Introduction

Traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) is a debilitating condition with significant impact on the patient’s psychological state. A variety of factors related to patients’ SCI experiences such as pain, medication, isolation, medical complications, altered body image and postinjury cognitive deficits may contribute to psychological morbidity, which in turn may negatively impact coping and quality of rehabilitation.1 Within Western societies, depression is a well-documented psychiatric complication of SCI. Between 20 and 45% of patients experience depression after their injury, and it is estimated that patients with SCI have a four to five times higher rate of suicide compared with age-matched population samples.1, 2, 3, 4 In low- and middle-income countries, however, the prevalence of depression in patients with SCI is not well characterized. This must be rectified, as morbidity and mortality associated with SCI in developing countries remains disproportionately high.5 The World Health Organization reports that, in addition to carrying high individual and societal costs, SCI causes individuals to be two to five times more likely to die prematurely, with worse survival rates if these individuals reside in low- and middle-income countries.6 In Sri Lanka, a low-income country with a population of ~20 million, the Sri Lankan Spinal Cord Network estimates that 2000 Sri Lankans are inflicted by traumatic SCI every year.7 This incidence, which is predicted by the Sri Lankan Spinal Cord Network to rise because of increased road traffic and industrial accidents,7 has implications for economic burden and patient suffering.

Currently, there is a lack of existing literature on psychosocial experiences of Sri Lankan patients with SCI. To address this knowledge gap, this research study aimed to explore psychiatric morbidity and coping mechanisms in a sample of Sri Lankan patients with SCI. In the exploratory phase of this study, focus groups were conducted to understand how patients perceived the impact of their injury and what coping mechanisms they actively used. Limitations of activities of daily living, fear of burdening family members, fragmentation of relational ties and inability to generate income and fulfill social roles emerged as patients’ greatest concerns. Furthermore, patients frequently and almost unanimously reported that religious or spiritual practices aided them in confronting challenges posed by their injury.8

Based on qualitatively identified psychosocial concerns associated with SCI and the strong recognition of religious practice as a coping mechanism in the Sri Lankan patient population, the quantitative aspect of this study was designed to assess specific potential predictors of depression. It was hypothesized that patients perceiving greater functional impairment in various life domains would be more likely to suffer from depression and that patients who identified greater benefit from spirituality/religiosity (S/R) would be less likely to suffer from depression. This paper presents the results of the quantitative analyses.

Materials and methods

Setting

Situated ~20 km north of Colombo in the Western Province, the town of Ragama is home to the Faculty of Medicine of the University of Kelaniya and the Ragama Rheumatology and Rehabilitation Hospital. The Ragama Rehabilitation and Rehabilitation Hospital accommodates 256 in-patient beds and presently serves as the leading referral rehabilitation facility for persons living with disabilities in the country. It sees the highest number of patients with SCI in Sri Lanka at any given time.

Approval of this study was obtained from the Ethical Review Committee of University of Kelaniya and the Director of Ragama Rheumatology and Rehabilitation Hospital in Ragama, Sri Lanka.

Sampling

Participant recruitment for this study was conducted through screening of medical records at the Ragama Rheumatology and Rehabilitation Hospital. Using a purposive sampling strategy, in-patient records were screened against inclusion criteria, which included a diagnosis of SCI from a traumatic cause, fluency in Sinhala and an age of 18 years or above. Patients fitting the inclusion criteria were identified on a rolling basis as they were admitted to hospital between June and July 2014. All consecutive, consenting patients were included in data collection and analysis.

Instruments

Sociodemographic data and SCI-relevant medical history was collected from each participant. To assess dimensions of depression, objectively and subjectively defined functional impairment and S/R, respectively, the Beck Depression Inventory II (BDI-II), Spinal Cord Independence Measure III (SCIM-III), Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) and Benefit through Religiosity/Spirituality Scale (BENEFIT) were administered. The four instruments were chosen for their applicability to a population with chronic disability, their suitability of use in Sri Lankan or other multicultural contexts, and their relative brevity. All four instruments are self-report scales, and medical residents at the Department of Psychiatry with experience in questionnaire administration assisted persons with impaired physical ability in completing the measures by reading aloud questionnaire items and noting participants’ selected answers.

The BDI-II is a 21-item measure of depressive symptomatology. Each item on the BDI-II is rated on a four-point scale ranging from 0 to 3; values indicate increasing severity in a particular symptom of depression in accordance with the DSM-IV. Summed ratings yield a total score indicative of either normal mood fluctuations, mild mood disturbance, borderline clinical depression, moderate depression, severe depression or extreme depression.9 The BDI-II has been widely used in rehabilitation settings in low- and middle-income countries, and has been translated into Sinhala and validated in Sri Lanka.10, 11

The SCIM-III is specifically designed for patients with spinal cord lesions, and is currently the only comprehensive measure of ability among this population. The 17-item scale assesses a patient’s physical ability to perform daily tasks in three domains: care, respiration and sphincter management, and mobility. The total score ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better task performance or independence. The SCIM-III was formulated based on the need to address intercultural biases and was found to produce high reliability, internal consistency and external validity in SCI-sustaining patient samples from three continents.12 The SCIM-III was previously used in Sri Lanka to assess functional outcomes of patients admitted to a Médecins Sans Frontières rehabilitation program during the civil conflict in 2009.13

The SDS is a three-item questionnaire that assesses the degree of functional impairment in three interrelated life domains: work/school, social life and family life/home responsibilities. The SDS measures respondents’ self-perceived extent of life disruptions due to symptomatology, whereas the SCIM assesses the severity of symptomatology itself.14 The SDS has been translated into Sinhala and is routinely used by the Faculty of Medicine of the University of Kelaniya in its psychiatric consultations.15 The SDS has also previously been implemented in an epidemiological study of the Sri Lankan population affected by the 2004 tsunami.16

The BENEFIT is a 6-item questionnaire that measures perceived beneficial effects of S/R in context of patients’ life concerns. The BENEFIT was developed in response to the need for a compact measure to better understand how S/R affects health in different populations, different religious groups and different circumstances. The instrument, which is scored on a scale of 0 to 4 for each item, assesses extent of disagreement or agreement for six unique statements (Table 2). Higher scores for each statement indicate greater perceived benefit through S/R. The BENEFIT was validated in a sample of patients (N=371) with chronic, disabling conditions and was found to have a high Cronbach’s α (0.922).17 For the purposes of this study, the BENEFIT was iteratively translated from English to Sinhala, then back-translated by two independent bilingual staff. Discrepancies were resolved through consultation with psychiatrists at the University of Kelaniya to achieve a consensus final version.

Table 2 Perceived beneficial effects from spiritual/religious practices on life concerns

Data analysis

Descriptive statistics were used to summarize sociodemographic data and injury characteristics, as well as responses to the validated measures. Planned comparisons using χ2 test and independent samples t-test were initially used to examine whether the degree of physical dependence, as indicated by the degree of paralysis and SCIM-III scores, was significantly different between clinically depressed and non-depressed individuals. To examine whether self-perceived functional impairment and S/R activities would predict psychiatric outcomes while accounting for various sociodemographic variables, a one-step linear regression model on the BDI-II score was developed. The model incorporated SDS and BENEFIT scores, as well as age, marital status and income level before SCI as independent variables. Sex and education were not included in the model because of the largely unequal distribution between genders and education levels within the study sample.

Results

Of the sample population, 62 patients met inclusion criteria. One patient chose not to participate, and written informed consent to participate in the study was obtained from 61 individuals, of whom 55 were males and 6 were females. Detailed sociodemographic descriptions and injury-related characteristics were obtained (Table 1). Participants’ ages ranged from 18 to 68 years, with a mean age of 39.5 years and a median age of 37 years(s.d.=14.7). Approximately 68% of the study sample was married, and 52% had one or more children. Educational achievement for the majority (84%) was a high school diploma, and a similar proportion (80%) reported earning an income of <Rs 5000 LKR (Sri Lankan Rupee) to Rs 20 000 LKR monthly (~US $40–150) before injury. Approximately 50% of the participants were referred from the Western Province; the remaining half of the study sample consisted of patients from across seven other provinces. Ethnic and religious identification showed 90% as Sinhalese and 85% as Buddhist. Common causes of SCI included falls from height (49%) and road traffic accidents (39%). Following the cause of injury, 66% of the study sample sustained tetraplegia, and 34% sustained paraplegia. None reported existing psychiatric diagnoses before hospital admission nor any family history of psychiatric illness.

Table 1 Participant demographic and injury characteristics

Psychiatric symptoms and functional impairment

Psychiatric consequences of SCI were reflected in a 41% prevalence of clinically significant depressive symptoms as measured by the BDI-II. Of the depressed individuals, eight scored between 17 and 20 (borderline clinical depression), eight scored between 21 and 30 (moderate depression) and nine scored above 30 (severe or extreme depression). Among all participants, SCIM-III measurements showed a mean of 47 (s.d.=21.7) on a scale from 0 to 100, indicating moderate level of physical limitations, and SDS measurements revealed a mean of 22 (s.d.=9.0), indicating marked self-perceived functional impairment. SCIM-III scores were not found to differ significantly between depressed and non-depressed groups t(59)=1.50, P>0.05 nor was there any difference between depressed and non-depressed groups in the degree of paralysis, whether paraplegic or tetraplegic χ2(1, N=61)=0.11, P>0.05.

S/R practices and religious beliefs

Respondents frequently perceived benefits through S/R activities, as demonstrated by the high mean BENEFIT score of 21 (s.d.=3.2). Strong agreement was expressed for all six items of the scale, with a majority of respondents agreeing that the item statement ‘definitely applies’ to their S/R experiences and giving a mean score of at least 3.4 (s.d.=0.8) out of 4 for each item. Descriptive statistics for the BENEFIT items are provided in Table 2.

Prediction of depression

Linear regression analyses were used to test predictors of depression severity (Table 3). Approximately 36% (R2=0.36) of the variance in BDI-II scores (F(5, 55)=6.07, P<0.001) was explained by the regression model. Self-perceived functional disability as measured by SDS emerged as the strongest predictor of depression symptom severity. Self-perceived benefit through S/R activities as measured by BENEFIT accounted for the second largest proportion of variance, demonstrating an inverse relationship between S/R activities and depressive symptomatology.

Table 3 Prediction of depression: Summary of linear regression analyses testing predictors of depression severity as measured by Beck Depression Inventory-II

Discussion

Prevalence of depressive symptoms

Clinically significant depressive symptoms were found in 41% of our patient sample, with 28% suffering from either moderate or severe depression. Through disease modeling based on a systematic review of epidemiological data, Ferrari et al.18 found the 2010 age-standardized point prevalence for major depressive disorder in Sri Lanka to be 4.73%, with a 95% uncertainty interval of 3.19–6.66%. The results of our study reflect a much higher prevalence of depressive symptoms among patients with traumatic SCI compared with this most recent estimate for the general Sri Lankan population. Overall, the finding that traumatic SCI puts individuals at risk for depression is expected and in keeping with findings from the West, where a review of literature on post-SCI psychological morbidity during the first 6–8 months following injury estimates the risk of depressive disorder to be 20 to 40%.19

Functional independence and self-perceived impairment with relation to depression

There was no significant difference in SCIM-III scores or type of paralysis between patients with clinically significant depressive symptoms and those without. This is consistent with previous research, which has similarly found that, in general, there is no association between depression severity and injury characteristics such as lesion level or lesion completeness. In particular, it has been previously concluded that the incidence of depression is unaffected by whether patients are paraplegic or tetraplegic.20 More recent studies of SCI corroborate the finding that injury characteristics such as lesion level, lesion completeness and functional impairment are not associated with depression severity.21, 22, 23 However, a few authors have found a relationship between lower functional independence and depression, and findings in this area seem to remain unclear.24, 25 Of note, we chose not to include characteristics such as level and injury completeness in our regression model as our study did not hypothesize that physical injury characteristics would have an impact on or relation with depression given the past literature. Rather, we were interested in the predicative value of psychosocial characteristics such as perceived impairment in family, work/school and social life.

In contrast to findings regarding the lack of relationship between degree of physical dependence and severity of depression, SDS score was the strongest predictor of depression severity in our patient sample. This is in keeping with past research in the Sri Lankan setting, which has also found that depression scores correlate with all three impairment subscales (extent of work, family and social disruption) on the SDS.16 While the SCIM-III is a measurement tool used by clinicians, the SDS is a self-report tool, and unique patient factors are thus more likely to influence responses. SDS may be related to depression because of a variety of modulating factors, including, but not limited to, social support, adaptation strategies and personal resilience. Patients’ personal appraisals of impairment within various life domains influence responses on the SDS, and could also modulate patients’ rehabilitation experience and psychological sequelae. Indeed, appraisals beginning in early stages of rehabilitation have been associated with psychological wellbeing in the SCI population, and coping early after injury has been found to be significantly related to quality of life outcomes up to 2 years postinjury.26, 27

Religiosity with relation to depression

All patients in our sample identified with a particular religion, and a mean score of at least 3.4 out of 4 was given for each individual BENEFIT item, indicating high perceived benefit through S/R. The four main religions observed in Sri Lanka were represented in this study, with 85.5% of respondents identifying as Buddhists. These numbers are fairly representative of the general patient population, as nearly all members Sri Lanka's population observe a certain religion, with over 70% of Sri Lankans observing Buddhism.28

BENEFIT scores were found to inversely predict depressive symptoms in our patient population, the reasons for which may be explained by the use of S/R practices as a method for coping. Past literature investigating adjustment in individuals with chronic disabilities has found that spirituality can assist patients in coping with life changes,29, 30, 31, 32, 33 and a literature review including 724 quantitative studies found that a majority of studies report religion to be significantly associated with better mental health and greater social support.34 With specific regard to SCI patients, Marini et al.35 found that S/R practices and a belief in God or a Spiritual Power help patients cope with the effects of their injury and provide them with a sense of purpose in life. White et al.23 further found significant correlations between spirituality, resilience, satisfaction in life and reduced depressive symptomatology in SCI patients, and Matheis et al.36 found that 98.7% of SCI patients in their sample reported using spiritual-based coping to the effect of greater perceived quality of life.

Our own qualitative work using focus groups revealed S/R practices to be mechanisms by which participants confront personal challenges following SCI.8 Participants in our patient sample relied on S/R practices for comfort and consolation, and some believed that their S/R practices assisted them in improving their health condition. While our qualitative findings elucidate the importance of S/R towards our patient sample’s overall coping, our quantitative findings specifically show that depressive symptoms in our patient population are inversely predicted by perceived benefit through S/R.

In the World Health Organization framework for measuring health and disability, spirituality is acknowledged as a contributor to wellbeing.37 It has been strongly suggested that, given the extent to which S/R practices help patients with disabilities cope and establish meaning in their lives, rehabilitation professionals adopt practical strategies to enhance religious coping.32, 38 Koenig38, 39 suggests that rehabilitation professionals ask particular questions around spiritual belief and spiritual needs during the taking of a spiritual history; such a history inquires about the role of S/R with regard to a patient’s understandings of their injury and aims to understand the use of S/R for subsequent coping. In addition, Johnstone et al.32 advise that rehabilitation professionals address religious issues with patients in an initial interview, establish an early understanding of their patients’ worldviews and the possible effect of these views on adherence to treatment, and recommend the use of external religious support systems, when appropriate, to facilitate community reintegration.32 Given the prevalence of depressive symptomatology in our patient sample and the finding of religiosity as an inverse predictor of depression severity, there may be benefit for such recommended measures to be adopted in the Sri Lankan setting.

There are limitations to this study that must be considered. First, we acknowledge that there is criticism that using the BDI-II in SCI populations may falsely elevate estimates of depression based on somatic symptom-focused questionnaire items.40 However, the BDI has been shown to be fairly reliable in patients with traumatic SCI, and remains one of the most commonly used tools for this patient population.24, 41 We deliberately chose the instrument due to its prior use in similar patient populations as well as geographic settings, and chose the more conservative cutoff of 17 to maximize specificity. Second, females were largely under-represented in our study sample given that the Ragama Rheumatology and Rehabilitation Hospital sees much fewer females as opposed to males sustaining traumatic SCI, in whom such injuries are more common. Thus, the results of this study may not be generalizable to females with traumatic SCI. Last, the majority of our sample consisted of individuals with low-income and a high school diploma education, which could be an important contributor to the detected prevalence of depressive symptoms. We recommend future work with larger, more diverse samples to better understand how socioeconomic status impacts appraisal, coping and depressive symptomatology. Our sample was further unique in that the patients had access to in-hospital practical rehabilitative programs; examining depressive symptomatology in patients with SCI living in rural communities, who may not have such instrumental and informational support, would be of further interest.

Conclusions

This cross-sectional study found that perceived functional impairment in work, social and family domains predicted depressive symptomatology among traumatic SCI inpatients in Sri Lanka while perceived benefit through S/R protected against depression. The high prevalence of depressive symptoms in our study sample emphasizes the need for culturally sensitive, practical rehabilitative programming to focus on patients' psychological wellbeing. S/R practices should be respected as aids to rehabilitation and future therapeutic efforts should assist patients to regain functional independence such that they may reintegrate into their work, social and family lives. A larger study would be useful to verify and extend these results, including the value of S/R practices as an aid to rehabilitation and reintegration into the community.

Data archiving

There were no data to deposit.