|
|
|
| 17 September 1998, Volume 17, Number 11, Pages 1395-1413 |
| Table of contents Previous Abstract Next Article PDF |
 |
| Review article |
| Increasing complexity of Ras signaling |
 |
| Sharon L Campbell1,4,a, Roya Khosravi-Far2, Kent L Rossman1, Geoffrey J Clark6 and Channing J Der3,4,5 |
 |
1Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA
2Department of Biology, MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA
3Department of Pharmacology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, USA
4Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, USA
5Curriculum in Genetics and Molecular Biology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, USA
6Department of Cell and Cellular Cancer Biology, NCI/NIH, 9610 Medical Center Drive, Rm 307, Rockville, Maryland 20850-3300, USA
|
 |
aAuthor for correspondence |
 |
| Abstract |
 | The initial discovery that ras genes endowed retroviruses with potent carcinogenic properties and the subsequent determination that mutated ras genes were present in a wide variety of human cancers, prompted a strong suspicion that the growth-promoting actions of mutated Ras proteins contribute to their aberrant regulation of growth stimulatory signaling pathways. In 1993, a remarkable convergence of experimental observations from genetic analyses of Drosophila, S. cerevisiae and C. elegans as well as biochemical and biological studies in mammalian cells came together to define a clear role for Ras in signal transduction. What emerged was an elegant linear signaling pathway where Ras functions as a relay switch that is positioned downstream of cell surface receptor tyrosine kinases and upstream of a cytoplasmic cascade of kinases that included the mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs). Activated MAPKs in turn regulated the activities of nuclear transcription factors. Thus, a signaling cascade where every component between the cell surface and the nucleus was defined and conserved in worms, flies and man. This was a remarkable achievement in our efforts to appreciate how the aberrant function of Ras proteins may contribute to the malignant growth properties of the cancer cell. However, the identification of this pathway has proven to be just the beginning, rather than the culmination, of our understanding of Ras in signal transduction. Instead, we now appreciate that this simple linear pathway represents but a minor component of a very complex signaling circuitry. Ras signaling has emerged to involve a complex array of signaling pathways, where cross-talk, feedback loops, branch points and multi-component signaling complexes are recurring themes. The simplest concept of a signaling cascade, where each component simply relays the same message to the next, is clearly not the case. In this review, we summarize our current understanding of Ras signal transduction with an emphasis on new complexities associated with the recognition and/or activation of cellular effectors, and the diverse array of signaling pathways mediated by interaction between Ras and Ras-subfamily proteins with multiple effectors. |
 |
| Keywords |
 | Ras; review; signal transduction; effector; Ras sub-family |
|
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
| 17 September 1998, Volume 17, Number 11, Pages 1395-1413 |
| Table of contents Previous Abstract Next Article PDF |
|
|