The where and the how of keeping up to date—a changing landscape
Suzanne J Farley
This article has no abstract so we have provided the first paragraph of the full text.
You are all familiar with the problem: how can any clinician possibly keep abreast of all the new data that are pertinent to their practice? In the attempt, most probably focus their literature reviewing efforts on the ten or so journals most relevant to their specialty that have the best reputation for publishing high-quality information. But is this enough? A study published recently in Kidney International would suggest not.
Full text of this article is available with one of the following:
- Membership of the International Society of Nephrology. If already a member, please login. If not please join the Society now
- Personal subscription Purchase your own personal subscription to this journal. Already a subscriber? Please login for immediate access.
- 7 day single article pass for US$18 In order to purchase this article you must be a registered user. Please register or login above.
- Site licence Learn more about institutional site licences
Current Subscribers
Please log in to access the full text article using the login box at the top of the page.
MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS
These links to content published by NPG are automatically generated.
NEWS AND VIEWS
Motion perception is learned, not innateNature Neuroscience News and Views (01 May 2006)
