Although it is well established that there are two memory T-cell populations — central memory T (TCM) cells and effector memory T (TEM) cells — which can be identified by distinct homing characteristics and effector functions, it is not clear whether these are distinct lineages or whether the development of one subset depends on the other. New data published in Nature Immunology now indicate that the naive T-cell precursor frequency determines which of these developmental schemes occurs.

TCM cells express CC-chemokine receptor 7 (CCR7) and CD62L, and are found in lymphoid organs. By contrast, TEM cells do not express either CCR7 or CD62L, and they reside in non-lymphoid tissues and mediate effector functions immediately after activation. Previous studies have led to the emergence of three models of memory T-cell differentiation: first, that TCM cells are a continual source of TEM cells; second, that TCM and TEM cells are distinct lineages; and third, that, over time, TEM cells convert to TCM cells. To further investigate the relationship between TCM and TEM cells, Marzo et al. assessed the phenotypic stability of TCM and TEM cells (defined as CD62Lhi and CD62Llow, respectively) after transferring the cells to separate naive recipients. When the transferred memory T-cell subsets were isolated from mice that were infected with ovalbumin-expressing vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV-OVA) and that had previously been recipients of naive CD8+ T cells expressing the OT-I T-cell receptor (OT-I TCR; which is specific for a peptide derived from OVA), the TCM cells remained CD62Lhi, whereas almost half of the TEM cells converted to TCM cells. By contrast, when polyclonal OVA-specific CD8+ memory T-cell subsets were isolated from wild-type mice infected with VSV-OVA, both TCM and TEM cells maintained their original phenotype. Consistent with a role for naive T-cell precursor frequency in determining CD8+ memory T-cell phenotype, if the number of naive CD8+OT-I TCR+ T cells transferred to mice that were subsequently infected with VSV-OVA was markedly decreased, then OVA-specific TEM cells did not convert to TCM cells when transferred to secondary recipients.

These data have led the authors to suggest that memory T-cell differentiation fits different models depending on the initial frequency of naive precursors: a high initial frequency of naive precursors leads to the development of TCM cells, TEM cells and a population of CD62Llow cells (that is, cells that are phenotypically TEM cells) that can convert to TCM cells, whereas a low initial frequency of naive precursors, such as occurs physiologically, leads to the development of TCM cells and TEM cells as distinct lineages.