 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |

© Nature
Publishing
Group
2006 |
|  |
Kathode rays
In 1896, Jean-Baptiste Perrin reported the results of experiments on the mysterious 'kathode rays' that emanate from a cathode within an evacuated tube. Hertz had proposed that these rays were a form of light, but Perrin's experiments showed that they were charged with negative electricity, and that positive charge flowed towards the cathode even as the negative rays came from it. In March 1897, J. J. Thomson reported corroborating observations, setting the stage for his announcement one month later that the cathode rays were comprised of corpuscles with mass 1,000 times smaller than that of the hydrogen atom.
Nature 53, 298299 (1896) and Nature 55, 453 (1897)
| click here
for a PDF (382 K) |
|
NEW EXPERIMENTS ON THE KATHODE RAYS.1
(1) TWO hypotheses have been propounded to explain the properties
of the kathode rays.
Some physicists think with Goldstein, Hertz, and Lenard, that this
phenomenon is like light, due to vibrations of the ether,2
or even that it is light of short wavelength. It is easily understood
that such rays may have a rectilinear path, excite phosphorescence,
and affect photographic plates.

Fig. 1
Others think, with Crookes and J. J. Thomson, that these rays are
formed by matter which is negatively charged and moving with great
velocity, and on this hypothesis their mechanical properties, as
well as the manner in which they become curved in a magnetic field,
are readily explicable.
This latter hypothesis has suggested to me some experiments which
I will now briefly describe, without for the moment pausing to inquire
whether the hypothesis suffices to explain all the facts at present
known, and whether it is the only hypothesis that can do so. Its
adherents suppose that the kathode rays are negatively charged;
so far as I know, this electrification has not been established,
and I first attempted to determine whether it exists or not.
(2) For that purpose I had recourse to the laws of induction, by
means of which it is possible to detect the introduction of electric
charges into the interior of a closed electric conductor, and to
measure them. I therefore caused the kathode rays to pass into a
Faraday's cylinder. For this purpose I employed the vacuum tube
represented in Fig. 1. A B C D
is a tube with an opening a in the centre of the face B
C. It is this tube which plays the part of a Faraday's cylinder.
A metal thread soldered at S to the wall of the tube
connects this cylinder with an electroscope.
E F G H is a second cylinder in permanent communication
with the earth, and pierced by two small openings at b
and g; it protects the Faraday's cylinder
from all external influence. Finally, at a distance of about 0.10
m. in front of F G, was placed an electrode N.
The electrode N served as kathode; the anode was
formed by the protecting cylinder E F G H; thus a
pencil of kathode rays passed into the Faraday's cylinder. This
cylinder invariably became charged with negative electricity.
The vacuum tube could be placed between the poles of an electro-magnet.
When this was excited, the kathode rays, becoming deflected, no
longer passed into the Faraday's cylinder, and this cylinder was
then not charged; it, however, became charged immediately the electromagnet
ceased to be excited.
In short, the Faraday's cylinder became negatively charged when
the kathode rays entered it, and only when they entered it; the
kathode rays are then charged with negative electricity.
The quantity of electricity which these rays carry can be measured.
I have not finished this investigation, but I shall give an idea
of the order of magnitude of the charges obtained when I say that
for one of my tubes, at a pressure of 20 microns of mercury, and
for a single interruption of the primary of the coil, the Faraday's
cylinder received a charge of electricity sufficient to raise a
capacity of 600 C.G.S. units to 300 volts.
(3) The kathode rays being negatively charged, the principle of
the conservation of electricity drives us to seek somewhere the
corresponding positive charges. I believe that I have found them
in the very region where the kathode rays are formed, and that I
have established the fact that they travel in the opposite direction,
and fall upon the kathode. In order to verify this hypothesis, it
is sufficient to use a hollow kathode pierced with a small opening
by which a portion of the attracted positive electricity might enter.
This electricity could then act upon a Faraday's cylinder inside
the kathode.
The protecting cylinder E F G H with its opening
b fulfilled these conditions, and this
time I therefore employed it as the kathode, the electrode N
being the anode. The Faraday's cylinder is then invariably charged
with positive electricity. The positive charges were of the
order of magnitude of the negative charges previously obtained.
Thus, at the same time as negative electricity is radiated
from the kathode, positive electricity travels towards that kathode.
I endeavoured to determine whether this positive flux formed a
second system of rays absolutely symmetrical to the first.
(4) For that purpose I constructed a tube (Fig. 2)
similar to the preceding, except that between the Faraday's cylinder
and the opening b was placed a metal
diaphragm pierced with an opening b',
so that the positive electricity which entered by b
could only affect the Faraday's cylinder if it also traversed the
diaphragm b'. Then I repeated
the preceding experiments.
When N was the kathode, the rays emitted from the
kathode passed through the two openings b
and b' without difficulty, and
caused a strong divergence of the leaves of the electroscope. But
when the protecting cylinder was the kathode, the positive flux,
which, according to the preceding experiment, entered at b,
did not succeed in separating the gold leaves except at very low
pressures. When an electrometer was substituted for the electroscope,
it was found that the action of the positive flux was real but very
feeble, and increased as the pressure decreased. In a series of
experiments at a pressure of 20 microns, it raised a capacity of
2000 C.G.S. units to 10 volts; and at a pressure of 3 microns, during
the same time, it raised the potential to 60 volts.1
By means of a magnet this action could be entirely suppressed.

Fig. 2
(5) These results as a whole do not appear capable of being easily
reconciled with the theory which regards the kathode rays as an
ultra-violet light. On the other hand, they agree well with the
theory which regards them as a material radiation, and which, as
it appears to me, might be thus enunciated.
In the neighbourhood of the kathode, the electric field is sufficiently
intense to break into pieces (into ions) certain of the molecules
of the residual gas. The negative ions move towards the region where
the potential is increasing, acquire a considerable speed, and form
the kathode rays; their electric charge, and consequently their
mass (at the rate of one valence-gramme for 100,000 Coulombs) is
easily measurable. The positive ions move in the opposite direction;
they form a diffused brush, sensitive to the magnet, and not a radiation
in the correct sense of the word.2
- Translation
of a paper by M. Jean Perrin, read before the Paris Academy of
Sciences on December 30, 1895.
- These vibrations might be something
different from light: recently M. Jaumann, whose hypotheses have
since been criticised by M. H. Poincaré, supposed them to
be longitudinal.
ON KATHODE RAYS
by Prof J. J. Thomson
CAMBRIDGE.
Philosophical Society, February 8. Mr. F. Darwin, President,
in the chair.
The experiments described in this paper were of two kinds: the
first set were on the electric charges carried along the rays, the
second on the deflection produced in these rays when they traversed
a uniform magnetic field. In the experiments on the electrical effects
produced by the rays, the kathode, a plane disc, was placed in a
small side tube fused on to a large bulb; between this tube and
the bulb there was a thick earth-connected metal disc with a slit
in it; a. pencil of kathode rays shot through this slit into the
bulb. In the bulb on the side opposite to the slit there was an
arrangement similar to that used by Perrin in his experiments on
the charges carried by the kathode rays; it consisted of two cylinders,
one inside the other; the outer cylinder was connected with the
earth, and the inner cylinder (which was insulated from the outer)
was connected with one pair of quadrants of an electrometer. Slits
were cut in the cylinder so that the kathode rays could pass through
the slits into the inside of the inner cylinder. The cylinders were
placed at a considerable distance from the direct line of the rays,
so that unless the rays were deflected by a magnet they did not
enter the cylinder. The charge in the cylinder produced by each
make and break of the coil was investigated. A slight charge was
found to pass into the cylinder even when it was not in the direct
line of the rays, due probably to a diffused charge sent out from
the tube through the slit into the bulb at each discharge of the
coil; this charge was small; it was generally negative, but at high
exhaustions was frequently positive. When the rays were deflected
by a magnet so as to pass inside the cylinder, the cylinder received
a strong negative charge; the charge was large as long as the phosphorescent
patch was stopped by the cylinder, small when by motion of the magnet
the patch was removed to one side or another of the cylinder. This
experiment seems conclusively to show that there is a flow of negative
electricity along the kathode rays. The following experiments show,
however, that there must be something besides a stream of negatively
electrified particles along the kathode rays. If the coil is kept
running the negative charge in the cylinder does not increase indefinitely,
it reaches a certain limit and then remains constant, though the
kathode rays keep pouring into the cylinder; and further, if the
inner cylinder be charged negatively to begin with, then if this
charge exceeds a certain amount, though the insulation is perfect
when the rays are not playing upon the cylinder, yet as soon as
the rays fall upon it some of the negative charge escapes.
In the experiments on the magnetic deflection of the rays, the rays
were produced in a side tube and sent into a large bell jar through
a slit in a metallic plate. The bell jar was placed between two
coils arranged as in a Helmholtz galvanometer so as to produce a
uniform magnetic field. The rays in their course through the bell
passed in front of a glass plate ruled into squares. A large number
of photographs of the rays were taken in different gases and at
various degrees of exhaustion. The following were some of the results
obtained. The magnetic deflection of the kathode rays in air, hydrogen,
carbonic acid gas and methyl iodide is the same provided the mean
potential difference between the kathode and the anode is the same.
Coming through the slit there are certain "rays" which are not deflected
by a magnet: these have little if any power of producing phosphorescence.
The path of the rays for the first part of their course was very
approximately circular.
| return
to looking back index page |
|