Practice Point

Nature Clinical Practice Cardiovascular Medicine (2006) 3, 16-17
doi:10.1038/ncpcardio0397  
Received 7 September 2005 | Accepted 6 October 2005

Is mechanical embolectomy a safe and efficacious treatment strategy in patients with acute ischemic stroke?

Nirav A Vora* and Lawrence R Wechsler

Correspondence *Department of Neurology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 200 Lothrop Street Suite C400, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA

Email
 vorana@upmc.edu

This article has no abstract so we have provided the first paragraph of the full text.

Endovascular treatment is a major development in AIS. In the PROACT II study, intra-arterial prourokinase administered within 6 h of stroke onset enhanced recanalization and improved outcomes in patients with middle cerebral artery occlusions.1 Many stroke centers now treat acute stroke patients presenting with large vessel occlusions with intra-arterial thrombolytics; however, experience has revealed several limitations. As in PROACT II, major arteries or branches are often only partially recanalized despite infusion times of 1–2 h. Furthermore, reocclusion can occur even after successful intra-arterial treatment.2 The time to recanalization is prolonged by the time taken to reach the angiography suite and prepare the patient, and the interval from arrival in the angiography suite to completion of the procedure is often 2–3 h. These drawbacks and the risk of intracerebral hemorrhage necessitate the need for alternative options.

Full text of this article is available with one of the following:
  1. Personal subscription Purchase your own personal subscription to this journal. Already a subscriber? Please log in for immediate access.
  2. 7 day single article pass for US$18 In order to purchase this article you must be a registered user. Please register or log in.
  3. Site licence Learn more about institutional site licences

Current Subscribers

Please log in to access the full text article using the login box at the top of the page.



Extra navigation

.