 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |

© Nature
Publishing
Group
2006 |
|  |
DNA a new twist on life
The determination in 1953 of the structure of deoxyribonucleic
acid (DNA), with its two entwined helices and paired organic
bases, was a tour de force in X-ray crystallography.
But more significantly, it also opened the way for a deeper
understanding of perhaps the most important biological process.
In the words of Watson and Crick: "It has not escaped our
notice that the specific pairing that we have postulated immediately
suggests a possible copying mechanism for the genetic material."
Nature 171, 737738 (1953)
| click
here for a PDF version (256 K) |
| Molecular Structure
of Nucleic AcidsA Structure for Deoxyribose Nucleic AcidWe wish
to suggest a structure for the salt of deoxyribose nucleic acid (D.N.A.). This
structure has novel features which are of considerable biological interest. A
structure for nucleic acid has already been proposed by Pauling and Corey1.
They kindly made their manuscript available to us in advance of publication. Their
model consists of three intertwined chains, with the phosphates near the fibre
axis, and the bases on the outside. In our opinion, this structure is unsatisfactory
for two reasons: (1) We believe that the material which gives the X-ray diagrams
is the salt, not the free acid. Without the acidic hydrogen atoms it is not clear
what forces would hold the structure together, especially as the negatively charged
phosphates near the axis will repel each other. (2) Some of the van der Waals
distances appear to be too small. Another three-chain structure
has also been suggested by Fraser (in the press). In his model the phosphates
are on the outside and the bases on the inside, linked together by hydrogen bonds.
This structure as described is rather ill-defined, and for this reason we shall
not comment on it.
 | Fig.
1 This figure is purely diagrammatic. The two ribbons symbolize the two
phosphatesugar chains, and the horizontal rods the pairs of bases holding
the chains together. The vertical line marks the fibre axis |
high-resolution version | |
We
wish to put forward a radically different structure for the salt of deoxyribose
nucleic acid. This structure has two helical chains each coiled round the same
axis (see diagram). We have made the usual chemical assumptions,
namely, that each chain consists of phosphate diester groups joining b-D-deoxyribofuranose
residues with 3′,5′ linkages. The two chains (but not their bases)
are related by a dyad perpendicular to the fibre axis. Both chains follow right-handed
helices, but owing to the dyad the sequences of the atoms in the two chains run
in opposite directions. Each chain loosely resembles Furberg's2
model No. 1; that is, the bases are on the inside of the helix and the phosphates
on the outside. The configuration of the sugar and the atoms near it is close
to Furberg's "standard configuration", the sugar being roughly perpendicular
to the attached base. There is a residue on each chain every 3·4 A. in
the z-direction. We have assumed an angle of 36° between adjacent residues
in the same chain, so that the structure repeats after 10 residues on each chain,
that is, after 34 A. The distance of a phosphorus atom from the fibre axis is
10 A. As the phosphates are on the outside, cations have easy access to them. The
structure is an open one, and its water content is rather high. At lower water
contents we would expect the bases to tilt so that the structure could become
more compact. The novel feature of the structure is the manner
in which the two chains are held together by the purine and pyrimidine bases.
The planes of the bases are perpendicular to the fibre axis. They are joined together
in pairs, a single base from one chain being hydrogen-bonded to a single base
from the other chain, so that the two lie side by side with identical z-co-ordinates.
One of the pair must be a purine and the other a pyrimidine for bonding to occur.
The hydrogen bonds are made as follows: purine position 1 to pyrimidine position
1; purine position 6 to pyrimidine position 6. If it is assumed
that the bases only occur in the structure in the most plausible tautomeric forms
(that is, with the keto rather than the enol configurations) it is found that
only specific pairs of bases can bond together. These pairs are: adenine (purine)
with thymine (pyrimidine), and guanine (purine) with cytosine (pyrimidine). In
other words, if an adenine forms one member of a pair, on either chain, then on
these assumptions the other member must be thymine; similarly for guanine and
cytosine. The sequence of bases on a single chain does not appear to be restricted
in any way. However, if only specific pairs of bases can be formed, it follows
that if the sequence of bases on one chain is given, then the sequence on the
other chain is automatically determined. It has been found experimentally3,4
that the ratio of the amounts of adenine to thymine, and the ratio of guanine
to cytosine, are always very close to unity for deoxyribose nucleic acid. It
is probably impossible to build this structure with a ribose sugar in place of
the deoxyribose, as the extra oxygen atom would make too close a van der Waals
contact. The previously published X-ray data5,6
on deoxyribose nucleic acid are insufficient for a rigorous test of our structure.
So far as we can tell, it is roughly compatible with the experimental data, but
it must be regarded as unproved until it has been checked against more exact results.
Some of these are given in the following communications. We were not aware of
the details of the results presented there when we devised our structure, which
rests mainly though not entirely on published experimental data and stereochemical
arguments. It has not escaped our notice that the specific pairing
we have postulated immediately suggests a possible copying mechanism for the genetic
material. Full details of the structure, including the conditions
assumed in building it, together with a set of co-ordinates for the atoms, will
be published elsewhere. We are much indebted to Dr. Jerry Donohue
for constant advice and criticism, especially on interatomic distances. We have
also been stimulated by a knowledge of the general nature of the unpublished experimental
results and ideas of Dr. M. H. F. Wilkins, Dr. R. E. Franklin and their co-workers
at King's College, London. One of us (J. D. W.) has been aided by a fellowship
from the National Foundation for Infantile Paralysis. J. D.
WATSON
F. H. C. CRICK
Medical Research
Council Unit for the Study of the Molecular Structure of Biological Systems, Cavendish
Laboratory, Cambridge, April 2. - Pauling, L.,
and Corey, R. B., Nature, 171, 346 (1953); Proc. U.S. Nat. Acad.
Sci., 39, 84 (1953).
- Furberg, S., Acta
Chem. Scand., 6, 634 (1952).
- Chargaff, E.,
for references see Zamenhof, S., Brawerman, G., and Chargaff, E., Biochim.
et Biophys. Acta, 9, 402 (1952).
- Wyatt.
G. R., J. Gen. Physiol., 36, 201 (1952).
- Astbury,
W. T., Symp. Soc. Exp. Biol. 1, Nucleic Acid, 66 (Camb. Univ. Press, 1947).
- Wilkins,
M. H. F., and Randall, J. T., Biochim. et Biophys. Acta, 10, 192
(1953)
| return
to looking back index page | |