Viewpoint

Nature Clinical Practice Nephrology (2007) 3, 60-61
doi:10.1038/ncpneph0391  
Received 25 September 2006 | Accepted 13 November 2006

The design of ALLHAT may have biased the study's outcome in favor of the diuretic cohort

Lee A Hebert*, Brad H Rovin and Christopher J Hebert

Correspondence *Ohio State University Medical Center, 1654 Upham Drive, Columbus, OH 43210, USA

Email
 lee.hebert@osumc.edu

The US National High Blood Pressure Education Program currently advocates diuretics as first-line treatment for all patients with hypertension, based mainly on the findings of ALLHAT. This Viewpoint identifies several flaws in the design of ALLHAT that call into question the validity of its conclusions. The authors argue that by encouraging use of angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors and calcium channel blockers in ways that are not the standard of care, the trial likely exaggerated the benefits of diuretics in this setting.

Full text of this article is available with one of the following:
  1. Membership of the International Society of Nephrology. If already a member, please login. If not please join the Society now
  2. Personal subscription Purchase your own personal subscription to this journal. Already a subscriber? Please login for immediate access.
  3. 7 day single article pass for US$18 In order to purchase this article you must be a registered user. Please register or login above.
  4. Site licence Learn more about institutional site licences

Current Subscribers

Please log in to access the full text article using the login box at the top of the page.



Extra navigation

.