Access
To read this story in full you will need to login or make a payment (see right).
Letter
Nature 452, 892-895 (17 April 2008) | doi:10.1038/nature06816; Received 22 August 2007; Accepted 4 February 2008; Published online 26 March 2008
nature jobs
Forecasting Analyst - Global Marketing & Sales
- Novartis Healthcare Private Limited
- Hyderabad, A.P. 500081 India
Manager - Marketing Science
- Novartis Healthcare Private Limited
- Hyderabad, A.P. 500081 India
Retinotopic order in the absence of axon competition
Nathan J. Gosse1, Linda M. Nevin2 & Herwig Baier1,2
- Program in Developmental Biology, and,
- Program in Neuroscience, University of California, San Francisco, Department of Physiology, 1550 Fourth Street, San Francisco, California 94158-2324, USA
Correspondence to: Herwig Baier1,2 Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to H.B. (Email: herwig.baier@ucsf.edu).
Abstract
The retinotectal projection has long been studied experimentally and theoretically, as a model for the formation of topographic brain maps1, 2, 3. Neighbouring retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) project their axons to neighbouring positions in the optic tectum, thus re-establishing a continuous neural representation of visual space. Mapping along this axis requires chemorepellent signalling from tectal cells, expressing ephrin-A ligands, to retinal growth cones, expressing EphA receptors4. High concentrations of ephrin A, increasing from anterior to posterior, prevent temporal axons from invading the posterior tectum. However, the force that drives nasal axons to extend past the anterior tectum and terminate in posterior regions remains to be identified. We tested whether axon–axon interactions, such as competition, are required for posterior tectum innervation. By transplanting blastomeres from a wild-type (WT) zebrafish into a lakritz (lak) mutant, which lacks all RGCs5, we created chimaeras with eyes that contained single RGCs. These solitary RGCs often extended axons into the tectum, where they branched to form a terminal arbor. Here we show that the distal tips of these arbors were positioned at retinotopically appropriate positions, ruling out an essential role for competition in innervation of the ephrin-A-rich posterior tectum. However, solitary arbors were larger and more complex than under normal, crowded conditions, owing to a lack of pruning of proximal branches during refinement of the retinotectal projection. We conclude that dense innervation is not required for targeting of retinal axons within the zebrafish tectum but serves to restrict arbor size and shape.
To read this story in full you will need to login or make a payment (see right).
MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS
These links to content published by NPG are automatically generated.
NEWS AND VIEWS
Developmental neuroscience Two gradients are better than oneNature News and Views (05 Jan 2006)
Neuronal Specificity: Ectopic EyesNature News and Views (26 May 1972)
See all 7 matches for News And ViewsRESEARCH
Wnt?Ryk signalling mediates medial?lateral retinotectal topographic mappingNature Article (05 Jan 2006)
Silencing of EphA3 through a cis interaction with ephrinA5Nature Neuroscience Article (01 Mar 2006)
See all 57 matches for Research