Abstract
Herceptin is a humanized monoclonal antibody targeted against the extracellular domain of the HER2 oncogene, which is amplified and overexpressed in 10–34% of breast cancers. Herceptin therapy provides effective treatment in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer, although a favorable treatment response is not achieved in all cases. Here, we show that Herceptin treatment induces a dose-dependent growth reduction in breast cancer cell lines with HER2 amplification, whereas nonamplified cell lines are practically resistant. Time-course analysis of global gene expression patterns in amplified and nonamplified cell lines indicated a major change in transcript levels between 24 and 48 h of Herceptin treatment. A step-wise gene selection algorithm revealed a set of 439 genes whose temporal expression profiles differed most between the amplified and nonamplified cell lines. The discriminatory power of these genes was confirmed by both hierarchical clustering and self-organizing map analyses. In the amplified cell lines, the Herceptin treatment induced the expression of several genes involved in RNA processing and DNA repair, while cell adhesion mediators and known oncogenes, such as c-FOS and c-KIT, were downregulated. These results provide additional clues to the downstream effects of blocking the HER2 pathway in breast cancer and may provide new targets for more effective treatment.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 50 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $5.18 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baselga J, Tripathy D, Mendelsohn J, Baughman S, Benz CC, Dantis L, Sklarin NT, Seidman AD, Hudis CA, Moore J, Rosen PP, Twaddell T, Henderson IC and Norton L . (1996). J. Clin. Oncol., 14, 737–744.
Bolstad B, Irizarry R, Astrand M and Speed TA . (2003). Bioinformatics, 19, 185–193.
Carter P, Presta L, Gorman CM, Ridgway JB, Henner D, Wong WL, Rowland AM, Kotts C, Carver ME and Shepard HM . (1992). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 89, 4285–4289.
Chen Y, Dougherty ER and Bittner ML . (1997). J. Biomed. Optics, 2, 364–374.
Cleveland W . (1979). J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 74, 829–836.
Cobleigh MA, Vogel CL, Tripathy D, Robert NJ, Scholl S, Fehrenbacher L, Wolter JM, Paton V, Shak S, Lieberman G and Slamon DJ . (1999). J. Clin. Oncol., 17, 2639–2648.
Duan R, Xie W, Li X, McDougal A and Safe S . (2002). Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 294, 384–394.
Eisen M, Spellman P, Brown P and Botstein D . (1998). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 95, 14863–14868.
Furitsu T, Tsujimura T, Tono T, Ikeda H, Kitayama H, Koshimizu U, Sugahara H, Butterfield JH, Ashman LK, Kanayama Y, Matsuzawa Y, Kitamura Y and Kanakura Y . (1993). J. Clin. Invest., 92, 1736–1744.
Hautaniemi S, Kauraniemi P, Rämö P, Yli-Harja O, Astola J and Kallioniemi A . (2003a). A Strategy for Identifying Class-Separating Genes in Drug-Treatment Microarray Data. Report 1. Institute of Signal Processing, Tampere University of Technology: Finland, ISBN 952-15-1067-6.
Hautaniemi S, Yli-Harja O, Astola J, Kauraniemi P, Kallioniemi A, Wolf M, Ruiz J, Mousses S and Kallioniemi O-P . (2003b). Mach. Learn., 52, 45–66.
Hirota S, Isozaki K, Moriyama Y, Hashimoto K, Nishida T, Ishiguro S, Kawano K, Hanada M, Kurata A, Takeda M, Muhammad Tunio G, Matsuzawa Y, Kanakura Y, Shinomura Y and Kitamura Y . (1998). Science, 279, 577–580.
Hyman E, Kauraniemi P, Hautaniemi S, Wolf M, Mousses S, Rozenblum E, Ringner M, Sauter G, Monni O, Elkahloun A, Kallioniemi OP and Kallioniemi A . (2002). Cancer Res., 62, 6240–6245.
Kauraniemi P, Bärlund M, Monni O and Kallioniemi A . (2001). Cancer Res., 61, 8235–8240.
Kohonen T (ed). (2001). Self-Organizing Maps, 3rd edn Springer: Heidelberg, Germany.
Longley BJ, Reguera MJ and Ma Y . (2001). Leuk. Res., 25, 571–576.
Molina MA, Codony-Servat J, Albanell J, Rojo F, Arribas J and Baselga J . (2001). Cancer Res., 61, 4744–4749.
Monni O, Bärlund M, Mousses S, Kononen J, Sauter G, Heiskanen M, Paavola P, Avela K, Chen Y, Bittner ML and Kallioniemi A . (2001). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 98, 5711–5716.
Mousses S, Bittner ML, Chen Y, Dougherty ER, Baxevanis A, Meltzer PS and Trent JM . (2000). Functional Genomics: Gene Expression Analysis by cDNA Microarrays, Livesey FJ and Hunt SP (eds). Oxford University Press: Oxford, pp. 113–137.
Ross JS and Fletcher JA . (1999). Semin. Cancer Biol., 9, 125–138.
Slamon DJ, Leyland-Jones B, Shak S, Fuchs H, Paton V, Bajamonde A, Fleming T, Eiermann W, Wolter J, Pegram M, Baselga J and Norton L . (2001). N. Engl. J. Med., 344, 783–792.
van der Burg B, van Selm-Miltenburg AJ, de Laat SW and van Zoelen EJ . (1989). Mol. Cell. Endocrinol., 64, 223–228.
Vesanto J, Himberg J, Alhoniemi E and Parhankangas J . (2000). SOM Toolbox for Matlab 5. Technical Report A57. Helsinki University of Technology: Finland.
Vogel CL, Cobleigh MA, Tripathy D, Gutheil JC, Harris LN, Fehrenbacher L, Slamon DJ, Murphy M, Novotny WF, Burchmore M, Shak S, Stewart SJ and Press M . (2002). J. Clin. Oncol., 20, 719–726.
Wilding G, Lippman ME and Gelmann EP . (1988). Cancer Res., 48, 802–805.
Yakes FM, Chinratanalab W, Ritter CA, King W, Seelig S and Arteaga CL . (2002). Cancer Res., 62, 4132–4141.
Yang Y, Dudoit S, Luu P and Speed T . (2001). Microarrays: Optical Technologies and Informatics, Bittner M, Chen Y, Dorsel A and Dougherty E (eds). SPIE, Society for Optical Engineering: San Jose, CA, pp. 141–152.
Acknowledgements
We thank Ms Kati Rouhento for excellent technical assistance. This work was supported by the Academy of Finland, Foundation for Finnish Cancer Institute, the Medical Research Fund of the Tampere University Hospital, the Science Fund of Tampere, as well as Finnish and Pirkanmaa Cultural Foundations.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kauraniemi, P., Hautaniemi, S., Autio, R. et al. Effects of Herceptin treatment on global gene expression patterns in HER2-amplified and nonamplified breast cancer cell lines. Oncogene 23, 1010–1013 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1207200
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1207200
Keywords
This article is cited by
-
Combining gene expression analysis of gastric cancer cell lines and tumor specimens to identify biomarkers for anti-HER therapies—the role of HAS2, SHB and HBEGF
BMC Cancer (2022)
-
Determining the effects of trastuzumab, cetuximab and afatinib by phosphoprotein, gene expression and phenotypic analysis in gastric cancer cell lines
BMC Cancer (2020)
-
Breast tumor subgroups reveal diverse clinical prognostic power
Scientific Reports (2014)
-
A network module-based method for identifying cancer prognostic signatures
Genome Biology (2012)
-
Genomic instability influences the transcriptome and proteome in endometrial cancer subtypes
Molecular Cancer (2011)