Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Paper
  • Published:

Nuclear–cytoplasmic translocation of BARD1 is linked to its apoptotic activity

Abstract

The tumor suppressor protein BARD1 plays a dual role in response to genotoxic stress: DNA repair as a BARD1–BRCA1 heterodimer and induction of apoptosis in a BRCA1-independent manner. We have constructed a series of BARD1 deletion mutants and analysed their cellular distribution and capacity to induce apoptosis. As opposed to previous studies suggesting an exclusively nuclear localization of BARD1, we found, both in tissues and cell cultures, nuclear and cytoplasmic localization of BARD1. Enhanced cytoplasmic localization of BARD1, as well as appearance of a 67 kDa C-terminal proteolytic cleavage product, coincided with apoptosis. BARD1 translocates to the nucleus independently of BRCA1. For recruitment to nuclear dots, however, the BRCA1-interacting RING finger domain is required but not sufficient. Protein levels of N-terminal RING finger deletion mutants were much higher than those of full-length BARD1, despite comparable mRNA levels, suggesting that the N-terminal region comprising the RING finger is important for BARD1 degradation. Sequences required for apoptosis induction were mapped between the ankyrin repeats and the BRCT domains coinciding with two known cancer-associated missense mutations. We suggest that nuclear and cytoplasmic localization of BARD1 reflect its dual function and that the increased cytoplasmic localization of BARD1 is associated with apoptosis.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ayi TC, Tsan JT, Hwang LY, Bowcock AM and Baer R . (1998). Oncogene, 17, 2143–2148.

  • Baer R and Ludwig T . (2002). Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev., 12, 86–91.

  • Baer R . (2001). Nat. Struct. Biol., 8, 822–824.

  • Brzovic PS, Meza JE, King MC and Klevit RE . (2001a). J. Biol. Chem., 276, 41399–41406.

  • Brzovic PS, Rajagopal P, Hoyt DW, King MC and Klevit RE . (2001b). Nat. Struct. Biol., 8, 833–837.

  • Chen A, Kleiman FE, Manley JL, Ouchi T and Pan ZQ . (2002). J. Biol. Chem., 277, 22085–22092.

  • Chiba N and Parvin JD . (2002). Cancer Res., 62, 4222–4228.

  • Conus S, Rosse T and Borner C . (2000). Cell Death Differ., 7, 947–954.

  • Dechend R, Hirano F, Lehmann K, Heissmeyer V, Ansieau S, Wulczyn FG, Scheidereit C and Leutz A . (1999). Oncogene, 18, 3316–3323.

  • Deng CX . (2002). Oncogene, 21, 6222–6227.

  • Fabbro M and Henderson BR . (2003). Exp. Cell Res., 282, 59–69.

  • Fabbro M, Rodriguez JA, Baer R and Henderson BR . (2002). J. Biol. Chem., 277, 21315–21324.

  • Ferrer I and Planas AM . (2003). J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol., 62, 329–339.

  • Gautier F, Irminger-Finger I, Gregoire M, Meflah K and Harb J . (2000). Cancer Res., 60, 6895–6900.

  • Ghimenti C, Sensi E, Presciuttini S, Brunetti IM, Conte P, Bevilacqua G and Caligo MA . (2002). Genes Chromosomes Cancer, 33, 235–242.

  • Gu J, Nie L, Wiederschain D and Yuan ZM . (2001). Mol. Cell. Biol., 21, 8533–8546.

  • Hashizume R, Fukuda M, Maeda I, Nishikawa H, Oyake D, Yabuki Y, Ogata H and Ohta T . (2001). J. Biol. Chem., 276, 14537–14540.

  • Hsu LC and White RL . (1998). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 95, 12983–12988.

  • Irminger-Finger I and Leung WC . (2002). Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol., 34, 582–587.

  • Irminger-Finger I, Leung WC, Li J, Dubois-Dauphin M, Harb J, Feki A, Jefford CE, Soriano JV, Jaconi M, Montesano R and Krause KH . (2001). Mol. Cell, 8, 1255–1266.

  • Irminger-Finger I, Soriano JV, Vaudan G, Montesano R and Sappino AP . (1998). J. Cell Biol., 143, 1329–1339.

  • Jin Y, Xu XL, Yang MC, Wei F, Ayi TC, Bowcock AM and Baer R . (1997). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 94, 12075–12080.

  • Kleiman FE and Manley JL . (1999). Science, 285, 1576–1579.

  • Kleiman FE and Manley JL . (2001). Cell, 104, 743–753.

  • Lohrum MA, Woods DB, Ludwig RL, Balint E and Vousden KH . (2001). Mol. Cell. Biol., 21, 8521–8532.

  • Lotti LV, Ottini L, D’Amico C, Gradini R, Cama A, Belleudi F, Frati L, Torrisi MR and Mariani-Costantini R . (2002). Genes Chromosomes Cancer, 35, 193–203.

  • Mallery DL, Vandenberg CJ and Hiom K . (2002). EMBO J., 21, 6755–6762.

  • Meza JE, Brzovic PS, King MC and Klevit RE . (1999). J. Biol. Chem., 274, 5659–5665.

  • Morris JR, Keep NH and Solomon E . (2002). J. Biol. Chem., 277, 9382–9386.

  • Parvin JD . (2001). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 98, 5952–5954.

  • Rodriguez JA, Schuchner S, Au WW, Fabbro M and Henderson BR . (2003). Oncogene.

  • Ruffner H, Joazeiro CA, Hemmati D, Hunter T and Verma IM . (2001). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 98, 5134–5139.

  • Scully R, Chen J, Ochs RL, Keegan K, Hoekstra M, Feunteun J and Livingston DM . (1997a). Cell, 90, 425–435.

  • Scully R, Chen J, Plug A, Xiao Y, Weaver D, Feunteun J, Ashley T and Livingston DM . (1997b). Cell, 88, 265–275.

  • Soriano JV, Irminger-Finger I, Uyttendaele H, Vaudan G, Kitajewski J, Sappino AP and Montesano R . (2000). Adv. Exp. Med. Biol., 480, 175–184.

  • Spahn L, Petermann R, Siligan C, Schmid JA, Aryee DN and Kovar H . (2002). Cancer Res., 62, 4583–4587.

  • Thai TH, Du F, Tsan JT, Jin Y, Phung A, Spillman MA, Massa HF, Muller CY, Ashfaq R, Mathis JM, Miller DS, Trask BJ, Baer R and Bowcock AM . (1998). Hum. Mol. Genet., 7, 195–202.

  • Wu LC, Wang ZW, Tsan JT, Spillman MA, Phung A, Xu XL, Yang MC, Hwang LY, Bowcock AM and Baer R . (1996). Nat. Genet., 14, 430–440.

  • Xia Y, Pao GM, Chen HW, Verma IM and Hunter T . (2003). J. Biol. Chem., 278, 5255–5263.

  • Yu X and Baer R . (2000). J. Biol. Chem., 275, 18541–18549.

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Swiss National Science Foundation grant to IIF and KHK, and Johnson & Johnson and AETAS awards to IIF. We are grateful to Dr Gilbert LeNoir and Dr Anne Vincent for the generous gift of the BRCA1 antibody, Dr Monica Sauer for discussing with us unpublished observations, Dr Wai-Choi Leung for critical comments on the manuscript, and Aurélie Caillon for excellent technical support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Irmgard Irminger-Finger.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jefford, C., Feki, A., Harb, J. et al. Nuclear–cytoplasmic translocation of BARD1 is linked to its apoptotic activity. Oncogene 23, 3509–3520 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1207427

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1207427

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links