Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • NEWS FEATURE

Self-destructing mosquitoes and sterilized rodents: the promise of gene drives

Altering the genomes of entire animal populations could help to defeat disease and control pests, but researchers worry about the consequences of unleashing this new technology.
  1. Megan Scudellari

    1. Megan Scudellari is a science journalist in Boston, Massachusetts.

    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed  Google Scholar

Illustration by Ana Kova

Austin Burt and Andrea Crisanti had been trying for eight years to hijack the mosquito genome. They wanted to bypass natural selection and plug in a gene that would mushroom through the population faster than a mutation handed down by the usual process of inheritance. In the back of their minds was a way to prevent malaria by spreading a gene to knock out mosquito populations so that they cannot transmit the disease.

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Learn more

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Nature 571, 160-162 (2019)

doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-02087-5

References

  1. Windbichler, N. et al. Nature 473, 212–215 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Champer, J. et al. PLoS Genet. 13, e1006796 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hammond, A. M. et al. PLoS Genet. 13, e1007039 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kyrou, K. et al. Nature Biotechnol. 36, 1062–1066 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Grunwald, H. A. et al. Nature 566, 105–109 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Shapiro, R. S. et al. Nature Microbiol. 3, 73–82 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Buchman, A. et al. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/645481 (2019).

  8. DiCarlo, J. E., Chavez, A., Dietz, S. L., Esvelt, K. M. & Church, G. M. Nature Biotechnol. 33, 1250–1255 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Noble, C. et al. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 8275–8282 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Li, M. et al. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/645440 (2019).

  11. North, A. R., Burt, A. & Godfray, H. C. J. BMC Biol. 17, 26 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. James, S. et al. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 98 (Suppl. 6), 1–49 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kofler, N. et al. Science 362, 527–529 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Subjects

Latest on:

Nature Careers

Jobs

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing

Search

Advanced search

Quick links