Introduction

Traditionally, organic syntheses are based on stepwise processes in which isolation and purification of key intermediates are needed before further transformations can be accomplished1. Domino and cascade reactions on the other hand can be performed in a one-pot fashion and allowing for the possible access to a myriad of complex molecules in an efficient, atom-economical and green manner2,3. However, the development of catalytic asymmetric domino and cascade reactions is very challenging and has previously been propelled predominantly by using transition metal catalysts4,5,6. Lately these types of transformations have begun to benefit from the rapidly growing field of organocatalysis7,8,9.

In recent years, the concept of combining transition metal catalysis and organocatalysis in one process, so called “organo-metal cooperative catalysis”, has attracted considerable attention and has emerged as a promising strategy for developing new and unprecedented transformations, not possible by using the transition metal or the organic catalysts alone10. Despite its advantages, the number of organo-metal cooperative catalyzed reactions that have been developed is by far less than those in which a single catalyst is employed. One major factor that contributes to this disparity is the incompatibility between transition metals and organocatalysts. Thus, the design and discovery of novel cooperative catalytic systems to conquer this challenge are particularly pressing. In 2006, we discovered that C-C bond formation could be achieved by combining homogeneous transition-metal catalysis with aminocatalysis and have since then developed dual catalytic systems for reactions, such as enantioselective α-allylic alkylaion of various carbonyl compounds11,12, enantioselective β-alkylation of α,β-unsaturated aldehydes13, carbocyclizations of various enynes14,15 and for the synthesis of homoallylboronates16. While successful, this methodology still suffers from drawbacks, the main being related to the use of homogeneous catalysts that are tedious to remove, resulting in inefficient separation, purification and recycling of the catalyst17,18,19,20,21. However, there are several examples in the literature where this problem has been circumvented e.g. by the use of heterogeneous catalysis22. Therefore, we were interested to investigate whether it was possible to implement a heterogenous Pd-catalyst in combination with an organocatalyst in the development of novel cascade and domino reaction protocols. To the best of our knowledge, we herein report on the first example in which heterogeneous Pd catalysis has been merged with amine catalysis for highly enantioselective cascade transformations.

Results

Initial screening

We have recently reported on a one-pot homogeneous dynamic kinetic asymmetric transformation (DYKAT) employing chiral amines and Pd(PPh3)4 or PdCl2 as co-catalysts for the preparation of a wide range of cyclopentenes and dihydrofurans in high yields (Figure 1)14,15.

Figure 1
figure 1

Pd-Amine co-catalyzed DYKAT.

These dynamic cascade reactions proceed via an initial reversible amine-catalyzed conjugate addition followed by carbocyclization were the synergistic catalysis is essential (Figure 1)15. Thus, the initial reversible 1,4-addition, which proceeds through catalytic iminium activation of an enal, forms two diastereomeric catalytic enamine intermediates (X = CH(CO2R1)2 or OH). Next, an irreversible Pd and amine co-catalyzed intramolecular enantioselective C-C bond-formation23,24,25,26 occurs via activation of the alkyne moiety and the stereochemical outcome of the reaction is determined by the different rates of cyclization for the two diastereomeric enamine intermediates. When using 2-substituted-4-pentynoate esters (e.g. X = CNCHCO2R1) as substrates, the transformation generates an all-carbon stereocenter, which has proved to be a challenging task in organic synthesis27. However, this cascade reaction is very difficult to control since the initial reversible 1,4-addition step to the enal results in the formation of two nearly racemic diastereomeric Michael intermediates. Thus, four stereoisomers are formed, Next, one of these four Michael stereoisomers has to react at a significantly higher rate as compared to the others during the metal-co-catalyzed carbozyclization step in order to make the reaction both highly diastereo- and enantioselective14. Based on the advantages associated with heterogeneous metal catalysis (e.g. recycling, simpler purification and reduction of metal-contamination), we became interested in developing this type of DYKAT cascade process in a heterogeneous fashion for the synthesis of cyclopentenes containing an all-carbon quaternary stereocenter. To our delight, we found that by carrying out the reaction of enal 1a and the cyanoacetate derivative 2 in CH3CN, in the presence of 1.5 mol% of a heterogeneous Pd(II)-catalyst28 and prolinol 429, the desired cyclopentene 3a could be isolated in 37% yield after 22 h (Table 1, Entry 1). Furthermore, the reaction proceeded with a high stereoselectivity, resulting in a dr of 16:1 and an ee of 90%, respectively. By increasing the loading of Pd to 3.0 mol% (Table 1, Entries 2–6), the yield of the reaction could be significantly increased while retaining high stereoselectivity. Performing the reaction in CH2Cl2 and toluene provided the highest stereoselectivity (up to 16:1 dr and 96% ee) for the co-catalyzed cascade reaction and delivered the corresponding product 3a in high yield (Entries 3–6). It should be mentioned that the diastereoselectivity increased with prolonged reaction time. The reaction employing a heterogeneous Pd(0)-catalyst29 also proved to be highly stereoselective in CH2Cl2, toluene and p-xylene (Entries 9–12). For example, the corresponding product 3a was isolated in 75% yield with up to 15:1 dr and 95% ee (Entry 11). It is noteworthy that an increase in stereoselectivity could be observed when heterogeneous Pd-sources were used as catalysts instead of homogeneous ones (Entries 7, 8, 13 and 14). Moreover, it was established that the chiral amine and the heterogeneous Pd catalysts have to operate in concert for product 3a to be formed (Entries 15 and 16).

Table 1 Condition screening*

Substrate scope

The scope of the reaction was studied and a variety of substrates were tested under the optimized reaction conditions described above for the dual catalytic system (Table 2). The protocol proved to tolerate a wide range of α,β-unsaturated aldehydes 1 with both electron-withdrawing (Entries 1–6), electron-donating (Entry 9) and heteroaromtic substituents (entry 10), giving the corresponding cyclopentenes 3a–3g in high yields with high dr's (up to 30:1) and ee's (91–99%). The reaction also proceeded with high stereoselectivity when the aryl substituent was replaced with an aliphatic group (Entry 11). The stereochemistry of the products 3 was established by NMR NOE experiments, chiral-phase HPLC analyses and by comparison with the literature14.

Table 2 The scope of the co-catalytic asymmetric cascade reaction using a heterogeneous Pd and chiral amine catalyst*

It is noteworthy that our dual catalytic system involving the heterogenous Pd-catalysts also proved to be successful for the synthesis of hetrocycles with important structural motifs. Thus, by replacing the enolate-type nucleophile 2 with either propargylic alcohol 5 or propargylic amine 615,30, it was possible to obtain dihydrofurans 7 and dihydropyrroles 8 generally in good to high yields and high ees, respectively (Table 3).

Table 3 The scope of the co-catalytic asymmetric cascade reaction using a heterogeneous Pd and chiral amine catalyst

Since the recycling and life-time of heterogeneous catalysts are significant issues for practical applications, the reusability of the heterogeneous Pd(II)-catalyst was investigated in great detail for the reaction between enal 1a and cyanoacetate 2, in both CH2Cl2 (Table 4) and CH3CN (Table 1S, supplementary information). During the recycling study, the conversion of starting material was monitored by NMR and after completion of the transformation, the reaction mixture was centrifuged at 4°C. The supernatant was isolated by syringe and analyzed by elemental analysis, confirming the absence of palladium and demonstrating that all of the palladium is retained on the support. Furthermore, the recovered catalyst was successfully reused 8 times in CH2Cl2 under the same reaction conditions without any decrease in activity (Table 4).

Table 4 Recycling of the heterogeneous Pd-catalyst*

Discussion

To determine the Pd species in our catalytic system a hot filtration tests was performed. Thus, the Pd(0)-AmP-MCF catalyst was filtered off after 20% conversion and the solid free filtrate was allowed to stir for 5 h under identical reaction conditions. Analysis of the catalyst-free reaction by NMR analysis determined that no further conversion of the substrate had occurred. Elemental analysis showed that no Pd had been leached in to the solution. The same type of experiment was made for the cascade reaction with the Pd(II)-AmP-MCF co-catalyst. Thus, the Pd-catalyst was filtered off after 5 min (20% conversion) and the solid free filtrate was allowed to stir for 5 h under equal reaction conditions. Once again analysis of the catalyst-free reaction by NMR determined that no further conversion of the substrate had occurred. However, elemental analysis of the filtrate showed a Pd content of 80 ppm, indicating leaching of Pd into solution during the reaction that was re-deposited after completion and recycling of the catalyst by centrifugation. To ensure that the catalytic reaction operates via a heterogeneous pathway and not via the participation of homogeneous Pd-species, a control experiment with corresponding amounts of homogeneous PdCl2 (80 ppm) was performed. Gratifyingly, only trace amounts of product were observed within 4 h while the same reaction with the heterogeneous Pd(II)-catalyst was completed within this time (Table 1, Entry 4). This result is in correlation to that of the former analysis of the catalyst-free reaction, demonstrating that the heterogeneous pathway truly catalyzes the carbocyclization. It is also in accordance with our results from the Pd(0)-AmP-MCF28 co-catalyzed carbocyclizations were the heterogeneous Pd-catalyst mediated the transformations. It is noteworthy that the efficiency of the cascade reactions in CH2Cl2 with the Pd(II)-AmP-MCF co-catalyst increased during the recycling and that the stereoselectivity also slightly improved (Table 4).

In conclusion, the concept of merging heterogeneous metal catalysis with asymmetric amino catalysis for highly enantioselective cascade transformations has been demonstrated. This type of co-catalysis enabled the diastereo- and enantioselective synthesis of highly substituted cyclopenetenes, bearing an all carbon quaternary stereocenter (up to 24:1 dr and 99% ee). In addition, synergistic co-catalysis allowed for the highly enantioselective synthesis of functionalized dihydrofurans and dihydropyrrolidines. The heterogeneous Pd co-catalysts were readily recycled and the efficiency and stereoselectivity slightly increased after the first two cycles in CH2Cl2. The ability of recycling expensive and non-environmentally friendly transition metal catalysts and their use as co-catalysts together with simple chiral metal-free catalysts for one-pot, multi-step reactions possess a great promise in the development of greener and more sustainable chemistry. Further studies towards this direction are ongoing in our laboratories.

Methods

General procedure for the cascade Michael/carbocyclization between 1 and 2

To a stirred solution of 2 (0.375 mmol, 1.2 equiv) in CH2Cl2 (0.5 mL) was added Pd-catalyst (3 mol%). After stirring for 5 minutes at room temperature, the chiral pyrrolidine catalyst 4 (20 mol%) and the enal 1(0.25 mmol, 1 equiv) were added sequentially. The reaction was vigorously stirred for the time shown in the table. Next, after removal of the Pd-catalyst by filtration, the crude reaction mixture was directly loaded on a silica-gel column and next chromatograph (pentane/EtOAc) afforded the corresponding product 3. All 1H-NMR spectra and 13C-NMR spectra of the products 3 can be found in the supplementary information. Detailed description of the conditions used (HPLC) for the ee determination of compounds 3 as well as HPLC traces are given in the Supplementary Information.

General procedure for the cascade Michael/carbocyclization between 1 and 5

To a stirred solution of propargyl alcohol 5 (0.375 mmol, 1.5 equiv) ) in CHCl3 (0.5 mL) was added Pd-catalyst (3 mol%). After stirring for 5 minutes, the chiral pyrrolidine catalyst 4 (20 mol%), benzoic acid (20 mol%) and the enal 1 (0,25 mmol, 1 equiv) were added sequentially. The reaction was vigorously stirred at 4°C for the time shown in the table. Next, after removal of the Pd-catalyst by filtration, the crude reaction mixture was directly loaded on a silica-gel column and next chromatography (pentane/ EtOAc) afforded the corresponding product 7. All1H-NMR spectra and 13C-NMR spectra of the products 7 can be found in the supplementary information. Detailed description of the conditions used (HPLC) for the ee determination of compounds 7 as well as HPLC traces are given in the Supplementary Information.

General procedure for the cascade Michael/carbocyclization between 1 and 6

To a stirred solution of N-tosyl propargylamine 6 (0.3 mmol, 1.5 equiv) in toluene (1 mL) was added Pd-catalyst (5 mol%). After stirring for 5 minutes, the chiral pyrrolidine catalyst 4 ( 20 mo%), sodium acetate (0.5 mmol, 2.5 equiv), water (0.2 mmol, 1 equiv) and the enal 1 (0,25 mmol, 1 eq) were added sequentially. The reaction was vigorously stirred at room temperature for the time shown in the table. Next, after removal of the Pd-catalyst by filtration, the crude reaction mixture was directly loaded on a silica-gel column and next chromatography (pentane/ EtOAc) afforded the corresponding product 8. All 1H-NMR spectra and 13C-NMR spectra of the products 8 can be found in the supplementary information. Detailed description of the conditions used (HPLC) for the ee determination of compounds 8 as well as HPLC traces are given in the Supplementary Information.

Procedure for recycling of the Pd nanoparticles

To a stirred solution of CH2Cl2 (1.5 mL) and 2 (0.72 mmol, 1.2 equiv) in a vial (5 mL), was added Pd-catalyst (3 mol%). After stirring for 5 minutes at room temperature, the chiral pyrrolidine catalyst 4 (20 mol%) and the enal 1a (0.6 mmol, 1 equiv) were added sequentially. The reaction was vigorously stirred for the time shown in Table 4. Next, the reaction mixture was transferred to a 14 mL centrifuge vial and CH2Cl2 (5 mL) was added. After centrifugation for 10 minutes, a syringe removed the supernatant and the Pd-catalyst was washed with CH2Cl2 (2×6 mL). The supernatant and the liquid phases were combined together, the solvent removed under reduced pressure and the resulting mixture was directly loaded on a silica gel column. Chromatography (pentane/EtOAc mixtures) gave the corresponding product 3a. The recovered catalyst was than successfully reused under the same reaction conditions following the same work-up procedure. (1R,2R)-methyl 1-cyano-3-formyl-4-methyl-2-(4-nitrophenyl)cyclopent-3-enecarboxylate 3a: oil. 1H NMR (400MHz, CDCl3): δ 9.94 (s, 1H), 8.21 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2H), 7.33 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2H), 4.81 (bs, 1H), 3.90 (s, 3H), 3.48 (d, J = 18.8 Hz, 1H), 3.32 (d, J = 18.8 Hz, 1H), 2.36 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): 185.8, 168.1, 159.1, 144.1, 136.2, 129.2, 124.2, 117.0, 57.7, 54.7, 51.3, 48.2, 14.4; HRMS (ESI) : calcd for [M+Na] (C16H14N2O5) requires m/z 337.0792, found 337.0795; [α]D25 = −86.1 (c = 1, CHCl3). The enantiomeric excess was determined by HPLC analysis in comparison with authentic racemic material (ODH-column, n-hexane/i-PrOH = 75/25, λ = 250 nm, 1.0 ml/min) tr (major enantiomer) = 34.0 min, tr (minor enantiomer) = 43.7 min.