Nature Publishing Group, publisher of Nature, and other science journals and reference works NATURE.COM NATURE NEWS NATUREJOBS NATUREEVENTS ABOUT NPG
Help Nature.com site index  
Oncogene
SEARCH     advanced search my account e-alerts subscribe register
Journal home
Advance online publication
Current issue
Archive
Press releases
For authors
For referees
Contact editorial office
About the journal
For librarians
Subscribe
Advertising
naturereprints
Contact NPG
Customer services
Site features
NPG Subject areas
Access material from all our publications in your subject area:
Biotechnology Biotechnology
Cancer Cancer
Chemistry Chemistry
Dentistry Dentistry
Development Development
Drug Discovery Drug Discovery
Earth Sciences Earth Sciences
Evolution & Ecology Evolution & Ecology
Genetics Genetics
Immunology Immunology
Materials Materials Science
Medical Research Medical Research
Microbiology Microbiology
Molecular Cell Biology Molecular Cell Biology
Neuroscience Neuroscience
Pharmacology Pharmacology
Physics Physics
Browse all publications
 
21 November 2002, Volume 21, Number 53, Pages 8128-8139
Table of contents    Previous  Abstract  Next   Full text  PDF
Original Paper
Rapid tumor development and potent vascularization are independent events in carcinoma producing FGF-1 or FGF-2
Clotilde Billottet, Bassam Janji, Jean-Paul Thiery and Jacqueline Jouanneau

Laboratory of Cell Morphogenesis and Tumor Progression, UMR 144 CNRS, Institut Curie, Section de recherche, 26 rue d'Ulm, 75248 Paris, cedex 05, France

Correspondence to: J Jouanneau, E-mail: jacqueline.jouanneau@curie.fr

Abstract

FGF-1 and FGF-2 are pleiotropic growth factors for many cell types, operating through the activation of specific transmembrane FGF receptors (FGFRs). The role of these factors in tumor progression was investigated, with specific discrimination between their autocrine and non autocrine cellular activity. The rat bladder carcinoma NBT-II cells were engineered to produce FGF-1 or 18 kDa FGF-2 in the presence or absence of their specific receptor. Non-autocrine cells that produced FGF-1 or FGF-2 but lacked FGFRs were epithelial and reminiscent of the parental NBT-II cells. Whilst autocrine cells, which both constitutively produced and secreted the growth factor and expressed FGFRs, had a highly invasive mesenchymal phenotype. Correspondingly, the autocrine cells were highly tumorigenic in vivo compared to the parental and non-autocrine cells, which correlated with the increased production of uPAR and active uPA and increased in vitro invasive potential. Although all cells produced VEGF, only tumors derived from cells that produced FGF-1 or FGF-2 were highly vascularized, suggesting that these two growth factors could be involved in the angiogenic process by activating host endothelial cells. As a result of activation of the FGFR in autocrine cells, changes in cell morphology and an increase in the invasive and tumorigenic properties were observed, however no in vitro or in vivo differential functions between FGF-1 and FGF-2 could be identified in this system. In conclusion, our data demonstrates that rapid tumor development is not dependent upon increased tumor vascularization, suggesting that 'basal' angiogenesis, probably mediated by VEGF, is sufficient to support tumor growth.

Oncogene (2002) 21, 8128-8139. doi:10.1038/sj.onc.1205935

Keywords

FGF signaling; tumor growth; angiogenesis; MMPs; uPA/uPAR

Received 10 June 2002; revised 2 August 2002; accepted 5 August 2002
21 November 2002, Volume 21, Number 53, Pages 8128-8139
Table of contents    Previous  Abstract  Next   Full text  PDF
Privacy Policy © 2002 Nature Publishing Group