolar Na+/H+ antiporter reveals a luminal C terminus that regulates antiporter cation selectivity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 12510–12515 (2003).
Yamaguchi, T., Aharon, G. S., Sottosanto, J. B. & Blumwald, E. Vacuolar Na+/H+ antiporter cation selectivity is regulated by calmodulin from within the vacuole in a Ca2+ and pH dependent manner. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 16107–16112 (2005).
Møller, I. S. et al. Shoot Na+ exclusion and increased salinity tolerance engineered by cell type-specific alteration of Na+ transport in arabidopsis. Plant Cell 21, 2163–2178 (2009).
Kiledjian, M. & Dreyfuss, G. Primary structure and binding-activity of the Hnrnp U-protein - binding RNA through RGG box. Embo. J. 11, 2655–2664 (1992).
Castello, A. et al. Insights into RNA biology from an atlas of mammalian mRNA-binding proteins. Cell 149, 1393–1406 (2012).
Thandapani, P., O’Connor, T. R., Bailey, T. L. & Richard, S. Defining the RGG/RG motif. Mol. Cell 50, 613–623 (2013).
Dure, L. A repeating 11-mer amino acid motif and plant desiccation. Plant J. 3, 363–369 (1993). 3rd.
Garay-Arroyo, A., Colmenero-Flores, J. M., Garciarrubio, A. & Covarrubias, A. A. Highly hydrophilic proteins in prokaryotes and eukaryotes are common during conditions of water deficit. J. Biol. Chem. 275, 5668–5674 (2000).
Battaglia, M., Olvera-Carrillo, Y., Garciarrubio, A., Campos, F. & Covarrubias, A. A. The enigmatic LEA proteins and other hydrophilins. Plant Physiol. 148, 6–24 (2008).
Uversky, V. N. Intrinsically disordered proteins in overcrowded milieu: membrane-less organelles, phase separation, and intrinsic disorder. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 44, 18–30 (2017).
Cuevas-Velazquez, C. L. & Dinneny, J. R. Organization out of disorder: liquid-liquid phase separation in plants. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 45, 68–74 (2018).
Wallmann, A. & Kesten, C. Common functions of disordered proteins across evolutionary distant organisms. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 21, 2105 (2020).
Mitrea, D. M. & Kriwacki, R. W. Phase separation in biology; functional organization of a higher order. Cell Commun. Signal. 14, 1 (2016).
Buchan, J. R. mRNP granules assembly, function, and connections with disease. Rna Biol. 11, 1019–1030 (2014).
Anderson, P. & Kedersha, N. Stress granules: the tao of RNA triage. Trends Biochem. Sci. 33, 141–150 (2008).
Jain, S. & Parker, R. The discovery and analysis of P bodies. Ten years of progress in. Gw/P Body Res. 768, 23–43 (2013).
Chong, P. A., Vernon, R. M. & Forman-Kay, J. D. RGG/RG motif regions in RNA binding and phase separation. J. Mol. Biol. 430, 4650–4665 (2018).
Roy, R., Das, G., Kuttanda, I. A., Bhatter, N. & Rajyaguru, P. I. Low complexity RGG-motif sequence is required for Processing body (P-body) disassembly. Nat. Commun. 13, 2077 (2022).
Bleckmann, A. et al. Cytosolic RGG RNA-binding proteins are temperature sensitive flowering time regulators in Arabidopsis. Biol. Chem. 404, 1069–1084 (2023).
R Core Team. R: A Language And Environment For Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/ (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, 2023).
Kato, A., Lamb, J. C. & Birchler, J. A. Chromosome painting using repetitive DNA sequences as probes for somatic chromosome identification in maize. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 13554–13559 (2004).
Doležel, J., Greilhuber, J. & Suda, J. Estimation of nuclear DNA content in plants using flow cytometry. Nat. Protoc. 2, 2233–2244 (2007).
Marcais, G. & Kingsford, C. A fast, lock-free approach for efficient parallel counting of occurrences of k-mers. Bioinformatics 27, 764–770 (2011).
Bolger, A. M., Lohse, M. & Usadel, B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30, 2114–2120 (2014).
Andrews, S. FastQC: A Quality Control Tool For High Throughput Sequence Data. http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/ (2010).
Cheng, H. Y., Concepcion, G. T., Feng, X. W., Zhang, H. W. & Li, H. Haplotype-resolved de novo assembly using phased assembly graphs with hifiasm. Nat. Methods 18, 170–175 (2021).
Smit, A., Hubley, R. & Green, P. RepeatMasker Open-4.0 http://www.repeatmasker.org (2013–2015).
Hubley, R. et al. The Dfam database of repetitive DNA families. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, D81–D89 (2016).
Bao, W. D., Kojima, K. K. & Kohany, O. Repbase update, a database of repetitive elements in eukaryotic genomes. Mob. DNA 6, 11 (2015).
Kim, D., Paggi, J. M., Park, C., Bennett, C. & Salzberg, S. L. Graph-based genome alignment and genotyping with HISAT2 and HISAT-genotype. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 907–915 (2019).
Bruna, T., Hoff, K. J., Lomsadze, A., Stanke, M. & Borodovsky, M. BRAKER2: automatic eukaryotic genome annotation with GeneMark-EP+ and AUGUSTUS supported by a protein database. NAR Genom. Bioinform. 3, lqaa108 (2021).
Hoff, K. J., Lomsadze, A., Borodovsky, M. & Stanke, M. Whole-genome annotation with BRAKER. Methods Mol. Biol. 1962, 65–95 (2019).
Bruna, T., Lomsadze, A. & Borodovsky, M. GeneMark-EP+: eukaryotic gene prediction with self-training in the space of genes and proteins. NAR Genom. Bioinform. 2, lqaa026 (2020).
Lomsadze, A., Ter-Hovhannisyan, V., Chernoff, Y. O. & Borodovsky, M. Gene identification in novel eukaryotic genomes by self-training algorithm. Nucleic Acids Res. 33, 6494–6506 (2005).
Buchfink, B., Xie, C. & Huson, D. H. Fast and sensitive protein alignment using DIAMOND. Nat. Methods 12, 59–60 (2015).
Iwata, H. & Gotoh, O. Benchmarking spliced alignment programs including Spaln2, an extended version of Spaln that incorporates additional species-specific features. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, e161 (2012).
Lomsadze, A., Burns, P. D. & Borodovsky, M. Integration of mapped RNA-Seq reads into automatic training of eukaryotic gene finding algorithm. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, e119–e119 (2014).
Stanke, M., Schoffmann, O., Morgenstern, B. & Waack, S. Gene prediction in eukaryotes with a generalized hidden Markov model that uses hints from external sources. BMC Bioinforma. 7, 62 (2006).
Kriventseva, E. V. et al. OrthoDB v10: sampling the diversity of animal, plant, fungal, protist, bacterial and viral genomes for evolutionary and functional annotations of orthologs. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, D807–D811 (2019).
Camacho, C. et al. BLAST plus: architecture and applications. BMC Bioinforma. 10, 421 (2009).
Altschul, S. F., Gish, W., Miller, W., Myers, E. W. & Lipman, D. J. Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 215, 403–410 (1990).
Aramaki, T. et al. KofamKOALA: KEGG Ortholog assignment based on profile HMM and adaptive score threshold. Bioinformatics 36, 2251–2252 (2020).
Jones, P. et al. InterProScan 5: genome-scale protein function classification. Bioinformatics 30, 1236–1240 (2014).
Lohse, M. et al. Mercator: a fast and simple web server for genome scale functional annotation of plant sequence data. Plant Cell Environ. 37, 1250–1258 (2014).
Kaul, S. et al. Analysis of the genome sequence of the flowering plant Arabidopsis thaliana. Nature 408, 796–815 (2000).
Cheng, C. Y. et al. Araport11: a complete reannotation of the Arabidopsis thaliana reference genome. Plant J. 89, 789–804 (2017).
DOE-JGI. Brassica rapa v1.3 http://phytozome.jgi.doe.gov/ (2020).
Dohm, J. C. et al. The genome of the recently domesticated crop plant sugar beet (Beta vulgaris). Nature 505, 546–549 (2014).
Jarvis, D. E. et al. The genome of chenopodium quinoa. Nature 542, 307–312 (2017).
Xu, C. et al. Draft genome spinach transcriptome diversity 120 Spinacia access. Nature 8, 15275 (2017).
Schmutz, J. et al. Genome sequence of the palaeopolyploid soybean. Nature 463, 178–183 (2010).
DOE-JGI and USDA-NIFA Phaseolus vulgaris v2.1. http://phytozome.jgi.doe.gov/ (2020).
Hosmani, P. S. et al. An improved de novo assembly and annotation of the tomato reference genome using single-molecule sequencing, Hi-C proximity ligation and optical maps. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/767764 (2019).
Barchi, L. et al. A chromosome-anchored eggplant genome sequence reveals key events in solanaceae evolution. Sci. Rep. 9, 11769 (2019).
McCormick, R. F. et al. The Sorghum bicolor reference genome: improved assembly, gene annotations, a transcriptome atlas, and signatures of genome organization. Plant J. 93, 338–354 (2018).
Maere, S., Heymans, K. & Kuiper, M. BiNGO: a cytoscape plugin to assess overrepresentation of Gene Ontology categories in biological networks. Bioinformatics 21, 3448–3449 (2005).
Shannon, P. et al. Cytoscape: A software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res. 13, 2498–2504 (2003).
Benjamini, Y. & Hochberg, Y. Controlling the false discovery rate - a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B-Methodol. 57, 289–300 (1995).
Edgar, R. C. Muscle5: High-accuracy alignment ensembles enable unbiased assessments of sequence homology and phylogeny. Nat. Commun. 13, 6968 (2022).
Edgar, R. C. MUSCLE: Multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 32, 1792–1797 (2004).
Castresana, J. Selection of conserved blocks from multiple alignments for their use in phylogenetic analysis. Mol. Biol. Evol. 17, 540–552 (2000).
Darriba, D. et al. ModelTest-NG: A new and scalable tool for the selection of DNA and protein evolutionary models. Mol. Biol. Evol. 37, 291–294 (2020).
Kozlov, A. M., Darriba, D., Flouri, T., Morel, B. & Stamatakis, A. RAxML-NG: a fast, scalable and user-friendly tool for maximum likelihood phylogenetic inference. Bioinformatics 35, 4453–4455 (2019).
Lemoine, F. et al. Renewing felsenstein’s phylogenetic bootstrap in the era of big data. Nature 556, 452–456 (2018).
Letunic, I. & Bork, P. Interactive Tree Of Life (iTOL) v5: an online tool for phylogenetic tree display and annotation. Nucleic Acids Res. 49, W293–W296 (2021).
Waterhouse, A. M., Procter, J. B., Martin, D. M. A., Clamp, M. & Barton, G. J. Jalview Version 2-a multiple sequence alignment editor and analysis workbench. Bioinformatics 25, 1189–1191 (2009).
Patro, R., Duggal, G., Love, M. I., Irizarry, R. A. & Kingsford, C. Salmon provides fast and bias-aware quantification of transcript expression. Nat. Methods 14, 417–419 (2017).
Love, M. I., Huber, W. & Anders, S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 15, 550 (2014).
Howe, E. A., Sinha, R., Schlauch, D. & Quackenbush, J. RNA-Seq analysis in MeV. Bioinformatics 27, 3209–3210 (2011).
Bradford, M. M. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal. Biochem. 72, 248–254 (1976).
Perkins, D. N., Pappin, D. J. C., Creasy, D. M. & Cottrell, J. S. Probability-based protein identification by searching sequence databases using mass spectrometry data. Electrophoresis 20, 3551–3567 (1999).
Searle, B. C. Scaffold: A bioinformatic tool for validating MS/MS-based proteomic studies. Proteomics 10, 1265–1269 (2010).
Usadel, B. et al. A guide to using MapMan to visualize and compare omics data in plants: a case study in the crop species, Maize. Plant Cell Environ. 32, 1211–1229 (2009).
Wan, S. B., Mak, M. W. & Kung, S. Y. mGOASVM: Multi-label protein subcellular localization based on gene ontology and support vector machines. BMC Bioinforma. 13, 290 (2012).
Lampropoulos, A. et al. GreenGate - A novel, versatile, and efficient cloning system for plant transgenesis. Plos One 8, e83043 (2013).
Koncz, C. & Schell, J. The promoter of Tl-DNA gene 5 controls the tissue-specific expression of chimeric genes carried by a novel type of agrobacterium binary vector. Mol. Gen. Genet. 204, 383–396 (1986).
Hellens, R. P., Edwards, E. A., Leyland, N. R., Bean, S. & Mullineaux, P. M. pGreen:: a versatile and flexible binary Ti vector for -mediated plant transformation. Plant Mol. Biol. 42, 819–832 (2000).
Nagel, R., Elliott, A., Masel, A., Birch, R. G. & Manners, J. M. Electroporation of binary Ti plasmid vector into Agrobacterium tumefaciens and Agrobacterium rhizogenes. Fems. Microbiol. Lett. 67, 325–328 (1990).
Norkunas, K., Harding, R., Dale, J. & Dugdale, B. Improving agroinfiltration-based transient gene expression in Nicotiana benthamiana. Plant Methods 14, 71 (2018).
Schindelin, J. et al. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat. Meth 9, 676–682 (2012).
Daniel Gietz, R. & Woods, R. A. Transformation of yeast by lithium acetate/single-stranded carrier DNA/polyethylene glycol method. In Methods in Enzymology, 350 ((eds.) Guthrie, C. & Fink, G. R.) 87–96 (Academic Press, 2002).
Rodríguez-Navarro, A. & Ramos, J. Dual system for potassium transport in saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Bacteriol. 159, 940–945 (1984).
Zhang, Y. et al. A highly efficient rice green tissue protoplast system for transient gene expression and studying light/chloroplast-related processes. Plant Methods 7, 30 (2011).
Nelson, B. K., Cai, X. & Nebenfuhr, A. A multicolored set of in vivo organelle markers for co-localization studies in arabidopsis and other plants. Plant J. 51, 1126–1136 (2007).
Studier, F. W. Protein production by auto-induction in high-density shaking cultures. Protein Expr. Purif. 41, 207–234 (2005).
Marley, J., Lu, M. & Bracken, C. A method for efficient isotopic labeling of recombinant proteins. J. Biomol. Nmr. 20, 71–75 (2001).
Linding, R. et al. Protein disorder prediction: implications for structural proteomics. Structure 11, 1453–1459 (2003).
Lupas, A., Vandyke, M. & Stock, J. Predicting coiled coils from protein sequences. Science 252, 1162–1164 (1991).
Wiedemann, C., Bellstedt, P. & Gorlach, M. CAPITO-a web server-based analysis and plotting tool for circular dichroism data. Bioinformatics 29, 1750–1757 (2013).
Acknowledgements
Research reported in this publication was supported by the King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST). We thank E. Glenn at University of Arizona and M. Sagi at Blaustein Institute for Desert Research for their assistance in providing seeds. We also thank E. Martinoia at University of Zurich for his technical advice on gradient formation for membrane separation. We would like to thank our visiting student, J. Otero, for his assistance in the laboratory.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
M.T., N.V.F., O.R.S., and S.M.S. conceived the project and experiments. M.T. and S.M.S. supervised the research. O.R.S. and V.J.M. generated the sequencing data. D.B., E.H., and J.C. performed the karyotyping and flow cytometry. O.R.S. performed the bioinformatic analyses and genome assemblies. M.A. and O.R.S. evaluated the genome assemblies. O.R.S. performed the phenotypic, transcriptomic, and proteomic experiments and analyses. M.P.R., O.R.S., and V.J.M overlooked the plant material. J.P.A.V. and V.J.M planned the tobacco subcellular localization assays. J.P.A.V. and L.M.C.L. performed the tobacco subcellular localization assays. O.R.S. performed the salt tolerance assays in yeast. L.J., and M.J. led the protein structural analyses. K.C. and O.R.S. did the protein production and purification. K.C., L.J., and M.J. performed the NMR and CDD analyses. K.C. performed the rice protoplast transformation. All authors contributed to the writing of the manuscript. M.T., O.R.S., and S.M.S. organized the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Communications thanks José Dinneny and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Source data
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Salazar, O.R., Chen, K., Melino, V.J. et al. SOS1 tonoplast neo-localization and the RGG protein SALTY are important in the extreme salinity tolerance of Salicornia bigelovii. Nat Commun 15, 4279 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-48595-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-48595-5
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.