This page has been archived and is no longer updated

 
March 04, 2011 | By:  Naseem S.
Aa Aa Aa

Where'd Pluto Go?

If you're my age, you probably remember learning that Pluto was the ninth planet in the solar system when we were kids, as 75 years of generations had before us. We learned that My Very Excellent Mother Just Served Us Nine Pizzas was a way to remember the order of the nine planets, including Pluto. But as we grow older, we kind of have to catch on that times are changing and we live in the 21st century and Pluto's no longer a planet. But don't worry, Pluto didn't go anywhere, and you'll find out Pluto's current status in today's post!

This is a picture of Pluto [center] that was taken from one of the ‘candidate moons'

You've probably heard that Pluto is now a dwarf planet, and you may (or may not) have any idea what a dwarf planet is. Much to the dismay of many adults that grew up marveling at the forgotten planet, a change to how we label Pluto was made by the International Astronomical Union five years ago. However, some of these same disheartened people still don't understand why scientists would, for example, "make fun of Pluto's size" by naming it a dwarf planet.

Trust me, scientists do not aim to make fun of anything, it's counter productive.

Yet, we find ourselves (as in us, the general public) to become accustomed to misconceptions and whatnot because of the press or just word of mouth. These errors in our perspective also tend to add up, and then leave us in a world far from reality where we have no idea what's going on! This is why I decided to bring up poor Pluto. Let me start with its discovery many years ago:

The Search for Planet X
After our 8th planet Neptune was discovered way back in 1846, scientists began to notice many inconsistencies occurring in the orbit of the gas giants. These inconsistencies led scientists to theorize the possibility of a planet beyond Neptune. Thus, the search for "Planet X" (that's what they called it) begun, and among the most excited was scientist Percival Lowell. Lowell was so excited he built the Lowell Observatory in Arizona; and it was in this same observatory where scientist Clyde W. Tombaugh accidentally discovered Pluto through a sky survey on February 18, 1930.

In 1930, an 11-year old Oxford gal named Venetia Burney had the honor to name the 'forgotten planet' through her well-connected grandpa Falconer Madan, a retired librarian of the Bodleian Library at Oxford. After news of planet's discovery March 1930, Venetia suggested the ‘frozen and lonely planet X' should be named Pluto, after mythical Roman

god of the underworld. Mr. Madan told his friend Herbert Hall Turner, professor of astronomy at Oxford, and passed the notion along at a Royal Astronomical Society meeting. And this person told that person and finally the scientists at Lowell voted in favor of Pluto. Man, wasn't Burney lucky? How would you feel if you got the opportunity to name a [dwarf] planet?!

But, Why Pluto?
Surprisingly enough, for centuries astronomers and common folk alike had been admiring the 'bright lights' of the night sky without wondering what they've actually been looking at. Yes, they knew there were stars and planets and such above them, but there wasn't a concrete definition of what actually constitutes a planet. As our technology has become more advanced over time, so did our outlook on, well, everything. Suddenly, more objects beyond Neptune like Pluto were being discovered (because of modern tech) and some were found to be larger in mass than Pluto...but weren't planets. Scientists have known about Pluto's illegitimacy as a planet because of its small size for years...but now, when the means were finally available, it was time to do something about it.

In 2006, the IAU, which is responsible for classification of things up in space, decided to update the understanding of planets in our solar system by writing solid definitions (in this resolution) for the word "planet" and "dwarf planet." This is important because by definition, Pluto was really a dwarf planet...it makes sense.


A planet is an object in space that (a) is in orbit around the Sun (b) has enough mass to stay round due to gravity and (c) doesn't have anything else going around in its same orbit.


A dwarf planet is an object in space that is similar to a planet except (a) it has other things going around in its orbit, and (b) is not a satellite.


And that's the story of Pluto! Children nowadays are learning a new mnemonic: My Very Excellent Mother Just Served Us Nachos. Hey, if Tyche is discovered, the mnemonic might as well continue the Mexican cuisine theme with Nine Tacos, right? For now, I'd like to pose two discussion questions:
  1. Why's it necessary for scientists and the general public to re-evaluate their claims?
  2. Why would scientists let a young girl name a planet? Do you think someone has to be 'qualified' to uphold such a task? Why Venetia Burney, and not, for example, the President of the United States?

Image #1 credit: NASA
Image #2 credit: NASA; (HST picture)

References:

"Dwarf Planets." National Geographic. (Check out this link for a really cool interactive about Pluto and Dwarf Planets! Find out your weight on Pluto! I'd be 7 lbs or about 3 kg)

O'Neill, Ian. "Does a Massive Planet Lurk in the Outer Solar System?" Discovery News. February 16, 2011. (Read this article about the planet that might replace Pluto! Tyche!)

"Pluto and The Developing Landscape of Our Solar System" Internatonal Astronomical Union.

"Pluto discovered." The History Channel.

"RESOLUTION B5: Definition of a Planet in the Solar System" International Astronomical Union.

"Venetia Phair Dies at 90; as a Girl, She Named Pluto ." New York Times.

14 Comments
Comments
March 10, 2011 | 10:34 PM
Posted By:  Daniel Turchiano
Great post Naseem! In 2006, NASA sent a a probe to Pluto, hoping to examine it and the Kuiper belt, an area beyond pluto with several dwarf planets and asteroids. This project is called new Horizons. The year being 2011, New Horizons is halfway done with its journey still 5 years to go. New Horizons will take High quality photos of the makeup, appearance, and temperature of Pluto, as well as discover several other dwarf planets past Pluto. New Horizons will also happen to photograph Pluto's Moon, Charon, which is almost half as large as Pluto (so large that they rotate around each other (Pluto, rotating less)).
In 2016, we can all hope to see the structure of the recurring dwarf planet, Pluto
http://www.popsci.com/military-aviation-space/article/2005-12/first-mission-last-planet
http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/newhorizons/main/index.html
March 10, 2011 | 03:32 AM
Posted By:  Noa Lev-Ari
Interesting post, Naseem! I myself was always a fan of Pluto and was disappointed to hear it declared a dwarf planet. I did some more research on dwarf planets and found five of them. The one I'd like to focus on is Makemake, because of its name. It's named after one of the Rapanui gods, which are from Easter Island. It was discovered in 2005 and named an official dwarf planet by the International Astronomical Union in 2008. The reddish planet is in the Kuiper Belt, and is the third largest dwarf planet. This planet even takes 310 years to orbit around the earth!

http://starchild.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/StarChild/solar_system_level1/makemake.html
March 10, 2011 | 02:49 AM
Posted By:  Aurora Tormey
Great post Naseem! I remember having to learn how Pluto wasn't a real planet anymore. I like how you gave definitions to what constitutes a planet versus a dwarf planet. They were very straightforward. To answer your first question, I think that technology is the reason why people are always re-evaluating their claims. Pluto was first discovered in the 1930s due to advances in technology. From then until now, we have made so many other breakthroughs, discoveries, and been able to correct ourselves. Like we learned in biology class, scientists are always changing their results or opinions based on what we know. The extent of out knowledge about anything is continuously evolving each day due to technological advances.
March 10, 2011 | 12:33 AM
Posted By:  Emily D'Arco
Really captivating post, Naseem. When I learned that Pluto had been deemed no longer a planet a couple years back, I was so surprised and thought that scientists had decided that it was just too small to be a planet. Now, thanks to your definitions, I understand that there are much more complex scientific concepts behind the redefining of Pluto as a planet. To answer your first question, it is necessary for scientists and people to reevaluate their claims because new discoveries are constantly being made. Therefore, if we had once believed something, but then because of new technology and updated information, found out something different, it is our responsibility to tell everybody about what we now know and what is now true. Science is constantly changing and developing! I truly believe that Venetia Burney was completely lucky in that she got to name a (dwarf) planet! I'm sure that one day this eleven-year-old came up with a creative name and scientists liked it and so it stuck.
March 09, 2011 | 12:43 AM
Posted By:  Emilio Berton
Great post Naseem, I was actually curious about how the other planets got their names. It turns out that all the planets, except for earth are named for gods in Greek or Roman mythology: Mercury, the god of trade, merchants, profit and travellers-Venus, the goddess of gardens, vineyards, love, and beauty-Mars, the god of war, agriculture, and terror-Jupiter, the lord of the gods, and the god of lightning and thunder-Saturn, the god of harvest-Neptune, the god of the sea-Uranus, god of the sky(the planet was originally going to be called "Georgium Sidus" after King George III), and lastly Pluto, the god of the underworld. Here are my sources:
http://curious.astro.cornell.edu/question.php?number=372
http://www.unrv.com/culture/major-roman-god-list.php
March 08, 2011 | 09:36 PM
Posted By:  Gurk Kang
Fantastic post Naseem! I remember one day sitting in my class learning about the planets and, then my teacher told me that Pluto was no longer a planet. To answer your first question, yes it is important for scientists to allow people know because, back when we studied about Pluto we were learning wrong. It is important for scientist’s to let the people know. For your second question, I have an answer Venetia Burney Phair was eating breakfast in her kitchen and her grandfather whom was a retired librarian, told Venetia about the new discovery and asked her what she would name “ Planet X”, Venetia said “ Why not Pluto?”. Then later on Venetia’s grandfather who was a Bodleian’s Librarian, which is the head librarian in the Bodleian at Oxford, which is the university library of course, told Herbert Hall Turner who later then told Lowell Observatory.
http://www.nasa.gov/multimedia/podcasting/transcript_pluto_naming_podcast.html
March 08, 2011 | 03:23 AM
Posted By:  Jessica Khrakovsky
(continuation)
As for your second question, I do agree that is was a shocking decision to allow an 11 year old girl to name a planet! That must have been a great honor for her. Although I agree that it is important to make science appeal to people of all ages and interests and letting this girl name a planet was a good way to do so, I also feel that someone of a higher power should've had the honor. Such an important deed should have been done by a prominent scientist who may have perhaps contributed to the discovery of the [dwarf] planet.
March 08, 2011 | 03:23 AM
Posted By:  Jessica Khrakovsky
Really interesting post, Naseem! This is a topic that I myself have been wondering about ever since they made the public announcement. To address your first question, I believe that it is essential to re-evaluate the opinions that people had because with all of the knew information that is being discovered about the planets, it is not fair to base an opinion on old facts. New facts and new discoveries lead to new conclusions everyday and yes, even though our beloved Pluto will be missed as a 9th planet, the public and scientists need to take other facts into consideration.
March 08, 2011 | 12:54 AM
Posted By:  Ali Syed
(part 2)
According to Merriam-Webster dictionary, in space "a star (as the sun) of ordinary or low luminosity and relatively small mass and size," is one way to describe a dwarf. In the case of the definition of 'dwarf planet,' the IAU attached dwarf to planet and labeled Pluto because its mass isnt large enough to qualify as a planet! Anyways, I wanna hear more of your opinion and see what evidence you can provide because I'm for 'dwarf planet.'

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/dwarf
http://history.nasa.gov/sputnik/
March 08, 2011 | 12:54 AM
Posted By:  Ali Syed
Sweet post, Naseem! I have to disagree with Cartland about her opinion on Pluto's status. Naseem said in her post that scientists don't make fun of such things on purpose, so why do you think they would? And also, scientists do aim to discover new planets like Tyche or discover new elements and they like to present them to the public and acknowledge that they were the ones who discovered it. This idea has been going on ever since the Space Race in the 50s, when the Russians sent out Sputnik 1 in 1957 and sent the first man into space. The US sent out to send the first man to the moon, and succeeded in 1969. The important thing is that scientists have too much to deal with and finding the right classification is more important than what name is used.
March 06, 2011 | 08:46 PM
Posted By:  Sara El-Hennawy
(continuation)
The fact that scientists chose the name from different people's suggestions just proves that anyone could've sent in suggestion. I think that it was a good idea and that if the name suits the planet then it should be given that name. It should not matter who came up with the name but the quality and creativeness of the name.

http://www.space.com/1889-scientist-englishwoman-pluto-mission-precious.html

March 06, 2011 | 08:45 PM
Posted By:  Sara El-Hennawy
Really interesting post Naseem. I decided to do more research on Venetia Mars and expand a little bit on why she had the opportunity to name the planet Pluto. Venetia's grandfather sent the suggestion of the name Pluto to Oxford University and it was chosen out of a lot of other suggestions. It is considered luck that the planet was named Pluto and not anything else because there were a lot of other suggestions.
I think that this is only fair, from the sources I found it states that it was chosen randomly none of the scientists knew who she was. The name Pluto was chosen out of several other names and it was just luck. Even if the President of the United States sent a suggestion for the name of the planet it might not necessarily be given the name suggested by the President. I also don't believe anyone has to be "qualified" to uphold the task of naming a planet.

March 06, 2011 | 04:41 AM
Posted By:  Cartland Zhou
It’s mean to call Pluto as a dwarf planet. First, after 75 years, it’s not identified as a “planet” anymore, which they should know it once they discover it. Second, although it is small, it’s still a “planet” at that time, no matter what its size is. Next, there’re many words have the similar meaning to “dwarf”. Do they really need to use this word to describe it? No. They can use “small”, “tiny”, etc.
Moreover, I can’t understand why they want to have a space journey to Pluto. As Rajput says, Pluto’s temperature is way below 0, it’s impossible for all the living things we discovered to survive in there. Then what’s the purpose of exploring them? Showing off to the other countries such as China or Russia? Or discovering new elements which don’t exist in the Earth? Well, at least, they don’t aim to find a new place for human to live but to waste a huge amount of money.

http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/newhorizons/main/index.html
March 04, 2011 | 10:41 PM
Posted By:  dawood rajput
Cool post Naseem. I didn't know that that Pluto was a dwarf planet, and that they started teaching children a new mnemonic. I think its important for scientists and the general public to re-evaluate their claims, that way the information is not out of date, wrong and
I think it was pretty cool that an 11 year old girl got to name a planet after a roman god. many of the other planets are also named after roman gods for example:Neptune,Mars, et al. The name fit perfectly with the planet because it was the planet farthest away from the sun and the tempratures were way below 0. I dont think that a person has to be qualified for naming a planet, it could be anyone
Blogger Profiles

Connect
Connect Send a message

Scitable by Nature Education Nature Education Home Learn More About Faculty Page Students Page Feedback



Blogs