Abstract
Despite an improved understanding of the molecular aberrations that occur in glioblastoma, the use of molecularly targeted therapies have so far been disappointing. We present a patient with three different brain tumours: astrocytoma, glioblastoma and gliosarcoma. Genetic analysis showed that the three different brain tumours were derived from a common origin but had each developed unique genetic aberrations. Included in these, the glioblastoma had PDGFRA amplification, whereas the gliosarcoma had MYC amplification. We propose that genetic heterogeneity contributes to treatment failure and requires comprehensive assessment in the era of personalised medicine.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Glioblastoma is among the most aggressive brain tumours, affecting 3500 people per year in the UK.1, 2 Significant progress has been made in unravelling the genetic changes driving glioblastoma.3, 4, 5 Despite this, trials using therapies to target these changes have thus far been disappointing.6, 7, 8 One potential challenge to targeted therapy is tumour heterogeneity. A functional heterogeneity has been shown for glioblastoma stem-like cells with the demonstration that they can form endothelial cells contributing to tumour neovasculature.9 Possibly of greater concern, there is increasing evidence of genetic heterogeneity in tumours. This was demonstrated in a recent study of clear-cell renal carcinoma, where 63–69% of all somatic mutations identified by exome sequencing could not be detected across all regions of the tumour.10 We present a patient with three histologically different brain tumours for whom we have performed genome-wide copy number analysis along with TP53, IDH1 and IDH2 sequencing.
Results
Case report
A 41-year-old male presented with weakness of the left arm and leg, poor coordination and difficulty in swallowing. The initial magnetic resonance imaging of the brain showed an enhancing mass in the right basal ganglia. Signal abnormality on the T2-dependent sequences extended into the right peduncle and also into the right side of the pons. The patient was commenced on dexamethasone 4 mg orally three times daily. A stereotactic biopsy of the right basal ganglia was performed and the histological examination confirmed a diagnosis of glioblastoma with regions of both grade II and IV tumour. The patient was treated with standard chemoradiation followed by three cycles of adjuvant temozolomide but his disease progressed.11 The patient died 5 months after starting second-line chemotherapy and 10 months from diagnosis.
Imaging and histopathology
At post-mortem, three separate areas of the brain tumour were sampled, one area was from the central pons, one from the right basal ganglia and one from the left frontal region. The pontine lesion and right basal ganglia were part of the same tumour mass. Histopathological examination revealed that the pontine tumour was a glioblastoma (WHO grade IV), the right basal ganglia tumour was a fibrillary astrocytoma (WHO grade II) and the left frontal tumour was a gliosarcoma (WHO grade IV). Serial magnetic resonance imaging at diagnosis and during treatment and the corresponding H&E sections showed three regions of tumour: (i) glioblastoma, (ii) astrocytoma and (iii) gliosarcoma (Figure 1).
Genetic analysis of three tumours
In order to investigate the genetics underlying the three different histological groups, DNA from each tumour sample was screened for copy number change and loss of heterozygosity (LOH) using the Affymetrix 250K single-nucleotide polymorphism arrays (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA, USA). In addition, the tumour samples were analysed for mutations of TP53, IDH1 and IDH2.5, 12 The results showed specific genetic changes common to all three tumours, as well as changes unique to each tumour. A model of tumour development based on DNA changes in the three tumours is proposed (Figure 2). All three tumours contained the TP53 missense mutation c.817C>T (p.R273C) (Figure 3a) but no mutation of IDH1 or IDH2. Each of the three tumours contained deletion of 9p23-21.3 encompassing CDKN2A and CDKN2B (Figure 3b), deletion of 15q13.3-22.31 (Figure 3c) and LOH of chromosomes 10, 17 and 19. The glioblastoma was characterised by amplification of 4q12 containing the receptor kinase genes KDR (VEGFR), KIT and PDGFRA (Figure 3d) and gain of CDK4, the astrocytoma by multiple rearrangements, whereas the gliosarcoma by amplification of 8q24.21 containing the oncogene MYC (Figure 3e).
Discussion
The most significant advance in the treatment of glioblastoma has been the addition of temozolomide chemotherapy to radiotherapy, but the median survival in treated patients is 14.6 months.11 There has been a focus on determining molecular markers that determine response in individual patients.13, 14, 15, 16, 17 However, in designing trials with molecular targeted agents, tumour heterogeneity has not been addressed. If the target is not present throughout the tumour, how can the tumour respond to the treatment?18
Gliobastomas have been subdivided into ‘primary’ and ‘secondary’ glioblastoma.19 The patients with primary glioblastoma are older with frequent activating mutations in EGFR. The secondary glioblastoma patients are younger and have tumours containing TP53 mutation, which have developed from lower grade tumours.12 More recently, this classification has been expanded based on genomic and expression changes defining four groups, with classical being defined by aberrations in EGFR, mesenchymal by NF1, proneuronal by changes in PDGFRA and IDH1 and a neural group defined by neural markers.5, 20, 21
The glioblastoma in this case is defined as a secondary, proneural glioblastoma. This patient was typical of those with proneural tumours as he was relatively young and had poor survival despite aggressive treatment.20 Gliosarcoma is distinguished histologically from glioblastoma by sarcomatous differentiation of the blood vessels. This diagnosis is made much less frequently than glioblastoma and the prognosis is worse.22, 23
The shared origin of these three tumours was demonstrated by the identical p.R273C TP53 mutation and the patterns of deletions. Deletion of 9p21.3 in tumours is common as this region contains the important tumour suppressor gene CDKN2A.24, 25 In this case, the region is deleted in all three tumours and the breakpoints for these deletions are the same. This would not be expected unless all three tumours were derived from the same origin. Again chromosome 15 contains a deletion with breakpoints common to all three tumours. In addition, there was a deletion at 11q14.1 and LOH of chromosomes 10, 17 and 19.
However, all the three tumours had additional unique mutations. The astrocytoma contained nonspecific changes in keeping with the greater radiation exposure. The gliosarcoma had a number of unique changes including amplification of 8q24.21-containing MYC. The glioblastoma had gain of CDK4 and amplification of the receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) PDGFRA. Three recent studies used FISH to investigate RTK gene amplification in glioblastoma. They demonstrated different subclones within the same tumour with differing and mutually exclusive EGFR, MET and PDGFRA amplification.26, 27, 28
This study raises questions over the current approach to diagnosis, tumour classification and therapies. We propose that a greater understanding of genetic heterogeneity is required. This will require more sensitive detection of mutations and rearrangements, more complete genetic assessment of the tumour mass and potentially, assessment of cell-free DNA where biopsy is problematic, for example, from cerebrospinal fluid or blood plasma.29 This should be incorporated into a new tumour classification system and to guide the use of therapy ideally to those lesions present throughout the tumour burden. Alternatively, we will have to identify and target multiple lesions.
Materials and methods
Ethics approval
At the request of the patient and his wife, following the patient’s death, a post-mortem examination was carried out and samples from the brain tumours were removed for research purposes. Approval for the use of patient material in research was obtained from Riverside Research Ethics Committee (RREC 3059 and RREC 3344).
Sample preparation
At post-mortem, samples were taken for histopathological analysis and the remaining was stored at −80 °C.
Affymetrix 250K single-nucleotide polymorphism array analysis
Tumour DNA was analysed for structural variations using the Affymetrix 250K Nsp array following standard Affymetrix protocols. Affymetrix 250K Nsp results were analysed for copy number changes and LOH using the Copy Number Analyser for GeneChip software package.30 Tumour data was normalised against that of normal male DNA. All copy number figures show data smoothed using a running mean of 50 single-nucleotide polymorphisms. Regions of LOH potentially masked by contaminating normal DNA were identified using the AsCNAR algorithm.31
Sequencing
All exons of TP53 and exon 4 of both IDH1 and IDH2 (including the mutational hotspots, R132 in IDH1 and R172 in IDH2) were sequenced for mutations. Target exons were amplified by PCR from tumour DNA, followed by bidirectional direct sequencing using the dideoxy chain termination method on an ABI 3730 DNA Sequencer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). Results were screened by eye using the Applied Biosystems Sequence Scanner Software v1.0.
References
DeAngelis LM . Brain tumors. N Engl J Med. 2001; 344: 114–123.
NICE. Guidance on the use of temozolomide for the treatment of recurrent malignant glioma (brain cancer). Technology Appraisal Guidance No23 2007.
Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network, Comprehensive genomic characterization defines human glioblastoma genes and core pathways. Nature 2008; 455: 1061–1068.
Parsons DW, Jones S, Zhang X, Lin JC, Leary RJ, Angenendt P et al. An integrated genomic analysis of human glioblastoma multiforme. Science 2008; 321: 1807–1812.
Yan H, Parsons DW, Jin G, McLendon R, Rasheed BA, Yuan W et al. IDH1 and IDH2 mutations in gliomas. N Engl J Med 2009; 360: 765–773.
Wick W, Puduvalli VK, Chamberlain MC, van den Bent MJ, Carpentier AF, Cher LM et al. Phase III study of enzastaurin compared with lomustine in the treatment of recurrent intracranial glioblastoma. J Clin Oncol 2010; 28: 1168–1174.
Wick W, Weller M, van den Bent M, Stupp R . Bevacizumab and recurrent malignant gliomas: a European perspective. J Clin Oncol 2010; 28: e188–e189.
Grossman SA, Ye X, Piantadosi S, Desideri S, Nabors LB, Rosenfeld M et al. Survival of patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma treated with radiation and temozolomide in research studies in the United States. Clin Cancer Res 2010; 16: 2443–2449.
Ricci-Vitiani L, Pallini R, Biffoni M, Todaro M, Invernici G, Cenci T et al. Tumour vascularization via endothelial differentiation of glioblastoma stem-like cells. Nature 2010; 468: 824–828.
Gerlinger M, Rowan AJ, Horswell S, Larkin J, Endesfelder D, Gronroos E et al. Intratumor heterogeneity and branched evolution revealed by multiregion sequencing. N Engl J Med 2012; 366: 883–892.
Stupp R, Mason WP, van den Bent MJ, Weller M, Fisher B, Taphoorn MJ et al. Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma. N Engl J Med 2005; 352: 987–996.
Ohgaki H, Dessen P, Jourde B, Horstmann S, Nishikawa T, Di Patre PL et al. Genetic pathways to glioblastoma: a population-based study. Cancer Res 2004; 64: 6892–6899.
Hegi ME, Diserens AC, Gorlia T, Hamou MF, de Tribolet N, Weller M et al. MGMT gene silencing and benefit from temozolomide in glioblastoma. N Engl J Med 2005; 352: 997–1003.
Mellinghoff IK, Wang MY, Vivanco I, Haas-Kogan DA, Zhu S, Dia EQ et al. Molecular determinants of the response of glioblastomas to EGFR kinase inhibitors. N Engl J Med 2005; 353: 2012–2024.
Shah SP, Morin RD, Khattra J, Prentice L, Pugh T, Burleigh A et al. Mutational evolution in a lobular breast tumour profiled at single nucleotide resolution. Nature 2009; 461: 809–813.
Pillay V, Allaf L, Wilding AL, Donoghue JF, Court NW, Greenall SA et al. The plasticity of oncogene addiction: implications for targeted therapies directed to receptor tyrosine kinases. Neoplasia 2009; 11: 448–458.
Wager M, Menei P, Guilhot J, Levillain P, Michalak S, Bataille B et al. Prognostic molecular markers with no impact on decision-making: the paradox of gliomas based on a prospective study. Br J Cancer 2008; 98: 1830–1838.
Mulholland PJ, Thirlwell C, Brock CS, Newlands ES . Emerging targeted treatments for malignant glioma. Expert Opin Emerg Drugs 2005; 10: 845–854.
Ohgaki H, Kleihues P . Genetic pathways to primary and secondary glioblastoma. Am J Pathol 2007; 170: 1445–1453.
Verhaak RG, Hoadley KA, Purdom E, Wang V, Qi Y, Wilkerson MD et al. Integrated genomic analysis identifies clinically relevant subtypes of glioblastoma characterized by abnormalities in PDGFRA, IDH1, EGFR, and NF1. Cancer Cell 2010; 17: 98–110.
Holtkamp N, Ziegenhagen N, Malzer E, Hartmann C, Giese A, von Deimling A . Characterization of the amplicon on chromosomal segment 4q12 in glioblastoma multiforme. Neuro Oncol 2007; 9: 291–297.
Kozak KR, Mahadevan A, Moody JS . Adult gliosarcoma: epidemiology, natural history, and factors associated with outcome. Neuro Oncol 2009; 11: 183–191.
Han SJ, Yang I, Tihan T, Prados MD, Parsa AT . Primary gliosarcoma: key clinical and pathologic distinctions from glioblastoma with implications as a unique oncologic entity. J Neurooncol 2010; 96: 313–320.
Mulholland PJ, Fiegler H, Mazzanti C, Gorman P, Sasieni P, Adams J et al. Genomic profiling identifies discrete deletions associated with translocations in glioblastoma multiforme. Cell Cycle 2006; 5: 783–791.
Shete S, Hosking FJ, Robertson LB, Dobbins SE, Sanson M, Malmer B et al. Genome-wide association study identifies five susceptibility loci for glioma. Nat Genet 2009; 41: 899–904.
Snuderl M, Fazlollahi L, Le LP, Nitta M, Zhelyazkova BH, Davidson CJ et al. Mosaic amplification of multiple receptor tyrosine kinase genes in glioblastoma. Cancer Cell 2011; 20: 810–817.
Little SE, Popov S, Jury A, Bax DA, Doey L, Al-Sarraj S et al. Receptor tyrosine kinase genes amplified in glioblastoma exhibit a mutual exclusivity in variable proportions reflective of individual tumor heterogeneity. Cancer Res 2012; 72: 1614–1620.
Szerlip NJ, Pedraza A, Chakravarty D, Azim M, McGuire J, Fang Y et al. Intratumoral heterogeneity of receptor tyrosine kinases EGFR and PDGFRA amplification in glioblastoma defines subpopulations with distinct growth factor response. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2012; 109: 3041–3046.
Forshew T, Murtaza M, Parkinson C, Gale D, Tsui DW, Kaper F et al. Noninvasive identification and monitoring of cancer mutations by targeted deep sequencing of plasma DNA. Sci Transl Med 2012; 4: 136ra68.
Nannya Y, Sanada M, Nakazaki K, Hosoya N, Wang L, Hangaishi A et al. A robust algorithm for copy number detection using high-density oligonucleotide single nucleotide polymorphism genotyping arrays. Cancer Res 2005; 65: 6071–6079.
Yamamoto G, Nannya Y, Kato M, Sanada M, Levine RL, Kawamata N et al. Highly sensitive method for genomewide detection of allelic composition in nonpaired, primary tumor specimens by use of affymetrix single-nucleotide-polymorphism genotyping microarrays. Am J Hum Genet 2007; 81: 114–126.
Acknowledgements
We thank Bryan Young and Tracy Chaplin-Perkins who ran the Affymetrix arrays. This work was supported by The Brain Tumour Charity, Mothers and Daughters and The National Brain Appeal.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/
About this article
Cite this article
Forshew, T., Lewis, P., Waldman, A. et al. Three different brain tumours evolving from a common origin. Oncogenesis 2, e41 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/oncsis.2013.1
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/oncsis.2013.1
Keywords
This article is cited by
-
Characterization of MUDENG, a novel anti-apoptotic protein
Oncogenesis (2016)
-
Ultrasonic Surgical Aspirate is a Reliable Source For Culturing Glioblastoma Stem Cells
Scientific Reports (2016)