Original Article

Spinal Cord (2007) 45, 404–410; doi:10.1038/sj.sc.3101991; published online 14 November 2006

A multicentre follow-up of clinical aspects of traumatic spinal cord injury

M C Pagliacci1, M Franceschini2, B Di Clemente2, M Agosti2 and L Spizzichino3 on behalf of GISEM (Gruppo Italiano Studio Epidemiologico Mielolesioni)

  1. 1Spinal Cord Injury Unit, Silvestrini Hospital, Perugia, Italy
  2. 2Department of Geriatrics and Rehabilitation – Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy
  3. 3Department of Prevention, National Health Board, Rome, Italy

Correspondence: MC Pagliacci, Unità Spinale Unipolare Ospedale Silvestrini, Azienda Ospedaliera di Perugia, 06156 Perugia, Italy

Top

Abstract

Study design:

 

Prospective, multicentred follow-up (FU) observational study.

Objectives:

 

Prospectively evaluate survival, complications, re-admissions and maintenance of clinical outcome in people experiencing traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI).

Setting:

 

Seven spinal units and 17 rehabilitation centres participating in the previous GISEM (ie Italian Group for the Epidemiological Study of Spinal Cord Injuries) study.

Method:

 

A total of 511 persons with SCI, discharged between 1997 and 1999 after their first hospitalisation, were enrolled. A standardised questionnaire was administered via telephone.

Results:

 

Of the 608 persons originally enrolled, 36 died between discharge and follow-up (mean 3.8plusminus0.64 years). Of the remainder, 403 completed telephone interviews, 72 refused to participate and 97 could not be contacted. More than half of the patients interviewed (53.6%) experienced at least one SCI-related clinical problem in the 6 months preceding interview; the most frequent being urological complications (53.7%). At least one re-admission was recorded in 56.8% of patients between discharge and FU interview. Of the patients interviewed, 70.5% reported bowel autonomy and 86% bladder management autonomy. On multivariate analysis, lack of bowel/bladder autonomy was the most common variable with a strong predicting value for mortality, occurrence of complications and re-admissions.

Conclusion:

 

Re-admission and major complications seem common after SCI and should be considered when planning facilities. Failure to obtain bowel/bladder autonomy upon discharge from rehabilitation proved to be the most common predictive factor of poor outcome during the period between discharge and FU interview.

Keywords:

follow-up, traumatic spinal cord injury, survival, complications, re-admission, clinical outcome

Top

MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS

Extra navigation

.

naturejobs

ADVERTISEMENT