Access

Letters to Nature

Nature 416, 624-626 (11 April 2002) | doi:10.1038/416624a; Received 8 October 2001; Accepted 25 January 2002

Strong male-driven evolution of DNA sequences in humans and apes

Kateryna D. Makova & Wen-Hsiung Li

  1. Department of Ecology and Evolution, University of Chicago, 1101 East 57th Street, Chicago, Illinois 60637, USA

Correspondence to: Wen-Hsiung Li Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to W.-H.L. (e-mail: Email: whli@uchicago.edu).

Top

Studies of human genetic diseases have suggested a higher mutation rate in males than in females1 and the male-to-female ratio (alpha) of mutation rate has been estimated from DNA sequence and microsatellite data to be about 4–6 in higher primates2, 3, 4, 5. Two recent studies, however, claim that alpha is only about 2 in humans6, 7. This is even smaller than the estimates (alpha > 4) for carnivores and birds8, 9; humans should have a higher alpha than carnivores and birds because of a longer generation time and a larger sex difference in the number of germ cell cycles. To resolve this issue, we sequenced a noncoding fragment on Y of about 10.4 kilobases (kb) and a homologous region on chromosome 3 in humans, greater apes, and lesser apes. Here we show that our estimate of alpha from the internal branches of the phylogeny is 5.25 (95% confidence interval (CI) 2.44 to infinity), similar to the previous estimates2, 3, 4, 5, but significantly higher than the two recent ones6, 7. In contrast, for the external (short, species-specific) branches, alpha is only 2.23 (95% CI: 1.47–3.84). We suggest that closely related species are not suitable for estimating alpha, because of ancient polymorphism and other factors. Moreover, we provide an explanation for the small estimate of alpha in a previous study12. Our study reinstates a high alpha in hominoids and supports the view that DNA replication errors are the primary source of germline mutation.