Epidemiology

Obesity (2008) 16 12, 2669–2675. doi:10.1038/oby.2008.425

Age at Arrival and Risk of Obesity Among US Immigrants

Reshma Roshania1, K.M. Venkat Narayan1 and Reena Oza-Frank2

  1. 1Hubert Department of Global Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
  2. 2Graduate Division of Biomedical and Biological Sciences, Nutrition and Health Sciences Program, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA

Correspondence: R. Oza-Frank (roza@emory.edu)

Received 21 May 2008; Accepted 6 July 2008; Published online 9 October 2008.

Top

Abstract

Although immigrants are a rapidly growing subgroup, little is known about overweight/obesity among the foreign-born in the United States, especially regarding the effect of age at arrival. This study determined whether overweight/obesity prevalence is associated with age at arrival of immigrants to the United States. We analyzed data on 6,421 adult immigrants from the New Immigrant Survey (NIS), a study that is nationally representative of adult immigrants with newly acquired legal permanent residence (LPR). Multiple regression analyses tested the effects of duration of residence and age at arrival on overweight/obesity, defined by BMI of greater than or equal to25 kg/m2, and self-reported dietary change score. We found the relationship between duration of residence and overweight/obesity prevalence varied by age at arrival (P < 0.001). Immigrants less than or equal to20-years old at arrival who had resided in the United States greater than or equal to15 years were 11 times (95% confidence interval: 5.33, 22.56) more likely to be overweight/obese than immigrants <20-years old at arrival who had resided in the United States less than or equal to1 year. By comparison, there was no difference in overweight/obesity prevalence by duration among immigrants who arrived at >50 years of age. Higher self-reported dietary change is also associated with overweight/obesity. In conclusion, immigrants younger than 20 at arrival in the United States may be at higher risk of overweight/obesity with increasing duration of residence than those who arrive at later ages. Obesity prevention among young US immigrants should be a priority.

Top

Introduction

The foreign-born population is a rapidly growing subgroup in the United States, currently representing almost 12% (or 37 million) of the national population (1); ~20% of all children under the age of 18 in the United States are either first- or second-generation immigrants (2). Overweight and obesity prevalence in the United States have increased dramatically over the past decades (3,4), with minorities disproportionately affected (5,6).

Although at arrival immigrants are less likely than native-born individuals to be overweight and obese, increasing length of residence in the destination/receiving country is associated with higher risk of overweight and obesity (7,8,9,10). Increasing duration of residence leads to the adoption of the host country's dietary patterns (11,12,13), and may be especially important in the context of overweight and obesity. Past studies suggest that age at arrival of migrants is a critical variable, reflective of adaptive capability, education level, and motive for migration, and may be important to consider in acculturation to western lifestyle, specifically smoking (14), physical activity levels (15), self-assessed overall health (16), and socioeconomic status (17). For example, a study of Mexicans in Houston found that younger age at migration predicts history of smoking (14). Another study of Hispanic women in North Carolina found that participants who arrived in the United States at younger ages were more likely to report being physically active (15). Similar to these studies, much of the current literature highlights only specific regions of the United States and specific immigrant subgroups, decreasing their generalizability. There is little information on overweight and obesity among the foreign-born in the United States, especially regarding the effect of age at arrival on overweight and obesity.

Using the New Immigrant Survey (NIS), we examined whether the relationship between overweight and obesity prevalence and duration of residence differs by age at arrival. Second, we explored level of self-reported dietary change after migration as a possible explanatory factor in overweight and obesity prevalence.

Top

Methods and Procedures

Data source

Data from the NIS, which is nationally representative of adult immigrants with newly acquired legal permanent residence (LPR) and their children, were used for this study (18). Specifically, we used data from the baseline cohort (NIS-2003) of sampled adult immigrants (n = 8,573). Details of NIS have been published elsewhere (19). Briefly, the sampling frame of NIS-2003 was based on electronic administrative records compiled by the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services and consists of adult immigrants admitted to LPR between May and November, 2003, and was stratified by four immigrant visa categories: employment principals, diversity principals, spouses of US citizens, and other immigrants; the first two strata were oversampled.

To avoid potential bias in our analyses, only subjects who reported migrating directly from their country of birth to the United States were included (n = 7,247), and those respondents who were overseas at the time of interview were excluded (n = 216). Of the remaining 7,031 subjects, those who did not provide data necessary to calculate duration of residence or age at arrival were excluded (n = 185). Finally, subjects providing missing height or weight data (n = 357) and unreliable BMI (less than or equal to12.5 or greater than or equal to42.5 kg/m2, n = 68) were excluded, resulting in a final sample size of 6,421.

Variables of interest

BMI was calculated from self-reported height and weight data, and was categorized as underweight (<18.5 kg/m2), normal weight (18.5 to <25 kg/m2), and overweight/obese (greater than or equal to25 kg/m2). Duration of residence was calculated by subtracting year of migration from year of interview, and was categorized as follows: <1, 1 to <5, 5 to <10, 10 to <15, and greater than or equal to15 years. Year of migration was determined based on the respondent's answer to "In what month and year did you first leave (country of birth) to live in another country for at least 60 days?" Similarly, age at arrival was determined by subtracting years of duration from current age, and was categorized into the following groups: less than or equal to20, 21 to 30, 31 to 40, 41 to 50, and >50.

Level of dietary change after migration was assessed by asking the following question: "Using a scale from 1 to 10, where 10 indicates exactly the same and 1 means completely different, how would you compare the similarity in diet in the food you now normally eat in the United States with the food you normally ate in your home country?" Based on the distribution of responses, we collapsed the scale into three levels of dietary change: low, moderate, and high.

Other variables of interest included current age (less than or equal to24, 25 to 34, 35 to 44, 45 to 54, 55 to 64, greater than or equal to65 years), sex, years of education (<12, greater than or equal to12), marital status (married, not married), and region of origin. Education was dichotomized because of the varying interpretation of years of education across countries. We considered 12 years of education as the cutoff point based on the mean and median of the sample distribution.

To determine region of origin, subjects were asked to respond to the question, "In what country were you born?" by choosing their country of birth from a list. Responses were then categorized into the following regions: Asia (including South, East, and Southeast Asia), Latin America and the Caribbean, Sub-Saharan Africa, Europe and Central Asia (including Russia, Eastern Europe, and Western Europe), and Middle East and North Africa.

Education level was considered a more appropriate indicator of socioeconomic status than income because of the loss of status that immigrants may have experienced; that is, income in the host country may not adequately reflect profession and/or education in the home country (20). The following variables were assessed but were not significant in regression analyses: health insurance, physical activity, smoking, alcohol use.

Statistical analysis

To explore baseline differences in overweight/obesity prevalence among immigrants who have resided in the United States for <1 year chi2-tests were carried out in sample categories, namely, sex, education, region of origin, and marital status. For the entire sample, multiple logistic regression analyses with overweight/obesity as the outcome variable were done with age at arrival and duration of residence as the exposures of interest. Although age at arrival and duration of residence were correlated (r = -0.404, P < 0.001), there was low multicollinearity, determined by a variance inflation factor of 1.22, allowing simultaneous assessment of both variables in models. However, adding current age with these variables resulted in high levels of multicollinearity (variance inflation factor = 6.58), which was expected, because current age is the sum of duration of residence and age at arrival. Therefore, we conducted separate analyses including duration of residence and current age in the first model, age at arrival and current age in the second model, and age at arrival and duration of residence in the third model. Because previous studies have shown sex differences in the associations between health behaviors and acculturation (9), the significance of sex interacting with age at arrival and duration of residence was assessed. We also tested the interaction between age at arrival and duration of residence to answer our main question of interest.

Bivariate associations of dietary change with duration of residence and age at arrival were done using chi2-tests. Ordinal logistic regression analyses with dietary change as the outcome were done to assess multivariable associations after verifying the proportional odds assumption was met. Categorical dietary change was the outcome variable, and age at arrival (continuous) and duration of residence (continuous) were the exposures of interest. Final models were determined by the backward elimination method.

Analyses were performed in SAS-callable SUDAAN (version 9.0, Research Triangle Institute, Research Triangle Park, NC) to account for the complex sampling design of NIS-2003. For all analyses, sample weights were applied, and statistical significance was considered at P less than or equal to 0.05.

Top

Results

The majority of immigrants in this sample resided in the United States for less than or equal to5 years, and over half of all migrants arrived at younger than 30 years of age (Table 1).


Overweight and obesity

Among immigrants who have resided in the United States for <1 year, males were significantly more likely to be overweight/obese (40.96%) than females (31.91%) (P < 0.001), and married immigrants are significantly less likely to be overweight/obese (33.86%) than unmarried immigrants (38.64%) (P < 0.001) after standardizing age directly to the distribution of the population. Overweight/obesity prevalence at arrival differed across regions of origin (P < 0.001); 23.74% of people from Asia were overweight/obese at arrival vs. 51.25% of immigrants from Latin America and the Caribbean. There was no significant association between overweight/obesity prevalence and education (P = 0.07). (Data not shown.)

Figure 1 shows that prevalence of overweight/obesity by sex among all age at arrival cohorts increases with greater duration of residence in the United States. Although immigrants less than or equal to20-years old are significantly less likely to be overweight/obese than immigrants >50 years of age at arrival (13.54% vs. 42.29% in males, P < 0.001; 9.76% vs. 56.01% in females, P < 0.001), the difference in overweight/obesity prevalence by age at arrival groups narrows and is no longer significant for males at 5 years of residence (P = 0.15), and for females at 10 years of residence (P = 0.20).

Figure 1.
Figure 1 - Unfortunately we are unable to provide accessible alternative text for this. If you require assistance to access this image, please contact help@nature.com or the author

Overweight/obesity prevalence by duration of residence and age at arrival in the United States. Although overweight/obesity increases among all age at arrival groups with duration of residence in the United States, the greatest increases are observed among those immigrants who arrived at less than or equal to20 years.

Full figure and legend (30K)

There was a significant interaction between sex and duration of residence (P < 0.01) and between sex and age at arrival (P < 0.001). Model 1 (Table 2) confirms our bivariate results, showing higher overweight/obesity prevalence with increasing duration of residence adjusted for current age, education, and region of origin. Model 2 (Table 2) shows that for both males and females, immigrants who were less than or equal to20-years old at arrival are more likely to report being overweight/obese compared to all other age at arrival cohorts, controlled for current age, education, and region of origin. Results from both models also suggest sex differences in overweight/obesity prevalence by region of origin and education. With regard to education, female immigrants with >12 years of education were less likely to be overweight/obese than those with <12 years of education (Table 2); there was no association between education and overweight/obesity for males. A sensitivity analysis using education as a continuous variable indicates the associations between weight and education for both females and males remain the same.


Adjusted for sex, education level, and region of origin, there was a significant interaction between duration of residence and age at arrival (P < 0.001) in predicting overweight/obesity, indicating that age at arrival modifies the relationship between duration of residence and overweight/obesity prevalence among immigrants in the United States.

Further analyses, stratified by age at arrival group (Table 3), show the largest difference in overweight/obesity prevalence by duration of residence was observed in the youngest age at arrival group. Trends were similar between males and females; therefore, the overall results adjusted for sex are presented. Immigrants less than or equal to20-years old at arrival who had resided in the United States greater than or equal to15 years were 11 times more likely to be overweight/obese than immigrants <20-years old at arrival who had resided in the United States less than or equal to1 year (OR = 10.96, 95% confidence interval: 5.33, 22.56; P < 0.001). By comparison, among immigrants >40 years of age at arrival, those having resided in the United States for greater than or equal to10 years are no more likely to self-report being overweight/obese than those who have recently arrived (P = 0.42).


Dietary change

Self-reported high dietary change after migration was found to be significantly and independently associated with overweight/obesity, controlling for age at arrival, duration of residence, sex, and education. Specifically, immigrants reporting high dietary change are 1.32 times more likely to self-report being overweight/obese compared to immigrants reporting low dietary change (95% confidence interval: 1.13, 1.53; P < 0.001) (data not shown).

Immigrants who have been in the United States longer are significantly more likely to report high dietary change from premigration diets than recently arrived immigrants (P < 0.001) (Table 1). Overall, those immigrants who are youngest at arrival are significantly more likely to report high dietary change, whereas immigrants oldest upon arrival are more likely to report low dietary change (P < 0.001) (Figure 2).

Figure 2.
Figure 2 - Unfortunately we are unable to provide accessible alternative text for this. If you require assistance to access this image, please contact help@nature.com or the author

Dietary change level by age at arrival to the United States. A negative linear trend is observed in age at arrival and the percentage of immigrants reporting high dietary change.

Full figure and legend (9K)

Adjusted for sex, education, and region of origin, there is a significant interaction found between age at arrival and duration of residence in predicting dietary change (P = 0.03), indicating that age at arrival of immigrants also modifies the relationship between duration of residence in the United States and dietary change.

Top

Discussion

We found that immigrants who arrive in the United States before the age of 20 years are more likely to be overweight or obese with increasing duration of residence than immigrants who arrive at later ages. Increasing duration of residence in the United States is significantly associated with greater odds of overweight/obesity, and age at arrival significantly modifies this relationship. We also found that the relationship between self-reported dietary change and duration of residence is modified by age at arrival; immigrants who arrive in the United States at younger ages are more likely to report high levels of dietary change than immigrants who arrive at older ages. Lastly, dietary change was associated with overweight and obesity; immigrants reporting high dietary change are more likely to be overweight and obese than immigrants reporting low dietary change.

The differences in overweight/obesity development and dietary change by age at arrival can potentially be explained by several factors: increased exposure and adaptability of younger immigrants to US lifestyles, differences in motives for migration by age group, and health selection for migration later in life. Compared to immigrants who arrive in the United States at later ages, immigrants who migrate during childhood and adolescence are more exposed to the lifestyles of their native-born counterparts because they are more likely to receive schooling in the United States, and are more likely to marry native-born Americans (21). Older immigrants are less likely to acculturate or build new social networks because they usually migrate to rejoin family members already in the United States (22), and the presence of a network of people of the same ethnicity is likely to delay or inhibit acculturation (10); young immigrants migrate either accompanying their families or for educational and/or economic opportunities and, as a result, may be more willing to acculturate (23). Lastly, health selection may operate in one of two ways on immigrants arriving in the United States at older ages. Consistent with the healthy immigrant effect, only those elderly individuals who are positively selected for health will migrate (24,25) and, furthermore, only those who remain healthy will stay in the United States, whereas unhealthy individuals may return to their home countries (26). Conversely, there is the possibility of negative selection (24), whereby elderly individuals migrate to seek care, and by accessing health services are less likely to develop overweight/obesity after arrival in the United States.

This study's finding that level of dietary change after migration is significantly associated with overweight/obesity is consistent with previous studies that have documented increased fat and sugar intake and decreased fruit and vegetable intake postmigration (11,27,28), implying that immigrants may be shifting toward more unhealthy dietary patterns after arrival in the United States.

Region of origin emerged as an important factor in overweight/obesity and dietary patterns in this study. Immigrants from Asia are the least likely to be overweight/obese and are the least likely to report high dietary change, whereas immigrants from Latin America and the Caribbean are the most likely to be overweight/obese and after Sub-Saharan Africans and are the most likely to report high dietary change. These findings are consistent with the literature on increasing obesity among Latin American immigrants in the United States (29,30).

Diversity between traditional and US diets, as well as increasing availability of western foods in certain regions could be explanations for the differences in dietary change by region of origin. For example, European and North American diets are relatively similar and, therefore, high dietary change may not be perceived among European immigrants after migration to the United States. However, we found that immigrants from Asia, whose traditional diets differ considerably from the North American diet (11,31,32), were no more likely to report high dietary change than European immigrants. For recently arrived immigrants, this can be explained by the increased availability and consumption of western foods by Asians before migration (12). Conversely, a study of Sub-Saharan African immigrants, the most likely to report high dietary change in our sample, noted increased consumption of western foods that were not available in Africa (27).

There were some limitations to our study. Although the NIS study is designed to be longitudinal, only the NIS-2003 baseline data were available for this study; the cross-sectional nature of this study cannot allow us to make any inferences regarding causality. The sampling method of selecting new immigrants for the NIS study resulted in a disproportionate number of immigrants who have resided in the United States for less than or equal to5 years; furthermore, NIS samples only immigrants with newly acquired LPR status, who may be different from immigrants without LPR. Precategorized countries of birth did not allow the examination of differences within regions (e.g., South Asian vs. other Asian). Our sample also includes immigrants who migrated directly from their country of birth to the United States and may have migrated elsewhere afterward, eventually returning to the United States. In these cases, duration of residence is overestimated, and thus observed increases in weight may have actually occurred within a shorter period than calculated in this study. Although our analysis could not account for cohort effects related to year at migration, previous research implies that overall, patterns of health assimilation including BMI are similar across cohorts of immigrants (33). Lastly, height and weight data are self-reported, thereby leading to potential recall and misreporting biases (34,35). Although the dietary change score has not been validated, inclusion of a dietary change component in exploring overweight/obesity among immigrants and data that is nationally representative of adult immigrants with newly acquired LPR allowed us to analyze a unique research question with relevant public health implications.

Although previous studies have observed increasing trends in overweight and obesity among second- and third-generation adolescent immigrants (36), our results have clearly indicated that young first-generation immigrants are also experiencing rises in overweight and obesity and, in fact, to a greater degree than the national population. At arrival, immigrants aged less than or equal to20 years are much less overweight and obese (12%) than the US population in the same age group (35%) (37), and at 15 years of duration in the United States, the overweight/obesity prevalence of the same age at arrival cohort (61%) has almost converged to the national overall prevalence (66%) (38). Although the age group under 20 includes both children and adolescents, our analysis showed no difference between younger age subgroups by overweight/obesity prevalence, suggesting that it is important to intervene among all immigrants who arrive at less than or equal to20 years of age, regardless of specific age of migration.

In summary, immigrants who arrived in the United States at younger ages may be at higher risk of overweight/obesity with duration of residence than immigrants who arrive at later ages. Immigrants who are younger at arrival are also more likely to report a high level of dietary change postmigration, which is associated with overweight and obesity. Our findings emphasize the need for aggressive overweight and obesity prevention programs tailored to immigrant youth in the United States.

Top

Disclosure

The authors declared no conflict of interest.

Top

References

REFERENCES

  1. Martin P, Midgley E. Immigration: shaping and reshaping America. Popul Bull 2006;61:3–28.
  2. Fix M, Passel JS. US immigration: trends and implications for schools. <http://www.urban.org
    /url.cfm?ID=410654
    > (2003). Accessed 15 December 2007.
  3. Flegal KM, Carroll MD, Ogden CL, Johnson CL. Prevalence and trends in obesity among US adults, 1999–2000. JAMA 2002;288:1723–1727. | Article | PubMed | ISI |
  4. Kuczmarski RJ, Flegal KM, Campbell SM, Johnson CL. Increasing prevalence of overweight among US adults: the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys, 1960 to 1991. JAMA 1994;272:205–211. | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  5. Hedley AA, Ogden CL, Johnson CL et al. Prevalence of overweight and obesity among US children, adolescents, and adults, 1999–2002. JAMA 2004;291:2847–2850. | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  6. Ogden CL, Flegal KM, Carroll MD, Johnson CL. Prevalence and trends in overweight among US children and adolescents, 1999–2000. JAMA 2002;288:1728–1732. | Article | PubMed | ISI |
  7. Cairney J, Ostbye T. Time since immigration and excess body weight. Can J Public Health 1999;90:120–124. | PubMed | ChemPort |
  8. Goel MS, McCarthy EP, Phillips RS, Wee CC. Obesity among US immigrant subgroups by duration of residence. JAMA 2004;292:2860–2867. | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |
  9. Koya DL, Egede LE. Association between length of residence and cardiovascular disease risk factors among an ethnically diverse group of United States immigrants. J Gen Intern Med 2007;22:841–846. | Article | PubMed |
  10. McDonald JT, Kennedy S. Is migration to Canada associated with unhealthy weight gain? Overweight and obesity among Canada's immigrants. Soc Sci Med 2005;61:2469–2481. | Article | PubMed |
  11. Lv N, Cason KL. Dietary pattern change and acculturation of Chinese Americans in Pennsylvania. J Am Diet Assoc 2004;104:771–778. | Article | PubMed |
  12. Raj S, Ganganna P, Bowering J. Dietary habits of Asian Indians in relation to length of residence in the United States. J Am Diet Assoc 1999;99:1106–1108. | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |
  13. Yang EJ, Chung HK, Kim WY, Bianchi L, Song WO. Chronic diseases and dietary changes in relation to Korean Americans' length of residence in the United States. J Am Diet Assoc 2007;107:942–950. | Article | PubMed |
  14. Wilkinson AV, Spitz MR, Strom SS et al. Effects of nativity, age at migration, and acculturation on smoking among adult Houston residents of Mexican descent. Am J Public Health 2005;95:1043–1049. | Article | PubMed |
  15. Evenson KR, Sarmiento OL, Ayala GX. Acculturation and physical activity among North Carolina Latina immigrants. Soc Sci Med 2004;59:2509–2522. | Article | PubMed |
  16. Angel JL, Angel RJ. Age at migration, social connections, and well-being among elderly Hispanics. J Aging Health 1992;4:480–499. | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |
  17. Schaafsma J, Sweetman A. Immigrant earnings: age at immigration matters. Can J Econ 2001;34:1066–1099. | Article |
  18. Jasso G, Massey DS, Rosenzweig MR, Smith JP. The New Immigrant Survey 2003 Round 1 (NIS-2003–1) public release data. <http://nis.princeton.edu
    /data.html
    > (2006). Accessed 15 November 2006.
  19. Jasso G, Massey DS, Rosenzweig MR, Smith JP. Immigration, health, and New York City: early results based on the U.S. new immigrant cohort of 2003. FRBNY Econ Policy Rev 2005;11:127–151.
  20. Barringer HR, Takeuchi DT, Xenos P. Education, occupational prestige, and income of Asian Americans. Sociol Educ 1990;63:27–43. | Article |
  21. Stevens G. Age at immigration and second language proficiency among foreign-born adults. Lang Soc 1999;28:555–578. | Article |
  22. Angel RJ, Angel JL, Lee GY, Markides KS. Age at migration and family dependency among older Mexican immigrants: recent evidence from the Mexican American EPESE. Gerontologist 1999;39:59–65. | PubMed | ChemPort |
  23. Gibson MA. Immigrant adaptation and patterns of acculturation. Hum Dev 2001;44:19–23. | Article |
  24. Jasso G, Massey DS, Rosenzweig MR, Smith JP. Immigrant health: selectivity and acculturation. In: Bulatao RA, Cohen B (eds). Critical Perspectives on Racial and Ethnic Differences in Health in Late Life. National Academy Press: Washington DC, 2004, pp 227–266.
  25. McDonald JT, Kennedy S. Insights into the 'healthy immigrant effect': health status and health service use of immigrants to Canada. Soc Sci Med 2004;59:1613–1627. | Article | PubMed | ISI |
  26. Palloni A, Arias E. Paradox lost: explaining the Hispanic adult mortality advantage. Demography 2004;41:385–415. | Article | PubMed |
  27. Kruseman M, Barandereka NA, Hudelson P, Stalder H. Post-migration dietary changes among African refugees in Geneva: a rapid assessment study to inform nutritional interventions. Soz Praventivmed 2005;50:161–165. | Article | PubMed |
  28. Pan YL, Dixon Z, Himburg S, Huffman F. Asian students change their eating patterns after living in the United States. J Am Diet Assoc 1999;99:54–57. | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |
  29. Barcenas CH, Wilkinson AV, Strom SS et al. Birthplace, years of residence in the United States, and obesity among Mexican-American adults. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2007;15:1043–1052. | Article | PubMed |
  30. Kaplan MS, Huguet N, Newsom JT, McFarland BH. The association between length of residence and obesity among Hispanic immigrants. Am J Prev Med 2004;27:323–326. | Article | PubMed |
  31. Lee SK, Sobal J, Frongillo EA. Acculturation, food consumption and diet-related factors among Korean Americans. J Nutr Educ 1999;31:321–330. | Article |
  32. Varghese S, Moore-Orr R. Dietary acculturation and health-related issues of Indian immigrant families in Newfoundland. Can J Diet Pract Res 2002;63:72–79. | Article | PubMed |
  33. Antecol H, Bedard K. Unhealthy assimilation: why do immigrants converge to American health status levels? Demography 2006;43:337–360. | Article | PubMed |
  34. Palta M, Prineas RJ, Berman R, Hannan P. Comparison of self-reported and measured height and weight. Am J Epidemiol 1982;115:223–230. | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  35. Rowland ML. Self-reported weight and height. Am J Clin Nutr 1990;52:1125–1133. | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  36. Popkin BM, Udry JR. Adolescent obesity increases significantly in second and third generation U.S. immigrants: the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health. J Nutr 1998;128:701–706. | PubMed | ChemPort |
  37. National Health Interview Survey 2003. National Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Hyattsville, MD. <http://www.cdc.gov/nchs
    /nhis.htm
    > (2004). Accessed 15 November 2007.
  38. Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Curtin LR, McDowell MA, Tabak CJ, Flegal KM. Prevalence of overweight and obesity in the United States, 1999–2004. JAMA 2006;295:1549–1545. | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
Top

Acknowledgments

We thank Solveig Argeseanu Cunningham, for her thoughtful review of the manuscript prior to submission. This work was partially supported by the Global Health Institute, Emory University.

MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS

These links to content published by NPG are automatically generated.

NEWS AND VIEWS

Global dissemination of hepatitis B virus

Nature News and Views (04 Jan 1974)

Extra navigation

.
ADVERTISEMENT