Surgical management of pelvic prolapse using a laparoscopic approach
Alfred Cutner
Correspondence Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Hospital and Obstetric Hospital, UCLH NHS Foundation Trust, Huntley Street, London WC1E 6DH, UK
Email alfred.cutner@uclh.org
This article has no abstract so we have provided the first paragraph of the full text.
This paper reports on a series of patients who underwent either a sacrohysteropexy or sacrocolpopexy, with or without concurrent hysterectomy and/or insertion of a TVT. It is a large series, with follow-up ranging from 6 months to 5 years. Unfortunately, the paper does not achieve its aims, as there are essentially three groups of patients: those with vault prolapse following previous hysterectomy, those with uterine prolapse treated with sacrohysteropexy, and those with uterine prolapse treated with hysterectomy and sacrocolpopexy. In addition, each group can be further divided into those with or without incontinence, treated with or without TVT, respectively.
Full text of this article is available with one of the following:
- Personal subscription Purchase your own personal subscription to this journal. Already a subscriber? Please log in for immediate access.
- 7 day single article pass for US$18 In order to purchase this article you must be a registered user. Please register or log in.
- Site licence Learn more about institutional site licences
Current Subscribers
Please log in to access the full text article using the login box at the top of the page.