Gregor Mendel and the Principles of Inheritance

By: Ilona Miko, Ph.D. (Write Science Right) © 2008 Nature Education
Citation: Miko, I. (2008) Gregor Mendel and the principles of inheritance. Nature Education 1(1)

Gregor Mendel's principles of inheritance form the cornerstone of modern genetics. So just what are they?

 

Ever wonder why you are the only one in your family with your grandfather's nose? The way in which traits are passed from one generation to the next-and sometimes skip generations-was first explained by Gregor Mendel. By experimenting with pea plant breeding, Mendel developed three principles of inheritance that described the transmission of genetic traits, before anyone knew genes existed. Mendel's insight greatly expanded the understanding of genetic inheritance, and led to the development of new experimental methods.

 

Traits are passed down in families in different patterns. Pedigrees can illustrate these patterns by following the history of specific characteristics, or phenotypes, as they appear in a family. For example, the pedigree in Figure 1 shows a family in which a grandmother (generation I) has passed down a characteristic (shown in solid red) through the family tree. The inheritance pattern of this characteristic is considered dominant, because it is observable in every generation. Thus, every individual who carries the genetic code for this characteristic will show evidence of the characteristic. In contrast, Figure 2 shows a different pattern of inheritance, in which a characteristic disappears in one generation, only to reappear in a subsequent one. This pattern of inheritance, in which the parents do not show the phenotype but some of the children do, is considered recessive. But where did our knowledge of dominance and recessivity first come from?

Gregor Mendel’s Courage and Persistence

Our modern understanding of how traits may be inherited through generations comes from the principles proposed by Gregor Mendel in 1865. However, Mendel didn't discover these foundational principles of inheritance by studying human beings, but rather by studying Pisum sativum, or the common pea plant. Indeed, after eight years of tedious experiments with these plants, and—by his own admission—"some courage" to persist with them, Mendel proposed three foundational principles of inheritance. These principles eventually assisted clinicians in human disease research; for example, within just a couple of years of the rediscovery of Mendel's work, Archibald Garrod applied Mendel's principles to his study of alkaptonuria. Today, whether you are talking about pea plants or human beings, genetic traits that follow the rules of inheritance that Mendel proposed are called Mendelian.

Mendel was curious about how traits were transferred from one generation to the next, so he set out to understand the principles of heredity in the mid-1860s. Peas were a good model system, because he could easily control their fertilization by transferring pollen with a small paintbrush. This pollen could come from the same flower (self-fertilization), or it could come from another plant's flowers (cross-fertilization). First, Mendel observed plant forms and their offspring for two years as they self-fertilized, or "selfed," and ensured that their outward, measurable characteristics remained constant in each generation. During this time, Mendel observed seven different characteristics in the pea plants, and each of these characteristics had two forms (Figure 3). The characteristics included height (tall or short), pod shape (inflated or constricted), seed shape (smooth or winkled), pea color (green or yellow), and so on. In the years Mendel spent letting the plants self, he verified the purity of his plants by confirming, for example, that tall plants had only tall children and grandchildren and so forth. Because the seven pea plant characteristics tracked by Mendel were consistent in generation after generation of self-fertilization, these parental lines of peas could be considered pure-breeders (or, in modern terminology, homozygous for the traits of interest). Mendel and his assistants eventually developed 22 varieties of pea plants with combinations of these consistent characteristics.

Mendel not only crossed pure-breeding parents, but he also crossed hybrid generations and crossed the hybrid progeny back to both parental lines. These crosses (which, in modern terminology, are referred to as F1, F1 reciprocal, F2, B1, and B2) are the classic crosses to generate genetically hybrid generations.

Understanding Dominant Traits

Before Mendel's experiments, most people believed that traits in offspring resulted from a blending of the traits of each parent. However, when Mendel cross-pollinated one variety of purebred plant with another, these crosses would yield offspring that looked like either one of the parent plants, not a blend of the two. For example, when Mendel cross-fertilized plants with wrinkled seeds to those with smooth seeds, he did not get progeny with semi-wrinkly seeds. Instead, the progeny from this cross had only smooth seeds. In general, if the progeny of crosses between purebred plants looked like only one of the parents with regard to a specific trait, Mendel called the expressed parental trait the dominant trait. From this simple observation, Mendel proposed his first principle, the principle of uniformity; this principle states that all the progeny of a cross like this (where the parents differ by only one trait) will appear identical. Exceptions to the principle of uniformity include the phenomena of penetrance, expressivity, and sex-linkage, which were discovered after Mendel's time.

Understanding Recessive Traits

When conducting his experiments, Mendel designated the two pure-breeding parental generations involved in a particular cross as P1 and P2, and he then denoted the progeny resulting from the crossing as the filial, or F1, generation. Although the plants of the F1 generation looked like one parent of the P generation, they were actually hybrids of two different parent plants. Upon observing the uniformity of the F1 generation, Mendel wondered whether the F1 generation could still possess the nondominant traits of the other parent in some hidden way.

To understand whether traits were hidden in the F1 generation, Mendel returned to the method of self-fertilization. Here, he created an F2 generation by letting an F1 pea plant self-fertilize (F1 x F1). This way, he knew he was crossing two plants of the exact same genotype. This technique, which involves looking at a single trait, is today called a monohybrid cross. The resulting F2 generation had seeds that were either round or wrinkled. Figure 4 shows an example of Mendel's data.

When looking at the figure, notice that for each F1 plant, the self-fertilization resulted in more round than wrinkled seeds among the F2 progeny. These results illustrate several important aspects of scientific data:

  1. Multiple trials are necessary to see patterns in experimental data.
  2. There is a lot of variation in the measurements of one experiment.
  3. A large sample size, or "N," is required to make any quantitative comparisons or conclusions.

In Figure 4, the result of Experiment 1 shows that the single characteristic of seed shape was expressed in two different forms in the F2 generation: either round or wrinkled. Also, when Mendel averaged the relative proportion of round and wrinkled seeds across all F2 progeny sets, he found that round was consistently three times more frequent than wrinkled. This 3:1 proportion resulting from F1 x F1 crosses suggested there was a hidden recessive form of the trait. Mendel recognized that this recessive trait was carried down to the F2 generation from the earlier P generation.

Mendel and Alleles

As mentioned, Mendel's data did not support the ideas about trait blending that were popular among the biologists of his time. As there were never any semi-wrinkled seeds or greenish-yellow seeds, for example, in the F2 generation, Mendel concluded that blending should not be the expected outcome of parental trait combinations. Mendel instead hypothesized that each parent contributes some particulate matter to the offspring. He called this heritable substance "elementen." (Remember, in 1865, Mendel did not know about DNA or genes.) Indeed, for each of the traits he examined, Mendel focused on how the elementen that determined that trait was distributed among progeny. We now know that a single gene controls seed form, while another controls color, and so on, and that elementen is actually the assembly of physical genes located on chromosomes. Multiple forms of those genes, known as alleles, represent the different traits. For example, one allele results in round seeds, and another allele specifies wrinkled seeds.

One of the most impressive things about Mendel's thinking lies in the notation that he used to represent his data. Mendel's notation of a capital and a lowercase letter (Aa) for the hybrid genotype actually represented what we now know as the two alleles of one gene: A and a. Moreover, as previously mentioned, in all cases, Mendel saw approximately a 3:1 ratio of one phenotype to another. When one parent carried all the dominant traits (AA), the F1 hybrids were "indistinguishable" from that parent. However, even though these F1 plants had the same phenotype as the dominant P1 parents, they possessed a hybrid genotype (Aa) that carried the potential to look like the recessive P1 parent (aa). After observing this potential to express a trait without showing the phenotype, Mendel put forth his second principle of inheritance: the principle of segregation. According to this principle, the "particles" (or alleles as we now know them) that determine traits are separated into gametes during meiosis, and meiosis produces equal numbers of egg or sperm cells that contain each allele (Figure 5).

Dihybrid Crosses

Mendel had thus determined what happens when two plants that are hybrid for one trait are crossed with each other, but he also wanted to determine what happens when two plants that are each hybrid for two traits are crossed. Mendel therefore decided to examine the inheritance of two characteristics at once. Based on the concept of segregation, he predicted that traits must sort into gametes separately. By extrapolating from his earlier data, Mendel also predicted that the inheritance of one characteristic did not affect the inheritance of a different characteristic.

Mendel tested this idea of trait independence with more complex crosses. First, he generated plants that were purebred for two characteristics, such as seed color (yellow and green) and seed shape (round and wrinkled). These plants would serve as the P1 generation for the experiment. In this case, Mendel crossed the plants with wrinkled and yellow seeds (rrYY) with plants with round, green seeds (RRyy). From his earlier monohybrid crosses, Mendel knew which traits were dominant: round and yellow. So, in the F1 generation, he expected all round, yellow seeds from crossing these purebred varieties, and that is exactly what he observed. Mendel knew that each of the F1 progeny were dihybrids; in other words, they contained both alleles for each characteristic (RrYy). He then crossed individual F1 plants (with genotypes RrYy) with one another. This is called a dihybrid cross. Mendel's results from this cross were as follows:

  • 315 plants with round, yellow seeds
  • 108 plants with round, green seeds
  • 101 plants with wrinkled, yellow seeds
  • 32 plants with wrinkled, green seeds

Thus, the various phenotypes were present in a 9:3:3:1 ratio (Figure 6).

Next, Mendel went through his data and examined each characteristic separately. He compared the total numbers of round versus wrinkled and yellow versus green peas, as shown in Tables 1 and 2.

Table 1: Data Regarding Seed Shape

  Round Wrinkled
Number of plants 315 + 108 = 423 101 + 32 = 133
Proportion of total 3.2 1

Table 2: Data Regarding Pea Color

  Yellow Green
Number of plants 315 + 101 = 416 108 + 32 = 140
Proportion of total 2.97 1

The proportion of each trait was still approximately 3:1 for both seed shape and seed color. In other words, the resulting seed shape and seed color looked as if they had come from two parallel monohybrid crosses; even though two characteristics were involved in one cross, these traits behaved as though they had segregated independently. From these data, Mendel developed the third principle of inheritance: the principle of independent assortment. According to this principle, alleles at one locus segregate into gametes independently of alleles at other loci. Such gametes are formed in equal frequencies.

Mendel’s Legacy

More lasting than the pea data Mendel presented in 1862 has been his methodical hypothesis testing and careful application of mathematical models to the study of biological inheritance. From his first experiments with monohybrid crosses, Mendel formed statistical predictions about trait inheritance that he could test with more complex experiments of dihybrid and even trihybrid crosses. This method of developing statistical expectations about inheritance data is one of the most significant contributions Mendel made to biology.

But do all organisms pass their on genes in the same way as the garden pea plant? The answer to that question is no, but many organisms do indeed show inheritance patterns similar to the seminal ones described by Mendel in the pea. In fact, the three principles of inheritance that Mendel laid out have had far greater impact than his original data from pea plant manipulations. To this day, scientists use Mendel's principles to explain the most basic phenomena of inheritance.

References and Recommended Reading


Mendel, G. Versuche über Plflanzen-hybriden.Verhandlungen des naturforschenden Ver-eines in Brünn, Bd. IV für das Jahr 1865, Abhand-lungen, 3–47 (1866) (Bateson translation) (link to article)

Strachan, T., & Read, A.P. Mendelian pedigree patterns. Human Molecular Genetics 2 (Garland Science, 1999)


Flag Inappropriate

This content is currently under construction.

This reading is linked to the following Scitable pages:

What happens when good genes go bad? What kinds of mutations create "lethal genes," and how are they passed on?
McClintock’s maize breeding experiments provided the first detailed descriptions of transposable elements. What exactly are these “jumping genes”, and why are they so important?
The eugenics movement of the early 1900s ultimately went horribly wrong despite its noble aims. What can we learn from this movement’s outcomes in order to avoid the repetition of these mistakes?
We each get two copies of every gene--one copy from each of our parents. But what happens when one of these genes has been "turned off", or imprinted, and the remaining gene is defective?
How ethical is it to keep a database of convicted felons' DNA profiles? Can we rely on DNA fingerprints for conviction? Many ethical issues surround the use of DNA in forensic technology.
Soon after the rediscovery of Mendel's work, several scientists noted traits in their crosses seemed “coupled.” But this deviated from Mendel's principles, so how did they explain this?
How did scientists determine that DNA is the hereditary material? Groundbreaking experiments by Griffith, Avery, Hershey, and Chase disproved the notion that proteins were genetic material.
How can a mutation in one single gene cause a disease with a wide range of symptoms? This situation is referred to as pleitropy, and it has been identified in a wide range of species, even humans.
Why should anyone care about Mendelian genetics? Have recent developments in molecular genetics replaced the need to learn about gene transmission?
X inactivation turns off entire chromosomes, whereas imprinting turns off only specific genes. How do these processes work, and why do they often produce similar results?
When you see a dominant trait, the underlying genetic make-up can still be ambiguous. See how researchers use test crosses to find out the genotype behind the phenotype.
How would you build a "better" tomato? Most likely, you'd select for genes in multiple locations—or quantitative trait loci (QTLs). Knowledge of QTLs is extremely valuable to crop scientists.
You are more like a mouse than you might think! Today, scientists are creating models of human genetic disease using mice, flies, worms, and other animals. But what do these models reveal about us?
Scientists were able to identify chromosomes under the microscope as early as the 19th century. But what did it take for them to figure out how important chromosomes really are?
Genetics seemed to promise incredible advances in the fight against disease, yet new cures and treatments have been slow to arrive. Why?
Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) help scientists understand the inheritance patterns of disorders on a global scale. But can we make predictions from these studies?
What does the sex of worms have to do with human kidneys? See how C. elegans research has unlocked scientists' understanding of polycystic kidney disease.
All Articles Within Gene Inheritance and Transmission (32)

Gene Mapping (1)

  • Gene Mapping: Then and Now
    Model organisms have long been valuable resources for mapping the genes responsible for specific phenotypes. Today, with the help of entire genomic sequences, scientists are equipped with additional tools to help them map genes to chromosomes. How does this work? How has genome sequencing changed the landscape of gene mapping? How do we use model organisms, like zebrafish, to locate specific genes involved in human biology?

The Foundation of Inheritance Studies (11)

  • Non-nuclear Genes and Their Inheritance
    Some genes are passed on from parent to offspring without ever being part of a nuclear chromosome. Where are these genes found, and how does this non-nuclear inheritance occur?
  • Multifactorial Inheritance and Genetic Disease
    Multifactorial diseases, such as coronary artery disease, can be as complex as their name suggests. How much can we hope to understand about diseases with such variation in inheritance?
  • Gregor Mendel and the Principles of Inheritance
    Gregor Mendel's principles of inheritance form the cornerstone of modern genetics. So just what are they?
  • Genetic Recombination
    How does DNA recombination work? It occurs frequently in many different cell types, and it has important implications for genomic integrity, evolution, and human disease.
  • Mitosis, Meiosis, and Inheritance
    Although mitosis and meiosis both involve cell division, they transmit genetic material in very different ways. What happens when either of these processes goes awry?
  • Developing the Chromosome Theory
    Scientists were able to identify chromosomes under the microscope as early as the 19th century. But what did it take for them to figure out how important chromosomes really are?
  • Test Crosses
    When you see a dominant trait, the underlying genetic make-up can still be ambiguous. See how researchers use test crosses to find out the genotype behind the phenotype.
  • Sex Chromosomes and Sex Determination
    In humans and many other animals, specific chromosomes determine sex. But how did researchers discover these so-called sex chromosomes?
  • Mendelian Genetics: Patterns of Inheritance and Single-Gene Disorders
    What can Gregor Mendel’s pea plants tell us about human disease? Single gene disorders, like Huntington’s disease and cystic fibrosis, actually follow Mendelian inheritance patterns.
  • Sex determination in honeybees
    In humans, sex is determined by the presence or absence of X or Y sex chromosomes. In honeybees, however, evolution has resulted in a very different and unique sex determination system.
  • Polygenic Inheritance and Gene Mapping
    Ever griped about your height? Figuring out its origins hasn't been any easier for geneticists who are turning to high-throughput, genome-wide association studies for clues.

Gene Linkage (5)

  • Thomas Hunt Morgan and Sex Linkage
    Can paying attention establish a new field? Learn about Thomas Hunt Morgan, the first person to definitively link trait inheritance to a specific chromosome and his white-eyed flies.
  • Chromosome Theory and the Castle and Morgan Debate
    Scientific debates can be as passionate and high-profile as political ones. Learn about an epic battle waged between the Castle and Morgan laboratories over the organization of genes.
  • Thomas Hunt Morgan, Genetic Recombination, and Gene Mapping
    How would you feel if you had to be the one to challenge Gregor Mendel's paradigm-shifting laws of inheritance? Yet Thomas Hunt Morgan did exactly this and in the process made gene mapping possible.
  • Discovery and Types of Genetic Linkage
    Soon after the rediscovery of Mendel's work, several scientists noted traits in their crosses seemed “coupled.” But this deviated from Mendel's principles, so how did they explain this?
  • Genetics and Statistical Analysis
    "Significance" has a very particular meaning in biology thanks to statistics. How does this term prove an experiment's results are worth special attention?

Variation in Gene Expression (6)

Methods for Studying Inheritance Patterns (7)

  • Mapping Genes to Chromosomes: Linkage and Genetic Screens
    After the invention of whole-genome sequencing, we now know the sequences that make up an entire organism. Now what do they mean? To answer that, we turn back to linkage mapping in model organisms.
  • Paternity Testing: Blood Types and DNA
    The modern-day paternity test compares a baby’s DNA profile to the potential father’s. How did we ever manage it before genetics?
  • Mendelian Ratios and Lethal Genes
    What happens when good genes go bad? What kinds of mutations create "lethal genes," and how are they passed on?
  • Biological Complexity and Integrative Levels of Organization
    If someone gave you a stranger’s complete genetic code, could you predict everything about that person? Of course not, but why isn't there one code to explain how everything works?
  • Human Evolutionary Tree
    Researchers have used distinct markers from human subpopulations to trace back to our common African root in a giant human "tree." However, a “trellis” model might be more appropriate.
  • C. elegans: Model Organism in the Discovery of PKD
    What does the sex of worms have to do with human kidneys? See how C. elegans research has unlocked scientists' understanding of polycystic kidney disease.
  • Genetics of Dog Breeding
    How did your friendly Fido become so different from his closest living relative, the wolf? See what scientists believe about humans' artificial selection pressures on the dog genome.
 
Ask an Expert
Post Question



Nature Education Home Learn More About Faculty Page Students Page Feedback



Genetics

Event Reminder