Behavior and Psychology
Obesity (2008) 16 8, 1780–1787. doi:10.1038/oby.2008.277
Adiposity and Eating Behaviors in Patients Under Second Generation Antipsychotics
Mélissa Blouin1,2, Angelo Tremblay3, Marie-Eve Jalbert1, Hélène Venables1, Roch-Hugo Bouchard4, Marc-André Roy4 and Natalie Alméras1
- 1Hôpital Laval Research Centre, Québec, Québec, Canada
- 2Faculty of Food and Agriculture Sciences, Department of Food Sciences and Nutrition, Université Laval, Québec, Québec, Canada
- 3Faculty of Medicine, Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Division of Kinesiology, Université Laval, Québec, Québec, Canada
- 4Centre de Recherche Université Laval Robert-Giffard, Clinical Research Unit, Québec, Québec, Canada
Correspondence: Natalie Alméras (natalie.almeras@crhl.ulaval.ca)
Received 13 April 2007; Accepted 21 September 2007; Published online 29 May 2008.
Abstract
Background:
Second generation antipsychotics (SGA) induce substantial weight gain but the mechanisms responsible for this phenomenon remain speculative.
Objective:
To explore eating behaviors among SGA-treated patients and compare them with nonschizophrenic healthy sedentary individuals (controls).
Methods and Procedures:
Appetite sensations were recorded before and after a standardized breakfast using visual analog scales. Three hours after breakfast, a buffet-type meal was offered to participants to document spontaneous food intake and food preferences. Satiety quotients (SQs) were calculated to determine the satiation of both meals and the Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire (TFEQ) was used to document eating behaviors. Body composition and abdominal fat distribution were assessed.
Results:
Compared with controls (n = 20), SGA-treated patients (n = 18) showed greater adiposity indices (P 
0.04). Patients' degree of hunger was also higher following the standardized breakfast (P = 0.03). Moreover, patients had significantly higher cognitive dietary restraint, disinhibition, and susceptibility to hunger scores than the reference group (P 0.05). Disinhibition in the reference group was positively associated with hunger triggered by external cues (r = 0.48, P = 0.03) whereas internal cues seem to mainly regulate emotional susceptibility to disinhibition in patients (r = 0.56, P = 0.02). Higher strategic restraint behavior in patients was associated with decreased satiation right after the buffet-type meal (r = -0.56, P = 0.02).
Discussion:
These exploratory findings suggest that patients under SGA seem to develop disordered eating behaviors in response to altered appetite sensations and increased susceptibility to hunger, a factor which may influence the extent of body weight gain triggered by these drugs.
