Editorial

Nature Clinical Practice Nephrology (2006) 2, 289
doi:10.1038/ncpneph0194  

Courting controversy

Suzanne J Farley

This article has no abstract so we have provided the first paragraph of the full text.

People love a good argument. Some as combatant, many as voyeurs. Physicians and scientists are no different. Indeed, frank exchange of opinions is essential to efficient medical and scientific progress. If journals are to promote such advancement they must truly reflect the concerns of their audiences by tackling controversial issues.

Full text of this article is available with one of the following:
  1. Membership of the International Society of Nephrology. If already a member, please login. If not please join the Society now
  2. Personal subscription Purchase your own personal subscription to this journal. Already a subscriber? Please login for immediate access.
  3. 7 day single article pass for US$18 In order to purchase this article you must be a registered user. Please register or login above.
  4. Site licence Learn more about institutional site licences

Current Subscribers

Please log in to access the full text article using the login box at the top of the page.



Extra navigation

.