This page has been archived and is no longer updated

 
July 15, 2011 | By:  Whitney Campbell
Aa Aa Aa

Microalgae: The Next Big Thing In Green Power?

When German botanist Friderico T. Kützing first described the microalga Botryococcus braunii in the 1849 book Species Algarum, I doubt he expected that 150 years later scientists would still be exploring its potential. It's equally probable he didn't anticipate the alga's significance for renewable energy either, which I was rather surprised to learn about myself.

Apparently, B. braunii naturally produces a triterpene oil comparable in hydrocarbon content to petroleum or natural gas. While too slow of a producer on its own to be a valuable energy resource, researchers from the University of Kentucky have isolated its oil-producing genes and genetically engineered a yeast that expresses a similar oil at faster rates.1 As I've subsequently learned, these experiments not only give a first-hand glimpse of hydrocarbon production hundreds of millions of years ago, but also offer a blueprint for a long-sought commodity — a renewable replacement for oil and coal shale.

Although seemingly far-fetched, the idea of developing algae as a source of power has actually been around for nearly forty years. After the oil crisis of the early 1970s, for example, US President Jimmy Carter established the Aquatic Species Program (ASP) in 1978 under the US Department of Energy as part of a nationwide push for energy independence. According to an ASP report, the initial "main focus of the program... was the production of biodiesel from high lipid-content algae grown in ponds, utilizing waste CO2 from coal-fired power plants."

As they recycle CO2 waste from burnt coal, these strands of microalgae produce natural oils that, after treated with transesterification, turn into biodiesel that releases significantly less greenhouse gases than petroleum.2 Unlike ethanol biodiesel made from corn or potatoes, microalgae biodiesel can also be grown with salt water and be harvested year-round on a smaller area of land.3 These features alone make microalgae biodiesel an attractive alternative energy source, and may be responsible for why similar programs to ASP can be found in many countries including Australia, New Zealand, China, Japan, Mexico and Chile.

University of Kentucky's microalga-yeast hybrid, however, produces a biofuel that has a similar carbon footprint when consumed as conventional petroleum. With all the microalgae strains available that have a lower environmental impact, while I applaud the lab's innovative techniques, I have to question their development of a renewable resource that is still unsustainable for the environment.

Image Credit: Image of Botryococcus braunii from Wikimedia.

1. Niehaus, T.D., Okada, S., Devarenne, T.P., Watt, D.S., Sviripa, V., & Chappell, J. (2011). Identification of unique mechanisms for triterpene biosynthesis in Botryococcus braunii. PNAS, Published online. PMID: 21746901 ResearchBlogging.com.

2. Howell, K. "Is Algae the Biofuel of the Future?" Scientific American. April 28, 2009.

3. Schenk, P., Thomas-Hall, S., Stephens, E., Marx, U., Mussgnug, J., Posten, C., & Kruse, O., & Hankamer, B. (2008). Second generation biofuels: High-efficiency microalgae for biodiesel production. BioEnergy Research, 1, 20-43 DOI: 10.1007/s12155-008-9008-8 ResearchBlogging.com.

6 Comments
Comments
August 15, 2011 | 07:26 PM
Posted By:  Paul Tanger
The CO2 output is not dependent only on what CO2 is released when it is burned. What the EPA is referring to is the potential for algae to capture CO2 and convert it to fuel. In this way, these systems could be carbon neutral, or at least less carbon intensive than fossil fuels. You need to consider the entire production process. The "format" of the fuel is not really important here.

Crude oil (whether extracted from the earth or excreted or separated from algae) could fulfill more markets than just the diesel fuel market, since you can refine and use it in reactions to make various polymers and plastics etc.
I don't think you can assume anything about the carbon footprint of these production systems.. sometimes they are better, sometimes they are worse. Extrapolating from lab scale level is even more uncertain. I think we should look at these sort of things as proof of concept and then down the road decide whether they are economical and sustainable before we scale up.
July 20, 2011 | 09:58 PM
Posted By:  Whitney Campbell
James, thanks for your comment and the link to this paper. Although some of its critiques of biofuel don’t apply to microalgae biodiesel (doesn’t compete with food for feedstock or require large-scale, freshwater irrigation) I agree with you and them that the microalgae process needs to be really efficient for it to be a contender. The price per gallon of microalgae oil the authors quote ($425/gal) seems to be calculated from a 2009 contract, and I think recent innovations have improved output. Instead of the racetrack open-pond system, for example, researchers are now using bioreactors that capture a much higher yield. I’m not sure about the 60% efficiency rate for the windfuel process the authors describe, but it seems some researchers think high-efficiency rates for microalgae are attainable:

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261910005210
July 20, 2011 | 09:55 PM
Posted By:  Whitney Campbell
One quote from a 2010 EPA report about renewable fuel helped me think about the issue: “While some algae companies are focusing on the use of algae for biodiesel production, it is important to note that algae can alternatively be used for producing ethanol or crude oil for gasoline or diesel which could also help contribute to the advanced biofuel mandate.” Without knowing the specific figures, I just thought if it’s possible to make biodiesel from microalgae, making crude oil out of it may be less helpful environmentally.

http://www.epa.gov/otaq/renewablefuels/420r10006.pdf
July 20, 2011 | 09:52 PM
Posted By:  Whitney Campbell
Paul, thanks for reading and your question. Although I couldn't find an official study for its carbon footprint, the oil that Botryococcus braunii expresses has a molecular formula of C30H48, and according to its researchers is meant to be a replacement for petroleum with a similarly high CO2 output. Other microalgae stands, such as Chlorella vulgaris, once treated by transesterification, make a diesel with a mono-alkyl ester structure. According the 1998 ASP report, “While no one single fuel can substitute for fossil fuels in an all of the energy sectors, we believe that biodiesel made from algal oils is a fuel which can make a major contribution to the reduction of CO2 generated by power plants and commercial diesel engines.”
July 19, 2011 | 10:02 AM
Posted By:  James Salsman
Algae is very unlikely to reach the 60% synthetic fuel efficiency claimed in http://talknicer.com/doty/TransportFuels-final.pdf by http://windfuels.com (in which I have no financial interest, by the way.)
July 19, 2011 | 03:30 AM
Posted By:  Paul Tanger
Just curious, where is the data regarding the carbon footprint of this product?
Blogger Profiles
Recent Posts

« Prev Next »

Connect
Connect Send a message

Scitable by Nature Education Nature Education Home Learn More About Faculty Page Students Page Feedback



Blogs