Original Article
Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases (2006) 9, 153–159. doi:10.1038/sj.pcan.4500860; published online 28 February 2006
Urinary incontinence after radical retropubic prostatectomy is not related to patient body mass index
T L Mulholland1, P N Huynh2, R R Huang3, C Wong4, A C Diokno2 and K M Peters2
- 1Department of Urology, Mason City Clinic, Mason City, IA, USA
- 2Department of Urology, William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, MI, USA
- 3Department of Biostatistics, William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, MI, USA
- 4Department of Urology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA
Correspondence: Dr TL Mulholland, Department of Urology, Mason City Clinic, 250 S. Crescent Dr., Mason City, IA 50401, USA. E-mail: mulhollandtim@hotmail.com
Received 22 December 2005; Accepted 22 December 2005; Published online 28 February 2006.
Abstract
To determine if a relationship exists between patient body habitus and urinary incontinence after radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) for clinically localized prostate cancer. A questionnaire developed by combining parts of lower urinary tract symptom questionnaires concerning voiding symptoms after RRP was mailed to 268 consecutive patients who underwent RRP over a 2-year period. The interval between surgery and questionnaire administration was greater than 24 months for each patient. No interval was greater than 54 months. The questionnaire attempted to overcome the subjectivity of patient documented urinary incontinence by probing different aspects of each patient's voiding symptoms. Body mass index (BMI), obtained from preoperative anesthesia records, was used as the measurement for body habitus. Pearson correlations were used to determine relationships between BMI and responses and the independent t-test was used to determine differences between grouped responses and BMI. One hundred and eighty-two of 268 (68%) questionnaires were returned. No relationship was detected between BMI and patient estimates of urinary control, QOL relating to urinary symptoms, severity of stress incontinence, or use of protection (pad use). As well, no statistically significant relationship was found between BMI and a patient's willingness to undergo RRP again, based on his voiding symptoms, if given the choice. In conclusion, although patient body habitus may be related to other clinical outcomes following RRP, there does not appear to be a relationship of BMI to post-RRP urinary incontinence.
Keywords:
prostate cancer, prostatectomy, complications, incontinence, body mass index
MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS
These links to content published by NPG are automatically generated
RESEARCH
Spongistatin 1: a new chemosensitizing marine compound that degrades XIAP
Leukemia Original Article
Modified Pfannenstiel approach for radical retropubic prostatectomy: a 3-year experience
Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases Original Article
