Original Paper
Oncogene (2005) 24, 1053–1065. doi:10.1038/sj.onc.1208298 Published online 22 November 2004
Molecular and prognostic distinction between serous ovarian carcinomas of varying grade and malignant potential
Ivo Meinhold-Heerlein1, Dirk Bauerschlag1,2, Felix Hilpert1, Petre Dimitrov2, Lisa M Sapinoso2, Marzenna Orlowska-Volk3, Thomas Bauknecht4, Tjoung-Won Park5, Walter Jonat1, Anja Jacobsen1, Jalid Sehouli6, Jutta Luttges7, Maryla Krajewski8, Stan Krajewski8, John C Reed8, Norbert Arnold1 and Garret M Hampton2
- 1Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
- 2Cancer Biology Discovery, Genomics Institute of the Novartis Research Foundation, 10675 John Jay Hopkins Drive, San Diego, CA 92121, USA
- 3Department of Pathology, University of Freiburg, Germany
- 4Lilly Deutschland, Bad Homburg, Germany
- 5Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Bonn, Germany
- 6Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Charite, Berlin, Germany
- 7Department of Pathology, University of Kiel, Germany
- 8Burnham Institute, La Jolla CA, USA
Correspondence: GM Hampton, E-mail: hampton@gnf.org
Received 9 August 2004; Revised 5 October 2004; Accepted 5 October 2004; Published online 22 November 2004.
Abstract
Profiles of gene transcription have begun to delineate the molecular basis of ovarian cancer, including distinctions between carcinomas of differing histology, tumor progression and patient outcome. However, the similarities and differences among the most commonly diagnosed noninvasive borderline (low malignant potential, LMP) lesions and invasive serous carcinomas of varying grade (G1, G2 and G3) have not yet been explored. Here, we used oligonucleotide arrays to profile the expression of 12 500 genes in a series of 57 predominantly stage III serous ovarian adenocarcinomas from 52 patients, eight with borderline tumors and 44 with adenocarcinomas of varying grade. Unsupervised and supervised analyses showed that LMP lesions were distinct from high-grade serous adenocarcinomas, as might be expected; however, well-differentiated (G1) invasive adenocarcinomas showed a strikingly similar profile to LMP tumors as compared to cancers with moderate (G2) or poor (G3) cellular differentiation, which were also highly similar. Comparative genomic hybridization of an independent cohort of five LMP and 63 invasive carcinomas of varying grade demonstrated LMP and G1 were again similar, exhibiting significantly less chromosomal aberration than G2/G3 carcinomas. A majority of LMP and G1 tumors were characterized by high levels of p21/WAF1, with concomitant expression of cell growth suppressors, gadd34 and BTG-2. In contrast, G2/G3 cancers were characterized by the expression of genes associated with the cell cycle and by STAT-1-, STAT-3/JAK-1/2-induced gene expression. The distinction between the LMP-G1 and G2–G3 groups of tumors was highly correlated to patient outcome (
2 for equivalence of death rates=7.681189; P=0.0056, log-rank test). Our results are consistent with the recent demonstration of a poor differentiation molecular 'meta-signature' in human cancer, and underscore a number of cell-cycle- and STAT-associated targets that may prove useful as points of therapeutic intervention for those patients with aggressive disease.
Keywords:
microarray, cluster, cell cycle
