Original Article
Spinal Cord (2004) 42, 169–176. doi:10.1038/sj.sc.3101579 Published online 3 February 2004
Perceived outcomes and utilization of upper extremity surgical reconstruction in individuals with tetraplegia at model spinal cord injury systems
A M Bryden1, K S Wuolle1, P K Murray2 and P Hunter Peckham1,2,3
- 1The Cleveland Functional Electrical Stimulation Center, Louis B Stokes Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
- 2MetroHealth Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
- 3Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
Correspondence: AM Bryden, MetroHealth Medical Center, Rehabilitation Engineering Center (H601), 2500 MetroHealth Drive, Cleveland, OH 44109-1998, USA
Abstract
Study design: Survey.
Objective: To measure the utilization of upper extremity reconstructive surgery and the clinicians' perceptions of the outcomes provided for persons with tetraplegia across the Model Spinal Cord (SCI) Injury Systems.
Setting: Model SCI Systems.
Methods: Participants: A clinician from each of the Model Centers. Main outcome measure: A mailed survey eliciting responses with respect to: (1) utilization of upper extremity reconstructive procedures and (2) the clinicians' perceived outcomes of these procedures.
Results: In all, 76% responded positively about the availability and appropriateness of upper extremity surgical reconstruction at their center. Of the respondents, 75% felt that surgery recipients were generally satisfied with their surgeries, 80% felt that the surgery made a positive impact on recipients' lives, 81% felt that recipients showed increased independence, and 70% reported a positive impact on recipients' occupation. In all, 93% felt insurance companies should pay for the procedures. Compared to the satisfaction of surgery recipients using a similar instrument, clinicians anticipated slightly greater improvements in all areas except occupation.
Conclusions: There is a positive perception of the benefits of reconstructive surgery for tetraplegia; however, procedures are not routinely offered at all centers. The primary reasons reported for this include the misconception that insurance does not remit payment, that a surgeon is not available, and that surgical candidates are referred to another center.
Sponsorship: Support was provided by the United States Department of Education, National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research. Award #H133N50018, Rehabilitation Research and Development Center of Excellence in Functional Electrical Stimulation Department of Veterans Affairs.
Keywords:
reconstructive surgery, tendon transfers, tetraplegia, outcomes, upper extremity
MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS
These links to content published by NPG are automatically generated
REVIEWS
Spinal Cord Review
RESEARCH
Latent Viruses in Chimpanzees with Experimental Kuru
Nature Article (04 Nov 1967)
Spinal Cord Original Article
Spinal Cord Original Article
Spinal Cord Original Article

