Original Article
Oncogene (2008) 27, 1218–1230; doi:10.1038/sj.onc.1210741; published online 27 August 2007
Sustained TGF
exposure suppresses Smad and non-Smad signalling in mammary epithelial cells, leading to EMT and inhibition of growth arrest and apoptosis
A Gal1,2, T Sjöblom1,4, L Fedorova3, S Imreh3, H Beug2,5 and A Moustakas1,5
- 1Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, Uppsala, Sweden
- 2Research Institute of Molecular Pathology, Vienna, Austria
- 3Microbiology and Tumour Biology Center, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
Correspondence: Dr H Beug, Research Institute of Molecular Pathology, Dr Bohr-Gasse 7, A-1030 Vienna, Austria. E-mail: beug@imp.univie.ac.at; Dr A Moustakas, TGF
signaling group, Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, Biomedical Center, Husargartan 3, Box 595, SE-75124 Uppsala, Uppland, Sweden. E-mail: aris.moustakas@LICR.uu.se
4Current address: Department of Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University Rudbeck Laboratory, SE-75185 Uppsala, Sweden.
5These authors contributed equally to this work.
Received 7 November 2006; Revised 11 July 2007; Accepted 24 July 2007; Published online 27 August 2007.
Abstract
To better understand the dual, tumour-suppressive and tumour-promoting function of transforming growth factor-
(TGF
), we analysed mammary epithelial NMuMG cells in response to short and long-term TGF
exposure. NMuMG cells became proliferation-arrested and apoptotic after exposure to TGF
for 2–5 days, whereas surviving cells underwent epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT). After chronic TGF
exposure (2–3 weeks), however, NMuMG cells became resistant to proliferation arrest and apoptosis, showing sustained EMT instead (TD cells). EMT was fully reversed by a pharmacologic TGF
-receptor-I kinase inhibitor or withdrawal of TGF
for 6–12 days. Interestingly, both cell cycle arresting/proapoptotic (Smads, p38 kinase) and antiapoptotic, proliferation and EMT-promoting signalling pathways (PI3K–PKB/Akt, ERK) were co-suppressed to low, but significant levels. Except for PI3K-Akt, TGF
-dependent downregulation of these signalling pathways in transdifferentiated (TD) cells was fully reversed upon TGF
withdrawal, together with partial re-induction of proliferation arrest and apoptosis. Co-injection of non-tumorigenic NMuMG cells with tumour-forming CHO cells oversecreting exogenous TGF
1 (CHO-TGF
1) allowed outgrowth of epithelioid cells in CHO-TGF
1 cell-induced tumours. These epithelial islands enhanced CHO-TGF
1 tumour cell proliferation, possibly due to chemokines (for example, JE/MCP-1) secreted by NMuMG/TD cells. We conclude that suppression of antiproliferative, proapoptotic TGF
signalling in TD cells may permit TGF
-dependent proliferation, survival and EMT-enhancing signalling pathways to act at low levels. Thus, TGF
may modulate its own signalling to facilitate switching from tumour suppression to tumour progression.
Keywords:
epithelial–mesenchymal transition, metastasis, Smad, signal transduction, TGF
, tumour suppression
MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS
These links to content published by NPG are automatically generated
REVIEWS
Oncogene Review
RESEARCH
Kidney International Original Article
TGF-β receptor-activated p38 MAP kinase mediates Smad-independent TGF-β responses
The EMBO Journal Article (15 Jul 2002)
Metastasis is driven by sequential elevation of H-ras and Smad2 levels
Nature Cell Biology Article
