Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Seismological evidence of mantle flow driving plate motions at a palaeo-spreading centre

Abstract

A long-standing question about the dynamics of mid-ocean spreading centres is whether mantle upwelling is passive or active. During passive upwelling, the motion of the overlying plate would be expected to drive mantle flow1,2. In contrast, during active upwelling, decompression melting of the mantle beneath the spreading axis would result in a low-density melt that creates local buoyancy, forcing mantle convection and driving plate motion3,4. Seismic images of older parts of the Pacific Plate reveal dipping reflectors in the lower crust that could be shear zones created by active mantle flow5,6,7, but there is little seismological evidence to indicate that mantle flow drags the plate. Here we use active-source seismic data to image the Pacific Plate that was created at a palaeo-spreading centre in the northwest Pacific Ocean. We identify very high P-wave velocities of 8.5–8.6 km s−1 and strong seismic anisotropy of 8.5–9.8% in the uppermost mantle, immediately below the lower-crustal dipping reflectors. We suggest that such strong seismic anisotropy, caused by the alignment of olivine crystals in response to mantle flow, could have been generated if mantle flow was much faster than plate motion. We conclude that both the lower-crustal dipping reflectors and the anisotropy were formed by a drag force at the Moho caused by rapid mantle flow, providing direct evidence for active mantle flow at a spreading centre.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Location of seismic profiles.
Figure 2: Seismic velocity structures.
Figure 3: Seismic reflection and velocity images.
Figure 4: Schematic model showing the processes that form LCDRs and anisotropy in the uppermost mantle.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Forsyth, D. W. in Mantle Flow and Melt Generation at Mid-Ocean Ridges (eds Morgan, J. P., Blackman, D. K. & Sinton, J. M.) 1–65 (Geophysical Monogr. 71, AGU, 1992).

  2. Blackman, D. K. & Forsyth, D. W. in Mantle Flow and Melt Generation at Mid-Ocean Ridges (eds Morgan, J. P., Blackman, D. K. & Sinton, J. M.) 311–326 (Geophysical Monogr. 71, AGU, 1992).

  3. Scott, D. R. in Mantle Flow and Melt Generation at Mid-Ocean Ridges (eds Morgan, J. P., Blackman, D. K. & Sinton, J. M.) 327–352 (Geophysical Monogr. 71, AGU, 1992).

  4. Toomey, D., Jousselin, D., Dunn, R. A., Wilcock, W. S. D. & Detrick, R. S. Skew of mantle upwelling beneath the East Pacific Rise governs segmentation. Nature 446, 409–414 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. White, R. S. et al. New seismic images of oceanic crustal structure. Geology 18, 462–465 (1990).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Morgan, J. P. & Chen, Y. J. The genesis of oceanic crust: Magma injection, hydrothermal circulation, and crustal flow. J. Geophys. Res. 98, 6283–6297 (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ranero, C. R., Reston, T. J., Belykh, I. & Gnibidenko, H. Reflective oceanic crust formed at a fast-spreading centre in the Pacific. Geology 25, 499–502 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Nicolas, A. & Boudier, F. Mapping oceanic ridge segments in Oman ophiolite. J. Geophys. Res. 100, 6179–6197 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hess, H. H. Seismic anisotropy of the uppermost mantle under oceans. Nature 203, 629–631 (1964).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Shimamura, H., Asada, T., Suyehiro, K., Yamada, T. & Inatani, H. Longshot experiments to study velocity anisotropy in the oceanic lithosphere of the northwestern Pacific. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 31, 348–362 (1983).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Nakanishi, M., Tamaki, K. & Kobayashi, K. Mesozoic magnetic anomaly lineations and seafloor spreading history of the northwestern Pacific. J. Geophys. Res. 94, 15437–15462 (1989).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Fujie, G. et al. Systematic changes in the incoming plate structure at the Kuril Trench. Geophys. Res. Lett. 40, 88–93 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kobayashi, K., Nakanishi, M., Tamaki, K. & Ogawa, Y. Outer slope faulting associated with the western Kuril and Japan trenches. Geophys. J. Int. 134, 356–372 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. White, R. S., McKenzie, D. & O’Nions, R. Oceanic crustal thickness from seismic measurements and rare earth element inversions. J. Geophys. Res. 97, 19683–19715 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Oikawa, M., Kaneda, K. & Nishizawa, A. Seismic structures of the 154–160 Ma oceanic crust and uppermost mantle in the Northwest Pacific Basin. Earth Planet. Space 62, e13–e16 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Jousselin, D. & Maimprice, D. Melt topology and seismic anisotropy in mantle peridotites of the Oman ophiolite. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 164, 553–568 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Reston, T. J., Ranero, C. R. & Belykh, I. The structure of Cretaceous oceanic crust of the NW Pacific: Constraints on processes at fast spreading centres. J. Geophys. Res. 104, 629–644 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ten Brink, U. S. & Brocher, T. M. Multichannel seismic evidence for variations in crustal thickness across the Molokai fracture zone in the mid-Pacific. J. Geophys. Res. 93, 1119–1130 (1988).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Eittreim, S. L. et al. Oceanic crustal thickness and seismic character along a central Pacific transect. J. Geophys. Res. 99, 3139–3145 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Morgan, J. P. & Chen, Y. J. The genesis of oceanic crust: Magma injection, hydrothermal circulation and crustal flow. J. Geophys. Res. 98, 6283–6297 (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Nicolas, A. Comment on ‘The genesis of oceanic crust: Magma injection, hydrothermal circulation, and crustal flow’ by Jason Phipps Morgan and Y. John Chen. J. Geophys. Res. 99, 12029–12030 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Karson, J. A., Collins, J. A. & Casey, J. F. Geologic and seismic velocity structure of the crust/mantle transition in the Bay of Islands ophiolite complex. J. Geophys. Res. 89, 6126–6138 (1984).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Zhang, S. & Karato, S. Lattice preferred orientation of olivine aggregates deformed in simple shear. Nature 375, 774–777 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Nicolas, A. & Christensen, N. I. in Formation of Anisotropy in Upper Mantle Peridotites—A Review in Composition, Structure and Dynamics of the Lithosphere–Asthenosphere System (eds Fuchs K. & Froidevaux C.) 111–123 (Geodyn. Ser. Vol. 16, AGU, 1987)

  25. Tchalenko, J. S. Similarities between shear zones of different magnitudes. Geol. Soc. Amer. Bull. 81, 1625–1640 (1970).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Pearce, J. A. in Ophiolite Concept and the Evolution of Geological Thought (eds Dilek, Y. & Newcomb, S.) Supra-subduction zone ophiolites: the search for modern analogues. 269–294 (Special Paper, Geological Society of America, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Nicolas, A. & Boudier, F. in Ophiolite Concept and the Evolution of Geological Thought (eds Dilek, & Newcomb, S.) Where ophiolites come from and what they tell us. 137–152 (Special Paper, Geological Society of America, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Sato, T. & Kennett, B. L. N. Two-dimensional refraction inversion by progressive model development. Geophys. J. Int. 140, 543–558 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Michibayashi, K., Gerbert-Gaillard, L. & Nicolas, A. Shear sense inversion in the Hilti mantle section (Oman ophiolite) and active mantle uprise. Mar. Geophys. Res. 21, 259–268 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Karson, J. A. et al. Structure of uppermost fast-spread oceanic crust exposed at the Hess Deep Rift: Implications for subaxial processes at the East Pacific Rise. Geochem. Geophys. Geosys. 3, 1002 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was partly financially supported by the Institute for Research on Earth Evolution, Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

S.K. designed the seismic surveys, interpreted the seismic data and wrote the paper with contributions from all of the co-authors. G.F. participated in data acquisition and processing. M.Y. participated in data processing. T.T., T.S. and N.T. participated in data acquisition.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shuichi Kodaira.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Information (PDF 43906 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kodaira, S., Fujie, G., Yamashita, M. et al. Seismological evidence of mantle flow driving plate motions at a palaeo-spreading centre. Nature Geosci 7, 371–375 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2121

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2121

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing