Abstract
An MS Office package has been developed to score IPSS, take a patient history, compare flows with nomograms and decide on interim management. This is based on these scores, residual volume and laboratory results. A clearly formatted GP letter is produced. The patient uses a touch screen to answer questions on the IPSS and other medical history. These questions and responses are stored in Excel spread sheets. Clinic staff then enter results of flow studies, urinalysis, U&E and PSA. Excel Visual Basic creates a detailed printout for the notes and the MS Office mail merge facility creates a summary printout, which also serves as a letter to the GP. Excel allows embedding of formulae and program code to implement the rules for management. Based on these rules, the program either generates a request for an urgent appointment in the clinic or recommends the use of either an alpha blocker (if not contraindicated by medical history) or 5 alpha reductase inhibitors in the interim period before they are reviewed in clinic. A total of 139 patients have been seen and the computer decisions compared with those of a consultant urologist. Agreement was found in 106, disagreement in 33. However, 21 of the 33 involved computer oversensitivity to flow results. We do not anticipate difficulty improving this and are investigating using an artificial neural network. Of the other 12 patients, the urologist departed from the fixed rules for IPSS, creatinine, PSA and residual urine when only one variable was slightly abnormal. To conclude, this novel user-friendly system shows great potential in the management of prostate outpatients. Some tuning is needed, with particular respect to uroflow results.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 4 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $64.75 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Mc Nicholas TA . Management of symptomatic BPH in the UK: who is treated and how? Eur Urol 1999; 36 (Suppl 3): 33–39.
Dasgupta P, Drudge-Coates L, Smith K, Booth CM . The cost effectiveness of a nurse-led shared-care prostate assessment clinic. Ann R College Surgeons Engl. 2002; 84: 328–330.
Glen ES, Small DR, Morrison LM, Pollock K . Urological history taking and management recommendations by microcomputer. Br J Urol 1989; 63: 117–121.
Lloyd S, Clark C, Small DR, Donnell L . A patient operated computer system for assessing fitness for day surgery anaesthesia. J One-day Surg 1994; Spring: 3–5.
Lucas RW et al. Computer interrogation of patients. BMJ 1976; 2: 623–625.
Rollema HJ . Uroflowmetry in males. PhD Thesis, University of Groningen, 1981.
Susset JG . Development of nomograms for application of uroflowmetry. In: Hinman Jr F (ed) Benign Prostatic Hypertrophy. Springer-Verlag: New York 1983; p 528.
Haylen BT et al. Maximum and average urine flow rates in normal male and female populations—the Liverpool nomograms. Br J Urol 1989; 64: 30–38.
Fischer S et al. Handheld computing in medicine. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2003; 10: 139–149.
van den Akker PJ, van Bockel JH, Brand R, van Schilfgaarde R . Computerised vascular data management: a flexible modular registry suitable for the evaluation of long-term results in patients subjected to multiple interventions. Eur J Vasc Surg 1991; 5: 459–465.
Berumen E, Barllow FD, Fong FJ, Lopez JA . Computers and the orthopaedic office. Arthroscopy 2002; 18: E30.
Howells TP . Pattern recognition in physiological time series data using Bayesian Neural Networks. PhD thesis, University of Edinburgh, 2002.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rajkumar, G., Small, D. & Conn, I. Computerised triage in a prostate assessment clinic. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 7, 118–121 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.pcan.4500703
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.pcan.4500703