TABLE 4
FROM:
Improved kinematics of unrestrained arm raising in C5–C6 tetraplegic subjects after deltoid-to-triceps transfer
O Remy-Neris, J Milcamps, R Chikhi-Keromest, A Thevenon, D Bouttens and S Bouilland
BACK TO ARTICLETable 4. SFVs and EFVs in tetraplegic subjects before surgery (BS), at the first (1st) and second (2nd) postsurgery evaluation during ascending phase (AP) and descending phase (DP) of HNNM
| SFV (°/s) | EFV (°/s) | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AP | DP | AP | DP | |||||||||
| BS | 1st | 2nd | BS | 1st | 2nd | BS | 1st | 2nd | BS | 1st | 2nd | |
| S1R | 33 | 65 | 42 | 69 | 81 | 111 | 116 | 163 | ||||
| S1L | 112 | 96 | 120 | 160 | 111 | 105 | 162 | 156 | ||||
| S2R | 70 | 123 | 224 | 91 | 152 | 300 | 131 | 126 | 202 | 100 | 119 | 175 |
| S3R | 64 | 98 | 173 | 73 | 119 | 172 | 89 | 115 | 175 | 145 | 110 | 204 |
| S3L | 81 | 55 | 181 | 102 | 105 | 189 | 128 | 106 | 238 | 152 | 177 | 230 |
| S4 | 50 | 58 | 47 | 48 | 29 | 65 | 43 | 64 | ||||
| S5 | 26 | 63 | 28 | 41 | 52 | 114 | 48 | 72 | ||||
| Mean | 62 | 80 | 192 | 72 | 99 | 220 | 89 | 106 | 205 | 109 | 123 | 203 |
| SEM | 22 | 22 | 21 | 28 | 40 | 53 | 30 | 12 | 22 | 39 | 36 | 19 |
| NS | 0.01 | NS | NS | |||||||||
NS: not significant
