Skip to main content

Working Corridors


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Fluorescent bird droppings may help shed light on contested predictions in ecology. To keep species from becoming isolated in fragmented landscapes, conservation biologists often join the patches with strips of habitat, a strategy whose usefulness has been controversial. Ornithologists from the University of Florida at Gainesville and elsewhere devised a large-scale test of such corridors with eight sites in South Carolina pine forests. Each site contained a 100-meter-square patch with wax myrtle bushes, a key source of food for the eastern bluebird. This patch was surrounded by three isolated patches and connected to a fourth by a 150-meter-long corridor. After spraying the wax myrtle fruit with fluorescent powder and analyzing the resulting 11,000 fluorescent bluebird droppings, the researchers found the feces were 37 percent more likely to occur in the connected patch than in the isolated ones, suggesting corridors do work. Their report appears in the July 1 Science.

Charles Q. Choi is a frequent contributor to Scientific American. His work has also appeared in The New York Times, Science, Nature, Wired, and LiveScience, among others. In his spare time, he has traveled to all seven continents.

More by Charles Q. Choi
Scientific American Magazine Vol 293 Issue 3This article was originally published with the title “Working Corridors” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 293 No. 3 (), p. 34
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0905-34d