Introduction

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) are phylogenetically unrelated non-cytopathic viruses that infect the liver1. While HBV is a DNA virus and HCV is a positive-strand RNA virus, both have the capacity to persist for years in some infected individuals. Hundreds of millions of people worldwide are chronic carriers of HBV or HCV, 30–50% of whom have chronic liver disease2. Together, these viral infections are responsible for ~60% of liver cirrhosis and ~80% of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), a leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Numerous studies suggest that microRNAs (miRNAs), small 21–23 nt non-coding RNAs are important in the pathogenesis of these infections, modulating viral replication as well as host responses and possibly influencing the risk of carcinogenesis3. For example the HBV X protein represses expression of miR-148a, potentially enhancing tumorigenesis4. In contrast, HCV infection is associated with higher expression of miR-21, which targets key components of Toll-like receptor signaling pathways, possibly facilitating viral evasion of innate immune responses5. miR-122 stabilizes HCV RNA and promotes its replication6,7 and the importance of this interaction is reflected in the clinical development of an anti-miR-122 antagomir (miravirsen) as an antiviral therapeutic8.

Somewhat larger, 30–35 nt RNAs derived from the 5′ half of tRNA (5′ tRHs) represent a second major class of small non-coding RNA9. Increased expression of 5′ tRHs has been associated with viral and rickettsial infections in animals10,11 and may serve to prevent apoptosis and promote cell survival12. However, they have not been studied previously in the context of viral hepatitis. To our knowledge, only one study has described unbiased profiling of small RNAs in the liver during chronic viral hepatitis13, but the analysis was restricted to miRNAs. We sequenced small (14–40 nts) RNAs in liver biopsies from subjects with chronic hepatitis and HCC, examining both non-tumor and matched cancer tissue and found a surprisingly high proportion of reads representing 5′ tRHs9. Our results document their presence in human tissue, demonstrate that they are the most highly abundant small RNAs in virus-infected liver and show that their abundance is altered in various disease states including hepatocellular carcinoma.

Results

tRNA-half abundance is significantly increased in chronic viral hepatitis

We employed high-throughput sequencing to characterize the small RNA transcriptome in liver tissue from Japanese adults with advanced hepatitis B or hepatitis C and concomitant HCC (see Supplemental Table 1 for patient information; see Supplemental Tables 2–4 for summary statistics on RNA, qRT-PCR and sequencing). Initial studies focused on non-malignant tissue from 4 subjects with hepatitis B (mean age 53 ± 4 yrs s.e.m.), 4 with hepatitis C (63 ± 2 yrs) and 4 uninfected individuals undergoing resection of metastatic tumors (60 ± 10 yrs)14. A large proportion of the sequencing reads were 19–25 nts in length (median 38%, range 10–73%), as expected for miRNAs15 (Figure 1a, left). However, we detected an equal or greater abundance of 30–35 nt reads in HBV- and HCV-infected liver (median 54%, range 14–80%). These larger RNAs were less abundant in uninfected tissue (median 21%, range 14–84%) and in human hepatoma (FT3-7) cells (median 9%, range 8.7–9.3%).

Figure 1
figure 1

tRH abundance in HBV- and HCV-infected liver.

(a) (left) Read length distribution of 14–40 nt RNAs in non-malignant liver from uninfected, HBV-, or HCV-infected subjects (n = 4 each) and FT3-7 cells (n = 3 replicates). (right) Proportion of reads mapping to miRNA versus tRNA loci. Boxes represent median ± 1.5 * interquartile range. (b) tRNA coverage plot from the average of the 20 non-cancer samples. Dot size represents percent of reads mapping at each base position within each tRNA (top 20 by average abundance). The anticodon is red, with 5′ bases green and 3′ bases blue. Gray: bases of RNAs that are non-tRHs. See Supplemental Figure 1. (c) Proportion of mapped reads aligning to miR-122 versus the five most abundant tRNA-derived RNAs. (d) (left) Expression levels (RT-qPCR) of miR-122, 5′ tRHGly (“Gly[C/G]CC”) and 5′ tRHVal (“Val[A/C]AC”) in uninfected (n = 5–6), HBV-infected (n = 6–9) and HCV-infected (n = 14) human liver. Numbers of samples differ due to limited RNA. (right) Similar results from uninfected (n = 5), HBV-infected (n = 9) and HCV-infected C (n = 5) chimpanzees. RNU48 was used as a normalizer. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.005 by Mann-Whitney U-test. (e) ClustalW43 multiple sequence alignment of representative tRNAGly and tRNAVal genes from which 5′ tRHGly and 5′ tRHVal could originate (see Supplemental Figure 3). tRNAs regions are highlighted according to the color scheme in panel (b). The box identifies a unique conserved sequence motif described in the text. “Mapped reads” represents all reads aligning to miRNAs or tRNAs (see Methods).

Most (~65%) of the 30–35 nt reads in infected samples aligned perfectly to the region 5′ of the anticodon triplet in annotated tRNA genes16 (Figure 1b, Supplemental Figure 1, Supplemental Table 5 and 6). We refer to these as “5′ tRNA-halves” (5′ tRHs)9. Many of the remaining 30–35 nt reads also aligned to the 5′ end of tRNAs, particularly tRNAGly, but with one or more nucleotide deletions. Also present were 3′ tRHs (~36–39 nts) mapping to the region 3′ of the anticodon, including the 3′ terminal CCA (Figure 1b, Supplemental Figure 1). Additionally, we identified shorter reads derived from 3′ or 5′ tRNA termini, referred to previously as “tRNA fragments”9 (tRFs), or the region immediately 5′ or 3′ of the anticodon loop, but these were much less frequent. In 6 of 8 infected livers, more reads mapped to tRNA loci16 than to known miRNAs17 (see Methods), while the opposite was true in 3 of 4 uninfected tissues as well as FT3-7 cells (Figure 1a, right).

There are 625 annotated tRNA genes in the human genome (hg19) encoding 458 unique tRNA sequences. We identified reads mapping to 348 of these 458 sequences. Notably, in 11 of the 12 subjects, the same five 5′ tRHs comprised >80% of tRNA-derived reads (Supplemental Figure 2a). The two most abundant 5′ tRHs were Gly[C/G]CC (“5′ tRHGly”), which could be derived from any of 10 tRNAGly genes with identical 5′ sequence and Val[A/C]AC (“5′ tRHVal”), which could originate from any of 15 tRNAVal genes (Figure 1b and C, Supplemental Figure 1 and 3 and Supplemental Table 5)16. 5′ tRHGly accounted for 54 ± 9% (s.d.) and 5′ tRHVal 17 ± 9% of all tRNA-derived RNA reads (Supplemental Figure 2a). Remarkably, 5′ tRHGly abundance exceeded that of miR-122, one of the most abundant liver miRNAs13, in 7 of 8 virus-infected tissues.

We used real-time reverse transcription quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) to validate these results and compare 5′ tRHGly, 5′ tRHVal and miR-122 abundance in liver tissue from 22 additional subjects (Supplemental Table 1–3)14. These analyses confirmed that 5′ tRHGly abundance was increased in HBV- and HCV-infected liver compared with uninfected tissues (P<0.01 and P<0.05, respectively) (Figure 1d, left). A similar trend was observed for 5′ tRHVal (HBV P = 0.07; HCV P = 0.7). 5′ tRHGly and 5′ tRHVal were more abundant than miR-122 in HBV- and HCV-infected liver (5′ tRHGly, P<0.005 for both HBV and HCV; 5′ tRHVal, P<0.005 for HBV and P<0.01 for HCV) (Figure 1d left). Notably, 5′ tRHVal abundance was higher in HBV- than in HCV-infected tissues (P<0.005).

Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) recapitulate many aspects of HBV and HCV infections in humans18,19 and are free of potential confounding variables (e.g., alcohol intake, smoking) that are difficult to control in human cohorts. Similar to humans, we found that intrahepatic 5′ tRHGly and 5′ tRHVal abundance was increased in archived liver tissue from chimpanzees chronically infected with HBV compared to uninfected animals (P<0.005 and P<0.05, respectively) (Figure 1d, right and Supplemental Table 7). However, 5′ tRH abundance was not increased in chronically HCV-infected chimpanzee liver.

In human tissues, the relative abundance of specific tRNA-derived RNAs correlated with codon usage (codon frequency in DNA sequence) (Spearman's rho = 0.32, P = 0.01) and the number of possible tRNA genes from which each could originate (rho = 0.41, P = 0.001) (Supplemental Figure 2b). However, tRNAs representing potential sources of the five most abundant tRHs were not the most highly ranked by gene number or codon usage, suggesting that additional factors likely determine tRH biogenesis (Supplemental Figure 4). Interestingly, those tRNAs from which 5′ tRHGly and 5′ tRHVal are potentially derived share a unique sequence motif in the anticodon stem-loop region (Figure 1e) not present in other tRNAs (Supplemental Figure 3).

tRNA-half abundance is altered in viral hepatitis associated cancer

In HCC tissue from HBV-infected subjects, RT-qPCR analysis showed that 5′ tRHGly and 5′ tRHVal abundance was significantly reduced (P<0.005 for both) (Figure 2a). Similar reductions were evident in HCV-associated cancer tissue, but significant only for 5′ tRHVal (P<0.05). We then sequenced small RNAs in cancer tissue from 4 HBV- and 4 HCV-infected subjects. The proportion of reads mapping to tRNA genes was reduced in 4 of 7 samples for which a paired analysis with non-malignant liver was possible and relatively unchanged in the other 3 (Figure 2b). Although tRNA-derived RNA expression profiles were similar across non-malignant tissues from different subjects, there was substantial variation when compared to cancer tissues (Figure 2c). This suggests that the relative abundance of specific tRNA-derived RNAs is altered in HCC. Notably, the relative abundance of 5′ tRHGly was reduced by ~50–60% in both HBV- and HCV-associated cancer (Figure 2d).

Figure 2
figure 2

5′ tRH abundance in HBV- and HCV-associated hepatocellular carcinoma.

(b) Abundance (RT-qPCR) of (left) 5′ tRHGly (Gly[C/G]CC) and (right) 5′ tRHVal (Val[A/C]AC) in (top) non-malignant (n = 9) and cancer tissue (n = 10) from HBV-infected subjects and (bottom) non-malignant (n = 14) and cancer tissue (n = 15) from HCV-infected subjects. Box and whisker plots are overlaid with data from each sample; whiskers extend to 1.5 * interquartile range. P-values calculated using Mann-Whitney U-test. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.005. (b) Proportion of mapped reads aligning to tRNAs for the paired cancer and non-cancer tissue from subjects with chronic hepatitis B (n = 3) and hepatitis C (n = 4) (c) Correlation heatmap of tRNA-derived RNA expression profiles determined by small RNA sequencing. The colors of the cells represent Spearman's rank correlation coefficients of the relative levels of the 10 most abundant tRNA-derived RNAs between all pairs of tissue samples sequenced (n = 20). (d) Proportion of mapped reads that align to 5′ tRHGly and 5′ tRHVal in non-malignant and cancer tissue from (top) HBV-infected and (bottom) HCV-infected subjects. “Mapped reads” represents all reads aligning to miRNAs or tRNAs (see Methods).

tRNA-half abundance correlates with angiogenin levels in HBV-associated cancer

Angiogenin (encoded by the gene ANG) is best known for its role in angiogenesis, but several studies suggest its RNase activity contributes to tRH biogenesis20,21. Consistent with this, analysis of previous microarray data obtained from these tissues14 revealed that ANG mRNA was reduced in both HBV- and HCV-associated cancer compared to non-malignant tissue (P<0.01 and P<0.005, respectively) or uninfected liver (P<0.005 and P = 0.01) (Figure 3a). Analysis of data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (https://tcga-data.nci.nih.gov/tcga/) also indicates that ANG expression is reduced in HCC compared to non-malignant tissue, although the difference is significant only for HBV-associated cancer (HBV P<0.005, HCV P = 0.12) (Supplemental Figure 5). ANG mRNA abundance correlated strongly with 5′ tRH expression in the HBV-infected subjects we studied (5′ tRHGly: Spearman's rho = 0.67, P<0.01; 5′ tRHVal: rho = 0.74, P<0.005) (Figure 3b). Quantitative immunoblot analyses (Supplemental Figure 6) confirmed a correlation between ANG protein abundance and 5′ tRH expression in HBV-associated cancer (5′ tRHGly: rho = 0.83, P<0.005; 5′ tRHVal: rho = 0.87, P<0.005) (Figure 3c). ANG was expressed within the cytoplasm of hepatocytes (Figure 3d) and although its expression varied substantially in different tumors (Figure 3e), reductions in ANG expression likely explain the reduced tRH abundance we observed in most HBV-associated cancers. Unfortunately, however, the available tissue sections from these subjects were insufficient to power a formal analysis of the correlation between cytoplasmic versus nuclear expression of ANG and tRH abundance. ANG expression correlated poorly with tRH abundance in HCV-infected livers, suggesting that other factors determine tRH biogenesis.

Figure 3
figure 3

Angiogenin expression in viral hepatitis and hepatocellular carcinoma.

(a) Normalized ANG mRNA levels from previously generated liver microarray data14 from uninfected subjects (n = 6), non-malignant (n = 7) and liver cancer (n = 8) tissue from HBV-infected subjects and non-malignant (n = 11) and cancer tissue (n = 15) from HCV-infected subjects. **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.005, calculated by Mann-Whitney U-test. (b) Scatter plot of the levels of 5′ tRHs (RT-qPCR, -dCT normalized to RNU48) and ANG mRNA (microarray). 5′ tRHGly (“Gly[C/G]CC”): uninfected subjects (n = 7), non-cancer (n = 7) and cancer (n = 8) liver tissue from chronic hepatitis B subjects and non-cancer (n = 11) and cancer (n = 15) liver tissue from chronic hepatitis C subjects; 5′ tRHVal: uninfected subjects (n = 6), non-cancer (n = 7) and cancer (n = 8) liver tissue from chronic hepatitis B subjects and non-cancer (n = 11) and cancer (n = 15) liver tissue of chronic hepatitis C subjects. (c) Scatter plot of the levels of 5′ tRHs (RT-qPCR, -dCT normalized to RNU48) and ANG protein expression (normalized to β-actin) determined by immunoblot analysis. (d) Immunohistochemistry staining for ANG in formalin-fixed non-tumor (NT) and tumor tissue (T) from HBV-infected subject #10. (Right) Magnified view of non-tumor (NT). (e) ANG staining in adjacent tumor nodules (T1 and T2) and in non-tumor (NT) tissue from HCV-infected subject #7.

Discussion

Recent advances in high-throughput sequencing technology have unveiled the complexity and diversity of functional small RNAs. We found that small RNAs derived from tRNAs, specifically 5′ tRNA-halves9 (5′ tRHs, ~30–35 nts), are abundant in liver, significantly increased during chronic viral infection and altered in abundance in liver cancer associated with these infections. We do not believe that these tRNA-halves are products of stochastic endonuclease cleavage of tRNAs for several reasons. First, the same tRNA-halves were found to be increased in chronic viral hepatitis across all individuals. Second, each tRNA-half family exhibited a uniform length distribution (e.g., 5′ tRHGly was represented primarily by reads of length 32–34 in every individual). Third, tRNA-halves were preferentially induced in chronic HBV infection (as compared to chronic HCV infection) in both human and chimpanzee tissue, indicating biological specificity. Finally, tRH abundance was correlated with disease state (cancer versus non-cancer), indicating reproducible sensitivity to the cellular environment.

Several models of disease have been shown to exhibit an increase in tRH abundance, including cultured human airway cells infected with respiratory syncytial virus22, mice infected with spotted-fever group rickettsia23 and rats treated with cisplatin24. While their function is not well understood, previous work in cell culture suggests that some tRHs promote cell survival, are anti-apoptotic12, reduce translation25 and promote the formation of stress granules26. Preliminary studies in our laboratory do not support a role for 5′ tRHGly or 5′ tRHVal in the regulation of global protein translation in human hepatoma cells (Supplemental Figure 7–8); however, more detailed investigation is required to uncover the potential functions of tRHs. It has also been suggested that tRHs may alter the immune response due to their enrichment in mouse lymphoid organs27, high abundance in seminal exosomes (considered to be immunosuppressive)28 and roles in facilitating Trypanosoma cruzi infection in human cells and altering host gene expression29.

There is good evidence that the abundance of these small non-coding RNAs increases in response to specific kinds of cellular stress. For example, tRHs are induced in cell culture by the addition of sodium arsenite, exposure to UV, nutrient starvation, hypoxia, hypothermia and heat, but not by exposure to etoposide, γ-radiation, caffeine30,31. This strongly suggests that the formation of tRHs is a regulated process, rather than due to general degradation of tRNAs in response to stress. In the nucleus angiogenin is involved in promoting angiogenesis32 and in the cytoplasm, when not bound to RNH1, it acts as a tRNA-processing RNase33,34, cleaving tRNAs at the anticodon loop and producing tRHs30,31. The cellular localization of angiogenin and its ribonuclease activity depend on the intracellular conditions and are regulated by RNH133. The differences we observed in correlations between ANG expression and tRH abundance in chronic hepatitis B, hepatitis C and associated liver cancer may be a result of differences in angiogenin localization and function in these disease states. Non-tumor and tumor tissues from patients with chronic hepatitis C tend to show more evidence of angiogenesis than the in chronic hepatitis B35,36. This could mean that in chronic hepatitis C angiogenin is primarily nuclear and therefore not exclusively involved in tRH production. Finally, it must also be noted that factors other than ANG may be critical to tRH biogenesis in different cell types or in response to different types of cellular stress. Much more remains to be uncovered about the specific mechanisms that lead to tRH accumulation.

Chronic infections with HBV and HCV typically lead to more severe liver disease in human patients than in the chimpanzee model37,38. Disease severity may account for the differences we observed in tRH abundance between liver tissue from human subjects with chronic HCV infection and the chimpanzee samples. Interestingly, however, humans and chimpanzees exhibited similar increases in tRH abundance in chronic hepatitis B, suggesting that there may be a primary HBV-specific mechanism that directly regulates tRH biogenesis.

Our study has some technical limitations. tRNAs are subject to many different chemical modifications39, several of which could impede library preparation and sequencing. This may have biased which tRNA-derived RNAs we detected. Also, we do not know how tRH abundance varies among the diverse cell types that populate the liver. Given that these small RNAs have not previously been studied in human tissue, we also have little appreciation of what functions these small non-coding RNAs have within the liver. Nonetheless, our finding that the intrahepatic abundance of tRHs is substantially increased in chronic viral infections of the liver and altered in HCC suggest that tRHs may have important, yet to be determined roles in liver disease. Thus, this study may have implications for disease pathogenesis and novel therapeutic strategies.

Methods

The methods were carried out in accordance with the approved guidelines.

Human subjects

Written informed consent was obtained from all human subjects. Ethics approval was obtained from the Ethics Committee for Human Genome/Gene Analysis Research at Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Science.

Chimpanzee liver tissue

The chimpanzee samples used in this study were archived from previous studies and were collected prior to December 15, 2011. Chimpanzees were housed and cared for at the Southwest National Primate Research Center (SNPRC) of the Texas Biomedical Research Institute. The animals were cared for in accordance with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and all protocols were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. SNPRC is accredited by the Association for Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care (AAALAC) International. SNPRC operates in accordance with the NIH and U.S. Department of Agriculture guidelines and the Animal Welfare Act. Animals were sedated for all procedures. Animals are group-housed with indoor and outdoor access and an environmental enrichment program is provided by a staff of behavioral scientists.

Small RNA-sequencing

RNA was isolated as described previously14. RNA purity was assessed with Nanodrop 2000 (Thermo Scientific) and integrity was determined with an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent). RNA integrity and sequencing quality were comparable for all specimens (Supplemental Table 2–4). Small RNA libraries were generated using Illumina TruSeq Small RNA Sample Preparation Kit (Illumina, San Diego, CA). Sequencing was performed on Illumina HiSeq 2000 platform. Bioinformatic analysis: Sequencing reads were trimmed using Cutadapt (parameters O -10 e 0.1) and were further analyzed in two different ways: (i) Mapped trimmed reads allowing no mismatches to all tRNA sequences (except pseudo-tRNAs and undefined tRNAs) downloaded from GtRNAdb16 (Figure 1b,c; Figure 2c,d; Supplemental Figure 1,2,4,7); (ii) Mapped trimmed reads to genomic regions spanning annotated miRNA s40 (+/− 20 nts) and tRNA sequences (+/− 40 nts) using Bowtie 0.12.741 allowing for no mismatches. Next, reads that did not map without mismatches were aligned to the same regions using SHRiMP2.2.242. SHRiMP2.2.2 seeds were set based on the length of the read allowing 1 mismatch anywhere in the body and up to 3 mismatches at the 3′ end of the read (based on the length of the read). (Figure 1a right, Figure 2b, Supplemental Figure 7, Supplemental Table 4). Small RNA-sequencing data was deposited on GEO (GSE57381).

AGO2-RNA Co-immunoprecipitation

FT3-7 cells were grown in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM, Life Technologies) and supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum and 2 mM GlutaMAX (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA). Cells were cultured in a humidified incubator at 37°C and 5% CO2. Three technical replicates of 1 × 107 FT3-7 cells were harvested in lysis buffer [150 mM KCl, 25 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 5 mM EDTA, 1% Triton X-100, 5 mM DTT, Complete protease inhibitor mixture (Roche) and 100 U/mL RNaseOUT (Life Technologies)]. Lysates were centrifuged for 30 min at 17,000 × g at 4°C and filtered through a 0.22-um filter. Filtrates were incubated with anti-human AGO2 mAb (RN003M, MBL International, Woborn, MA) or isotype control IgG (Abcam, Cambridge, England) at 4°C for 2 h, followed by addition of 30 μL of Protein G Sepharose (GE Healthcare) for 1 h. The Sepaharose beads were washed three times in lysis buffer and RNA extracted using the miRNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany).

Small RNA real time quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR)

Complementary DNA (cDNA) was synthesized using TaqMan MicroRNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Life Technologies) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Real time PCR amplification was performed using TaqMan Universal Master Mix (Life Technologies) on the Bio-Rad CFX96 real time PCR detection system. U6, miR-24, let-7a, let-7f, RNU48 and RNU66 were all evaluated as potential housekeeping small RNAs for purposes of normalization. RNU48 was selected because it was the most consistent across disease groups. RT-qPCR reactions for human samples were performed in triplicate. RT-qPCR reactions for chimpanzee samples were performed in duplicate. The following TaqMan assays were purchased from Life Technologies: miR-122 (product number 4427975; 002245) and RNU48 or SNORD48 (product number 4427975; 001006). Primers for the custom TaqMan assays (5′ tRH-Gly and 5′ tRH-Val) were designed using 5′-GCAUUGGUGGUUCAGUGGUAGAAUUCUCGCCU-3′ for 5′ tRH-Gly and 5′-GUUUCCGUAGUGUAGUGGUUAUCACGUUCGCCU-3′ for 5′ tRHVal.

Metabolic Radiolabeling and Measurement of Nascent Protein Synthesis

Huh7 cells were seeded onto the wells of 6-well cell culture plates at a density of 2 × 105 cells/well and incubated overnight to allow cell attachment. Cells were transfected with 50 nM and 100 nM of 5′ tRHGly (5′-GCAUUGGUGGUUCAGUGGUAGAAUUCUCGCCU-3′), 5′ tRHVal (5′-GUUUCCGUAGUGUAGUGGUUAUCACGUUCGCCU-3′), or scramble (5′-GCAUUCACUUGGAUAGUAAAUCCAAGCUGAA-3′)21 (all from Integrated DNA Technologies, Coralville, IA) oligonucleotide after replacing cell culture medium with methionine- and cysteine-deficient DMEM (Life Technologies) and cultured for further 12 hrs. Cells were then metabolically radiolabeled for 12 hrs with 200 μCi/well of Express Protein Labeling Mix containing [35S]methionine and [35S]cysteine (PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA) in the presence or absence of 50 μg/ml puromycin and lysed with lysis buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.4] containing 150 mM NaCl, 1% Triton X-100, 0.05% SDS and 10% glycerol) supplemented with 50 mM NaF, 5 mM Na3VO4 and a protease inhibitor cocktail (Complete; Roche, Mannheim, Germany). The protein concentration of cell lysates was determined by the Bio-Rad Protein Assay (Bio-Rad) and 10 μg (total protein) of cell lysates was subjected to SDS-PAGE followed by staining gels with the Sypro Ruby Protein Gel Stain (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA) and autoradiography.

Immunohistochemistry (IHC)

Staining was performed by immunoperoxidase technique with an Envision kit (DAKO Japan). Primary antibodies used were against β-actin (Cell signaling technology, #4967, Beverly, MA) and Human Angiogenin Affinity Purified Polyclonal Ab (R and D Systems, AF265, Minneapolis, MN).