Correction to: Spinal Cord advance online publication, 15 September 2015; doi:10.1038/sc.2015.145
Since the publication of this article, the authors have noticed an error in the methods section of the abstract. The section should read:
‘Thirty-three ventilator requiring inpatients were randomized to either the higher (Group 1) or the standard (Group 2) Vt protocol. Initially, all patients were ventilated at 10 ml kg−1 IBW Vt and 5 cm H2O of PEEP for 72 h. For Group 1, Vt was raised 100 ml per day until reaching target Vt of 20 ml kg−1 IBW. Group 2 was maintained at Vt of 10 ml kg−1 IBW. Plateau pressures were kept at or below 30 cm H2O. Safety outcomes included incidence of adverse events.’
The html and online versions of the article have been amended. The authors apologise for any inconvenience caused.
Additional information
The online version of the original article can be found at 10.1038/sc.2015.145
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fenton, J., Warner, M., Lammertse, D. et al. Erratum: A comparison of high vs standard tidal volumes in ventilator weaning for individuals with sub-acute spinal cord injuries: a site-specific randomized clinical trial. Spinal Cord 54, 245 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.2015.222
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.2015.222
