Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Christianity spread faster in small, politically structured societies

Nature Human Behaviour volume 2, pages 559–564 (2018)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Over the past 2,000 years, Christianity has grown from a tiny Judaic sect to the world’s largest religious family1. Historians and social scientists have long debated whether Christianity spread through a top-down process driven by political leaders or a bottom-up process that empowered social underclasses2,3,4,5,6. The Christianization of Austronesian populations is well-documented across societies with a diverse range of social and demographic conditions7. Here, we use this context to test whether political hierarchy, social inequality and population size predict the length of conversion time across 70 Austronesian cultures. We also account for the historical isolation of cultures and the year of missionary arrival, and use a phylogenetic generalized least squares method to estimate the effects of common ancestry and geographic proximity of cultures8. We find that conversion to Christianity typically took less than 30 years, and societies with political leadership and smaller populations were fastest to convert. In contrast, social inequality did not reliably affect conversion times, indicating that Christianity’s success in the Pacific is not due to its egalitarian doctrine empowering social underclasses. The importance of population size and structure in our study suggests that the rapid spread of Christianity can be explained by general dynamics of cultural transmission.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Number of years taken to convert for each of the 70 Austronesian cultures sampled.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Johnson, T. M. & Grim, B. J. The World’s Religions in Figures: An Introduction to International Religious Demography (Wiley, Hoboken, 2013).

  2. Deissmann, A. New Light on the New Testament: From Records of the Graeco-Roman Period (T. & T. Clark, Edinburgh, 1908).

  3. Judge, E. A. The early Christians as a scholastic community. J. Relig. Hist. 1, 4–15 (1960).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hopkins, K. Christian number and its implications. J. Early Christ. Stud. 6, 185–226 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Stark, R. The class basis of early Christianity: inferences from a sociological model. Sociol. Anal. 47, 216–225 (1986).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Stark, R. The Rise of Christianity (Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ, 1997).

  7. Watts, J. et al. Pulotu: database of Austronesian supernatural beliefs and practices. PLoS ONE 10, e0136783 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Freckleton, R. P. & Jetz, W. Space versus phylogeny: disentangling phylogenetic and spatial signals in comparative data. Proc. R. Soc. B 276, 21–30 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Fox, R. L. Pagans and Christians (Penguin, London, 1986).

  10. Barnes, T. D. Constantine and Eusebius (Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, MA, 1981).

  11. Nietzsche, F. On the Genealogy of Morality: A Polemic (Hackett Publishing Company, Indianapolis, IN, 1998).

  12. Muthukrishna, M., Shulman, B. W., Vasilescu, V. & Henrich, J. Sociality influences cultural complexity. Proc. R. Soc. B 281, 20132511 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Derex, M., Beugin, M. P., Godelle, B. & Raymond, M. Experimental evidence for the influence of group size on cultural complexity. Nature 503, 389–391 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Derex, M. & Boyd, R. Partial connectivity increases cultural accumulation within groups. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 2982–2987 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Powell, A., Shennan, S. & Thomas, M. G. Late Pleistocene demography and the appearance of modern human behavior. Science 324, 1298–1301 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Henrich, J. Demography and cultural evolution: how adaptive cultural processes can produce maladaptive losses: the Tasmanian case. Soc. Am. Archaeol. 69, 197–214 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Aoki, K., Lehmann, L. & Feldman, M. W. Rates of cultural change and patterns of cultural accumulation in stochastic models of social transmission. Theor. Popul. Biol. 79, 192–202 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Rogers, E. M. Diffusion of Innovations (The Free Press, New York, NY, 1995).

  19. Goodenough, W. H. Oceania and the problem of controls in the study of cultural and human evolution. J. Polyn. Soc. 66, 146–155 (1957).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kirch, P. V. & Green, R. C. Hawaiki, Ancestral Polynesia: An Essay in Historical Anthropology (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2001).

  21. Murdock, G. P. & Provost, C. Measurement of cultural complexity. Ethnology 12, 379–392 (1973).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Sahlins, M. D. Social Stratification in Polynesia (Univ. Washington Press, Seattle, WA, 1958).

  23. Mace, R. & Pagel, M. The comparative method in anthropology. Curr. Anthropol. 35, 549–564 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Matthews, L. J., Passmore, S. H., Richard, P. M., Gray, R. D. & Atkinson, Q. D. Shared cultural history as a predictor of political and economic changes among Nation States. PLoS ONE 11, e0152979 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Lieber, M. in Exiles and Migrants in Oceania 35–67 (Univ. Press of Hawai’i, Honolulu, HI, 1977).

  26. Keesing, R. Kwaio Religion: The Living and the Dead in a Solomon Island Society (Columbia Univ. Press, New York, NY, 1982).

  27. McLaren, D. et al. Incorporating sociocultural beliefs in mental health services in Kwaio, Solomon Islands. Australas. Psychiatry 17, S125–S127 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Gilson, R. P. Samoa 1830–1900: The Politics of a Multi-Cultural Community (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 1970).

  29. Beatty, A. Society and Exchange in Nias (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1992).

  30. Gilson, R. & Crocombe, R. The Cook Islands 1820–1950 (Victoria Univ. Press, Wellington, 1980).

  31. Stark, R. & Bainbridge, W. S. Networks of faith: interpersonal bonds and recruitment to cults and sects. Am. J. Sociol. 85, 1376–1395 (1980).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Efferson, C., Lalive, R., Richerson, P. J., McElreath, R. & Lubell, M. Conformists and mavericks: the empirics of frequency-dependent cultural transmission. Evol. Hum. Behav. 29, 56–64 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Mesoudi, A. & Lycett, S. J. Random copying, frequency-dependent copying and culture change. Evol. Hum. Behav. 30, 41–48 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Watts, J. et al. Clarity and causality needed in claims about Big Gods. Behav. Brain Sci. 39, e27 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Atkinson, Q. Q. D., Latham, A. A. J. & Watts, J. Are Big Gods a big deal in the emergence of big groups? Relig. Brain Behav. 5, 266–274 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Norenzayan, A. et al. The cultural evolution of prosocial religions. Behav. Brain Sci. 39, 1–86 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Diamond, J. Guns, Germs, and Steel: The Fates of Human Societies (W.W. Norton & Company, New York, NY, 1997).

  38. Henrich, J. et al. Understanding cumulative cultural evolution. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, E6724–E6725 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Kline, M. A. & Boyd, R. Population size predicts technological complexity in Oceania. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 277, 2559–2564 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Collard, M., Ruttle, A., Buchanan, B. & O’Brien, M. J. Population size and cultural evolution in nonindustrial food-producing societies. PLoS ONE 8, e72628 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Collard, M., Buchanan, B., O’Brien, M. & Scholnick, J. Risk, mobility or population size? Drivers of technological richness among contact-period western North American hunter-gatherers. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 368, 20120412 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Read, D. An interaction model for resource implement complexity based on risk and number of annual moves. Am. Antiq. 73, 599–625 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Buchanan, B., O’Brien, M. J. & Collard, M. Drivers of technological richness in prehistoric Texas: an archaeological test of the population size and environmental risk hypotheses. Archaeol. Anthropol. Sci. 8, 625–634 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Vaesen, K., Collard, M., Cosgrove, R. & Roebroeks, W. Population size does not explain past changes in cultural complexity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, E2241–E2247 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Mesoudi, A. Cultural Evolution: How Darwinian Theory Can Explain Human Culture and Synthesize the Social Sciences (Univ. Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, 2011).

  46. Gray, R. D. & Watts, J. Cultural macroevolution matters. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 7846–7852 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Gray, R. D., Drummond, A. J. & Greenhill, S. J. Language phylogenies reveal expansion pulses and pauses in Pacific settlement. Science 323, 479–483 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Sheehan, O., Watts, J., Gray, R. D. & Atkinson, Q. D. Coevolution of landesque capital intensive agriculture and sociopolitical hierarchy. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 3628–3633 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Blomberg, S. P., Garland, T. & Ives, A. Testing for phylogenetic signal in comparative data: behavioral traits are more labile. Evolution 57, 717–745 (2003).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Kembel, S. W. et al. Picante: R tools for integrating phylogenies and ecology. Bioinformatics 26, 1463–1464 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Paradis, E., Claude, J. & Strimmer, K. APE: analyses of phylogenetics and evolution in R language. Bioinformatics 20, 289–290 (2004).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Dow, M. & Eff, E. Global, regional, and local network autocorrelation in the standard cross-cultural sample. Cross Cult. Res. 42, 148–171 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Atkinson, Q. D., Coomber, T., Passmore, S. H., Greenhill, S. J. & Kushnick, G. Cultural and environmental predictors of pre-European deforestation on Pacific Islands. PLoS ONE 11, e0156340 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Sookias, R. B., Passmore, S. H. & Atkinson, Q. D. Deep cultural ancestry and human development indicators across nation states. R. Soc. Open Sci. 5, 171411 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Greenhill, S. J., Blust, R. & Gray, R. D. The Austronesian Basic Vocabulary Database: from bioinformatics to lexomics. Evol. Bioinform. 4, 271–283 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. R Core Development Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2015).

  57. Revell, L. J. phytools: an R package for phylogenetic comparative biology (and other things). Methods Ecol. Evol. 3, 217–223 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank S. Passmore for assistance with the PGLS-spatial analyses, and A. Powell for comments. They also thank the John Templeton Foundation (28745), Templeton Religion Trust (TRT0153) and Marsden Fund (UOA1104) for funding. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History, Jena, Germany

    Joseph Watts, Oliver Sheehan, Joseph Bulbulia, Russell D. Gray & Quentin D. Atkinson

  2. Social and Evolutionary Neuroscience Research Group, Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK

    Joseph Watts

  3. School of Psychology, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand

    Oliver Sheehan, Russell D. Gray & Quentin D. Atkinson

  4. School of Humanities, Faculty of Arts, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand

    Joseph Bulbulia

  5. Research School of the Social Sciences, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia

    Russell D. Gray

  6. Institute of Cognitive and Evolutionary Anthropology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK

    Quentin D. Atkinson

Authors
  1. Joseph Watts
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Oliver Sheehan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Joseph Bulbulia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Russell D. Gray
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Quentin D. Atkinson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

J.W. and Q.D.A. designed the study. J.W. and O.S. developed the coding scheme and coded the data. J.W. ran the analyses. J.W. wrote the manuscript with input from all authors.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joseph Watts.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Note, Supplementary Figure 1, Supplementary Tables 1–10, Supplementary References 1–184

Reporting Summary

Supplementary Data 1

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Watts, J., Sheehan, O., Bulbulia, J. et al. Christianity spread faster in small, politically structured societies. Nat Hum Behav 2, 559–564 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0379-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0379-3

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing