Nature Publishing Group, publisher of Nature, and other science journals and reference works NATURE.COM NATURE NEWS NATUREJOBS NATUREEVENTS ABOUT NPG
Help Nature.com site index  
Spinal Cord
SEARCH     advanced search my account e-alerts subscribe register
Journal home
Advance online publication
Current issue
Archive
Press releases
For authors
For referees
Contact editorial office
About the journal
For librarians
Subscribe
Advertising
naturereprints
Contact NPG
Customer services
Site features
NPG Subject areas
Access material from all our publications in your subject area:
Biotechnology Biotechnology
Cancer Cancer
Chemistry Chemistry
Dentistry Dentistry
Development Development
Drug Discovery Drug Discovery
Earth Sciences Earth Sciences
Evolution & Ecology Evolution & Ecology
Genetics Genetics
Immunology Immunology
Materials Materials Science
Medical Research Medical Research
Microbiology Microbiology
Molecular Cell Biology Molecular Cell Biology
Neuroscience Neuroscience
Pharmacology Pharmacology
Physics Physics
Browse all publications
 
September 2001, Volume 39, Number 9, Pages 471-476
Table of contents    Previous  Abstract  Next   Article  PDF
Original Article
Is methyl prednisolone useful in acute transverse myelitis?
J Kalita and U K Misra

Department of Neurology, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, India

Correspondence to: J Kalita, Department of Neurology, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, RaeBareli Road, Lucknow 226 014, India

Abstract

Study design: Hospital based observational study.

Objectives: To evaluate the role of methyl prednisolone (MPS) in the management of acute transverse myelitis (ATM).

Methods: Twenty-one patients with ATM were included in a prospective hospital based study during 1992-1997. All the patients underwent neurological examination, spinal MRI, somatosensory and motor evoked potentials of both upper and lower limbs and concentric needle EMG study. Twelve consecutive patients did not receive MPS therapy who were managed during 1992-1994 and nine consecutive patients during 1995-1997 received MPS therapy in a dose of 500 mg i.v. for 5 days. The clinical and neurophysiological studies were repeated 3 months later. The outcome was defined on the basis of Barthel index (BI) score at the end of 3 months into good (BI12) and poor (BI<12).

Results: The age of MPS group was 25.5 years (range 12-42) and three were females. The age of non MPS group was 33.5 years (range 16-70) and two were females. In the MPS group 33% had poor outcome compared to 67% in the non MPS group. In the MPS group mean admission BI score was 7.3 which improved to 14.6 after MPS therapy. In the non MPS group, the admission BI score was 3.2 which improved to 9.6 at 3 month follow-up. In patients with complete paraplegia, evidence of denervation on EMG and unrecordable central motor conduction time to lower limb and tibial SEP were associated with poor outcome irrespective of MPS treatment. Global test statistics did not suggest a beneficial role of MPS therapy in the outcome of ATM.

Conclusion: Our results do not suggest a beneficial role of methyl prednisolone on the 3 month outcome of ATM.

Spinal Cord (2001) 39, 471-476.

Keywords

methyl prednisolone; myelitis; denervation

September 2001, Volume 39, Number 9, Pages 471-476
Table of contents    Previous  Abstract  Next   Article  PDF
Privacy Policy © 2001 Nature Publishing Group