Introduction

Leptospirosis is an often overlooked cause of acute kidney injury that can lead to multiple organ failure and even death. It was estimated to cause one million cases worldwide yearly and the mortality rates were 5 to 10%1. The disease is a common zoonosis caused by exposure to Leptospira species, a family of spiral-shaped gram-negative spirochetes, in water or soil that are contaminated by the infected animals2,3,4. Sharing of Leptospira species pathogens between rodents, cattle and fish in the same locality has been reported5. Pathogenic Leptospira species disseminates hematogenously and colonizes in renal proximal tubule epithelial cells6. The clinical manifestations of leptospirosis include fever, headache, muscle pain, jaundice, pulmonary hemorrhage, acute tubulointerstitial nephritis and multiple organ failures7. Electrolyte imbalance such as sodium and potassium wasting is common in affected patients due to predominantly proximal tubular dysfunction8. Early diagnosis and prompt treatment with appropriate antibiotics are imperative to reverse the complications of leptospirosis7.

The candidate virulence factors for leptospiral infection include lipopolysaccharides (LPS)9, glycolipoproteins (GLP)10,11, hemolysins12, adhesion molecules13 and outer membrane proteins (OMPs)14,15, but their precise functions are still not completely understood. Among these factors, a 32-kDa lipoprotein, designated LipL32, is the most prominent protein in the leptospiral protein profiles and is highly conserved among pathogenic Leptospira species16. Anti-LipL32 reactivity was detectable in sera from leptospirosis patients in both acute and convalescent phases17. LipL32 has been shown to induce inflammatory cytokines and stimulates extracellular matrix production in cultured renal tubular epithelial cells through the TGF-beta1/Smad-dependent pathway6,18. These inflammatory reactions require Toll-like receptor 2 (TLR2) rather than TLR4 in cultured renal tubular cells19,20. Structurally, LipL32 contains the calcium-bound dock which is crucial for its interaction to host cells21,22. LipL32 recognizes and adheres to the individual components of extracellular matrix (ECM) including laminin, collagen I and collagen V of the host cell23,24. However, the in vivo role of LipL32 in the pathogenesis of renal injury remains to be determined.

Zebrafish (Danio rerio) has been a vertebrate model for studying infectious diseases such as Streptococcus, Salmonella and Candida albican infection25,26,27. These studies have demonstrated novel disease mechanisms that are not likely seen in other animal models. The advantages of zebrafish models include the ease of genetic manipulation, the ability to keep in germ-free conditions and the resemblance of physiology to that of mammals28,29. There are only sparse data available on the use of zebrafish larvae for leptospirosis studies. An earlier study showed that microinjection of L. interrogans serovar Copenhageni stably infect zebrafish embryos30. The accumulation of macrophages surrounding the pronephric region suggests a role of leptospiral infection in causing kidney damage. However, the effects of leptospiral infection on the pronephric kidneys of zebrafish remain uninvestigated.

In this study, we have utilized a zebrafish model to study the effects of leptospiral infection and its major outer membrane protein, LipL32, on the developing kidneys. We demonstrated that LipL32 induced inflammation, reversed the polarity of NA-K-ATPase and resulted in kidney injury. In addition, we found that LipL32 induced inflammation through TLR2 but not TLR4 by specifically knocking down these receptors in zebrafish larvae. These results may improve our understanding of the cellular and molecular mechanisms of the pathogenesis of leptospirosis.

Results

Leptospira infection caused tubular injuries in zebrafish larvae

To examine the virulence of Leptospira infection in zebrafish larvae, we first immersed zebrafish larvae to L. Shermani and L. Patoc from 24 hpf for 5 days (Fig. 1A). L. Shermani is the most frequently isolated pathogenic serovar in Taiwan and L. Patoc is a non-pathogenic leptospira2. The survival of zebrafish larvae treated with L. Shermani was 78.0% (85/109), whereas the survival of those treated with L. Patoc and E3 buffer control was 81.7% (89/109) and 85.3% (93/110), respectively. There was no significant difference in survival between groups (log-rank test, P = 0.4248). These results suggest that incubating zebrafish larvae with L. Shermani at a concentration of up to 1 × 106 CFU/ml had no significant effects on larva viability.

Figure 1
figure 1

Leptospira Shermani infection in zebrafish larvae.

(A) Kaplan-Meier survival curves of zebrafish larvae incubated with L. Shermani (n = 109), L. Patoc (n = 109) and controls (n = 110). Log-rank test P = 0.4248. Standard error was calculated by the Greenwood method. (B) RT-PCR analyses show the expression of lipl32 and flaB mRNAs in zebrafish larvae incubated with L. Shermani but not with L. Patoc or E3 buffer. Zebrafish β-actin was used as a loading control. Cropped gel images are shown and the gels were run under the same experimental conditions. Uncropped gels are shown in Supplementary Figure S1.

To confirm the actual infection of zebrafish larvae with L. Shermani, we then investigated the expression of LipL32 in these larvae using Reverse Transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR). As shown in Fig. 1B, lipl32 mRNA was detected in the zebrafish larvae that were incubated with L. Shermani but not in those treated with L. Patoc. The expression of lipl32 mRNA appeared as early as two hours after incubation (26 hpf) and persisted until 48 hpf. We also examined the flagellin gene flaB mRNA, which showed a similar expression pattern but persisted until 72 hpf (Fig. 1B and Supplementary Figure S1)31. These results indicate a successful infection of L. Shermani in the zebrafish larvae using the immersion method.

We then examined the pathological changes in pronephric kidneys after L. Shermani and L. Patoc infection. Compared with control larvae (Fig. 2A,D,G) and L. Patoc-infected larvae (Fig. 2B,E,H), the L. Shermani-infected larvae (Fig. 2C,F,I) showed marked swelling of the pronephric epithelial cells, predominantly in the proximal parts of pronephric ducts on histological examination. These results were confirmed by quantifying the area of pronephric ducts by image analysis on histology sections (Fig. 2J–L). Thus, our results demonstrated that infection with the pathogenic L. Shermani, which expresses the outer membrane protein LipL32, could cause acute tubular injury in zebrafish larvae. It seems unlikely that these changes are due to non-specific cytotoxicity because the larval survival was not jeopardized by current experimental conditions.

Figure 2
figure 2

Leptospira Shermani induced acute tubular injury in zebrafish larvae.

Transverse histological sections (H&E stain) from control (A,D,G), L. Patoc-treated (B,E,H) and L. Shermani-treated larvae (C,F,I). Note the marked swelling of the proximal pronephric ducts (circles) in L. Shermani-treated larvae compared with L. Patoc-treated larvae and controls. The differences were not evident in the distal pronephric ducts. Living larvae were incubated in E3 media containing L. Shermani or L. Patoc (1 × 106 CFU/ml) from 24 hpf to 48 hpf. Control larvae were incubated with E3 buffer only. Representative micrographs from the level of the glomerulus (A–C), proximal pronephric duct (D–F) and distal pronephric duct (G–I) are shown. Circles indicate the location of the pronephric duct. Pt, pronephric tubule; Glm, glomerulus; Scale bar, 10 μm. (J,K) Quantification of the area of pronephric ducts. *P < 0.05 compared to control. n = 6 from three larvae in each group. (L) Diagram of transverse sections illustrating the structure of zebrafish pronephros at 48 hpf.

Ectopic expression of lipl32 mRNA in zebrafish larvae

We then sought to examine the pathological role of LipL32 in the developing kidneys by ectopic expression of the protein in zebrafish larvae. To this end, zebrafish embryos were firstly microinjected with a capped RNA of lipl32 (myc-tagged) in the one-cell stage. As shown in Fig. 3A, in situ hybridization of lipl32 mRNA at 24 hpf revealed a widespread expression of LipL32 including the regions of pronephros and the posterior blood island, indicating a successful injection of lipl32 mRNA. We further confirmed the colocalization of the lipl32 mRNA expression with wt1b:GFP fluorescence in pronephric tubules and ducts, suggesting that the expression of LipL32 may occur in the pronephric kidneys. Similarly, immunostaining for the Myc-tagged epitope in larvae at 48 hpf demonstrated that LipL32 expression can be detected in the pronephros (Fig. 3B). We also found colocalization of Myc and wt1b:GFP signals in the pronephric tubules and ducts (Fig. 3B). These results enabled us to examine the specific effects of LipL32 on the pronephros in our model. The ectopic expression of LipL32 was further confirmed by Western blotting with an antibody against LipL32 on the whole larva lysates from the lipl32 mRNA-injected larvae at 48 hpf (Fig. 3C and Supplementary Figure S1). We next examined whether the ectopic expression of LipL32 induces pronephric duct damages. As shown in Fig. 3D, edematous degeneration and swelling of pronephric epithelium were observed in the lipl32 mRNA-injected larvae, suggesting that LipL32 may directly contribute to acute tubular injury in leptospiral infection.

Figure 3
figure 3

Microinjection of myc-tagged lipl32 mRNA and ectopic expression of LipL32 in zebrafish larvae.

(A) Whole-mount in situ hybridization for lipl32 mRNA (lateral view, head to the left, scale bar, 200 μm). The expression of lipl32 mRNA was prominent in the head, the pronephric region (arrowhead) and the posterior blood island (arrow) in the transgenic wt1b:GFP line at 24 hpf. In transverse sections, signals detected by in situ hybridization are pseudocolored in red and merged to GFP immunostaining (green) to locate the pronephros. The white arrows indicate colocalization (orange stain) of lipl32 and GFP signals. Nuclei are stained with DAPI (blue). Scale bar, 20 μm. (B) Whole-mount immunostaining for Myc tag at 24 and 48 hpf. The expression of Myc tag was detected in the pronephric region (arrowhead) in lipl32 mRNA-injected larvae (scale bar, 200 μm). In transverse sections, the white arrow indicates colocalization (orange stain) of Myc tag (red) and wt1b:GFP fluorescence (green) in pronephric tubules and ducts. Scale bar, 10 μm. (C) Cropped western blot shows the expression of LipL32 protein in lipl32 mRNA-injected larvae at 48 hpf but not in control larvae under the same experimental condition. Whole larva lysates were immunoblotted with a customized antibody against LipL32. The uncropped blot is shown in Supplementary Figure S1. (D) Transverse sections (H&E stain, scale bar, 10 μm) show non-fusion of the glomerulus and markedly swelling of the pronephric ducts in lipl32 mRNA-injected larvae. Quantification of the area of proximal pronephric ducts is shown (*P < 0.05 compared to control). Pt, pronephric tubule; Glm, glomerulus. Circles indicate the location of the pronephric duct. Control larvae were injected with pCS2 (A,B) or myc mRNA (C,D).

Expression of lipl32 mRNA impaired kidney development

We next tested whether ectopic expression of lipl32 mRNA in zebrafish embryo perturbs the development of pronephros. As shown in Fig. 4A, the percentage of pronephric kidney abnormalities (mild and severe) was significantly increased in lipl32 mRNA-injected larvae compared with control (30/35 vs 3/30, P < 0.0001). To investigate the underlying mechanism of kidney injury, we performed in situ hybridization for a macrophage marker, l-plastin. The expression of l-plastin was markedly increased in lipl32 mRNA-injected larvae and the staining was merged to the wt1b:GFP signal (Fig. 4B), suggesting that these inflammatory cells infiltrated the pronephric kidneys. Meanwhile, we tested if LipL32 could affect NA-K-ATPase or cilia in renal epithelial cells. As illustrated in Fig. 4C, the expression of LipL32 disoriented the basolateral location of NA-K-ATPase to the apical membrane of the renal epithelial cells. In contrast, immunostaining for the primary cilia, which is responsible for the mechanosensation of renal tubular epithelium, did not show any structural abnormality in lipl32 mRNA-injected larvae (Fig. 4D). These results demonstrate that LipL32 may cause pronephric kidney injury by inducing inflammation and mislocalization of NA-K-ATPase. We also found that the glomerular filtration rates, as estimated by the excretion of injected 10-kDa rhodamine dextran, were significantly reduced in the lipl32 mRNA-injected larvae compared to controls (Fig. 4E), indicating a functional impairment of the affected pronephric kidneys.

Figure 4
figure 4

LipL32 induced pronephric malformation, inflammatory cell infiltration and translocation of NA-K-ATPase in zebrafish tubular epithelial cells.

(A) Quantification of normal, mild or severe deformities of pronephros between groups of wt1b:GFP larvae at 48 hpf (n = 30 to 35 in each group). Photos were collected by in vivo observation under fluorescence microscopy (dorsal view, anterior to the left). Pronephric kidneys show abnormalities in glomerular fusion, cystic changes and deformities of pronephric tubules and ducts. Scale bar, 50 μm. (B) In situ hybridization shows that l-plastin positive cells (pseudo-colored by red) were increased in lipl32 mRNA-injected larvae compared to control. Arrows indicate a colocalization (orange) of GFP staining (green) and l-plastin in the pronephric tubule and duct. Scale bar, 50 μm. (C) Immunostaining for NA-K-ATPase shows the normal basolateral location of NA-K-ATPase in the pronephric ducts was disorganized in lipl32 mRNA injected larvae (scale bar, 10 μm). Arrows indicate the basolateral cell surface. Right panels are transverse sections on whole-mount stained larvae on the left (scale bar, 2 μm). A diagram illustrating the changes in the cellular location of NA-K-ATPase is shown. (D) Immunostaining for acetyl-tubulin shows no significant differences of pronephric cilia (arrows) between groups (scale bar, left panel, 10 μm, right panel, 2 μm). (E) The retention rates of 10-kDa rhodamine dextran as measured from the boxed region of the posterior pronephric ducts 6 hours after pericardial injection were significantly reduced in the lipl32 mRNA-injected larvae compared to myc-mRNA controls (**P < 0.01, n = 10 to 11 in each group, scale bar, 100 μm). Transverse sections demonstrate retention of rhodamine fluorescence in the lumen of pronephric ducts (circle) in lipl32 mRNA-injected larvae (scale bar, 5 μm).

LipL32 triggered pronephric inflammation through the TL2R pathway

We then investigated whether LipL32 triggers inflammation through the TLR2 pathway according to our previous in vitro studies19,20,32. As shown in Fig. 5A,B, the ectopic expression of lipl32 mRNA triggers the accumulation of l-plastin positive cells in the posterior blood island and the region surrounding pronephric ducts. The inflammatory response was significantly abolished (P < 0.0001) in the tlr-2 knockdown larvae but remained unchanged with concomitant tlr4a and tlr4b knockdown. Knockdown of the tlr2 downstream transducers myeloid differentiation factor 88 (myd88) also blocked (P < 0.0001) the lipl32-mediated l-plastin expression. Quantitative real-time RT-PCR confirmed that the expression of l-plastin mRNA was reduced significantly after knocking down tlr2 (P < 0.05) rather than tlr4a and tlr4b (Fig. 5C).

Figure 5
figure 5

LipL32 promoted pronephric inflammation through the TL2R pathway in zebrafish.

Morpholino (MO) knockdown of tlr2 but not tlr4a and tlr4b attenuated the expression of l-plastin induced by microinjection of myc-tagged lipl32 mRNA. (A) In situ hybridization for l-plastin in zebrafish larvae at 48 hpf, with MO-knockdown of tlr2, myd88 and tlr4a/4b in response to lipl32-myc mRNA injection. Wild-type (WT) larvae and myc mRNA-injected control larvae are shown. All panels are lateral view (head toward the left). The insets are enlarged views of the corresponding boxed regions containing the pronephric ducts. (B) Comparative frequencies of strong and weak staining of l-plastin with different MOs (n = 43 to 171 from two experiments, ***P < 0.0001 versus lipl32 mRNA). (C) Quantitative real-time RT-PCR analyses show that tlr2 MO inhibited the expression of l-plastin induced by LipL32. Results shown are the mean ± SEM from three independent experiments carried out in duplicate (*P < 0.05 versus controls, #P < 0.05 versus LipL32). Scale bar, 200 μm.

Injection of LipL32 protein through the tail vein

We finally investigated the virulence of LipL32 protein by direct injection of a recombinant LipL32 protein into the tail vein of zebrafish larvae at 24 hpf. Successful injection of the recombinant protein to the circulation was confirmed by the presence of co-injected rhodamine fluorescence. As shown in Fig. 6A, the frequency of pronephric kidney deformity was significantly increased compared to control larvae (16/21 vs 7/26, P < 0.01). Injection of LipL32 protein also disrupted the expression of NA-K-ATPase, which was partially translocated from the basolateral membrane to the apical cell membrane (Fig. 6B). Furthermore, the expression of l-plastin mRNA in the pronephric area as shown by in situ hybridization was markedly increased after injection of LipL32 and was significantly suppressed (P < 0.0001) with morpholino knockdown of tlr2 but not of tlr4a and tlr4b (Fig. 6C). These data confirmed that circulating LipL32 can induce inflammation and kidney malformation in zebrafish larvae.

Figure 6
figure 6

Injection of recombinant LipL32 protein induced pronephric kidney deformity, inflammation and translocation of NA-K-ATPase.

(A) The frequencies of deformities in pronephros were significantly increased in the LipL32-injected group compared to the control group (wt1b:GFP larvae at 48 hpf, n = 21 to 26 in each group, P < 0.01). Purified recombinant LipL32 protein was microinjected into the tail vein of zebrafish larvae at 24 hpf. Control larvae were injected with RFP. Photos were collected by in vivo observation under fluorescence microscopy (dorsal view, anterior to the left). Scale bar, 50 μm. (B) Immunostaining for NA-K-ATPase shows disruption of the basolateral location of NA-K-ATPase in the pronephric ducts in LipL32-injected larvae at 48 hpf. Right panels (scale bar, 5 μm) are the transverse sections of whole-mount stained larvae on the left (scale bar, 20 μm). Asterisks denote the lumens of pronephric ducts. Arrows indicate the basolateral cell surface. (C) In situ hybridization at 48 hpf shows that l-plastin-positive cells were increased after injection of LipL32 and the response was blocked by morpholino knockdown of tlr2 but not tl4a and tl4b. The insets are enlarged views of the corresponding regions of pronephric ducts. Scale bar, 200 μm. The diagram indicates the frequencies of strong and weak staining of l-plastin with different MOs (n = 27 to 101 from three experiments, ***P < 0.0001 versus LipL32 protein).

TLR2 blockade ameliorated the kidney injury induced by LipL32

We further determined the potential rescue effects of TLR blockade on the LipL32-induced injury to the pronephros. As shown in Fig. 7, the frequencies of kidney deformities caused by the ectopic expression of lipl32 mRNA in wt1b:GFP larvae were significantly reduced by microinjection of tlr2 MOs (P < 0.05) but not tlr4a and tlr4b MOs (P = 0.2275). These results suggest that LipL32 might induce kidney injury predominantly through a TLR2-dependent pathway in zebrafish larvae.

Figure 7
figure 7

TLR2 blockade ameliorated the kidney injury induced by LipL32.

(A) Pronephric kidney injuries were induced in the lipl32 mRNA-injected wt1b:GFP larvae at 48 hpf. Representative images of normal, mild and severe deformities in pronephros are shown. Morphological deformities were assessed according to the criteria described in Methods. Photos were collected under fluorescence microscopy (dorsal view, anterior to the top). Scale bar, 50 μm. (B) Morpholino (MO) knockdown of tlr2 but not tlr4a and tlr4b significantly attenuated the LipL32-induced kidney injuries. The diagram indicates the frequencies of normal, mild and severe deformities in the wt1b:GFP larvae microinjected with different TLR MOs (n = 32 to 83 from three experiments, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001 versus lipl32 mRNA, n.s., not significant).

Discussion

Here we used a zebrafish model for investigating the potential virulence mechanisms of LipL32 in leptospirosis. We found that L. Shermani infection induced pronephric kidney injury in zebrafish larvae. Meanwhile, ectopic expression of LipL32 in zebrafish larvae prompted macrophage infiltration to the pronephric kidneys through the innate immunity TLR2 pathway, disrupted the basolateral NA-K-ATPase location and impaired the normal kidney structure. These results support the use of zebrafish as a model organism for leptospiral infection30.

Zebrafish has been used as a model organism for various diseases and may provide a unique opportunity to observe early pathological changes. Zebrafish has a fully functional innate immune system by 32 hpf with the development of circulating systems and phagocytes30. The pattern-recognition receptor system in zebrafish is highly similar to that in other vertebrates, which makes it a useful tool for examining host-microbe interactions33,34. An earlier study that injected L. interrogans into the caudal vein of zebrafish larvae has shown that leptospires are readily ingested by macrophages, which are later found specifically accumulated in the ventral wall of the dorsal aorta, equivalent to the aorta-gonad-mesonephros (AGM) in mammals30. In this current study, we further demonstrated that overexpression of LipL32 induced accumulation of macrophages in the posterior blood island and the pronephros, suggesting that LipL32 may participate in guiding macrophages to the target organs. Thus, LipL32 might be a potential leptospiral adhesin that is important in the specific interactions to host substrates35.

LipL32 is a major immunogen during leptospiral infection in humans and mammals9. In hamster model of leptospirosis, immunohistochemical analyses of L. kirschneri–infected kidneys have demonstrated the intense LipL32 expression in proximal tubule cells and the interstitium16. Vaccination with LipL32 reduces the severity of kidney inflammation in the hamsters infected with L. interrogans serovar Canicola in hamsters36. In this study, we demonstrated that the ectopic expression of LipL32 directly induced an inflammatory reaction and caused kidney injury, suggesting that LipL32 is a virulence factor and plays an important role in mediating the pathogenesis of renal injury in leptospirosis37.

Disturbances of renal electrolyte handling may occur in acute leptospirosis. This could lead to decreased renal water absorption and renal salt losing commonly seen as non-oliguric renal failure in leptospirosis10. Previous studies have demonstrated that the expression and function of NA-K-ATPase are inhibited by L. interrogans glycoproteins38,39,40. The addition of GLP extracted from L. interrogans specifically inhibits the Na-K-ATPase in rabbit kidney epithelial cells39. Downregulation of NA-K-ATPase and other ion transporters have been found in L. interrogans-infected mice41. Basolaterally located Na-K-ATPase is essential for transfer of salt and water across epithelium to interstitium and its dislocation has been related to alveolar edema in leptospirosis11. Our data are consistent with these findings and provide in vivo evidence that LipL32 also perturbed the expression of NA-K-ATPase in renal epithelial cells. Whether LipL32 might interact with NA-K-ATPase directly warrants future studies.

The TLR pathways have been shown to play a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of leptospirosis42. It has been demonstrated that TLR2-deficient mice showed a reduced cytokine response to leptospiral LPS challenge and LPS activates macrophages through TLR2 in cultured monocytes9. Our previous studies have shown that LipL32 activates TLR2 and downstream genes in cultured mouse medullary ascending limb cells and proximal tubule cells19,43. Experimental evidence from an atomic force microscope study suggests that LipL32 binds directly to TLR2, but not TLR4, on the renal cell surface32. In the current study, we further demonstrated that LipL32 induced leukocyte infiltration through the TLR2 pathway in vivo. These finding strongly support that LipL32 binds directly to TLR2 to mediate its virulence functions. Future research could also explore the potential LipL32 ligands other than immune receptors44,45.

Our results are different to a previous study which showed that a LipL32 mutant constructed in L. interrogans was still able to infect hamsters and rats46. This discrepancy may be explained partly by a high degree of redundancy in leptospiral proteins involved in adhesion, survival and renal colonization47. However, by direct expression of LipL32 in the zebrafish model, our data demonstrated clearly the virulence of LipL32 in causing host inflammation and target organ damage. It is also worth noting that other outer membrane proteins such as Loa22, OmpL1, p31/LipL45 and LenA have been regarded as potential leptospiral adhesins and might warrant further investigation35,48.

In conclusion, we have shown that LipL32 promotes inflammation and induces kidney injury in zebrafish larvae. This investigation supports the hypothesis that LipL32 contributes to the pathogenesis of renal injury in leptospirosis. Our results support the use of zebrafish as a model organism for studying the disease mechanism of leptospiral infection. This model might permit the future exploration of the virulence and molecular pathways of different leptospiral outer membrane proteins.

Methods

Maintenance of fish

The study was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University. The study conformed to the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals published by the National Institute of Health. Zebrafish were maintained by standard protocols49. The transgenic line wt1b:GFP with pronephros specific GFP expression was kindly provided by Prof. Christoph Englert (Fritz Lipmann Institute, Jena, Germany)50. Zebrafish embryos were staged according to hours post fertilization (hpf)51.

Bacterial strains, growth conditions and zebrafish larva infection

L. santarosai serovar Shermani strain LT821 (ATCC number 43286; a pathogenic strain) and L. biflexa serovar Patoc (ATCC number 23582; a non-pathogenic strain) were purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA) and propagated at 28 °C under aerobic conditions in medium containing 10% Leptospira Enrichment Ellinghausen-McCullough-Johnson-Harris (EMJH) and 90% Leptospira Medium Base EMJH (Difco, BD Diagnostics, Sparks, MD). Bacterial densities were counted with a CASY-Model TT cell counter and analyzer (Roche Innovatis AG, Casy-Technology, Reutlingen, Germany). For zebrafish infection, living 24 hpf larvae were manually dechorionated and distributed in 6-well plates (15–30 larvae per well), immersed in E3 media containing leptospires at a concentration of 1 × 106 colony-forming units (CFU)/ml and maintained at 28 °C in an incubator at the RG2 laboratory.

Microinjection of lipl32 mRNA

An myc epitope-tagged pCS2-MT-LipL32 plasmid was generated by cloning lipl32 cDNA (798 bp, amino acids 1–266) from pathogenic L. santarosai serovar Shermani genomic DNA, into the Cla1/EcoR1 sites of the pCS2-MT plasmid (Promega). The lipl32 sequence was confirmed by DNA sequencing. In vitro transcribed capped RNA of lipl32 (myc-tagged, 600 ng/μl, 4 nl) was microinjected in the one-cell stage of zebrafish embryos according to standard protocols52.

Microinjection of LipL32 protein

Detoxified LipL32 protein (amino acids 21–272) was prepared as described previously20,32. Larvae were anesthetized using 0.02% tricaine. LipL32 recombinant protein (0.07mg/ml, 4 nl) was injected into the caudal vein at 24 hpf together with a 10-kDa rhodamine–dextran (Invitrogen) to confirm the injection into blood circulation. Control larvae were injected with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) or red fluorescent protein (RFP).

Morpholino knockdown

Antisense morpholino oligonucleotides (MO) against zebrafish tlr2, tlr4a, tlr4b and myd88 were designed and synthesized by Gene-Tools (Philomath, OR)53,54. One- to two-cell stage embryos were microinjected with 0.125 mM antisense MOs. The sequences of MO used in this study are as follows: tlr2 MO1 (translating blocking), 5′-CCTGACTGCCATTATTGTGTCTACT-3′, tlr2 MO2 (translating blocking) 5′-AGTCATTGTTCCTACGAGTCTCATC-3′53, tlr4a MO (splice blocking), 5′-GTAATGGCATTACTTACCTTGACAG-3′54, tlr4b MO (splice blocking), 5′-CTATGTAATGTTCTTACCTCGGTAC-3′54, myd88 MO (translating blocking) 5′-TACCATAACCTGTGTTATCGAGGGA-3′54 and standard control MO, 5′-CCTCTTACCTCAGTTACAATTTATA-3′.

Morphological abnormalities in pronephros

Pronephros was observed in living transgenic wt1b:GFP zebrafish larvae under fluorescence microscopy at 48 hpf 55. Developmental abnormalities of the pronephros including glomerular malformation and tubular dilatation were categorized as normal, mild (glomerular malformation or a loss of tubular angle) or severe deformity (glomerular malformation and a loss of tubular angle)50,56,57.

Histology analysis

Zebrafish larvae were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS overnight at 4 °C, embedded in glycol methacrylate (JB-4; Polyscience) and cut at 5 μm. Slides were stained with Hematoxylin and Eosin (H&E). Quantitative image analysis for the area of pronephric ducts was performed using ImageJ software.

Immunohistochemistry

Immunostaining was performed in whole-mount larvae as described previously58. A mouse anti-NA-K-ATPase alpha-subunit (a5) antibody (1:200, Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank) was used to label the location of NA-K-ATPase in the pronephric epithelial cells. A mouse anti-acetylated alpha-tubulin antibody (1:200, Sigma) was used to label the primary cilia of pronephric ducts. A mouse anti-c-myc (9E10) antibody (1:500, Covance) was used to label the Myc-tag of LipL32 protein expression. A rabbit anti-GFP antibody (1:500, Invitrogen) was used to label the pronephric GFP expression in the wt1b:GFP larvae. The secondary antibodies used were Alexa Fluor 488- or 594- conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG and goat anti-rabbit IgG (1:500, Invitrogen). The immunostained larvae were then embedded in OTC medium and cryosectioned. Sections were mounted in Vectashield (Vector Laboratories) with DAPI and observed under fluorescence microscopy.

Rhodamine-dextran injection

For renal function estimation, a 10-kDa rhodamine–dextran (Invitrogen) was injected into the pericardium of zebrafish larvae at 48 hpf after anesthesia with tricaine59. Images of larvae were collected under fluorescence microscopy 6 hours after injection. A region of 200 × 100 pixels containing the pronephric duct and cloaca was selected and the fluorescence intensity was measured using ImageJ software.

Whole-mount in situ hybridization

Larvae were fixed overnight in 4% paraformaldehyde at 4 °C. Whole-mount in situ hybridization was performed according to published protocols49. Antisense digoxigenin-labeled probes were made for lipl32 and l-plastin from corresponding cDNA constructs.

RT-PCR

The expression of lipl32 and flaB mRNAs was examined by RT-PCR to confirm the infection of pathogenic Leptospira species according to the previously described methods31,60. Larvae were mixed and ground in liquid nitrogen for total RNA extraction using TRIzol Reagent (Life Technologies). We obtained cDNA from the total RNA using the First Strand cDNA synthesis kit for RT-PCR (AMV) (Roche Diagnostics) following the manufacturer’s instructions. The primers used were: lipl32, forward 5′-CGCTGAAATGGGAGTTCGTATGATT-3′ and reverse 5′- CCAACAGATGCAACGAAAGATCCTTT-3′60; flaB, forward 5′- CTCACCGTTCTCTAAAGTTCAAC-3′ and reverse 5′- TGAATTCGGTTTCATATTTGCC-3′31. Zebrafish ß-actin was used as internal control.

Real-time RT-PCR

Real-time quantitative RT-PCR was performed with the ABI PRISM 7700 sequence detection system (Applied Biosystems) in the presence of SYBR Green. The primers used to amplify zebrafish l-plastin were: forward 5′-CCGCTACGACCTGCTGAAG-3′, reverse: 5′-GCGCCATCGAGATTGCAT-3′. The zebrafish ribosomal protein S18 (rps18) was used as internal control. The reaction was performed in duplicate for each sample.

Western blot analysis

Proteins extracted from whole larvae were analyzed by Western blotting following the standard method49. Antibodies used include anti-tubulin (1:8000, clone DM1a, Sigma) and a purified custom-made rabbit polyclonal antibody (1:10000) raised against the LipL32 protein (amino acids 21–272).

Statistical analysis

Continuous variables are expressed as mean ± SEM and compared by using Student’s t-test or one-way ANOVA followed by Newman-Keuls Test. Categorical variables were analyzed using the Fisher’s exact or Chi-square test. Cumulative survival curves were generated by the Kaplan–Meier method and compared with the log-rank test. The standard error of the survival curves was calculated using the Greenwood method. P-values < 0.05 are considered statistically significant. All analyses were performed using the Graphpad Prism 5.1 (Graphpad, La Jolla, CA).

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Chang, M.-Y. et al. Leptospiral outer membrane protein LipL32 induces inflammation and kidney injury in zebrafish larvae. Sci. Rep. 6, 27838; doi: 10.1038/srep27838 (2016).