Access

Letter

Nature 445, 418-421 (25 January 2007) | doi:10.1038/nature05517; Received 25 July 2006; Accepted 5 December 2006

Inconsistent correlation of seismic layer 2a and lava layer thickness in oceanic crust

Gail L. Christeson1, Kirk D. McIntosh1 & Jeffrey A. Karson2

  1. University of Texas Institute for Geophysics, Jackson School of Geosciences, J.J. Pickle Research Campus, Mail Code R2200, 10100 Burnet Road, Austin, Texas 78758, USA
  2. Department of Earth Sciences, Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York 13244, USA

Correspondence to: Gail L. Christeson1 Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to G.L.C. (Email: gail@ig.utexas.edu).

Top

At mid-ocean ridges with fast to intermediate spreading rates, the upper section of oceanic crust is composed of lavas overlying a sheeted dyke complex. These units are formed by dykes intruding into rocks overlying a magma chamber, with lavas erupting at the ocean floor. Seismic reflection data acquired over young oceanic crust commonly image a reflector known as 'layer 2A', which is typically interpreted as defining the geologic boundary between lavas and dykes1, 2, 3. An alternative hypothesis is that the reflector is associated with an alteration boundary within the lava unit4, 5, 6. Many studies have used mapped variability in layer 2A thickness to make inferences regarding the geology of the oceanic crust, including volcanic construction, dyke intrusion and faulting7, 8, 9, 10. However, there has been no link between the geologic and seismological structure of oceanic crust except at a few deep drill holes. Here we show that, although the layer 2A reflector is imaged near the top of the sheeted dyke complex at fast-spreading crust located adjacent to the Hess Deep rift, it is imaged significantly above the sheeted dykes section at intermediate-spreading crust located near the Blanco transform fault. Although the lavas and underlying transition zone thicknesses differ by about a factor of two, the shallow seismic structure is remarkably similar at the two locations. This implies that seismic layer 2A cannot be used reliably to map the boundary between lavas and dykes in young oceanic crust. Instead we argue that the seismic layer 2A reflector corresponds to an alteration boundary that can be located either within the lava section or near the top of the sheeted dyke complex of oceanic crust.

MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS

These links to content published by NPG are automatically generated.

NEWS AND VIEWS

News from a deepening hole

Nature News and Views (05 Feb 1987)

Geology: Submersible study of the East Pacific Rise

Nature News and Views (18 Oct 1984)

See all 8 matches for News And Views